Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 May;137(1):165–174. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.165

Retrotransposon-Induced Ectopic Expression of Cut Causes the Om(1a) Mutant in Drosophila Ananassae

T Awasaki 1, N Juni 1, T Hamabata 1, K Yoshida 1, M Matsuda 1, Y N Tobari 1, S H Hori 1
PMCID: PMC1205933  PMID: 8056307

Abstract

Optic morphology (Om) mutations in Drosophila ananassae map to at least 22 loci scattered throughout the genome. They are semidominant, neomorphic, nonpleiotropic, and are associated with the insertion of a retrotransposon, tom. The Om(1A) gene, which is cytogenetically linked to the cut locus, was cloned using a DNA fragment of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster as a probe. Three of the eight alleles of Om(1A) examined have insertion of the tom element within a putative cut region. The γ-ray-induced revertants of Om(1A) are accompanied with cut lethal mutations and rearrangements within the cut coding region. In the eye imaginal discs of the Om(1A) mutants, differentiation of photoreceptor clusters is suppressed, abnormal cell death occurs in the center and the cut protein is expressed ectopically. D. melanogaster flies transformed with a chimeric cut gene under the control of a heat-inducible promoter show excessive cell death in the region anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, suppressed differentiation to photoreceptor clusters and defect in the imaginal eye morphology when subjected to temperature elevation. These findings suggest that the tom element inserted within the Om(1A) region induces ectopic cut expression in the eye imaginal discs, thus resulting in the Om(1A) mutant phenotype.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jack J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):629–635. doi: 10.1038/333629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):441–450. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1124–1135. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonini N. M., Leiserson W. M., Benzer S. The eyes absent gene: genetic control of cell survival and differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):379–395. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90115-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frischauf A. M., Lehrach H., Poustka A., Murray N. Lambda replacement vectors carrying polylinker sequences. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):827–842. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80190-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Higashijima S., Kojima T., Michiue T., Ishimaru S., Emori Y., Saigo K. Dual Bar homeo box genes of Drosophila required in two photoreceptor cells, R1 and R6, and primary pigment cells for normal eye development. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):50–60. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hinton C. W. Morphogenetically Specific Mutability in DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE. Genetics. 1984 Apr;106(4):631–653. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.4.631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jack J. W. Molecular organization of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):869–876. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jack J., Dorsett D., Delotto Y., Liu S. Expression of the cut locus in the Drosophila wing margin is required for cell type specification and is regulated by a distant enhancer. Development. 1991 Nov;113(3):735–747. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.3.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson T. K., Judd B. H. Analysis of the Cut Locus of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):485–502. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimmel B. E., Heberlein U., Rubin G. M. The homeo domain protein rough is expressed in a subset of cells in the developing Drosophila eye where it can specify photoreceptor cell subtype. Genes Dev. 1990 May;4(5):712–727. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.5.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kojima T., Ishimaru S., Higashijima S., Takayama E., Akimaru H., Sone M., Emori Y., Saigo K. Identification of a different-type homeobox gene, BarH1, possibly causing Bar (B) and Om(1D) mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4343–4347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu S., McLeod E., Jack J. Four distinct regulatory regions of the cut locus and their effect on cell type specification in Drosophila. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):151–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Matsubayashi H., Juni N., Usui K., Hori S. H., Tobari Y. N. Molecular and histological characterizations of the Om(2D) mutants in Drosophila ananassae. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Jun;227(2):165–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00259667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matsubayashi H., Matsuda M., Tomimura Y., Shibata M., Tobari Y. N. Cytological mapping of Om mutants of Drosophila ananassae. Jpn J Genet. 1992 Jun;67(3):259–264. doi: 10.1266/jjg.67.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nusse R. The int genes in mammary tumorigenesis and in normal development. Trends Genet. 1988 Oct;4(10):291–295. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ready D. F., Hanson T. E., Benzer S. Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Dev Biol. 1976 Oct 15;53(2):217–240. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saint R., Kalionis B., Lockett T. J., Elizur A. Pattern formation in the developing eye of Drosophila melanogaster is regulated by the homoeo-box gene, rough. Nature. 1988 Jul 14;334(6178):151–154. doi: 10.1038/334151a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shrimpton A. E., Montgomery E. A., Langley C. H. OM Mutations in DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE Are Linked to Insertions of a Transposable Element. Genetics. 1986 Sep;114(1):125–135. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Strand D. J., McDonald J. F. Insertion of a copia element 5' to the Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase gene (adh) is associated with altered developmental and tissue-specific patterns of expression. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):787–794. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanda S., Corces V. G. Retrotransposon-induced overexpression of a homeobox gene causes defects in eye morphogenesis in Drosophila. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):407–417. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07962.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanda S., Shrimpton A. E., Chueh L. L., Itayama H., Matsubayashi H., Saigo K., Tobari Y. N., Langley C. H. Retrovirus-like features and site specific insertions of a transposable element, tom, in Drosophila ananassae. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Nov;214(3):405–411. doi: 10.1007/BF00330473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tanda S., Shrimpton A. E., Hinton C. W., Langley C. H. Analysis of the Om(1D) locus in Drosophila ananassae. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):495–502. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tomlinson A., Kimmel B. E., Rubin G. M. rough, a Drosophila homeobox gene required in photoreceptors R2 and R5 for inductive interactions in the developing eye. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):771–784. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90133-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tomlinson A., Ready D. F. Neuronal differentiation in Drosophila ommatidium. Dev Biol. 1987 Apr;120(2):366–376. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff T., Ready D. F. Cell death in normal and rough eye mutants of Drosophila. Development. 1991 Nov;113(3):825–839. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.3.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES