Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Jun;137(2):597–606. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.2.597

A Ruby in the Rubbish: Beneficial Mutations, Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of Sex

J R Peck 1
PMCID: PMC1205982  PMID: 8070669

Abstract

This study presents a mathematical model in which a single beneficial mutation arises in a very large population that is subject to frequent deleterious mutations. The results suggest that, if the population is sexual, then the deleterious mutations will have little effect on the ultimate fate of the beneficial mutation. However, if most offspring are produced asexually, then the probability that the beneficial mutation will be lost from the population may be greatly enhanced by the deleterious mutations. Thus, sexual populations may adapt much more quickly than populations where most reproduction is asexual. Some of the results were produced using computer simulation methods, and a technique was developed that allows treatment of arbitrarily large numbers of individuals in a reasonable amount of computer time. This technique may be of prove useful for the analysis of a wide variety of models, though there are some constraints on its applicability. For example, the technique requires that reproduction can be described by Poisson processes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birky C. W., Jr, Walsh J. B. Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6414–6418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet Res. 1990 Jun;55(3):199–221. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300025532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566–3573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Houle D., Hoffmaster D. K., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):58–60. doi: 10.1038/359058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Effects of linkage on response to directional selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1983 Oct;42(2):193–206. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300021650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirkpatrick M., Jenkins C. D. Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1989 May 25;339(6222):300–301. doi: 10.1038/339300a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kondrashov A. S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1988 Dec 1;336(6198):435–440. doi: 10.1038/336435a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kondrashov A. S., Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pamilo P., Nei M., Li W. H. Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):135–146. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES