Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Jul;137(3):783–789. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.783

Genetic and Maternal Variation for Heat Resistance in Drosophila from the Field

N L Jenkins 1, A A Hoffmann 1
PMCID: PMC1206038  PMID: 8088524

Abstract

In Drosophila, field heritability estimates have focused on morphological traits and ignored maternal effects. This study considers heritable variation and maternal effects in a physiological trait, heat resistance. Drosophila were collected from the field in Melbourne, Australia. Resistance was determined using knock-down time at 37°. Drosophila melanogaster was more resistant than Drosophila simulans, and males tended to be more resistant than females. Field heritability and maternal effects were examined in D. simulans using the regression of laboratory-reared F(1) and F(2) onto field-collected parents. Males from the field were crossed to a laboratory stock to obtain progeny. The additive genetic component to variation in heat resistance was large and significant, and heritability was estimated to be around 0.5. A large maternal effect was also evident. Comparisons of regression coefficients suggested that the maternal effect was not associated with cytoplasmic factors. There was no correlation between body size (as measured by wing length) and heat resistance. Unlike in the case of morphological traits, the heritability for heat resistance in nature is not less than that measured in the laboratory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aspi J., Hoikkala A. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. Heredity (Edinb) 1993 Apr;70(Pt 4):400–406. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coyne J. A., Beecham E. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):727–737. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisen E. J. Mating designs for estimating direct and maternal genetic variances and direct-maternal genetic covariances. Can J Genet Cytol. 1967 Mar;9(1):13–22. doi: 10.1139/g67-002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lande R., Price T. Genetic correlations and maternal effect coefficients obtained from offspring-parent regression. Genetics. 1989 Aug;122(4):915–922. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.4.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McKenzie J. A., Parsons P. A. TheThe genetic architecture of resistance to desiccation in populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Aust J Biol Sci. 1974 Aug;27(4):441–456. doi: 10.1071/bi9740441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parsons P. A. Genetics of resistance to environmental stresses in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1973;7:239–265. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prout T., Barker J. S. Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):803–813. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Riska B., Prout T., Turelli M. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):865–871. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruiz A., Santos M., Barbadilla A., Quezada-Díaz J. E., Hasson E., Fontdevila A. Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):739–750. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephanou G., Alahiotis S. N. Non-Mendelian Inheritance of "Heat-Sensitivity" in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1983 Jan;103(1):93–107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES