Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Jul;137(3):815–827. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.3.815

Transposable Element Numbers in Cosmopolitan Inversions from a Natural Population of Drosophila Melanogaster

P D Sniegowski 1, B Charlesworth 1
PMCID: PMC1206041  PMID: 8088526

Abstract

Population studies of the distribution of transposable elements (TEs) on the chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster have suggested that their copy number increase due to transposition is balanced by some form of natural selection. Theory suggests that, as a consequence of deleterious ectopic meiotic exchange between TEs, selection can favor genomes with lower TE copy numbers. This predicts that TEs should be less deleterious, and hence more abundant, in chromosomal regions in which recombination is reduced. To test this, we surveyed the abundance and locations of 10 families of TEs in recombination-suppressing chromosomal inversions from a natural population. The sample of 49 chromosomes included multiple independent isolates of seven different inversions and a corresponding set of standard chromosomes. For all 10 TE families pooled, copy numbers were significantly higher overall within low frequency inversions than within corresponding regions of standard chromosomes. TEs occupied chromosomal sites at significantly higher frequencies within the In(3R)M0 and In(3R)K inversions than within the corresponding regions of standard 3R chromosomes. These results are consistent with the predictions of the ectopic exchange model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M. Restriction map variation at the adh locus of Drosophila melanogaster in inverted and noninverted chromosomes. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):135–140. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashley T., Moses M. J., Solari A. J. Fine structure and behaviour of a pericentric inversion in the sand rat, Psammomys obesus. J Cell Sci. 1981 Aug;50:105–119. doi: 10.1242/jcs.50.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bojko M. Synaptic adjustment of inversion loops in Neurospora crassa. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):593–598. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brookfield J. F., Montgomery E., Langley C. H. Apparent absence of transposable elements related to the P elements of D. melanogaster in other species of Drosophila. 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1Nature. 310(5975):330–332. doi: 10.1038/310330a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brookfield J. F. The population biology of transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Jan 29;312(1154):217–226. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B., Langley C. H. The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:251–287. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlesworth B., Lapid A. A study of ten families of transposable elements on X chromosomes from a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1989 Oct;54(2):113–125. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300028482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charlesworth B., Lapid A., Canada D. The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Element frequencies and distribution. Genet Res. 1992 Oct;60(2):103–114. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B., Lapid A., Canada D. The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Inferences on the nature of selection against elements. Genet Res. 1992 Oct;60(2):115–130. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chovnick A. Gene conversion and transfer of genetic information within the inverted region of inversion heterozygotes. Genetics. 1973 Sep;75(1):123–131. doi: 10.1093/genetics/75.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coyne J. A., Meyers W., Crittenden A. P., Sniegowski P. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis P. S., Shen M. W., Judd B. H. Asymmetrical pairings of transposons in and proximal to the white locus of Drosophila account for four classes of regularly occurring exchange products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):174–178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doolittle W. F., Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):601–603. doi: 10.1038/284601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J., Yokoyama S. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics. 1976 Aug;83(4):845–859. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.4.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gabriel-Robez O., Ratomponirina C., Croquette M., Couturier J., Rumpler Y. Synaptonemal complexes in a subfertile man with a pericentric inversion in chromosome 21. Heterosynapsis without previous homosynapsis. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1988;48(2):84–87. doi: 10.1159/000132595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldberg M. L., Sheen J. Y., Gehring W. J., Green M. M. Unequal crossing-over associated with asymmetrical synapsis between nomadic elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Aug;80(16):5017–5021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.16.5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenbaum I. F., Reed M. J. Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1984;38(2):106–111. doi: 10.1159/000132040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hale D. W. Heterosynapsis and suppression of chiasmata within heterozygous pericentric inversions of the Sitka deer mouse. Chromosoma. 1986;94(6):425–432. doi: 10.1007/BF00292751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harada K., Yukuhiro K., Mukai T. Transposition rates of movable genetic elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(8):3248–3252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holliday R. Gene conversion: a possible mechanism for eliminating selfish DNA. Basic Life Sci. 1982;20:259–264. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3476-7_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Langley C. H., Ito K., Voelker R. A. Linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster Seasonal variation. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):447–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Langley C. H., Montgomery E., Hudson R., Kaplan N., Charlesworth B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 1988 Dec;52(3):223–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Langley C. H., Tobari Y. N., Kojima K. I. Linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Nov;78(3):921–936. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.3.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindsley D. L., Sandler L. The genetic analysis of meiosis in female Drosophila melanogaster. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Mar 21;277(955):295–312. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lyttle T. W., Haymer D. S. The role of the transposable element hobo in the origin of endemic inversions in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica. 1992;86(1-3):113–126. doi: 10.1007/BF00133715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MULLER H. J. THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2–9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Malpica J. M., Vassallo J. M., Frías A., Fuentes-Bol F. On recombination among In(2L)t, alpha-Gpdh and Adh in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):141–142. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin J. Meiosis in inversion heterozygotes in Chironomidae. Can J Genet Cytol. 1967 Mar;9(1):255–268. doi: 10.1139/g67-021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McClintock B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science. 1984 Nov 16;226(4676):792–801. doi: 10.1126/science.15739260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McDonald J. F. Evolution and consequences of transposable elements. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Dec;3(6):855–864. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90005-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mettler L. E., Voelker R. A., Mukai T. Inversion Clines in Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1977 Sep;87(1):169–176. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Miklos G. L., Yamamoto M. T., Davies J., Pirrotta V. Microcloning reveals a high frequency of repetitive sequences characteristic of chromosome 4 and the beta-heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(7):2051–2055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Montgomery E. A., Huang S. M., Langley C. H., Judd B. H. Chromosome rearrangement by ectopic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster: genome structure and evolution. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1085–1098. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Montgomery E., Charlesworth B., Langley C. H. A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1987 Feb;49(1):31–41. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mukai T., Mettler L. E., Chigusa S. I. Linkage disequilibrium in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 May;68(5):1065–1069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.5.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mukai T., Voelker R. A. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster XIII. Further studies on linkage disequilibrium. Genetics. 1977 May;86(1):175–185. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Orgel L. E., Crick F. H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pamilo P., Nei M., Li W. H. Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):135–146. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Payne F. Crossover Modifiers in the Third Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1924 Jul;9(4):327–342. doi: 10.1093/genetics/9.4.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheen F., Lim J. K., Simmons M. J. Genetic instability in Drosophila melanogaster mediated by hobo transposable elements. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):315–334. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sniegowski P. D., Pringle A., Hughes K. A. Effects of autosomal inversions on meiotic exchange in distal and proximal regions of the X chromosome in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1994 Feb;63(1):57–62. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sturtevant A H, Beadle G W. The Relations of Inversions in the X Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster to Crossing over and Disjunction. Genetics. 1936 Sep;21(5):554–604. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.5.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Voelker R. A., Cockerham C. C., Johnson F. M., Schaffer H. E., Mukai T., Mettler L. E. Inversions fail to account for allozyme clines. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):515–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilke C. M., Adams J. Fitness effects of Ty transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 May;131(1):31–42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yamaguchi O., Ichinose M., Matsuda M., Mukai T. Linkage disequilibrium in isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1980 Oct;96(2):507–522. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.2.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES