Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0319350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319350

Gene delivery of AGAT and GAMT boosts creatine levels in creatine transporter deficiency patient fibroblasts

Chloe Wells 1, Jon Sorgenfrei 1, Sadie L Johnson 1, Devin Albertson 1, Jared Rutter 2,3,4, Steven Andrew Baker 1,*
Editor: Sharon DeMorrow5
PMCID: PMC12061113  PMID: 40338959

Abstract

Creatine is a critical metabolite used to buffer cellular energy demands in highly energetic tissues such as the brain and muscle. Genetic defects in endogenous creatine synthesis or transport across cellular membranes lead to a common set of phenotypes referred to as Cerebral Creatine Deficiency Syndrome (CCDS). The most common form of CCDS is Creatine Transporter 1 (CT1) Deficiency (CTD). It accounts for ~ 70% of cases and results from loss-of-function mutations in the X-linked gene SLC6A8. Affected individuals suffer from intellectual disability, autistic-like behaviors, and epilepsy. There are currently no effective therapies for this disorder, but gene therapy has emerged as a potential approach. The two enzymes which comprise the endogenous creatine synthetic pathway (AGAT and GAMT) are selectively expressed by specific cell types throughout the body. However, after synthesized, creatine uptake relies on the protein product of SLC6A8, CT1, to transport creatine into target cell types. We hypothesized that gene delivery of GATM (encoding AGAT) and GAMT into end-user cell types would bypass the need for CT1, allowing for intracellular synthesis of creatine. We tested this strategy in two human cell types: HEK293T cells and primary fibroblasts. Co-delivery of GATM and GAMT increased internal creatine concentrations by 7.6-fold in HEK293T cells and 12.3-fold in healthy control fibroblasts. We then employed this approach to primary fibroblasts from patients with CTD. This resulted in an up to 11.6-fold increase in intracellular creatine concentrations, far exceeding the intracellular concentration of creatine in healthy control fibroblasts. Importantly, overexpression of AGAT and GAMT resulted in proper targeting of these enzymes to their natural cellular compartment and did not impair the growth of patient fibroblasts. These findings establish gene therapy with GATM and GAMT as a potential strategy for patients with CTD.

Introduction

Creatine is a metabolite which serves to buffer cellular energy demands by undergoing reversible phosphorylation [1]. Creatine kinases utilize ATP to phosphorylate creatine in periods of energy abundance, for later transfer of a phosphate back to ADP when cellular energetic demands increase [2]. About half of the body’s daily creatine requirement is absorbed from food, while the other half is synthesized endogenously, in individuals consuming a Western diet [3]. Endogenous creatine is generated by two enzymes: glycine amidinotransferase, mitochondrial (GATM; also known as L-Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase or AGAT, EC 2.1.4.1), and guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT, EC 2.1.1.2). AGAT transfers the amidino group of arginine onto the amine of glycine to generate the intermediate guanidinoacetate (GAA). GAA is then methylated by GAMT on the same nitrogen, using S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) as a methyl donor, to produce creatine [4]. Loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding either of these enzymes (GATM or GAMT, respectively) lead to a disorder referred to as Cerebral Creatine Deficiency Syndrome (CCDS) [5]. Affected individuals exhibit intellectual disability, developmental delay, autistic-like behaviors, and seizures [6]. Defects in GATM cause AGAT Deficiency, accounting for less than 10% of CCDS cases, whereas mutations in GAMT cause GAMT Deficiency, making up ~ 20% of individuals with this disease [5]. GATM and GAMT are located on autosomes and, correspondingly, both disorders exhibit autosomal recessive inheritance.

By contrast, the most common form of Creatine Transporter 1 (CT1) Deficiency (CTD) is caused by loss-of-function mutations in the X-linked gene SLC6A8 [7]. This gene encodes the principal transporter mediating cellular import of creatine (CT1). These patients comprise approximately 70% of CCDS cases [5]. Affected males typically have a more severe phenotype than females, owing to the presence of a second copy of SLC6A8 in females, which can compensate for heterozygous mutations depending on X-chromosome inactivation [8].

If diagnosed early, patients with AGAT or GAMT deficiency can be supplemented with creatine in their diets, markedly improving symptoms [9]. For individuals with CTD, creatine supplementation generally does not improve symptoms in the absence of residual transporter function [10]. At present, there are no highly effective therapies for patients with this frequent form of CCDS, but gene therapy via SLC6A8 delivery is an emerging possibility [11].

Canonically, AGAT activity is thought to be the highest in the kidney [12,13], while GAMT expression is highest in the liver [14]. However, previous characterization of the creatine synthetic pathway by our group [15], and others [16,17], has detected expression in several other organs and tissues. Oligodendrocytes in the brain express both enzymes at high levels [15], suggesting that certain cell types in the body are capable of synthesizing creatine from its amino acid precursors directly. We hypothesized that co-expressing AGAT and GAMT would permit intracellular creatine synthesis in other cell types. Creatine is a zwitterion at physiologic pH [4,18]. Internal creatine synthesis may allow cells to retain this metabolite due to its charge, if membrane transporters for creatine are not expressed. Thus, internal synthesis of creatine has the potential to bypass the need for CT1.

To test this hypothesis, we overexpressed both AGAT and GAMT in HEK293T cells. This resulted in a dramatic increase in intracellular creatine content without salient effects on cell viability. We then used these cells to produce lentiviral particles capable of delivering human GATM and GAMT to other cell types. Upon delivery to healthy control and CTD patient derived fibroblasts, AGAT and GAMT expression was markedly increased, and both enzymes localized appropriately to their natural compartments inside the cell. Genetic delivery of these enzymes dramatically increased cellular creatine content, indicative of intracellular synthesis. Cells retained AGAT and GAMT expression after several passages without selection, and cellular growth was not impaired in patient fibroblasts with loss-of-function of CT1. These results suggest that boosting creatine synthesis does not have major deleterious effects on cellular physiology and establish a first step proof-of-concept for this strategy as a potential gene therapy for patients with CTD.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture conditions

HEK293T cells were originally obtained from ATCC (Cat. #CRL-3216) and then gifted by the Rutter laboratory at passage 11 (P11). For primary fibroblasts, the following cell lines were obtained from the NIGMS Human Genetic Cell Repository at the Coriell Institute for Medical Research: Wild-type (WT) control (Cat. #GM28214) skin fibroblasts from a 41-year-old male (passage 2); CT1 mutant SLC6A8Δex10-11/y (Ca. #GM27448) skin fibroblasts from a 4-year-old male (passage 3); and CT1 mutant SLC6A8W556X/y (Ca. #GM27865) skin fibroblasts from a 13-year-old male (passage 2). Cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 under atmospheric oxygen. HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Corning, Cat. #10–013-CM) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Peak Serum, Cat. #PS-FB2), and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco, Cat. #15140–122) in uncoated 10 cm culture plates (Greiner Bio-One, Cat. #664160-TRI) and passaged every three to four days at ~ 85–95% confluence. Similar conditions were maintained for primary fibroblasts except DMEM was supplemented to 15% FBS and cells were passaged at 80–90% confluence in intervals which varied by cell line, but typically three to seven days with media changes every three to four days.

Cloning and primers

pLenti CMV Blast empty (w263-1) was a gift from Dr. Alex Bott in the Rutter laboratory and was originally obtained from Addgene (Cat. #17486). This plasmid was modified by site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange XL Kit, Agilent, Cat. #200516) per the manufacturer’s instructions to eliminate the ORF in the 5’ gateway arm and insert additional restriction enzyme sites into the multiple cloning site using two primers: pLenti2-Blast-QC.F1 5’-AGAGCTCGTTTAGTGAACCGTACCGGTTTAATTAAACTAGTGGCCGGCCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGA-3’ and pLenti2-Blast-QC.R1 5’-AGAGCTCGTTTAGTGAACCGTACCGGTTTAATTAAACTAGTGGCCGGCCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGA-3’. The resulting plasmid was verified by Sanger sequencing, renamed pLenti2-Blast and used for lentiviral production in this study.

Lentivirus Production. HEK293T cells were plated in a 10 cm dish in DMEM, 10% FBS, and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. The following day, two hours prior to transfection, the media was changed to fresh media. HEK293T cells were then transfected with 4 µg psPAX2, 1 µg pVSV-G, and 3 µg of cargo plasmid (pLenti2-Blast) DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher, Cat. #52887) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The next morning, media was exchanged to remove the transfection mix. For three collections, 8–16 hours apart, the media was exchanged for fresh media and the post-incubation media was collected, pooled, and stored at 4°C. After three collections, the pooled media was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500xg at 4°C to pellet any transferred cells. The supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22-μm Steriflip filter unit (Millipore, Cat. #SCGP00525). Filtered virus was divided into 1 or 2 mL aliquots and stored at -80°C until needed. Viral aliquots of each construct were titered with HEK293T cells in a 3-dilution series scoring for blasticidin resistance (Gibco, Cat. #A11139-03 used at 10 µg/mL final).

Western blots

HEK293T cells (between P12 and P20) were plated at a ratio of 1:5 in a 6-well plate in DMEM, 10% FBS, and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. The following day, cells were transfected with 1 μg of DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 per the manufacturer’s protocol. After 36–48 hours, the media was aspirated and cells were harvested by pipetting with 1 mL ice cold 1xPBS (Gibco, Cat. #10010–023) and centrifuged for one minute at 16,000xg to pellet. The PBS was aspirated and cells were lysed in 500 μL Extraction Buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 2% SDS) for 15 minutes, rotating at room temperature. The lysates were then centrifuged at room temperature for ten minutes at 16,000xg. The gelatinous DNA pellet was removed and 30 μL of the supernatant was added to 30 μL of 2x Laemmli sample buffer (Thermo Fisher, Cat. #NP0007). Samples were either used immediately or frozen for later at -80°C. For SDS-PAGE, samples were incubated at 95°C for five to ten minutes, then loaded into 10-well, or 15-well 4–15% precast gels (Bio-Rad Cat. #4561084, Cat. #4561086). Samples were electrophoresed until completion and then transferred to 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Protran, Cat. # 10600002) for approximately one hour. Blots were blocked with 5% BSA in 1xTBST for 30 minutes, prior to incubation with primary antibody overnight in blocking buffer. Primary antibodies included: mouse anti-AGAT (Novus, Cat. #NBP2–00984, 1:300); rabbit anti-GAMT (Biorbyt, Cat. #orb247514, 1:300); chicken anti-GAPDH (Abcam, Cat. #ab83956); rabbit anti-Histone H3 (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. #07–690); and mouse anti-V5 (BioRad, Cat. #MCA1360). The following day, membranes were washed x4 with 1xTBST prior to incubation with fluorescent secondary antibodies in 5% skim milk in 1xTBST for one hour at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were: Donkey anti-mouse 790 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Cat. #715-655-151); Donkey anti-rabbit 680 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Cat. #711-625-152); and Donkey anti-chicken 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Cat. #703-545-155). After four washes, membranes were imaged with a LI-COR Odyssey CLx or BioRad ChemiDoc MP. The same procedure was followed for human fibroblasts except that after aspirating the culture media, the cells were incubated with ice cold PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA for five to ten minutes to facilitate collection by pipetting.

Creatine assay and protein quantification

For HEK293T experiments, cells were plated in a 6-well plate as described for western blotting. After 36–48 hours post-transfection, the media was changed to creatine-free media (DMEM Corning, Cat. #10–013-CM, with 10% dialyzed FBS Gibco, Cat. #A33820-01, and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin Gibco, Cat. #15140–122) supplemented with L-arginine, glycine, and methionine to 1 mM above the standard formula for DMEM. Approximately 24 hours later, the media was aspirated and cells were gently washed twice with ice cold PBS. Cells were collected by pipetting with a third PBS wash and centrifuged at 16,000xg for one minute to pellet. PBS was aspirated and the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of -80°C 80% methanol. Cell lysates were rotated for 15 minutes at 4°C before spinning down in a centrifuge at 16,000xg for 10 minutes at 4°C. All supernatant was collected and placed in a vacuum centrifuge overnight at room temperature to allow the methanol to evaporate, leaving the dried metabolite pellet. The insoluble protein pellet that was left in the tube after methanol extraction was resuspended in 1 mL Extraction Buffer, rotating for 15 minutes at room temperature. Once homogenous, the protein suspension was centrifuged for ten minutes at room temperature at 16,000xg to remove insoluble material. A 25 µ L sample of the supernatant was used to measure the protein concentration relative to a 25 µ L BSA standard series with the Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific, Cat. #23225) per the manufacturer’s instructions.

The next morning, the dried metabolite pellet was taken from the vacuum centrifuge and resuspended in a known amount (either 200 or 310 µ L) of Creatine Assay Buffer (CAB, Sigma Aldrich, Cat. #MAK079A). The resuspended pellet was allowed to equilibrate by rotating for 15 minutes at room temperature before either being used immediately or frozen at -20°C for later analysis. Cytoplasmic creatine was measured from this sample using a commercially available Creatine Assay Kit (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. #MAK079) on a BioTek Synergy Neo2 plate reader. The plate reader was programmed to measure in kinetic mode once every 30 seconds for 30 minutes. Measurements were standardized to a known creatine standard series diluted in CAB per the manufacturer’s instruction. The slope of 570 nm absorbance produced by a 50 µ L aliquot of the sample was averaged in duplicate and compared to the slope of the creatine standard dilution series. The resulting concentration was multiplied by the volume of CAB used to resuspend the total metabolite pellet to produce the measurement for total cellular creatine in each cell pellet. These values were normalized to the total protein mass measured by the BCA assay to produce values in nmoles creatine per mg total protein.

For WT and CTD patient fibroblasts, stable empty vector or AGAT and GAMT expressing lines were established by infecting the parental lines with lentiviral particles at similar titer. After selection for three days with blasticidin, these lines were passaged in standard media, (DMEM with 15% FBS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin), until the start of experiments. For the creatine assay, stable lines were plated at ~ 10–30% confluence in a 15 cm culture plate and allowed to grow for one month, exchanging the standard media every three to five days. This long culture process was found to be necessary to produce enough cellular material for creatine measurements that were in the linear range for our Creatine Assay Kit. Empty vector controls and AGAT and GAMT co-expressing lines were produced, fed, and treated under identical conditions for each parental line (WT, SLC6A8Δex10-11/y, and SLC6A8W556X/y). After 1 month of growth, the plates were completely confluent. The media was exchanged for creatine-free media (DMEM with 15% dialyzed FBS, and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin) and the cells were allowed to incubate for three days. After three days, a sample of the media was collected and frozen at -20°C for direct measurement with the Creatine Assay Kit. The remaining media was aspirated and the cells were washed twice with PBS. A third wash was then added containing PBS with 0.5 mM EDTA and the cells were allowed to incubate at room temperature for approximately five minutes to loosen from the dish. The cells were then collected by pipetting and pelleted at room temperature at 3,220xg for one minute in a 15 mL conical tube. The third wash was aspirated, leaving a small meniscus, and then a fourth wash with 1 mL of PBS was used to resuspend the pellet and transfer it to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. This was then centrifuged at 4°C and 16,000xg for 1 minute to pellet the cells into a tight pellet prior to aspirating all of the PBS. This pellet was then used for metabolite extraction with 1 mL of -80°C 80% methanol, identical to the extraction for HEK293T cells described above. The remaining steps for metabolite extraction, drying, resuspension, and quantification were identical to those used for HEK293T cells, as was the quantification of total protein mass using the BCA assay.

Immunofluorescence. Sterile coverslips (FisherBrand, 18 mm circle #1, Cat. #12541005) were placed in a 12-well culture plate (Greiner Bio-One, Cat. #665180). These were coated with poly-D-lysine (EMD Biosciences, Cat. #A-003-E) 100 µg/mL in PBS at room temperature for 2 hours, air dried, and rinsed x3 with PBS prior to plating fibroblasts at ~ 10–30% confluence in standard media. After ~2–5 days, when cells reached 30–70% confluence, they were rinsed with PBS once and then immediately fixed with 4% PFA in PBS. After 15 minutes, the fix was removed, the cells were washed x3 in PBS, and then permeabilized with PBS-0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes. After permeabilization the cells were incubated for one hour in blocking solution (5% Normal Goat Serum + 1% BSA in PBS 0.05% Tween-20). The block was removed and then coverslips were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody in blocking solution. Primary antibodies were mouse anti-AGAT (Novus, Cat. #NBP2–00984, 1:300) and rabbit anti-GAMT (Biorbyt, Cat. #orb247514, 1:300). The next day, coverslips were washed x3 with PBS and then incubated for one hour at room temperature with secondary antibody in blocking solution. Secondary antibodies were: Polyclonal goat anti-mouse 488 (Thermo, Cat. #A11001, 1:1000); and Polyclonal goat anti-rabbit 594 (Thermo, Cat. #A11012, 1:1000). Coverslips were then washed once in PBS with 5 µg/mL DAPI for 15–30 minutes, then washed an additional three times in PBS before mounting on SuperFrost Plus Slides (VWR, Cat. #48311–703) in Vectashield Vibrance Antifade Mounting Media (Vector Labs, Cat. #H-1700). Slides were imaged on a Zeiss LSM880 Confocal Microscope and images were processed with ImageJ.

Growth assay

Fibroblasts from each line were trypsinized, and following neutralization, the cell suspension was counted using a manual hemocytometer (Fisher Scientific, Cat. #0267151B). Cells were diluted to 50,000 cells per 3 mL of either standard media (DMEM + 15% FBS + P/S) or standard media supplemented with creatine precursors (L-arginine, glycine, and methionine at 1 mM final above the concentration in standard media). Three mL of the cell suspension was plated in each well of a 6-well plate (Costar, Cat. #3516) and allowed to settle in a tissue culture incubator for one to four hours. The plates were then placed in an IncuCyte S3 Live-Cell Analysis System (Sartorius) and imaged using the phase channel through a 10x objective (16 images per well, every 6 hours for 72 hours total). Images were then processed using the Analysis Wizard within IncuCyte’s manufacturer provided software, computing the raw percentage confluence averaged for all 16 images from each well at each time point. The raw confluence values were normalized to the maximum confluence achieved at the end of three days for the highest confluence condition and plotted as a percentage of the maximum confluence for all conditions collected in the same batch. Each batch contained three replicates of empty vector control and three replicates of AGAT and GAMT overexpressing stable fibroblast lines from the same parental genotype.

Statistical analysis

Data were processed and analyzed using R 4.2.2. For t-tests, the t.test() function from base R was used with the arguments alternative = “two.sided” and var.equal = T. For one-way ANOVA the aov() function from base R was used with default settings. For the exact two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test the ks.test() function from base R was used with alternative = “two.sided”. A P-value of P < 0.05 was used for statistical significance.

Results

We constructed lentiviral plasmids to express WT full-length human AGAT or GAMT either untagged or tagged with a short peptide (V5) driven by the ubiquitously expressed CMV promoter. In order to assess for proper expression of these constructs, we transfected them into HEK293T cells in isolation or various combinations (Fig 1A and 1B). After 36–48 hours the cells were collected, lysed, and analyzed by western blotting. Transfection with an empty vector control revealed that HEK293T express virtually no AGAT at the protein level but have a small amount of endogenous GAMT expression (Fig 1A). Transfection with human GATM or GAMT dramatically increased the expression of each protein. When transfected together, both proteins were highly co-expressed, with minimal impact on the abundance of each other, compared to singly transfected cells (Fig 1A). To compare the relative abundance of these two proteins, both were transfected with the same V5 tag and analyzed by western blotting (Fig 1B). This revealed similar abundance of both proteins and unchanged abundance of AGAT-V5 co-expressed with GAMT-V5, when compared to AGAT-V5 transfected only cells (Fig 1B). Importantly, the cells from each well were lysed in an equal volume of buffer and loaded onto the SDS-PAGE gel using an identical sample volume, revealing uniform abundance of loading controls (GAPDH and Histone H3, Fig 1A). These data indicate that transient overexpression of AGAT and GAMT over this time period has minimal impacts on cell abundance for HEK293T cells.

Fig 1. Expression of AGAT and GAMT in HEK293T cells.

Fig 1

(A) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmid. Cells were then lysed and analyzed by western blotting with the indicated antibody. N = 3. (B) Same lysates as in (A) were probed for the V5 tagged form of AGAT and GAMT by western blot. N = 3. (C) Cells transfected as in (A) were cultured in creatine-free media supplemented with amino acid precursors for 24 hours. Cells were lysed and the total cellular creatine was quantified. N = 4. Two-sided t-test * indicates P < 0.05. (D) Same experiment as in (C) plotting the total cellular protein measured. N = 4. n.s. indicates not significant for one-way ANOVA. Error bars show SEM.

We next performed a similar experiment, but instead of lysing cells 36–48 hours post-transfection, the media was exchanged for creatine-free media supplemented with creatine precursor amino acids (L-arginine, glycine, and methionine, 1 mM each). Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed and intracellular metabolites were extracted and analyzed for creatine content (Fig 1C). The abundance of creatine was markedly increased in cells co-expressing AGAT and GAMT relative to empty vector controls (208.0 vs 27.5 nmoles/mg protein, respectively, or 7.6-fold, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). The same result was obtained in cells co-expressing AGAT-V5 and GAMT-V5 (238.1 nmoles/mg protein, or 8.7-fold increased relative to control, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). Although the effect was smaller when AGAT-V5 was expressed alone, it also reached statistical significance (54.0 nmoles/mg protein, or 2.0-fold increased relative to control, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). The reduced amount of creatine synthesized by AGAT-V5 overexpression alone likely reflects the low, but detectable, endogenous expression of GAMT in HEK293T cells (see Fig 1A). To further control for cellular abundance/survival upon transient overexpression of AGAT and GAMT, we quantified the total cellular protein from each well (Fig 1D). This revealed no significant difference in total protein abundance between conditions (one-way ANOVA, F(5,18)).

Having established that our constructs were functional, we then used HEK293T cells to prepare lentiviral particles for infection of other cell types. We started by infecting human WT control fibroblasts and assessing expression at the protein level (Fig 2A and 2B). Delivery of human GATM or GAMT to these cells resulted in abundant overexpression of these proteins relative to an essentially undetectable background expression level (Fig 2A). Cells were selected with blasticidin 24 hours post-infection, to eliminate uninfected cells, and then allowed to grow for two to three days (in blasticidin) prior to harvesting. All the surviving cells from each well were lysed in an equal amount of buffer and an equal volume of sample was loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels. The total amount of GAPDH detected in each lane was unchanged and the cells appeared healthy at harvest suggesting that overexpression of AGAT and GAMT was not deleterious for cell viability (Fig 2A). We also compared the abundance of AGAT-V5 and GAMT-V5 by probing for the V5 tag in the same lysates from Fig 2A which revealed a relative overabundance of GAMT-V5 compared to AGAT-V5 (Fig 2B). This likely owes to differences in the subcellular distributions of these two proteins. AGAT is restricted to mitochondria, whereas GAMT distributes throughout the nucleocytoplasm [15]. However, slight differences in viral titer or better cell survival/proliferation of cells with higher GAMT expression relative to AGAT is also possible.

Fig 2. Total cellular expression of AGAT and GAMT in WT fibroblasts.

Fig 2

(A) WT control fibroblasts were infected with the indicated lentivirus. Cells were then lysed and analyzed by western blotting with the indicated antibody. N = 3. (B) Same lysates as in (A) were probed for the V5 tagged form of AGAT and GAMT by western blot. N = 3. (C) WT fibroblasts stably expressing the indicated transgenes were cultured in creatine-free media supplemented with amino acid precursors for 3 days. Cells were lysed and the total cellular creatine was quantified. N = 3. Two-sided t-test * indicates P < 0.05. (D) Same experiment as in (C) plotting the media creatine concentration measured. N = 3. Two-sided t-test ** indicates P < 0.01. (E) Same experiment as in (C) plotting the total cellular protein measured. N = 3. Two-sided t-test n.s. indicates not significant. Error bars show SEM.

We then compared the abundance of intracellular creatine in WT fibroblasts infected with both GATM and GAMT relative to cells infected with empty vector. These cells were selected in blasticidin 24 hours post-infection for three days and then allowed to grow without selection for approximately one month (the equivalent of approximately 6–8 passages). After this prolonged growth phase, the media in the dish was exchanged for creatine-free media supplemented with creatine amino acid precursors for three days. When metabolites were extracted from washed cells, the amount of intracellular creatine was found to be markedly increased by co-expression of AGAT and GAMT (Fig 2C, 19.7 vs 1.6 nmoles/mg protein, or 12.3-fold increased relative to control, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). Prior to harvesting the cells, a sample of the creatine-free media was collected and measured to determine the extracellular creatine content produced (Fig 2D). This revealed an increased concentration of creatine in the media to 8.7 µ M relative to 2.3 µ M from empty vector controls (3.8-fold, P < 0.01, two-sided t-test). Importantly, we did not observe a noticeable difference in the total number of cells after one month of growth in the 15 cm dish used for these experiments, confirmed by quantifying the total cellular protein (Fig 2E, 1.3 vs 1.1 mg in control vs AGAT and GAMT, respectively, not significant, two-sided t-test).

Immunofluorescence for AGAT and GAMT was performed on WT fibroblasts stably expressing these transgenes to confirm expression after several passages without blasticidin selection (Fig 3A and 3B). Empty vector control cells displayed only background signal throughout the cytoplasm when stained for AGAT. In contrast, cytoplasmic and low level nuclear signal was detected when these cells were stained for GAMT (Fig 3A and 3B). In cells stably expressing the GATM and GAMT transgenes, tubular and punctate signal could be detected for AGAT throughout the cytoplasm, consistent with its known localization to mitochondria [15]. The GAMT signal in these cells was also much more pronounced than empty vector controls and localized throughout the nucleocytoplasm (Fig 3A and 3B). These data indicate that stably infected WT fibroblasts target these enzymes to the appropriate compartment and markedly upregulate their abundance relative to the endogenous level of expression.

Fig 3. Localization of delivered AGAT and GAMT in WT fibroblasts.

Fig 3

Immunofluorescence (IF) of WT fibroblasts stably expressing AGAT + GAMT and empty vector infected controls imaged at 63x magnification. N = 4. Scale bars indicate 10 µm.

We obtained two CTD patient fibroblast lines donated by males with complete loss-of-function mutations in SLC6A8. We infected the first mutant line (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y) with our GATM and GAMT lentiviral particles and analyzed their expression after blasticidin selection (Fig 4A and 4B). Consistent with our results in WT fibroblasts, delivery of each transgene led to dramatically increased expression of AGAT and GAMT without noticeable impacts on cell abundance as determined by GAPDH loading (Fig 4A). We probed the same lysates for V5 to determine the relative expression of AGAT-V5 and GAMT-V5 in cells co-expressing these transgenes (Fig 4B). Like WT fibroblasts, this revealed an overabundance of GAMT-V5 relative to AGAT-V5 in CT1 mutant fibroblasts.

Fig 4. Total cellular expression of AGAT and GAMT in CT1 mutant fibroblasts.

Fig 4

(A) Fibroblasts from a patient with CT1 loss-of-function (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y) were infected with the indicated lentivirus. Cells were then lysed and analyzed by western blotting with the indicated antibody. N = 3. (B) Same lysates as in (A) were probed for the V5 tagged form of AGAT and GAMT by western blot. N = 3. (C) The same CT1 loss-of-function fibroblasts stably expressing the indicated transgenes were cultured in creatine-free media supplemented with amino acid precursors for three days. Cells were lysed and the total cellular creatine was quantified. N = 3. Two-sided t-test P = 0.06. (D) Same experiment as in (C) plotting the media creatine concentration measured. N = 2. Two-sided t-test n.s. indicates not significant. (E) Same experiment as in (C) plotting the total cellular protein measured. N = 3. Two-sided t-test n.s. indicates not significant. Error bars show SEM. (F) A second line of CT1 loss-of-function fibroblasts (SLC6A8W556X/y) stably expressing the indicated transgenes were cultured in creatine-free media supplemented with amino acid precursors for three days. Cells were lysed and the total cellular creatine was quantified. N = 3. Two-sided t-test * indicates P < 0.05. (G) Same experiment as in (F) plotting the media creatine concentration measured. N = 3. Two-sided t-test * indicates P < 0.05. (H) Same experiment as in (F) plotting the total cellular protein measured. N = 3. Two-sided t-test n.s. indicates not significant. Error bars show SEM.

We then generated CT1 mutant fibroblasts stably expressing AGAT and GAMT from both patients with different loss-of-function mutations (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y and SLC6A8W556X/y). We cultured these cells for approximately one month (the equivalent of approximately 6–8 passages) without blasticidin selection and then exchanged their media for creatine-free media supplemented with creatine amino acid precursors to determine their potential to synthesize creatine (Fig 4C-H). After three days, for the first CT1 mutant line (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y), we observed a 3.5-fold increase in intracellular creatine although this increase just failed to reach statistical significance (Fig 4C, 4.2 vs 1.2 nmoles/mg protein relative to empty vector controls, P = 0.061, two-sided t-test). The amount of creatine in the media collected immediately before harvesting these cells was not significantly different (Fig 4D, 9.5 relative to 5.6 µ M from empty vector controls, two-sided t-test). The total cellular protein was also not significantly different (Fig 4E, 0.6 vs 0.7 mg in control vs AGAT and GAMT, respectively, two-sided t-test) indicating that expression of these transgenes did not impact cell abundance. For the second CT1 mutant line (SLC6A8W556X/y) we observed an 11.6-fold increase in intracellular creatine (Fig 4F, 10.4 vs 0.9 nmoles/mg protein relative to empty vector controls, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). There was also significantly more creatine in the media collected immediately before harvesting these cells (Fig 4G, 8.9 relative to 4.2 µ M from empty vector controls, or 2.1-fold increased, P < 0.05, two-sided t-test). Importantly, there was again no significant difference in total protein from the harvested cells expressing AGAT and GAMT relative to empty vector controls (Fig 4H, 0.7 vs 0.6 mg, respectively, two-sided t-test). Taken together, these data indicate that co-expression of AGAT and GAMT in CTD patient fibroblasts can increase intracellular creatine up to 11.6-fold.

Next, both CT1 mutant fibroblast lines were analyzed for transgenic protein expression by immunofluorescence (Fig 5 and 6). AGAT expression was undetectable in empty vector controls at low magnification (Fig 5A and 6A). Any signal detected in empty vector controls at high magnification (Fig 5B and 6B) did not localize to mitochondria and is therefore likely background. These data are consistent with essentially no expression of endogenous AGAT in these cells seen by western blot (see Fig 4A). In GATM and GAMT transgenic CT1 mutant cells, the AGAT signal localized well to tubular/punctate structures consistent with mitochondrial targeting in both SLC6A8Δex10-11/y mutants (Fig 5) and SLC6A8W556X/y (Fig 6). GAMT expression was detected throughout the nucleocytoplasm in empty vector controls but was dramatically increased in GATM and GAMT stable transgenic fibroblasts (Fig 5 and 6). These data indicate that AGAT and GAMT target appropriately to their respective subcellular compartment. Furthermore, immunofluorescence analysis was carried out after several passages without blasticidin selection, suggesting that high level AGAT and GAMT overexpression does not cause major deleterious effects on CT1 mutant fibroblast survival.

Fig 5. Localization of delivered AGAT and GAMT in CT1 mutant (SLC6A8.

Fig 5

Δex10-11/y) fibroblasts. IF of CT1 loss-of-function patient fibroblasts stably expressing AGAT + GAMT and empty vector infected controls imaged at 63x magnification. N = 4. Scale bars indicate 10 µm.

Fig 6. Localization of delivered AGAT and GAMT in CT1 mutant (SLC6A8W556X/y) fibroblasts.

Fig 6

IF of a second line of CT1 loss-of-function patient fibroblasts stably expressing AGAT + GAMT and empty vector infected controls imaged at 63x magnification. N = 4. Scale bars indicate 10 µm.

To support these initial observations, we then performed growth rate quantification on WT and CT1 mutant fibroblasts stably overexpressing AGAT and GAMT (Fig 7). We imaged fibroblasts plated at 50,000 cells per well every six hours over the course of three days in standard media (DMEM + 15% FBS + P/S). For CT1 mutant fibroblasts, we also performed these experiments in the same media supplemented with creatine precursor amino acids (Fig 7A). In standard media, WT fibroblast exhibited an indistinguishable growth curve whether they overexpressed AGAT and GAMT or an empty vector control (Fig 7B, not significant, two-sided K-S test). In the same media, the first CT1 mutant fibroblast line (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y) expressing AGAT and GAMT outgrew empty vector controls (Fig 7C, P < 0.0001, two-sided K-S test). When the media was supplemented with creatine precursors, cells overexpressing AGAT and GAMT also outgrew their empty vector controls (Fig 7D, P < 0.001, two-sided K-S test). Similarly, the second line of CT1 mutant fibroblasts (SLC6A8W556X/y) stably overexpressing AGAT and GAMT outgrew their empty vector controls (Fig 7E, P < 0.05, two-sided K-S test). This effect was observed again when creatine precursors were supplemented in the media (Fig 7F, P < 0.0001, two-sided K-S test). In summary, stable overexpression of AGAT and GAMT does not impair the growth of CTD patient fibroblasts irrespective of precursor supplementation.

Fig 7. Growth characteristics of fibroblasts stably expressing AGAT and GAMT.

Fig 7

(A) A model depicting the two sources of intracellular creatine. Creatine is either imported via CT1 or synthesized from its amino acid precursors: L-arginine; glycine; and methionine. The latter is converted into SAM via MAT2. Created with BioRender.com. (B) Growth of WT fibroblasts stably expressing the indicated constructs in standard media (DMEM + 15% FBS + P/S). N = 6. Two-sided K-S test n.s. indicates not significant. (C) Growth of CT1 loss-of-function (SLC6A8Δex10-11/y) patient fibroblasts stably expressing the indicated constructs in standard media. N = 6. Two-sided K-S test **** indicates P < 0.0001. (D) Similar experiment to (C) except media was supplemented with creatine precursor amino acids to 1 mM above standard media. N = 6. Two-sided K-S test *** indicates P < 0.001. (E) Growth of CT1 loss-of-function (SLC6A8W556X/y) patient fibroblasts stably expressing the indicated constructs in standard media. N = 6. Two-sided K-S test * indicates P < 0.05. (F) Similar experiment to (E) except media was supplemented with creatine precursor amino acids. N = 6. Two-sided K-S test **** indicates P < 0.0001. Lines indicate a LOESS curve fit to the mean at each timepoint. Error bars show mean + /- SEM.

Discussion

Creatine is an essential molecule required for physiologic brain activity. Although patients with CTD have normal functioning copies of GATM and GAMT, the endogenous expression of these synthetic enzymes cannot compensate for the loss of CT1. This holds true despite the observation that AGAT and GAMT are expressed by various cell types throughout the body [15,17], including oligodendrocytes in the brain. Transport of creatine across the blood-brain barrier is poor when this metabolite is supplemented in the diet [19], evidenced by the slow recovery of brain creatine levels in patients with AGAT or GAMT Deficiency on oral creatine therapy [9]. In those patients (which have biallelic loss of GAMT or GATM, respectively), replenishment of creatine abundance in the brain requires many months of dietary supplementation. This is despite the fact that creatine supplementation vastly increases plasma creatine levels [20] in patients with AGAT or GAMT Deficiency and both groups express a functional CT1 transporter. If the brain can endogenously produce creatine, and CT1 is not an efficient transporter of creatine across the blood-brain barrier, why are creatine levels decreased by ~ 80% [21] in the brains of patients with CTD? One hypothesis is that creatine is produced by oligodendrocytes in the brain for local use by end-user cell types, but it cannot be taken up and concentrated in those cells without CT1. In support of this hypothesis, the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of patients with CTD contains a normal to even slightly elevated concentration of creatine [22,23].

Creatine is important to support variable energy demands by highly active tissues such as cardiac and skeletal muscle [24]. Importantly, both of these myocyte lineages uniquely express a form of creatine kinase (sarcomeric creatine kinase mitochondrial, ScCKmit) that localizes to mitochondria (encoded by CKMT2) [25]. Within the brain, ScCKmit is not expressed. Instead, a related mitochondrial kinase (Ubiquitous creatine kinase mitochondrial, UbCKmit, encoded by Ckmt1 in mice), is exclusively expressed at high levels by neurons [26]. This feature and the known energetic demands of neuronal membrane polarization and synaptic signaling [27], suggest that neurons are a principal end-user of creatine in the brain. Thus, even though patients with CTD are likely capable of synthesizing creatine within the brain, the net deficiency of this metabolite may result from impaired uptake of creatine from the CSF by neurons without a functional copy of CT1. One means of bypassing this requirement is to permit neurons to synthesize creatine within their own cytoplasm by overexpressing AGAT and GAMT. It is worth noting that many examined neuronal populations express GAMT at low levels but do not express AGAT [15].

Similar to neurons, we determined here that HEK293T cells express low levels of GAMT but do not express detectable levels of AGAT. When AGAT-V5 was expressed in these cells, the intracellular creatine concentration was significantly increased. Expression of AGAT without the V5 tag also trended towards increased creatine levels (~1.4-fold) but did not achieve statistical significance. These changes were much smaller than increases observed when AGAT and GAMT were both overexpressed. Thus, the low amount of endogenous GAMT expression can permit creatine synthesis, but flow through this pathway is dramatically improved by overexpressing both enzymes. These data indicate that GAMT levels limit the synthesis of creatine in this context. Considering these observations, we chose to co-express both AGAT and GAMT in primary fibroblasts to maximize creatine synthesis.

In both SLC6A8 WT and mutant fibroblasts, overexpression of AGAT and GAMT markedly boosted intracellular creatine concentrations. For all experiments measuring this metabolite, we exchanged the media to creatine-free media 24 hours (HEK293T experiments) or 72 hours (fibroblast experiments) prior to measurement. The standard formulation of DMEM (as used here) does not contain creatine. However, FBS derives from a natural source and the concentration of small metabolites in FBS likely varies by lot [28]. As an estimate, the creatine concentration in adult bovine serum has been measured at approximately 200 µ M [29]. Thus, cells expressing a functional CT1 would have the ability to concentrate creatine from the media during propagation, prior to exchanging the media to creatine-free media. This would not be the case for the CTD patient fibroblasts we used for our experiments, as these cells are hemizygous for a complete loss-of-function allele for SLC6A8. The strong increase in intracellular creatine concentration we observed in these cells, and likely those observed in SLC6A8 WT cells, were due to internal synthesis of creatine followed by retention of this metabolite intracellularly. Furthermore, the fold difference in creatine concentration measured in the media observed with AGAT and GAMT overexpression was lower in magnitude than the intracellular difference, indicating that diffusion from an extracellular compartment could not explain the intracellular increase. Rather, some diffusion out of the cytoplasm or background cell turnover/death is the likely source of higher media concentrations of creatine observed in cells overexpressing AGAT and GAMT. These data indicate that creatine can be synthesized and concentrated in cells lacking CT1.

Limitations

We utilized immunofluorescence for AGAT and GAMT to localize these proteins in fibroblasts stably expressing our lentiviral constructs after blasticidin selection. Our immunofluorescence experiments were performed after several passages without blasticidin selection, confirming that both transgenes were expressed without strong selection against expressing cells. However, we did not perform quantitative western blotting over time to study the relative stability of these transgenes and their equilibrium expression over time. Future studies could reveal whether AGAT and GAMT expression provides a positive or negative selective advantage for WT and CT1 mutant cells by measuring the level of expression, sampled throughout successive passages, after removing blasticidin selection. Of note, the measurements of creatine and total cellular protein we performed in fibroblasts were carried out after more than a month in culture without blasticidin. The marked increase in intracellular creatine we observed reflects persistent expression of these transgenes, but a more quantitative analysis would provide additional insight into the phenotypic consequences of AGAT and GAMT overexpression.

The kit we employed to measure creatine (both intracellular levels and those in the media) detects total levels of this metabolite. Intracellular creatine exists in a phosphorylated and unphosphorylated form. Due to this constraint, it is not known if the rise in intracellular creatine observed upon AGAT and GAMT overexpression results in the increase of only one or both metabolites and in what ratio. Given that both HEK293 cells and human fibroblasts express cytoplasmic creatine kinase (namely, CKB) [30,31], it would be expected that a portion of the synthesized creatine would exist as phosphocreatine. Future studies would be required to determine the relative abundance of creatine/phosphocreatine in cells overexpressing exogenous AGAT and GAMT.

Our prior studies indicated that certain cell types, such as oligodendrocytes, express both AGAT and GAMT at high levels in vivo [15]. Based on this observation, we hypothesized that overexpressing these enzymes would permit the internal synthesis of creatine, boosting its levels in cells with a genetic defect in SLC6A8. We have demonstrated that this is indeed the case for CTD patient derived fibroblasts, suggesting that this strategy could be used for gene therapy in CTD. Replacement of a functional copy of SLC6A8, however, would be a more direct therapeutic approach for these patients [11], if delivery and expression can recapitulate its endogenous pattern of expression. Although we did not observe any salient deleterious consequences in our cell culture experiments with AGAT and GAMT overexpression, this may not be the case in vivo, where precursor amino acids or related metabolic pathways may be more limited [32,33]. Indeed, if neurons are truly the primary end-user of creatine in the brain, why has expression of AGAT and GAMT been delegated to oligodendrocytes? It could be that the metabolic demands of creatine synthesis [33] are consequential for, or incompatible with, highly active cell types such as neurons. Future studies would need to provide a detailed analysis of the metabolic consequences of AGAT and GAMT in various cell types. We did not quantify the amount of intracellular arginine, glycine, methionine or SAM in AGAT and GAMT overexpressing cells. Indeed, these experiments are first steps towards a proof-of-principal along a longer continuum which would involve additional cell culture, organoid/tissue, in vivo pre-clinical and, ultimately, early phase clinical experiments. Although AGAT and GAMT overexpression may consume amino acid precursors, the degree to which this happens does not impair cell growth. A particularly important case is WT fibroblasts overexpressing AGAT and GAMT without precursor supplementation as this removes the potentially confounding effect of rescue from a state of creatine deficiency that could be occurring in SLC6A8 mutant fibroblasts. Collectively our data indicate that AGAT and GAMT overexpression permits highly productive synthesis and retention of creatine in novel cell types, including those lacking CT1.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 1.

The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 1A. (B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 1B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s001.zip (927.8KB, zip)
S2 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 2.

The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 2A. (B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 2B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s002.zip (1.3MB, zip)
S3 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 3.

Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Fig 3.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s003.zip (4.2MB, zip)
S4 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 4.

The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 4A.(B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 4B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s004.zip (479.9KB, zip)
S5 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 5.

Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Fig 5.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s005.zip (5.1MB, zip)
S6 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 6.

Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Figure 6.

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s006.zip (7.4MB, zip)
S7 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 7.

Excel sheet containing the raw confluence data recorded by Incucyte which was analyzed in Figure 7

(ZIP)

pone.0319350.s007.zip (55.2KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank members of the Rutter laboratory and the Baker laboratory for many helpful suggestions and discussion. We are sincerely grateful to Erica Swenson for editing the manuscript. CW, JS, and SAB were supported by a grant from the Association for Creatine Deficiencies. SAB was supported by a grant from the Uplifting Athletes’ Foundation. SLJ, DA, and SAB were supported by funds from the University of Utah Department of Pathology. JR is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

CW, JS, and SAB were supported by a grant from the Association for Creatine Deficiencies. SAB was supported by a grant from the Uplifting Athletes’ Foundation. SLJ, DA, and SAB were supported by funds from the University of Utah Department of Pathology. JR is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

References

  • 1.Joncquel-Chevalier Curt M, Voicu P-M, Fontaine M, Dessein A-F, Porchet N, Mention-Mulliez K, et al. Creatine biosynthesis and transport in health and disease. Biochimie. 2015;119:146–65. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qin W, Khuchua Z, Cheng J, Boero J, Payne RM, Strauss AW. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1998;184(1/2):153–67. doi: 10.1023/a:1006807515892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME. Creatine: endogenous metabolite, dietary, and therapeutic supplement. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27:241–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R. Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(3):1107–213. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mercimek-Andrews S, Salomons GS. Creatine Deficiency Syndromes. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA); 2022. Available: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20301745 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stockler S, Schutz PW, Salomons GS. Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes: clinical aspects, treatment and pathophysiology. Subcell Biochem. 2007;46:149–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6486-9_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lion-François L, Cheillan D, Pitelet G, Acquaviva-Bourdain C, Bussy G, Cotton F, et al. High frequency of creatine deficiency syndromes in patients with unexplained mental retardation. Neurology. 2006;67(9):1713–4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000239153.39710.81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mejdahl Nielsen M, Petersen ET, Fenger CD, Ørngreen MC, Siebner HR, Boer VO, et al. X-linked creatine transporter (SLC6A8) deficiency in females: Difficult to recognize, but a potentially treatable disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2023;140(3):107694. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.107694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schulze A. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2003;244(1/2):143–50. doi: 10.1023/a:1022443503883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dunbar M, Jaggumantri S, Sargent M, Stockler-Ipsiroglu S, van Karnebeek CDM. Treatment of X-linked creatine transporter (SLC6A8) deficiency: systematic review of the literature and three new cases. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;112(4):259–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernandes-Pires G, Braissant O. Current and potential new treatment strategies for creatine deficiency syndromes. Mol Genet Metab. 2022;135(1):15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2021.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borsook H, Dubnoff JW. The formation of glycocyamine in animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1941;138(1):389–403. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)51446-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horner WH. Transamidination in the Nephrectomized Rat. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1959;234(9):2386–7. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)69820-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee H, Ogawa H, Fujioka M, Gerton GL. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase in the mouse: extensive expression in Sertoli cells of testis and in microvilli of caput epididymis. Biol Reprod. 1994;50(1):152–62. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod50.1.152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baker SA, Gajera CR, Wawro AM, Corces MR, Montine TJ. GATM and GAMT synthesize creatine locally throughout the mammalian body and within oligodendrocytes of the brain. Brain Res. 2021;1770:147627. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Defalco AJ, Davies RK. The synthesis of creatine by the brain of the intact rat. J Neurochem. 1961;7:308–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1961.tb13518.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Braissant O, Henry H, Loup M, Eilers B, Bachmann C. Endogenous synthesis and transport of creatine in the rat brain: an in situ hybridization study. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001;86(1–2):193–201. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00269-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 586, Creatine. Pub Chem. Bethesda (MD). https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Creatine. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Braissant O. Creatine and guanidinoacetate transport at blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(4):655–64. doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9433-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stockler-Ipsiroglu S, van Karnebeek C, Longo N, Korenke GC, Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S, Marquart I, et al. Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency: outcomes in 48 individuals and recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;111(1):16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dezortova M, Jiru F, Petrasek J, Malinova V, Zeman J, Jirsa M, et al. 1H MR spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for cerebral creatine deficiency. MAGMA. 2008;21(5):327–32. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0137-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cecil KM, Salomons GS, Ball WS Jr, Wong B, Chuck G, Verhoeven NM, et al. Irreversible brain creatine deficiency with elevated serum and urine creatine: a creatine transporter defect?. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):401–4. doi: 10.1002/ana.79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.DeGrauw TJ, Salomons GS, Cecil KM, Chuck G, Newmeyer A, Schapiro MB, et al. Congenital creatine transporter deficiency. Neuropediatrics. 2002;33(5):232–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Strumia E, Pelliccia F, D’Ambrosio G. Creatine phosphate: pharmacological and clinical perspectives. Adv Ther. 2012;29(2):99–123. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0091-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Steeghs K, Heerschap A, de Haan A, Ruitenbeek W, Oerlemans F, van Deursen J, et al. Use of gene targeting for compromising energy homeostasis in neuro-muscular tissues: the role of sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;71(1):29–41. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(96)00124-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schaum N, Karkanias J, Neff NF, May AP, Quake SR, Wyss-Coray T, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature. 2018;562:367–372. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Howarth C, Gleeson P, Attwell D. Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(7):1222–32. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu S, Yang W, Li Y, Sun C. Fetal bovine serum, an important factor affecting the reproducibility of cell experiments. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29060-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ardalan M, Batista E, Armendariz C, Titgemeyer E. Guanidinoacetic Acid as a Precursor of Creatine for Cattle. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 2015;1(8). doi: 10.4148/2378-5977.1150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zervou S, Whittington HJ, Ostrowski PJ, Cao F, Tyler J, Lake HA, et al. Increasing creatine kinase activity protects against hypoxia / reoxygenation injury but not against anthracycline toxicity in vitro. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Povey S, Inwood M, Tanyar A, Bobrow M. The expression of creatine kinase isozymes in human cultured cells. Ann Hum Genet. 1979;43(1):15–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1979.tb01545.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fernstrom JD. Branched-chain amino acids and brain function. J Nutr. 2005;135(6 Suppl):1539S-46S. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.6.1539S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brosnan JT, Wijekoon EP, Warford-Woolgar L, Trottier NL, Brosnan ME, Brunton JA, et al. Creatine synthesis is a major metabolic process in neonatal piglets and has important implications for amino acid metabolism and methyl balance. J Nutr. 2009;139(7):1292–7. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.105411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

7 Aug 2024

-->PONE-D-24-17122-->-->Gene Delivery of AGAT and GAMT Boosts Creatine Levels in Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient Fibroblasts-->-->PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Baker,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I would like to sincerely apologise for the delay you have incurred with your submission. It has been exceptionally difficult to secure reviewers to evaluate your study. We have now received two completed reviews; the comments are available below. The reviewers have raised significant scientific concerns about the study that need to be addressed in a revision.

Please revise the manuscript to address all the reviewer's comments in a point-by-point response in order to ensure it is meeting the journal's publication criteria. Please note that the revised manuscript will need to undergo further review, we thus cannot at this point anticipate the outcome of the evaluation process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 21 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:-->

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Miquel Vall-llosera Camps

Senior Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"CW, JS, and SAB were supported by a grant from the Association for Creatine Deficiencies. SAB was supported by a grant from the Uplifting Athletes’ Foundation.  SLJ, DA, and SAB were supported by funds from the University of Utah Department of Pathology. JR is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"We kindly thank members of the Rutter laboratory and the Baker laboratory for many helpful suggestions and discussion. We are sincerely grateful to Erica Swenson for editing the manuscript. CW, JS, and SAB were supported by a grant from the Association for Creatine Deficiencies. SAB was supported by a grant from the Uplifting Athletes’ Foundation.  SLJ, DA, and SAB were supported by funds from the University of Utah Department of Pathology. JR is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"CW, JS, and SAB were supported by a grant from the Association for Creatine Deficiencies. SAB was supported by a grant from the Uplifting Athletes’ Foundation.  SLJ, DA, and SAB were supported by funds from the University of Utah Department of Pathology. JR is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: 

"I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JR is a founder of Vettore Biosciences and a member of its scientific advisory board. All other authors declare no competing interests."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared. 

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

6. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.   

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

-->Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. -->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)-->

Reviewer #1: Reviewer comments

Title: Gene Delivery of AGAT and GAMT Boosts Creatine Levels in Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient Fibroblasts

Journal: PLOS One

Manuscript number: PONE-D-24-17122

Manuscript type: Research Article

Authors: Wells et al.

Wells et al report increased creatine levels in HEK293T cells, wild-type fibroblasts and in fibroblasts of individuals with CRTR deficiency when co-delivered with GAMT and GATM. They report that this gene delivery strategy will overcome the need for CRTR.

There are few questions listed below:

1. The AGAT and GAMT are written italic, as this is a gene delivery, however the gene name for AGAT deficiency is GATM that needs to be corrected throughout the manuscript. If authors using AGAT as abbreviation of the enzyme, they can still use AGAT for enzyme/protein name.

2. Last sentence of the abstract is confusing if this is a gene therapy strategy for CRTR deficiency or for all CCDS as the last paragraph of introduction refers to CRTR deficiency not all CCDS. Please revise accordingly.

3. In material and methods, is there typo for patient numbers as control and 13-year old affected male abbreviated as P2. Please check and correct accordingly.

4. Even if those CCDS types 1, 2, 3 are used in OMIM, they are not used in the medical literature. Please change the terms used CCDS 1, 2, 3 to actual enzyme and transporter deficiencies throughout the manuscript, as those are not used consistently in the manuscript. Refer to GAMT and AGAT deficiencies as well as creatine transporter deficiency and remove all CCDS types throughout the manuscript.

5. Despite abstract reports that the study findings establish proof-of-concept for gene therapy for CRTR deficiency, discussion does not give any information how the overexpression of GAMT and GATM would be feasible gene therapy approach in CRTR deficiency as they will still need precursor therapy with arginine and glycine. Their intakes in each neuronal cell in the brain is not feasible as HEK293T and fibroblasts does not correspondence to brain neuronal cells. These experiments should have been performed in brain organoids to be able to show if creatine would increase in brain neuronal cells with the overexpression of GAMT and GATM.

6. Discussion repeats study results, which should be revised.

7. Why did not authors use iPSC derived oligodendrocytes for their experiments, if their method would allow creatine increases if the overexpression of GAMT and GATM would have any toxic effects on those cells?

Reviewer #2: This study intends to provide some proof of principle that expression of enzymes in the creatine synthesis pathway could be used in a gene therapy of the creatine deficiency syndrome. The genes for the two enzymes AGAT and GAMT are delivered to HEK293T cells or primary human fibroblasts from patients. The data provide evidence for AGAT and GAMT protein expression, their correct cellular localization, and their effect on a strongly increased intracellular creatine content.

While the study demonstrates very well that expression of AGAT and GAMT can dramatically boost intracellular creatine levels, it remains unclear whether this is not detrimental for the intracellular levels of the precursors of creatine synthesis. This is particularly important for arginine and SAM which are essential for many other metabolic pathways. There are also some issues with the immunofluorescence images and the creatine determination that should be addressed.

Major:

1. Introducing massive creatine synthesis in cells normally not synthesizing this metabolite may have drastic effects on the rewiring of metabolism. This important issue for such a study is not addressed in the experimental part. Somehow the authors are aware of the problem, since they supplement the creatine-free medium used with arginine, glycine and methionine. However, although "intracellular metabolites were extracted” (p.12) perfectly, creatine is the only molecule quantified. At least one of the critical precursors (arginine or SAM) should be quantified along with creatine in at least one of the experimental systems used.

Although the authors state that “boosting creatine synthesis does not have major deleterious effects on cellular physiology” (p.4), this is limited to the same cell number, same GAPDH abundance or same growth curve between control and transfected cells in standard medium. The authors admit that here may be problems in vivo “where precursor amino acids or related metabolic pathways may be more limited” and “It could be that the metabolic demands of creatine synthesis are … incompatible with, highly active cell types ...” (p.20). However, some of these potential important limitations could be already analyzed at the cellular level by looking at other metabolites.

2. Immunofluorescence results as described in the text are difficult to grasp from the figures.

- Figs 3, 5 and 6: In most panels labelled “DAPI”, there is no or only extremely faint staining visible, which precludes evaluation of the cell number and situation in the following panels

- Fig 3A,B: “Empty vector control cells displayed … cytoplasmic and low level nuclear signal was detected when these cells were stained for GAMT” (p.14) – This is not visible in the figures!

- Fig 3, 5A, 6A: “In cells stably expressing the AGAT and GAMT transgenes, tubular and punctate signal could be detected for AGAT throughout the cytoplasm” (p.14) and “In AGAT and GAMT transgenic CT1 mutant cells, the AGAT signal localized well to tubular/punctate structures consistent with mitochondrial targeting” (p.16) – Contrary to this text, there is very few to no staining of AGAT in Figs. 3A,B and 5A and 6A! Does this mean that many cells that express high levels of GAMT do not express AGAT (or only at very low level)?

3. Are the authors sure which sort of “intracellular creatine” they measure? Is this really only creatine, or rather a sort of “total creatine”, which is creatine + phosphocreatine? An overnight speedvac at room temperature risks to hydrolyze a large part of phosphocreatine, which is then detected as creatine. This issue should be addressed in the text.

Minor :

p.3: “GAA is then methylated on the same nitrogen” – better: “GAA is then methylated by GAMT on the same nitrogen”

p.4: “… if membrane channels that transport creatine are not expressed.” – membrane transfer of creatine uses a transporter, not a channel, so correct to “… if membrane transporters for creatine are not expressed.”

The immunofluorescence images are not very informative and could be limited to the 63x magnified parts of Figs. 3 and 5, once the above mentioned problems are solved.

**********

-->6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: ReviewerComments.doc

pone.0319350.s008.doc (41KB, doc)
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0319350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319350.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 Jan 2025

We thank the reviewers for their excellent and thoughtful comments. As we indicated to the editor when we submitted this manuscript, the funding for this project (and the research laboratory in which experiments were conducted) had ended. Therefore, we are not able to carry out additional experiments as requested. However, we have significantly revised the manuscript, incorporating the critiques of both reviewers. Our responses can be found below the reviewers’ comments which are copied here in blue.

Reviewer #1:

Wells et al report increased creatine levels in HEK293T cells, wild-type fibroblasts and in fibroblasts of individuals with CRTR deficiency when co-delivered with GAMT and GATM. They report that this gene delivery strategy will overcome the need for CRTR.

There are few questions listed below:

1. The AGAT and GAMT are written italic, as this is a gene delivery, however the gene name for AGAT deficiency is GATM that needs to be corrected throughout the manuscript. If authors using AGAT as abbreviation of the enzyme, they can still use AGAT for enzyme/protein name.

Thank you for this comment. You are completely correct. However, because of the similarity of the gene names for GATM and GAMT we and other authors (see PMID: 39402976, 31853708, and 26695944) often refer to the gene encoding AGAT by the same symbol with italics (namely, AGAT). To assist with clarity, we have revised the gene name to GATM throughout.

2. Last sentence of the abstract is confusing if this is a gene therapy strategy for CRTR deficiency or for all CCDS as the last paragraph of introduction refers to CRTR deficiency not all CCDS. Please revise accordingly.

We corrected the abstract to reflect the goal of the project and the introduction.

3. In material and methods, is there typo for patient numbers as control and 13-year old affected male abbreviated as P2. Please check and correct accordingly.

We apologize for being unclear here. We meant to indicate that the cells from this patient were obtained from Coriell at passage 2 (P2), not that this was patient 2. We have removed the abbreviation for clarity.

4. Even if those CCDS types 1, 2, 3 are used in OMIM, they are not used in the medical literature. Please change the terms used CCDS 1, 2, 3 to actual enzyme and transporter deficiencies throughout the manuscript, as those are not used consistently in the manuscript. Refer to GAMT and AGAT deficiencies as well as creatine transporter deficiency and remove all CCDS types throughout the manuscript.

We removed these references to CCDS type and replaced them by the suggested name. Thank you.

5. Despite abstract reports that the study findings establish proof-of-concept for gene therapy for CRTR deficiency, discussion does not give any information how the overexpression of GAMT and GATM would be feasible gene therapy approach in CRTR deficiency as they will still need precursor therapy with arginine and glycine. Their intakes in each neuronal cell in the brain is not feasible as HEK293T and fibroblasts does not correspondence to brain neuronal cells. These experiments should have been performed in brain organoids to be able to show if creatine would increase in brain neuronal cells with the overexpression of GAMT and GATM.

This is an excellent point, and we raised this concern in the original discussion. We are unfortunately unable to carry out additional experiments, but we have revised the wording in the manuscript to indicate that these are first steps towards a proof of principal along a lengthy continuum which would involve additional cell culture, organoid/tissue, in vivo pre-clinical and, ultimately, early phase clinical experiments. Please see the revised introduction and discussion sections.

6. Discussion repeats study results, which should be revised.

Thank you for bringing that to our attention. We have removed the portion of the discussion containing details from the results.

7. Why did not authors use iPSC derived oligodendrocytes for their experiments, if their method would allow creatine increases if the overexpression of GAMT and GATM would have any toxic effects on those cells?

A very thoughtful comment again. Oligodendrocytes naturally express high levels of Gatm and Gamt, and thus, these cells might be a natural experimental system to pilot exogenous overexpression. Our thought would be to overexpress these enzymes in iPSC derived neurons, which because of their metabolic demands, might be more susceptible to any detrimental effects of GATM and GAMT overexpression. Our laboratory did not have extensive experience with iPSC culture or differentiation, but this would be a reasonable experiment for future study.

Reviewer #2: 

This study intends to provide some proof of principle that expression of enzymes in the creatine synthesis pathway could be used in a gene therapy of the creatine deficiency syndrome. The genes for the two enzymes AGAT and GAMT are delivered to HEK293T cells or primary human fibroblasts from patients. The data provide evidence for AGAT and GAMT protein expression, their correct cellular localization, and their effect on a strongly increased intracellular creatine content.

While the study demonstrates very well that expression of AGAT and GAMT can dramatically boost intracellular creatine levels, it remains unclear whether this is not detrimental for the intracellular levels of the precursors of creatine synthesis. This is particularly important for arginine and SAM which are essential for many other metabolic pathways. There are also some issues with the immunofluorescence images and the creatine determination that should be addressed.

Thank you for your kind comments and excellent feedback.

Major:

1. Introducing massive creatine synthesis in cells normally not synthesizing this metabolite may have drastic effects on the rewiring of metabolism. This important issue for such a study is not addressed in the experimental part. Somehow the authors are aware of the problem, since they supplement the creatine-free medium used with arginine, glycine and methionine. However, although "intracellular metabolites were extracted” (p.12) perfectly, creatine is the only molecule quantified. At least one of the critical precursors (arginine or SAM) should be quantified along with creatine in at least one of the experimental systems used.

This is a highly valid point. If we were to continue this project, our laboratory would measure these precursors (especially arginine and SAM) in non-supplemented media to interrogate the consequences of AGAT and GAMT overexpression. Importantly, in Figures 7B, 7C, and 7E, we did not supplement the media beyond the original formulation of DMEM + 15% FBS. In Figures 7D and 7F we did supplement the media with arginine, glycine, and methionine. In all cases, the fibroblasts overexpressing AGAT + GAMT either grew equivalently (Figure 7B) or outgrew (Figure 7C-F) their empty vector controls. This suggests that although AGAT + GAMT overexpression may consume amino acid precursors, the degree to which this happens does not impair cell growth. A particularly important case is WT fibroblasts overexpressing AGAT + GAMT without precursor supplementation (Figure 7B) as this removes the potentially confounding effect of rescue from a state of creatine deficiency that could be occurring in SLC6A8 mutant fibroblasts.

We have not quantified these precursors in AGAT + GAMT overexpressing cells and have highlighted this important limitation in the discussion.

Although the authors state that “boosting creatine synthesis does not have major deleterious effects on cellular physiology” (p.4), this is limited to the same cell number, same GAPDH abundance or same growth curve between control and transfected cells in standard medium. The authors admit that here may be problems in vivo “where precursor amino acids or related metabolic pathways may be more limited” and “It could be that the metabolic demands of creatine synthesis are … incompatible with, highly active cell types ...” (p.20). However, some of these potential important limitations could be already analyzed at the cellular level by looking at other metabolites.

We completely agree. We included those comments throughout the manuscript to highlight these limitations. Our hope was to determine that overexpression of AGAT + GAMT could boost intracellular creatine at all (particularly in cells with loss-of-function of CT1). As we note above, a series of these experiments were carried out in fibroblasts with unsupplemented media. Still, even basal DMEM contains high concentrations of arginine·HCl (84 mg/L or 399 µM), glycine (30 mg/L or 400 µM), and methionine (30 mg/L or 201 µM) relative to plasma or CSF (9.2−54.7 µM, 2.3−72.7 µM, 1.3−14.2 µM for the latter, respectively per https://www.labcorp.com/resource/cerebrospinal-fluid-amino-acid-reference-intervals). Furthermore, the media above the cells provides an abundant volume from which these metabolites would need to be depleted. We are reassured that both reviewers appreciated these limitations from reading the manuscript as written. We hope that a reader of our work would be able to view our results in this context. Unfortunately, we have closed our laboratory and are unable to carry out additional experiments to explicitly address these concerns.

2. Immunofluorescence results as described in the text are difficult to grasp from the figures.

- Figs 3, 5 and 6: In most panels labelled “DAPI”, there is no or only extremely faint staining visible, which precludes evaluation of the cell number and situation in the following panels

Thank you for pointing this out. We found that our standard immunofluorescence protocol led to faint staining of the thin nuclei found in fibroblasts. We have adjusted the images to better highlight them by taking a Z-projection from a confocal stack.

- Fig 3A,B: “Empty vector control cells displayed … cytoplasmic and low level nuclear signal was detected when these cells were stained for GAMT” (p.14) – This is not visible in the figures!

We have adjusted the images to better demonstrate the low level of expression in control cells.

- Fig 3, 5A, 6A: “In cells stably expressing the AGAT and GAMT transgenes, tubular and punctate signal could be detected for AGAT throughout the cytoplasm” (p.14) and “In AGAT and GAMT transgenic CT1 mutant cells, the AGAT signal localized well to tubular/punctate structures consistent with mitochondrial targeting” (p.16) – Contrary to this text, there is very few to no staining of AGAT in Figs. 3A,B and 5A and 6A! Does this mean that many cells that express high levels of GAMT do not express AGAT (or only at very low level)?

There is some variation in expression likely attributable by lentiviral delivery, but we appreciate detectable AGAT in most cells. The PDF generated for review may have obscured the visualization of the signal. The original TIF figure reveals AGAT expression more clearly. However, along with reprocessing the DAPI and GAMT staining as requested above, we have reprocessed the AGAT signals using the same Z-projection. We hope you would agree this better demonstrates its expression. Thank you for making these suggestions.

3. Are the authors sure which sort of “intracellular creatine” they measure? Is this really only creatine, or rather a sort of “total creatine”, which is creatine + phosphocreatine? An overnight speedvac at room temperature risks to hydrolyze a large part of phosphocreatine, which is then detected as creatine. This issue should be addressed in the text.

This is an excellent point. We did not distinguish between creatine and phosphocreatine. Indeed, the kit we used (Sigma Aldrich Cat. #MAK079) measures total creatine in both the phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated form and thus we cannot interpret which of these two distinct (but highly related) metabolites is contributing to the signal. We have now addressed this important point in the discussion.

Minor :

p.3: “GAA is then methylated on the same nitrogen” – better: “GAA is then methylated by GAMT on the same nitrogen”

Much clearer, thank you!

p.4: “… if membrane channels that transport creatine are not expressed.” – membrane transfer of creatine uses a transporter, not a channel, so correct to “… if membrane transporters for creatine are not expressed.”

Agreed, thanks again. Fixed.

The immunofluorescence images are not very informative and could be limited to the 63x magnified parts of Figs. 3 and 5, once the above mentioned problems are solved.

We removed the low magnification images. We agree this helps to demonstrate the expression features more clearly in addition to the suggestions incorporated above.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0319350.s011.docx (15.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Sharon DeMorrow

31 Jan 2025

Gene Delivery of AGAT and GAMT Boosts Creatine Levels in Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient Fibroblasts

PONE-D-24-17122R1

Dear Dr. Baker,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sharon DeMorrow

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Congratulations

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

-->Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.-->

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

-->2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. -->

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

-->3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

-->4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

-->5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

-->6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)-->

Reviewer #1: Reviewer comments

Title: Gene Delivery of AGAT and GAMT Boosts Creatine Levels in Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient Fibroblasts

Journal: PLOS One

Manuscript number: PONE-D-24-17122R1

Manuscript type: Research Article

Authors: Wells et al.

Authors responded to this reviewer’s questions and revised the manuscript accordingly. There are no other questions from this reviewer.

**********

-->7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .-->

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Attachment

Submitted filename: ReviewerComments.doc

pone.0319350.s010.doc (38KB, doc)

Acceptance letter

Sharon DeMorrow

PONE-D-24-17122R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Baker,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sharon DeMorrow

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 1.

    The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 1A. (B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 1B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s001.zip (927.8KB, zip)
    S2 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 2.

    The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 2A. (B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 2B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s002.zip (1.3MB, zip)
    S3 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 3.

    Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Fig 3.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s003.zip (4.2MB, zip)
    S4 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 4.

    The figure includes (A) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Fig 4A.(B) Raw uncropped western blots used to prepare Figure 4B. The raw data for creatine and protein measurements is included.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s004.zip (479.9KB, zip)
    S5 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 5.

    Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Fig 5.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s005.zip (5.1MB, zip)
    S6 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 6.

    Raw tiff files containing the confocal Z-stack processed to produce the images in Figure 6.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s006.zip (7.4MB, zip)
    S7 Fig. Raw Data For Fig 7.

    Excel sheet containing the raw confluence data recorded by Incucyte which was analyzed in Figure 7

    (ZIP)

    pone.0319350.s007.zip (55.2KB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ReviewerComments.doc

    pone.0319350.s008.doc (41KB, doc)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0319350.s011.docx (15.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ReviewerComments.doc

    pone.0319350.s010.doc (38KB, doc)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES