Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Sep;138(1):125–134. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.125

Differential Regulation of Target Genes by Different Alleles of the Segmentation Gene Hunchback in Drosophila

M Hulskamp 1, W Lukowitz 1, A Beermann 1, G Glaser 1, D Tautz 1
PMCID: PMC1206124  PMID: 8001780

Abstract

hunchback (hb) is a key regulatory gene in the early segmentation gene hierarchy of Drosophila. It codes for a transcription factor of the Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger type and shows two separate zinc finger domains in its coding region. hb forms a morphogenetic gradient in the middle of the embryo that is required for setting the spatial boundaries of several target genes. We have analyzed the molecular lesions found in the different hb alleles and have studied the differential effects of these alleles on a number of such target genes. We find that in mutants in which the HB protein lacks a functional second finger domain, the regulation of the target genes Kruppel (Kr) and knirps (kni) is differentially affected. While this domain is required for the correct regulation of Kr, it is not necessary for the repression of kni. Furthermore, mutations affecting this domain lead to a decreased protein stability. The integration of the expression pattern of target genes was found to be distorted in a second class of mutants between the two finger domains which lead to gain of function or neomorphic phenotypes. The effects of these mutations were studied in detail and it was found that they fall into two classes, the first one interfering with the function of the maternal hb product, the second leading to a delayed segmentation. The function of the latter class appears to be linked to the secondary expression of hb in the parasegment 4 (PS4) stripe at blastoderm stage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Duncan I. Control of bithorax complex functions by the segmentation gene fushi tarazu of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1986 Oct 24;47(2):297–309. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90452-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gaul U., Jäckle H. Pole region-dependent repression of the Drosophila gap gene Krüppel by maternal gene products. Cell. 1987 Nov 20;51(4):549–555. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harding K., Levine M. Gap genes define the limits of antennapedia and bithorax gene expression during early development in Drosophila. EMBO J. 1988 Jan;7(1):205–214. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02801.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoch M., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Gene expression mediated by cis-acting sequences of the Krüppel gene in response to the Drosophila morphogens bicoid and hunchback. EMBO J. 1991 Aug;10(8):2267–2278. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07763.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hülskamp M., Tautz D. Gap genes and gradients--the logic behind the gaps. Bioessays. 1991 Jun;13(6):261–268. doi: 10.1002/bies.950130602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irish V. F., Martinez-Arias A., Akam M. Spatial regulation of the Antennapedia and Ultrabithorax homeotic genes during Drosophila early development. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1527–1537. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03537.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Irish V., Lehmann R., Akam M. The Drosophila posterior-group gene nanos functions by repressing hunchback activity. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):646–648. doi: 10.1038/338646a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laski F. A., Rio D. C., Rubin G. M. Tissue specificity of Drosophila P element transposition is regulated at the level of mRNA splicing. Cell. 1986 Jan 17;44(1):7–19. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90480-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lehmann R., Nüsslein-Volhard C. hunchback, a gene required for segmentation of an anterior and posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol. 1987 Feb;119(2):402–417. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lukowitz W., Schröder C., Glaser G., Hülskamp M., Tautz D. Regulatory and coding regions of the segmentation gene hunchback are functionally conserved between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev. 1994 Feb;45(2):105–115. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pankratz M. J., Busch M., Hoch M., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Spatial control of the gap gene knirps in the Drosophila embryo by posterior morphogen system. Science. 1992 Feb 21;255(5047):986–989. doi: 10.1126/science.1546296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pankratz M. J., Seifert E., Gerwin N., Billi B., Nauber U., Jäckle H. Gradients of Krüppel and knirps gene products direct pair-rule gene stripe patterning in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1990 Apr 20;61(2):309–317. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90811-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Patel N. H., Martin-Blanco E., Coleman K. G., Poole S. J., Ellis M. C., Kornberg T. B., Goodman C. S. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell. 1989 Sep 8;58(5):955–968. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90947-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pavletich N. P., Pabo C. O. Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science. 1991 May 10;252(5007):809–817. doi: 10.1126/science.2028256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Qian S., Capovilla M., Pirrotta V. Molecular mechanisms of pattern formation by the BRE enhancer of the Ubx gene. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3865–3877. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06065.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reinitz J., Levine M. Control of the initiation of homeotic gene expression by the gap genes giant and tailless in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1990 Jul;140(1):57–72. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90053-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rogers S., Wells R., Rechsteiner M. Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: the PEST hypothesis. Science. 1986 Oct 17;234(4774):364–368. doi: 10.1126/science.2876518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommer R., Tautz D. Segmentation gene expression in the housefly Musca domestica. Development. 1991 Oct;113(2):419–430. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.2.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tautz D., Pfeifle C. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 1989 Aug;98(2):81–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00291041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Treier M., Pfeifle C., Tautz D. Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1517–1525. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03536.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang C., Lehmann R. Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Aug 23;66(4):637–647. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90110-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. White R. A., Lehmann R. A gap gene, hunchback, regulates the spatial expression of Ultrabithorax. Cell. 1986 Oct 24;47(2):311–321. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90453-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES