Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Oct;138(2):511–518. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.511

Possible Loss of Length Conservation and Reciprocity during Recombination or Conversion in Tandem Arrays

H L Fletcher 1
PMCID: PMC1206167  PMID: 7828832

Abstract

Recombination or conversion between arrays of repeated sequences need not be conservative for length because two single strands of DNA from one chromatid may form heteroduplexes in different registers on the other participating duplex. This can cause an overall change in repeat number. Loss of length conservation is equally possible whether models of recombination initiated by single-strand transfer or double-strand break are applicable. Length changing conversion will frequently produce a characteristic insertion within a deletion, often appearing as a double deletion such as are frequently found in new variants of human minisatellite MS32. There is no apparent means of preserving parity during length-changing conversion or recombination, and if the changes are biased then the overall copy number will increase or decrease according to that bias. The observation that arrays persist suggests that any bias in these arrays will be toward gains. An equilibrium may be reached where gains, which may be largely independent of array length, equal losses from the array-length-dependent processes of intrachromatid recombination and repeated unequal sister chromatid exchanges.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (777.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bishop D. K., Park D., Xu L., Kleckner N. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):439–456. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The evolution of restricted recombination and the accumulation of repeated DNA sequences. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):947–962. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fletcher H. L., Rafferty J. A. The effects of unequal sister chromatid exchange on length of arrays of repeated sequences. J Theor Biol. 1993 Oct 21;164(4):507–514. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Game J. C., Sitney K. C., Cook V. E., Mortimer R. K. Use of a ring chromosome and pulsed-field gels to study interhomolog recombination, double-strand DNA breaks and sister-chromatid exchange in yeast. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):695–713. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hastings P. J., McGill C., Shafer B., Strathern J. N. Ends-in vs. ends-out recombination in yeast. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):973–980. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeffreys A. J., Neumann R., Wilson V. Repeat unit sequence variation in minisatellites: a novel source of DNA polymorphism for studying variation and mutation by single molecule analysis. Cell. 1990 Feb 9;60(3):473–485. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90598-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith G. P. Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science. 1976 Feb 13;191(4227):528–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1251186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith G. P. Unequal crossover and the evolution of multigene families. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:507–513. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephan W. Recombination and the evolution of satellite DNA. Genet Res. 1986 Jun;47(3):167–174. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300023089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Voelkel-Meiman K., Roeder G. S. Gene conversion tracts stimulated by HOT1-promoted transcription are long and continuous. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):851–867. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walsh J. B. Persistence of tandem arrays: implications for satellite and simple-sequence DNAs. Genetics. 1987 Mar;115(3):553–567. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.3.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolff R., Nakamura Y., Odelberg S., Shiang R., White R. Generation of variability at VNTR loci in human DNA. EXS. 1991;58:20–38. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7312-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES