Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Nov;138(3):883–900. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.883

A Pleiotropic Nonadditive Model of Variation in Quantitative Traits

A Caballero 1, P D Keightley 1
PMCID: PMC1206236  PMID: 7851783

Abstract

A model of mutation-selection-drift balance incorporating pleiotropic and dominance effects of new mutations on quantitative traits and fitness is investigated and used to predict the amount and nature of genetic variation maintained in segregating populations. The model is based on recent information on the joint distribution of mutant effects on bristle traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster from experiments on the accumulation of spontaneous and P element-induced mutations. These experiments suggest a leptokurtic distribution of effects with an intermediate correlation between effects on the trait and fitness. Mutants of large effect tend to be partially recessive while those with smaller effect are on average additive, but apparently with very variable gene action. The model is parameterized with two different sets of information derived from P element insertion and spontaneous mutation data, though the latter are not fully known. They differ in the number of mutations per generation which is assumed to affect the trait. Predictions of the variance maintained for bristle number assuming parameters derived from effects of P element insertions, in which the proportion of mutations with an effect on the trait is small, fit reasonably well with experimental observations. The equilibrium genetic variance is nearly independent of the degree of dominance of new mutations. Heritabilities of between 0.4 and 0.6 are predicted with population sizes from 10(4) to 10(6), and most of the variance for the metric trait in segregating populations is due to a small proportion of mutations (about 1% of the total number) with neutral or nearly neutral effects on fitness and intermediate effects on the trait (0.1-0.5σ(P)). Much of the genetic variance is contributed by recessive or partially recessive mutants, but only a small proportion (about 10%) of the genetic variance is dominance variance. The amount of apparent selection on the trait itself generated by the model is very small. If a model is assumed in which all mutation events have an effect on the quantitative trait, the majority of the genetic variance is contributed by deleterious mutations with tiny effects on the trait. If such a model is assumed for viability, the heritability is about 0.1, independent of the population size.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):773–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton N. H., Turelli M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:337–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):493–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caballero A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):89–102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B., Lapid A. A study of ten families of transposable elements on X chromosomes from a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1989 Oct;54(2):113–125. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300028482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockerham C. C., Tachida H. Evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation by mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6205–6209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A., Beecham E. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):727–737. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eggleston W. B., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Engels W. R. P-M hybrid dysgenesis does not mobilize other transposable element families in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1988 Jan 28;331(6154):368–370. doi: 10.1038/331368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavrilets S., de Jong G. Pleiotropic models of polygenic variation, stabilizing selection, and epistasis. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):609–625. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill W. G. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet Res. 1982 Dec;40(3):255–278. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Houle D., Hoffmaster D. K., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):58–60. doi: 10.1038/359058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet Res. 1988 Aug;52(1):33–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Keightley P. D., Kacser H. Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):319–329. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Keightley P. D., Mackay T. F., Caballero A. Accounting for bias in estimates of the rate of polygenic mutation. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):291–296. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kidwell J. F., Kidwell M. M. The effects of inbreeding on body weight and abdominal chaeta number in Drosophila melanogaster. Can J Genet Cytol. 1966 Jun;8(2):207–215. doi: 10.1139/g66-026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kondrashov A. S., Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lande R. The Genetic Covariance between Characters Maintained by Pleiotropic Mutations. Genetics. 1980 Jan;94(1):203–215. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. López-Fanjul C., Hill W. G. Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster for a quantitative trait. II. Wild and laboratory populations. Genet Res. 1973 Aug;22(1):69–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. López M. A., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Response to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):107–116. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. López M. A., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness. Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):117–126. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mackay T. F., Langley C. H. Molecular and phenotypic variation in the achaete-scute region of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1990 Nov 1;348(6296):64–66. doi: 10.1038/348064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Montgomery E., Charlesworth B., Langley C. H. A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1987 Feb;49(1):31–41. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mukai T., Yamaguchi O. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):339–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ohta T., Kimura M. Linkage disequilibrium between two segregating nucleotide sites under the steady flux of mutations in a finite population. Genetics. 1971 Aug;68(4):571–580. doi: 10.1093/genetics/68.4.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Roff D. A., Mousseau T. A. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1987 Feb;58(Pt 1):103–118. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1987.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rose M. R., Charlesworth B. Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experiments. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):187–196. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Santiago E., Albornoz J., Domínguez A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The distribution of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):771–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shrimpton A. E., Robertson A. The Isolation of Polygenic Factors Controlling Bristle Score in Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Distribution of Third Chromosome Bristle Effects within Chromosome Sections. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):445–459. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spickett S. G., Thoday J. M. Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes. Genet Res. 1966 Feb;7(1):96–121. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300009502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sved J. A. An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1971 Aug;18(1):97–105. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sved J. A., Ayala F. J. A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1970 Sep;66(1):97–113. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sved J. A. Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1975 Apr;25(2):197–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tantawy A. O., El-Helw M. R. Studies on Natural Populations of Drosophila. IX. Some Fitness Components and Their Heritabilities in Natural and Mutant Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):79–91. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Turelli M. Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation-selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):165–195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wagner G. P. Multivariate mutation-selection balance with constrained pleiotropic effects. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):223–234. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zeng Z. B., Cockerham C. C. Mutation models and quantitative genetic variation. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):729–736. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES