Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Dec;138(4):1315–1322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1315

The Distribution of Mutation Effects on Viability in Drosophila Melanogaster

P D Keightley 1
PMCID: PMC1206267  PMID: 7896110

Abstract

Parameters of continuous distributions of effects and rates of spontaneous mutation for relative viability in Drosophila are estimated by maximum likelihood from data of two published experiments on accumulation of mutations on protected second chromosomes. A model of equal mutant effects gives a poor fit to the data of the two experiments; higher likelihoods are obtained with leptokurtic distributions or for models in which there is more than one class of mutation effect. Minimum estimates of mutation rates (events per generation) at polygenes affecting viability on chromosome 2 are 0.14 and 0.068, but estimates are strongly confounded with other parameters in the model. Separate information on rates of molecular divergence between Drosophila species and from rates of movement of transposable elements is used to infer the overall genomic mutation rate in Drosophila, and the viability data are analyzed with mutation rate as a known parameter. If, for example, a mutation rate for chromosome 2 of 0.4 is assumed, maximum likelihood estimates of mean mutant effect on relative viability are 0.4% and 1%, but the majority of mutations have very much smaller effects than these values as distributions are highly leptokurtic. The methodology is applied to estimate viability effects of single P element insertional mutations. The mean effect per insertion is found to be higher, and their distribution is found to be less leptokurtic than for spontaneous mutations. The equilibrium genetic variance of viability predicted by a mutation-selection balance model with parameters estimated from the mutation accumulation experiments is similar to laboratory estimates of genetic variance of viability from natural populations of Drosophila.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (816.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Eggleston W. B., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Engels W. R. P-M hybrid dysgenesis does not mobilize other transposable element families in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1988 Jan 28;331(6154):368–370. doi: 10.1038/331368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harada K., Yukuhiro K., Mukai T. Transposition rates of movable genetic elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(8):3248–3252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Houle D., Hoffmaster D. K., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):58–60. doi: 10.1038/359058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keightley P. D., Hill W. G. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet Res. 1988 Aug;52(1):33–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kidwell M. G., Kidwell J. F., Sved J. A. Hybrid Dysgenesis in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: A Syndrome of Aberrant Traits Including Mutation, Sterility and Male Recombination. Genetics. 1977 Aug;86(4):813–833. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.4.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kondrashov A. S., Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Langley C. H., Montgomery E., Hudson R., Kaplan N., Charlesworth B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 1988 Dec;52(3):223–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MUKAI T. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nuzhdin S. V., Mackay T. F. Direct determination of retrotransposon transposition rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1994 Apr;63(2):139–144. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rowan R. G., Hunt J. A. Rates of DNA change and phylogeny from the DNA sequences of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene for five closely related species of Hawaiian Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Jan;8(1):49–70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sved J. A. An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1971 Aug;18(1):97–105. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sved J. A. Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1975 Apr;25(2):197–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES