Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Feb;139(2):495–509. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.495

The Sep1 Mutant of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Arrests in Pachytene and Is Deficient in Meiotic Recombination

D X Tishkoff 1, B Rockmill 1, G S Roeder 1, R D Kolodner 1
PMCID: PMC1206362  PMID: 7713413

Abstract

Strand exchange protein 1 (Sep1) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae promotes homologous pairing of DNA in vitro and sep1 mutants display pleiotropic phenotypes in both vegetative and meiotic cells. In this study, we examined in detail the ability of the sep1 mutant to progress through meiosis I prophase and to undergo meiotic recombination. In meiotic return-to-growth experiments, commitment to meiotic recombination began at the same time in wild type and mutant; however, recombinants accumulated at decreased rates in the mutant. Gene conversion eventually reached nearly wild-type levels, whereas crossing over reached 15-50% of wild type. In an assay of intrachromosomal pop-out recombination, the sep1, dmc1 and rad51 single mutations had only small effects; however, pop-out recombination was virtually eliminated in the sep1 dmc1 and sep1 rad51 double mutants, providing evidence for multiple recombination pathways. Analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates indicates that the sep1 mutant is deficient in meiotic double-strand break repair. In a physical assay, the formation of mature reciprocal recombinants in the sep1 mutant was delayed relative to wild type and ultimately reached only 50% of the wild-type level. Electron microscopic analysis of meiotic nuclear spreads indicates that the sep1δ mutant arrests in pachytene, with apparently normal synaptonemal complex. This arrest is RAD9-independent. We hypothesize that the Sep1 protein participates directly in meiotic recombination and that other strand exchange enzymes, acting in parallel recombination pathways, are able to substitute partially for the absence of the Sep1 protein.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bishop D. K., Park D., Xu L., Kleckner N. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):439–456. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bähler J., Hagens G., Holzinger G., Scherthan H., Heyer W. D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells lacking the homologous pairing protein p175SEP1 arrest at pachytene during meiotic prophase. Chromosoma. 1994 Apr;103(2):129–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00352322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao L., Alani E., Kleckner N. A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1089–1101. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dresser M. E., Giroux C. N. Meiotic chromosome behavior in spread preparations of yeast. J Cell Biol. 1988 Mar;106(3):567–573. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dykstra C. C., Hamatake R. K., Sugino A. DNA strand transfer protein beta from yeast mitotic cells differs from strand transfer protein alpha from meiotic cells. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 5;265(19):10968–10973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dykstra C. C., Kitada K., Clark A. B., Hamatake R. K., Sugino A. Cloning and characterization of DST2, the gene for DNA strand transfer protein beta from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 May;11(5):2583–2592. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.5.2583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Esposito M. S., Brown J. T. Conditional hyporecombination mutants of three REC genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1990 Jan;17(1):7–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00313242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fishel R., Derbyshire M. K., Moore S. P., Young C. S. Biochemical studies of homologous and nonhomologous recombination in human cells. Biochimie. 1991 Feb-Mar;73(2-3):257–267. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90211-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Golin J. E., Esposito M. S. Evidence for joint genic control of spontaneous mutation and genetic recombination during mitosis in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jan 18;150(2):127–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00695392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Halbrook J., McEntee K. Purification and characterization of a DNA-pairing and strand transfer activity from mitotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15;264(35):21403–21412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall S. D., Kolodner R. D. Homologous pairing and strand exchange promoted by the Escherichia coli RecT protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3205–3209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heyer W. D., Evans D. H., Kolodner R. D. Renaturation of DNA by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that catalyzes homologous pairing and strand exchange. J Biol Chem. 1988 Oct 15;263(29):15189–15195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson A. W., Kolodner R. D. Strand exchange protein 1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A novel multifunctional protein that contains DNA strand exchange and exonuclease activities. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jul 25;266(21):14046–14054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kearsey S., Kipling D. Recombination and RNA processing: a common strand? Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;1(5):110–112. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90101-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim J., Ljungdahl P. O., Fink G. R. kem mutations affect nuclear fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):799–812. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Klapholz S., Esposito R. E. Recombination and chromosome segregation during the single division meiosis in SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 diploids. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):589–611. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.3.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kleckner N., Padmore R., Bishop D. K. Meiotic chromosome metabolism: one view. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:729–743. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kolodner R., Evans D. H., Morrison P. T. Purification and characterization of an activity from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that catalyzes homologous pairing and strand exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5560–5564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kolodner R., Hall S. D., Luisi-DeLuca C. Homologous pairing proteins encoded by the Escherichia coli recE and recT genes. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Larimer F. W., Stevens A. Disruption of the gene XRN1, coding for a 5'----3' exoribonuclease, restricts yeast cell growth. Gene. 1990 Oct 30;95(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90417-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu Z., Gilbert W. The yeast KEM1 gene encodes a nuclease specific for G4 tetraplex DNA: implication of in vivo functions for this novel DNA structure. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):1083–1092. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90447-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore S. P., Fishel R. Purification and characterization of a protein from human cells which promotes homologous pairing of DNA. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 5;265(19):11108–11117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Hoekstra M. F., Heffron F. Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jun 5;207(3):527–541. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Padmore R., Cao L., Kleckner N. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Radding C. M. Helical interactions in homologous pairing and strand exchange driven by RecA protein. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 25;266(9):5355–5358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reenan R. A., Kolodner R. D. Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):975–985. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rockmill B., Roeder G. S. Meiosis in asynaptic yeast. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):563–574. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rose D., Holm C. Meiosis-specific arrest revealed in DNA topoisomerase II mutants. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;13(6):3445–3455. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sander M., Carter M., Huang S. M. Expression of Drosophila Rrp1 protein in Escherichia coli. Enzymatic and physical characterization of the intact protein and a carboxyl-terminally deleted exonuclease-deficient mutant. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 25;268(3):2075–2082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shinohara A., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell. 1992 May 1;69(3):457–470. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90447-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith G. R. Homologous recombination in procaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1988 Mar;52(1):1–28. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.1.1-28.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sugawara N., Haber J. E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):563–575. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sym M., Engebrecht J. A., Roeder G. S. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):365–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tishkoff D. X., Johnson A. W., Kolodner R. D. Molecular and genetic analysis of the gene encoding the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strand exchange protein Sep1. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 May;11(5):2593–2608. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.5.2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weber L., Byers B. A RAD9-dependent checkpoint blocks meiosis of cdc13 yeast cells. Genetics. 1992 May;131(1):55–63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. West S. C. Enzymes and molecular mechanisms of genetic recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:603–640. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES