Abstract
We have conducted genetic analyses of 12 long-term selection lines of Drosophila melanogaster derived from a highly inbred base population, containing new mutations affecting abdominal and sternopleural bristle number. Biometric analysis of the number of effective factors differentiating the selected lines from the base inbred indicated that with the exception of the three lines selected for increased number of abdominal bristles, three or more mutations contributed to the responses of the selection lines. Analysis of the chromosomal distribution of effects revealed that mutations affecting abdominal bristle number occurred on all three major chromosomes. In addition, Y-linked mutations with effects ranging from one to three bristles occurred in all three lines selected for decreased number of abdominal bristles, as well as in one line selected for increased abdominal bristle number. Mutations affecting sternopleural bristle number were mainly on the X and third chromosomes. One abdominal and one sternopleural selection line showed evidence of a segregating lethal with large effects on bristle number. As an indirect test for allelism of mutations occurring in different selection lines, the three lines selected in the same direction for the same trait were crossed in all possible combinations, and selection continued from the F(2) hybrids. Responses of the hybrid lines usually did not exceed those of the most extreme parental lines, indicating that the responses of the parental lines may have been partly due to mutations at the same loci, although other interpretations are possible.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barton N. H. Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):773–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caballero A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):89–102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockerham C. C., Tachida H. Evolution and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation by mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6205–6209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham R., Briscoe D. A., Nurthen R. K. Unequal crossing over at the rRNA locus as a source of quantitative genetic variation. Nature. 1978 Mar 2;272(5648):80–81. doi: 10.1038/272080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham R., Briscoe D. A., Nurthen R. K. Unequal crossing over at the rRNA tandon as a source of quantitative genetic variation in Drosophila. Genetics. 1980 Jul;95(3):727–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillings M. R., Frankham R., Speirs J., Whalley M. X-Y Exchange and the Coevolution of the X and Y Rdna Arrays in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):241–251. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S., Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):603–618. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):541–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López M. A., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Response to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):107–116. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López M. A., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of mutant effects on the trait and fitness. Genet Res. 1993 Apr;61(2):117–126. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay T. F., Fry J. D., Lyman R. F., Nuzhdin S. V. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):937–951. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay T. F., Lyman R. F., Jackson M. S. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Feb;130(2):315–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maddern R. H. Exchange between the ribosomal RNA genes of X and Y chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster males. Genet Res. 1981 Aug;38(1):1–7. doi: 10.1017/s001667230002036x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago E., Albornoz J., Domínguez A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The distribution of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):771–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Z. B., Houle D., Cockerham C. C. How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):235–247. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]