Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 May;140(1):47–54. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.47

Genetic and Physical Interactions between Yeast Rgr1 and Sin4 in Chromatin Organization and Transcriptional Regulation

Y W Jiang 1, P R Dohrmann 1, D J Stillman 1
PMCID: PMC1206570  PMID: 7635307

Abstract

The SIN4 and RGR1 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were identified by mutations in quite different genetic screens. We have shown that the SIN4 gene product is required for proper transcriptional regulation of many genes and that a sin4 mutation can affect either activation or repression of specific genes. We have suggested that this dual nature of SIN4 in transcriptional regulation is due to its involvement in chromatin organization. We now report that the role of RGR1 in gene regulation is similar to that of SIN4. SIN4 and RGR1 both function as negative transcriptional regulators of HO and IME1, and mutations in either gene lead to decreased expression of other genes including CTS1. Strains with sin4 or rgr1 mutations both have phenotypes similar to those caused by histone mutations, including suppression of {delta small} insertion into promoters (Spt- phenotype), activation of promoters lacking UAS elements, and decreased superhelical density of plasmid DNA molecules. Overexpression of RGR1 suppresses the temperature sensitivity due to a sin4 mutation. Finally, we use yeast strains expressing GST fusion proteins to demonstrate that the Sin4p and Rgr1p proteins are physically associated in vivo. These results indicate that Sin4p and Rgr1p act together in vivo to organize chromatin structure and thus regulate transcription.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brazas R. M., Stillman D. J. Identification and purification of a protein that binds DNA cooperatively with the yeast SWI5 protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5524–5537. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeden L., Nasmyth K. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell. 1987 Feb 13;48(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cairns B. R., Kim Y. J., Sayre M. H., Laurent B. C., Kornberg R. D. A multisubunit complex containing the SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1950–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen S., West R. W., Jr, Johnson S. L., Gans H., Kruger B., Ma J. TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;13(2):831–840. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark-Adams C. D., Norris D., Osley M. A., Fassler J. S., Winston F. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1988 Feb;2(2):150–159. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.2.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collart M. A., Struhl K. NOT1(CDC39), NOT2(CDC36), NOT3, and NOT4 encode a global-negative regulator of transcription that differentially affects TATA-element utilization. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 1;8(5):525–537. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.5.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Covitz P. A., Song W., Mitchell A. P. Requirement for RGR1 and SIN4 in RME1-dependent repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):577–586. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis J. L., Kunisawa R., Thorner J. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1879–1892. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Denis C. L., Malvar T. The CCR4 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for both nonfermentative and spt-mediated gene expression. Genetics. 1990 Feb;124(2):283–291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.2.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devlin C., Tice-Baldwin K., Shore D., Arndt K. T. RAP1 is required for BAS1/BAS2- and GCN4-dependent transcription of the yeast HIS4 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3642–3651. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dohrmann P. R., Butler G., Tamai K., Dorland S., Greene J. R., Thiele D. J., Stillman D. J. Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):93–104. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drysdale M. R., Kolze S. E., Kelly J. M. The Aspergillus niger carbon catabolite repressor encoding gene, creA. Gene. 1993 Aug 25;130(2):241–245. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90425-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fassler J. S., Winston F. Isolation and analysis of a novel class of suppressor of Ty insertion mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):203–212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Field J., Nikawa J., Broek D., MacDonald B., Rodgers L., Wilson I. A., Lerner R. A., Wigler M. Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of an epitope addition method. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 May;8(5):2159–2165. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.5.2159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Han M., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;12(10):4503–4514. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang Y. W., Stillman D. J. Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):103–114. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Malone E. A., Clark C. D., Chiang A., Winston F. Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5710–5717. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Myers A. M., Tzagoloff A., Kinney D. M., Lusty C. J. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene. 1986;45(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nasmyth K. Regulating the HO endonuclease in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Apr;3(2):286–294. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90036-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nasmyth K., Stillman D., Kipling D. Both positive and negative regulators of HO transcription are required for mother-cell-specific mating-type switching in yeast. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):579–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neigeborn L., Celenza J. L., Carlson M. SSN20 is an essential gene with mutant alleles that suppress defects in SUC2 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;7(2):672–678. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.2.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Park H. O., Chant J., Herskowitz I. BUD2 encodes a GTPase-activating protein for Bud1/Rsr1 necessary for proper bud-site selection in yeast. Nature. 1993 Sep 16;365(6443):269–274. doi: 10.1038/365269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peterson C. L., Dingwall A., Scott M. P. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2905–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Prelich G., Winston F. Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):665–676. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakai A., Shimizu Y., Hishinuma F. Isolation and characterization of mutants which show an oversecretion phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Jul;119(3):499–506. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sternberg P. W., Stern M. J., Clark I., Herskowitz I. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stillman D. J., Dorland S., Yu Y. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):781–788. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sulston J., Du Z., Thomas K., Wilson R., Hillier L., Staden R., Halloran N., Green P., Thierry-Mieg J., Qiu L. The C. elegans genome sequencing project: a beginning. Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):37–41. doi: 10.1038/356037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Swanson M. S., Winston F. SPT4, SPT5 and SPT6 interactions: effects on transcription and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):325–336. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams F. E., Varanasi U., Trumbly R. J. The CYC8 and TUP1 proteins involved in glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated in a protein complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3307–3316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Winston F., Chaleff D. T., Valent B., Fink G. R. Mutations affecting Ty-mediated expression of the HIS4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1984 Jun;107(2):179–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yamashita I. Isolation and characterization of the SUD1 gene, which encodes a global repressor of core promoter activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Dec;241(5-6):616–626. doi: 10.1007/BF00279904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES