Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Jun;140(2):821–841. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.821

Linkage and the Limits to Natural Selection

N H Barton 1
PMCID: PMC1206655  PMID: 7498757

Abstract

The probability of fixation of a favorable mutation is reduced if selection at other loci causes inherited variation in fitness. A general method for calculating the fixation probability of an allele that can find itself in a variety of genetic backgrounds is applied to find the effect of substitutions, fluctuating polymorphisms, and deleterious mutations in a large population. With loose linkage, r, the effects depend on the additive genetic variance in relative fitness, var (W), and act by reducing effective population size by (N/N(e)) = 1 + var (W)/2r(2). However, tightly linked loci can have a substantial effect not predictable from N(e). Linked deleterious mutations reduce the fixation probability of weakly favored alleles by exp(-2U/R), where U is the total mutation rate and R is the map length in Morgans. Substitutions can cause a greater reduction: an allele with advantage s < s(crit) = (π(2)/6) log(e) (S/s)[var(W)/R] is very unlikely to be fixed. (S is the advantage of the substitution impeding fixation.) Fluctuating polymorphisms at many (n) linked loci can also have a substantial effect, reducing fixation probability by exp [ &2Kn var(W)/R] [K = -1/E((u - u)(2)/uv) depending on the frequencies (u,v) at the selected polymorphisms]. Hitchhiking due to all three kinds of selection may substantially impede adaptation that depends on weakly favored alleles.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. The probability of establishment of an advantageous mutant in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1987 Aug;50(1):35–40. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300023314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birky C. W., Jr, Walsh J. B. Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6414–6418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulmer M. Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):728–730. doi: 10.1038/325728a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897–907. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B. Genetic recombination. Patterns in the genome. Curr Biol. 1994 Feb 1;4(2):182–184. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(94)00045-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean A. M., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Fitness effects of amino acid replacements in the beta-galactosidase of Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):469–485. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis N., Taylor A., Bengtsson B. O., Kidd J., Rogers J., Goodfellow P. Population structure of the human pseudoautosomal boundary. Nature. 1990 Apr 12;344(6267):663–665. doi: 10.1038/344663a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566–3573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartl D. L., Dykhuizen D. E., Dean A. M. Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):655–674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Houle D., Hoffmaster D. K., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):58–60. doi: 10.1038/359058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Models of host-parasite interaction and MHC polymorphism. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):863–864. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kimura M. Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5773–5777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. King J. L., Jukes T. H. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):788–798. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3881.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kondrashov A. S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1988 Dec 1;336(6198):435–440. doi: 10.1038/336435a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lande R. The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity (Edinb) 1985 Jun;54(Pt 3):323–332. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1985.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maruyama T. On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1970 Apr;15(2):221–225. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300001543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Milkman R. D. Heterosis as a major cause of heterozygosity in nature. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):493–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nadeau J. H., Collins R. L. Does associative overdominance account for the extensive polymorphism of h-2-linked Loci. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):241–244. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nadeau J. H., Collins R. L., Klein J. Organization and evolution of the mammalian genome: I. Polymorphism of H-2 linked loci. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):583–598. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ohta T., Kimura M. The effect of selected linked locus on heterozygosity of neutral alleles (the hitch-hiking effect). Genet Res. 1975 Jun;25(3):313–326. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ota T. Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet Res. 1971 Dec;18(3):277–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peck J. R. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1994 Jun;137(2):597–606. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.2.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Santiago E., Caballero A. Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1013–1030. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sawyer S. A., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6225–6228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith J. M. "Haldane's dilemma" and the rate of evolution. Nature. 1968 Sep 14;219(5159):1114–1116. doi: 10.1038/2191114a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sved J. A. An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1971 Aug;18(1):97–105. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sved J. A. Does natural selection increase or decrease variability at linked Loci. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):239–240. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sved J. A., Reed T. E., Bodmer W. F. The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained in a natural population. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):469–481. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tachida H., Iizuka M. Fixation probability in spatially changing environments. Genet Res. 1991 Dec;58(3):243–251. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Takahata N., Nei M. Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):967–978. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tautz D. Redundancies, development and the flow of information. Bioessays. 1992 Apr;14(4):263–266. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES