Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Aug;140(4):1319–1338. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1319

Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Drosophila Simulans: Dynamics and Parameter Estimates from Natural Populations

M Turelli 1, A A Hoffmann 1
PMCID: PMC1206697  PMID: 7498773

Abstract

In Drosophila simulans, cytoplasmically transmitted Wolbachia microbes cause reduced egg hatch when infected males mate with uninfected females. A Wolbachia infection and an associated mtDNA variant have spread northward through California since 1986. PCR assays show that Wolbachia infection is prevalent throughout the continental US and Central and South America, but some lines from Florida and Ecuador that are PCR-positive for Wolbachia do not cause incompatibility. We estimate from natural populations infection frequencies and the transmission and incompatibility parameter values that affect the spread of the infection. On average, infected females from nature produce 3-4% uninfected ova. Infected females with relatively low fidelity of maternal transmission show partial incompatibility with very young infected laboratory males. Nevertheless, crosses between infected flies in nature produce egg-hatch rates indistinguishable from those produced by crosses between uninfected individuals. Incompatible crosses in nature produce hatch rates 30-70% as high as those from compatible crosses. Wild-caught infected and uninfected females are equally fecund in the laboratory. Incompatibility decreases with male age, and age-specific incompatibility levels suggest that males mating in nature may often be 2 or 3 weeks old. Our parameter estimates accurately predict the frequency of Wolbachia infection in California populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyle L., O'Neill S. L., Robertson H. M., Karr T. L. Interspecific and intraspecific horizontal transfer of Wolbachia in Drosophila. Science. 1993 Jun 18;260(5115):1796–1799. doi: 10.1126/science.8511587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeuwer J. A., Stouthamer R., Barns S. M., Pelletier D. A., Weisburg W. G., Werren J. H. Phylogeny of cytoplasmic incompatibility micro-organisms in the parasitoid wasp genus Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. Insect Mol Biol. 1992;1(1):25–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breeuwer J. A., Werren J. H. Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):558–560. doi: 10.1038/346558a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bressac C., Rousset F. The reproductive incompatibility system in Drosophila simulans: DAPI-staining analysis of the Wolbachia symbionts in sperm cysts. J Invertebr Pathol. 1993 May;61(3):226–230. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1993.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. French W. L. Genetic and Phenogenetic Studies on the Dynamic Nature of the Cytoplasmic Inheritance System in CULEX PIPIENS. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):447–455. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffmann A. A., Clancy D. J., Merton E. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Australian populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):993–999. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M., Harshman L. G. Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):933–948. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffmann A. A., Turelli M. Unidirectional incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: inheritance, geographic variation and fitness effects. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):435–444. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Langley C. H., MacDonald J., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Lack of correlation between interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism at the suppressor of forked region in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 1;90(5):1800–1803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Montchamp-Moreau C., Ferveur J. F., Jacques M. Geographic distribution and inheritance of three cytoplasmic incompatibility types in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):399–407. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nigro L., Prout T. Is there selection on RFLP differences in mitochondrial DNA? Genetics. 1990 Jul;125(3):551–555. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.3.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rousset F., Vautrin D., Solignac M. Molecular identification of Wolbachia, the agent of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans, and variability in relation with host mitochondrial types. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Mar 23;247(1320):163–168. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Turelli M., Hoffmann A. A., McKechnie S. W. Dynamics of cytoplasmic incompatibility and mtDNA variation in natural Drosophila simulans populations. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):713–723. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Voelker R. A., Gibson W., Graves J. P., Sterling J. F., Eisenberg M. T. The Drosophila suppressor of sable gene encodes a polypeptide with regions similar to those of RNA-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):894–905. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wade M. J., Chang N. W. Increased male fertility in Tribolium confusum beetles after infection with the intracellular parasite Wolbachia. Nature. 1995 Jan 5;373(6509):72–74. doi: 10.1038/373072a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES