Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Jan;142(1):79–89. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.79

Effects of Homology, Size and Exchange on the Meiotic Segregation of Model Chromosomes in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

L O Ross 1, S Rankin 1, M F Shuster 1, D S Dawson 1
PMCID: PMC1206966  PMID: 8770586

Abstract

In most eukaryotic organisms, chiasmata, the connections formed between homologous chromosomes as a consequence of crossing over, are important for ensuring that the homologues move away from each other at meiosis I. Some organisms have the capacity to partition the rare homologues that have failed to experience reciprocal recombination. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is able to correctly partition achiasmate homologues with low fidelity by a mechanism that is largely unknown. It is possible to test which parameters affect the ability of achiasmate chromosomes to segregate by constructing strains that will have three achiasmate chromosomes at the time of meiosis. The meiotic partitioning of these chromosomes can be monitored to determine which ones segregate away from each other at meiosis I. This approach was used to test the influence of homologous yeast DNA sequences, recombination intiation sites, chromosome size and crossing over on the meiotic segregation of the model chromosomes. Chromosome size had no effect on achiasmate segregation. The influence of homologous yeast sequences on the segregation of noncrossover model chromosomes was negligible. In meioses in which two of the three model chromosomes experienced a crossover, they nearly always disjoined at meiosis I.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown P. A., Szostak J. W. Yeast vectors with negative selection. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:278–290. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke D. T., Carle G. F., Olson M. V. Cloning of large segments of exogenous DNA into yeast by means of artificial chromosome vectors. Science. 1987 May 15;236(4803):806–812. doi: 10.1126/science.3033825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fogel S., Mortimer R., Lusnak K., Tavares F. Meiotic gene conversion: a signal of the basic recombination event in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1325–1341. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldway M., Arbel T., Simchen G. Meiotic nondisjunction and recombination of chromosome III and homologous fragments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):149–158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldway M., Sherman A., Zenvirth D., Arbel T., Simchen G. A short chromosomal region with major roles in yeast chromosome III meiotic disjunction, recombination and double strand breaks. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):159–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guacci V., Kaback D. B. Distributive disjunction of authentic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):475–488. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawley R. S., Irick H., Zitron A. E., Haddox D. A., Lohe A., New C., Whitley M. D., Arbel T., Jang J., McKim K. There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females, one of which requires heterochromatic homology. Dev Genet. 1992;13(6):440–467. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020130608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hawley R. S., Theurkauf W. E. Requiem for distributive segregation: achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females. Trends Genet. 1993 Sep;9(9):310–317. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90249-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaback D. B., Guacci V., Barber D., Mahon J. W. Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):228–232. doi: 10.1126/science.1566070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loidl J., Scherthan H., Kaback D. B. Physical association between nonhomologous chromosomes precedes distributive disjunction in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):331–334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Louis E. J., Haber J. E. Nonrecombinant meiosis I nondisjunction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by tRNA ochre suppressors. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):81–95. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mann C., Davis R. W. Meiotic disjunction of circular minichromosomes in yeast does not require DNA homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(16):6017–6019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.6017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray A. W., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Chromosome length controls mitotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):529–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray A. W., Szostak J. W. Pedigree analysis of plasmid segregation in yeast. Cell. 1983 Oct;34(3):961–970. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90553-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicolas A., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35–39. doi: 10.1038/338035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Tousa J. Meiotic chromosome behavior influenced by mutation-altered disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):503–524. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ross L. O., Treco D., Nicolas A., Szostak J. W., Dawson D. Meiotic recombination on artificial chromosomes in yeast. Genetics. 1992 Jul;131(3):541–550. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sears D. D., Hegemann J. H., Hieter P. Meiotic recombination and segregation of human-derived artificial chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5296–5300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sears D. D., Hegemann J. H., Shero J. H., Hieter P. Cis-acting determinants affecting centromere function, sister-chromatid cohesion and reciprocal recombination during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1159–1173. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sears D. D., Hieter P., Simchen G. An implanted recombination hot spot stimulates recombination and enhances sister chromatid cohesion of heterologous YACs during yeast meiosis. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1055–1065. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Surosky R. T., Tye B. K. Meiotic disjunction of homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directed by pairing and recombination of the chromosome arms but not by pairing of the centromeres. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):273–287. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zenvirth D., Arbel T., Sherman A., Goldway M., Klein S., Simchen G. Multiple sites for double-strand breaks in whole meiotic chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3441–3447. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05423.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang P., Hawley R. S. The genetic analysis of distributive segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Further genetic analysis of the nod locus. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):115–127. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES