Abstract
This study presents a mathematical model that allows for some offspring to be dispersed at random, while others stay close to their mothers. A single genetic locus is assumed to control fertility, and this locus is subject to the occurrence of deleterious mutations. It is shown that, at equilibrium, the frequency of deleterious mutations in the population is inversely related to the rate of dispersal. This is because dispersal of offspring leads to enhanced competition among adults. The results also show that sexual reproduction can lead to a decrease in the equilibrium frequency of deleterious mutations. The reason for this relationship is that sex involves the dispersal of genetic material, and thus, like the dispersal of offspring, sex enhances competition among adults. The model is described using the example of a hermaphroditic plant population. However, the results should apply to animal populations as well.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (883.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566–3573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KIMURA M., MARUYAMA T., CROW J. F. THE MUTATION LOAD IN SMALL POPULATIONS. Genetics. 1963 Oct;48:1303–1312. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.10.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keightley P. D. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1315–1322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Jenkins C. D. Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature. 1989 May 25;339(6222):300–301. doi: 10.1038/339300a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondrashov A. S. Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? J Theor Biol. 1995 Aug 21;175(4):583–594. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch M., Bürger R., Butcher D., Gabriel W. The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J Hered. 1993 Sep-Oct;84(5):339–344. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michod R. E. Genetic error, sex, and diploidy. J Hered. 1993 Sep-Oct;84(5):360–371. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STEBBINS G. L. Longevity, habitat. and release of genetic variability in the higher plants. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:365–378. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]