Abstract
The selection intensity for codon bias and the synonymous diversity have been used in the recent literature to estimate the effective population size of Escherichia coli. The results have varied between 10(5) and 10(8). It is suggested here that most of this disparity can be explained by a model that accounts for the population structure of the species. Thus it is assumed that weakly selected characters, like synonymous substitutions, are selectively fixed within individual lines or colonies but spread throughout the population in an essentially neutral way when colonies replace one another. In this way, the effective population size that enters expressions for the codon bias will be that of an individual colony, which, if hitchhiking effects are considered, can be a very small number. The effective population size that appears together with the mutation rate in expressions for the synonymous diversity, on the other hand, will be related to the total number of colonies that make up the species and can be a very large number.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (442.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berg O. G. Periodic selection and hitchhiking in a bacterial population. J Theor Biol. 1995 Apr 7;173(3):307–320. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg O. G. The evolutionary selection of DNA base pairs in gene-regulatory binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7501–7505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guttman D. S., Dykhuizen D. E. Detecting selective sweeps in naturally occurring Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):993–1003. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartl D. L., Dykhuizen D. E. The population genetics of Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:31–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.18.120184.000335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartl D. L., Moriyama E. N., Sawyer S. A. Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):227–234. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helling R. B., Vargas C. N., Adams J. Evolution of Escherichia coli during growth in a constant environment. Genetics. 1987 Jul;116(3):349–358. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.3.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenski R. E. Assessing the genetic structure of microbial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4334–4336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levin B. R. Periodic selection, infectious gene exchange and the genetic structure of E. coli populations. Genetics. 1981 Sep;99(1):1–23. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maruyama T., Kimura M. Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6710–6714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]