Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 May;143(1):407–416. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.407

Dominance of Insecticide Resistance Presents a Plastic Response

D Bourguet 1, M Prout 1, M Raymond 1
PMCID: PMC1207273  PMID: 8722792

Abstract

Dominance level of insecticide resistance provided by one major gene (an insensitive acetylcholinesterase) in the mosquito Culex pipiens was studied in two distinct environments. Dominance level was found to be very different between environments, varying from almost complete dominance to almost recessive when either propoxur (a carbamate insecticide) or chlorpyrifos (an organophosphorus insecticide) was used. To better understand this plastic response, three environmental parameters were manipulated and their interactions studied. For chlorpyrifos, each parameter had a small effect, but when all parameters were changed, the dominance level was greatly affected. For propoxur, one environmental parameter had a large effect by itself. It was further studied to understand the causal relationship of this plasticity. Recessivity of resistance was associated with more demanding environments. These results are discussed in the context of the various theories of the evolution of dominance. It appears that dominance of insecticide resistance cannot be directly predicted by Wright's physiological theory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (873.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cornish-Bowden A. Dominance is not inevitable. J Theor Biol. 1987 Apr 7;125(3):333–338. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Georghiou G. P., Metcalf R. L., Gidden F. E. Carbamate-resistance in mosquitos. Selection of Culex pipiens fatigans Wiedemann (=C. quinquefasciatus Say) for resistance to Baygon. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;35(5):691–708. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Georghiou G. P. Parasitological review. Genetics of resistance to insecticides in houseflies and mosquitoes. Exp Parasitol. 1969 Oct;26(2):224–255. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(69)90116-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Georghiou G. P., Taylor C. E. Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. J Econ Entomol. 1977 Jun 15;70(3):319–323. doi: 10.1093/jee/70.3.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday W. R., Georghiou G. P. Cross-resistance and dominance relationships of pyrethroids in a permethrin-selected strain of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Econ Entomol. 1985 Dec;78(6):1227–1232. doi: 10.1093/jee/78.6.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffmann F., Fournier D., Spierer P. Minigene rescues acetylcholinesterase lethal mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jan 5;223(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90710-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keightley P. D., Kacser H. Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure. Genetics. 1987 Oct;117(2):319–329. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Plapp F. W., Jr, Tripathi R. K. Biochemical genetics of altered acetylcholinesterase resistance to insecticides in the house fly. Biochem Genet. 1978 Feb;16(1-2):1–11. doi: 10.1007/BF00484380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raymond M., Fournier D., Bride J. M., Cuany A., Berge J., Magnin M., Pasteur N. Identification of resistance mechanisms in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) from southern France: insensitive acetylcholinesterase and detoxifying oxidases. J Econ Entomol. 1986 Dec;79(6):1452–1458. doi: 10.1093/jee/79.6.1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Raymond M., Heckel D. G., Scott J. G. Interactions between pesticide genes: model and experiment. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):543–551. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roush R. T., McKenzie J. A. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annu Rev Entomol. 1987;32:361–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.002045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smissaert H. R., el Hamid F. M., Overmeer W. P. The minimum acetylcholinesterase (AChE) fraction compatible with life derived by aid of a simple model explaining the degree of dominance of resistance to inhibitors in AChE "mutants". Biochem Pharmacol. 1975 May 1;24(9):1043–1047. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(75)90443-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stone B. F., Wilson J. T., Youlton N. J. Linkage and dominance characteristics of genes for resistance to organophosphorus acaricides and allelic inheritance of decreased brain cholinesterase activity in three strains of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Aust J Biol Sci. 1976 Jul;29(3):251–263. doi: 10.1071/bi9760251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Takahashi M., Yasutomi K. Insecticidal resistance of Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Japan: genetics and mechanisms of resistance to organophosphorus insecticides. J Med Entomol. 1987 Nov;24(6):595–603. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/24.6.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tate L. G., Plapp F. W., Hodgson E. Genetics of cytochrome P450 in two insecticide-resistant strains of the housefly, Musca domestica L. Biochem Genet. 1974 Jan;11(1):49–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00486619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES