Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 May;143(1):537–548. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.537

Patterns of Nucleotide Substitution in Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes of Vertebrates

S Kumar 1
PMCID: PMC1207285  PMID: 8722802

Abstract

Maximum likelihood methods were used to study the differences in substitution rates among the four nucleotides and among different nucleotide sites in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of vertebrates. In the 1st+2nd codon position data, the frequency of nucleotide G is negatively correlated with evolutionary rates of genes, substitution rates vary substantially among sites, and the transition/transversion rate bias (R) is two to five times larger than that expected at random. Generally, largest transition biases and greatest differences in substitution rates among sites are found in the highly conserved genes. The 3rd positions in placental mammal genes exhibit strong nucleotide composition biases and the transitional rates exceed transversional rates by one to two orders of magnitude. Tamura-Nei and Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano models with gamma distributed variable rates among sites (gamma parameter, α) adequately describe the nucleotide substitution process in 1st+2nd position data. In these data, ignoring differences in substitution rates among sites leads to largest biases while estimating substitution rates. Kimura's two-parameter model with variable-rates among sites performs satisfactorily in likelihood estimation of R, α, and overall amount of evolution for 1st+2nd position data. It can also be used to estimate pairwise distances with appropriate values of α for a majority of genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson S., de Bruijn M. H., Coulson A. R., Eperon I. C., Sanger F., Young I. G. Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA. Conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 25;156(4):683–717. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnason U., Gullberg A. Comparison between the complete mtDNA sequences of the blue and the fin whale, two species that can hybridize in nature. J Mol Evol. 1993 Oct;37(4):312–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00178861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnason U., Gullberg A., Widegren B. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus. J Mol Evol. 1991 Dec;33(6):556–568. doi: 10.1007/BF02102808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bibb M. J., Van Etten R. A., Wright C. T., Walberg M. W., Clayton D. A. Sequence and gene organization of mouse mitochondrial DNA. Cell. 1981 Oct;26(2 Pt 2):167–180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90300-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W. M., Prager E. M., Wang A., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J Mol Evol. 1982;18(4):225–239. doi: 10.1007/BF01734101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang Y. S., Huang F. L., Lo T. B. The complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of carp (Cyprinus carpio) mitochondrial genome. J Mol Evol. 1994 Feb;38(2):138–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00166161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 20;212(4):599–634. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90225-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Esposti M. D., De Vries S., Crimi M., Ghelli A., Patarnello T., Meyer A. Mitochondrial cytochrome b: evolution and structure of the protein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Jul 26;1143(3):243–271. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90197-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gadaleta G., Pepe G., De Candia G., Quagliariello C., Sbisà E., Saccone C. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Rattus norvegicus mitochondrial genome: cryptic signals revealed by comparative analysis between vertebrates. J Mol Evol. 1989 Jun;28(6):497–516. doi: 10.1007/BF02602930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Golding G. B. Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: an examination of some assumptions. Mol Biol Evol. 1983 Dec;1(1):125–142. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldman N. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J Mol Evol. 1993 Feb;36(2):182–198. doi: 10.1007/BF00166252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasegawa M., Kishino H. Heterogeneity of tempo and mode of mitochondrial DNA evolution among mammalian orders. Jpn J Genet. 1989 Aug;64(4):243–258. doi: 10.1266/jjg.64.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Higgins D. G., Bleasby A. J., Fuchs R. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Apr;8(2):189–191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Honeycutt R. L., Nedbal M. A., Adkins R. M., Janecek L. L. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA evolution: a comparison of the cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase II genes. J Mol Evol. 1995 Mar;40(3):260–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00163231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horai S., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Tsugane K., Takahata N. Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):532–536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.2.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128–144. doi: 10.1007/BF02515385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janke A., Feldmaier-Fuchs G., Thomas W. K., von Haeseler A., Päbo S. The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):243–256. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Converting distance to time: application to human evolution. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:550–570. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)83036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S., Tamura K., Nei M. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Apr;10(2):189–191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lynch M., Jarrell P. E. A method for calibrating molecular clocks and its application to animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1197–1208. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Navidi W. C., Churchill G. A., von Haeseler A. Methods for inferring phylogenies from nucleic acid sequence data by using maximum likelihood and linear invariants. Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Jan;8(1):128–143. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nei M. Age of the common ancestor of human mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Nov;9(6):1176–1178. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roe B. A., Ma D. P., Wilson R. K., Wong J. F. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. J Biol Chem. 1985 Aug 15;260(17):9759–9774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rzhetsky A., Nei M. Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jan;12(1):131–151. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Saccone C., Lanave C., Pesole G., Preparata G. Influence of base composition on quantitative estimates of gene evolution. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:570–583. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)83037-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamura K. Model selection in the estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jan;11(1):154–157. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tateno Y., Takezaki N., Nei M. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Mar;11(2):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tzeng C. S., Hui C. F., Shen S. C., Huang P. C. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Crossostoma lacustre mitochondrial genome: conservation and variations among vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 25;20(18):4853–4858. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.18.4853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vigilant L., Stoneking M., Harpending H., Hawkes K., Wilson A. C. African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1991 Sep 27;253(5027):1503–1507. doi: 10.1126/science.1840702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wakeley J. Substitution rate variation among sites in hypervariable region 1 of human mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1993 Dec;37(6):613–623. doi: 10.1007/BF00182747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):306–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00160154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang Z., Roberts D. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):451–458. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES