Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Jun;143(2):645–659. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.645

A Search for a General Phenomenon of Adaptive Mutability

T Galitski 1, J R Roth 1
PMCID: PMC1207326  PMID: 8725216

Abstract

The most prominent systems for the study of adaptive mutability depend on the specialized activities of genetic elements like bacteriophage Mu and the F plasmid. Searching for general adaptive mutability, we have investigated the behavior of Salmonella typhimurium strains with chromosomal lacZ mutations. We have studied 30 revertible nonsense, missense, frameshift, and insertion alleles. One-third of the mutants produced >=10 late revertant colonies (appearing three to seven days after plating on selective medium). For the prolific mutants, the number of late revertants showed rank correlation with the residual β-galactosidase activity; for the same mutants, revertant number showed no correlation with the nonselective reversion rate (from fluctuation tests). Leaky mutants, which grew slowly on selective medium, produced late revertants whereas tight nongrowing mutants generally did not produce late revertants. However, the number of late revertants was not proportional to residual growth. Using total residual growth and the nonselective reversion rate, the expected number of late revertants was calculated. For several leaky mutants, the observed revertant number exceeded the expected number. We suggest that excess late revertants from these mutants arise from general adaptive mutability available to any chromosomal gene.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames B. N., Whitfield H. J., Jr Frameshift mutagenesis in Salmonella. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:221–225. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz D., Hushon J. M., Whitfield H. J., Jr, Roth J., Ames B. N. Procedure for identifying nonsense mutations. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jul;96(1):215–220. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.1.215-220.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brammar W. J., Berger H., Yanofsky C. Altered amino acid sequences produced by reversion of frameshift mutants of tryptophan synthetase A gene of E. coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Oct;58(4):1499–1506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.4.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridges B. A. Sexual potency and adaptive mutation in bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 1995 Aug;3(8):291–294. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)88952-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bridges B. A. mutY 'directs' mutation? Nature. 1995 Jun 29;375(6534):741–741. doi: 10.1038/375741a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns J., Foster P. L. Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1991 Aug;128(4):695–701. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.4.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cairns J., Overbaugh J., Miller S. The origin of mutants. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):142–145. doi: 10.1038/335142a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaconas G., de Bruijn F. J., Casadaban M. J., Lupski J. R., Kwoh T. J., Harshey R. M., DuBow M. S., Bukhari A. I. In vitro and in vivo manipulations of bacteriophage Mu DNA: cloning of Mu ends and construction of mini-Mu's carrying selectable markers. Gene. 1981 Jan-Feb;13(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90041-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cupples C. G., Cabrera M., Cruz C., Miller J. H. A set of lacZ mutations in Escherichia coli that allow rapid detection of specific frameshift mutations. Genetics. 1990 Jun;125(2):275–280. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cupples C. G., Miller J. H. A set of lacZ mutations in Escherichia coli that allow rapid detection of each of the six base substitutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5345–5349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Datta A., Jinks-Robertson S. Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast. Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1616–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.7777859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis B. D. Transcriptional bias: a non-Lamarckian mechanism for substrate-induced mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(13):5005–5009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Foster P. L. Adaptive mutation: the uses of adversity. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:467–504. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.002343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Foster P. L., Cairns J. The occurrence of heritable Mu excisions in starving cells of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1994 Nov 1;13(21):5240–5244. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06855.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foster P. L. Directed mutation: between unicorns and goats. J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(6):1711–1716. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.6.1711-1716.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Foster P. L., Trimarchi J. M. Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5487–5490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gutnick D., Calvo J. M., Klopotowski T., Ames B. N. Compounds which serve as the sole source of carbon or nitrogen for Salmonella typhimurium LT-2. J Bacteriol. 1969 Oct;100(1):215–219. doi: 10.1128/jb.100.1.215-219.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall B. G. Selection-induced mutations. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Dec;2(6):943–946. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80120-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall B. G. Spectrum of mutations that occur under selective and non-selective conditions in E. coli. Genetica. 1991;84(2):73–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00116545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall B. G. Spontaneous point mutations that occur more often when advantageous than when neutral. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris R. S., Longerich S., Rosenberg S. M. Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science. 1994 Apr 8;264(5156):258–260. doi: 10.1126/science.8146657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kleckner N., Bender J., Gottesman S. Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:139–180. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04009-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kleckner N., Steele D. A., Reichardt K., Botstein D. Specificity of insertion by the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1023–1040. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. LEDERBERG J., LEDERBERG E. M. Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. J Bacteriol. 1952 Mar;63(3):399–406. doi: 10.1128/jb.63.3.399-406.1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Langridge J., Campbell J. H. Classification and intragenic position of mutations in the beta-galactosidase gene of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1969;103(4):339–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00383484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lenski R. E., Mittler J. E. The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):188–194. doi: 10.1126/science.7678468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lenski R. E., Slatkin M., Ayala F. J. Mutation and selection in bacterial populations: alternatives to the hypothesis of directed mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2775–2778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lenski R. E., Sniegowski P. D. "Adaptive mutation": the debate goes on. Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):285–288. doi: 10.1126/science.7618089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maenhaut-Michel G., Shapiro J. A. The roles of starvation and selective substrates in the emergence of araB-lacZ fusion clones. EMBO J. 1994 Nov 1;13(21):5229–5239. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peters J. E., Benson S. A. Redundant transfer of F' plasmids occurs between Escherichia coli cells during nonlethal selections. J Bacteriol. 1995 Feb;177(3):847–850. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.3.847-850.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Prival M. J., Cebula T. A. Sequence analysis of mutations arising during prolonged starvation of Salmonella typhimurium. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):303–310. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Radicella J. P., Park P. U., Fox M. S. Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli: a role for conjugation. Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):418–420. doi: 10.1126/science.7716545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Riddle D. L., Roth J. R. Suppressors of frameshift mutations in Salmonella typhimurium. J Mol Biol. 1970 Nov 28;54(1):131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rosenberg S. M., Harris R. S., Torkelson J. Molecular handles on adaptive mutation. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Oct;18(2):185–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_18020185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosenberg S. M. In pursuit of a molecular mechanism for adaptive mutation. Genome. 1994 Dec;37(6):893–899. doi: 10.1139/g94-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roth J. R. UGA nonsense mutations in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1970 May;102(2):467–475. doi: 10.1128/jb.102.2.467-475.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmieger H. A method for detection of phage mutants with altered transducing ability. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;110(4):378–381. doi: 10.1007/BF00438281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shapiro J. A. Adaptive mutation: who's really in the garden? Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):373–374. doi: 10.1126/science.7716540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shapiro J. A., Leach D. Action of a transposable element in coding sequence fusions. Genetics. 1990 Oct;126(2):293–299. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.2.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shapiro J. A. Observations on the formation of clones containing araB-lacZ cistron fusions. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;194(1-2):79–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00383501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shapiro J. A. Response. Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):286–288. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stahl F. W. Bacterial genetics. A unicorn in the garden. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):112–113. doi: 10.1038/335112a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Symonds N. Directed mutation: a current perspective. J Theor Biol. 1994 Aug 21;169(4):317–322. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tlsty T. D., Albertini A. M., Miller J. H. Gene amplification in the lac region of E. coli. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):217–224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90317-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Way J. C., Davis M. A., Morisato D., Roberts D. E., Kleckner N. New Tn10 derivatives for transposon mutagenesis and for construction of lacZ operon fusions by transposition. Gene. 1984 Dec;32(3):369–379. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Whitfield H. J., Jr, Martin R. G., Ames B. N. Classification of aminotransferase (C gene) mutants in the histidine operon. J Mol Biol. 1966 Nov 14;21(2):335–355. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90103-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wing J. P., Levine M., Smith H. O. Recombination-deficient mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1968 May;95(5):1828–1834. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1828-1834.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES