Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Aug;143(4):1819–1829. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1819

Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Rare Binary Traits under Different Modes of Inheritance

G Thaller 1, L Dempfle 1, I Hoeschele 1
PMCID: PMC1207442  PMID: 8844167

Abstract

Maximum likelihood methodology was applied to determine the mode of inheritance of rare binary traits with data structures typical for swine populations. The genetic models considered included a monogenic, a digenic, a polygenic, and three mixed polygenic and major gene models. The main emphasis was on the detection of major genes acting on a polygenic background. Deterministic algorithms were employed to integrate and maximize likelihoods. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate model selection and parameter estimation. Three designs were simulated that differed in the number of sires/number of dams within sires (10/10, 30/30, 100/30). Major gene effects of at least one SD of the liability were detected with satisfactory power under the mixed model of inheritance, except for the smallest design. Parameter estimates were empirically unbiased with acceptable standard errors, except for the smallest design, and allowed to distinguish clearly between the genetic models. Distributions of the likelihood ratio statistic were evaluated empirically, because asymptotic theory did not hold. For each simulation model, the Average Information Criterion was computed for all models of analysis. The model with the smallest value was chosen as the best model and was equal to the true model in almost every case studied.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elston R. C., Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1971;21(6):523–542. doi: 10.1159/000152448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo S. W., Thompson E. A. A Monte Carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Nov;51(5):1111–1126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hartl D. L., Maruyama T. Phenogram enumeration: the number of regular genotype-phenotype correspondences in genetic systems. J Theor Biol. 1968 Aug;20(2):129–163. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(68)90186-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knott S. A., Haley C. S. Maximum likelihood mapping of quantitative trait loci using full-sib families. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1211–1222. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knott S. A., Haley C. S., Thompson R. Methods of segregation analysis for animal breeding data: parameter estimates. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Apr;68(Pt 4):313–320. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping complex genetic traits in humans: new methods using a complete RFLP linkage map. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1986;51(Pt 1):49–62. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1986.051.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morton N. E., MacLean C. J. Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Jul;26(4):489–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES