ABSTRACT
Signaling pathways involving NF‐κB transcription factors have essential roles in inflammation, immunity, cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Classical IκB proteins, such as IκBα and IκBβ, bind to NF‐κB via ankyrin repeats to sequester NF‐κB in the cytoplasm and thus suppress NF‐κB activity. Unlike these constitutively expressed classical IκBs, the expression of the atypical IκBs Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ is induced in immune cells after recognition of antigens, pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or cytokines, upon which they localize to the nucleus and form complexes with transcription factors and regulators on the DNA. Atypical, nuclear IκBs have been proposed to modulate NF‐κB activity in a context‐dependent manner as they can either inhibit or increase gene expression of a subset of NF‐κB target genes. This complexity may be related to the molecular function of atypical IκBs, which bind to different transcription factor complexes and form a bridge to different cofactors or epigenetic modifiers. Recent research has identified novel target genes of atypical IκBs that include chemokines, cytokines, and master regulators of lymphocyte differentiation, underscoring prominent roles in adaptive immune and autoimmune responses. Here, we summarize our current understanding of atypical IκBs in lymphocytes with a focus on their emerging role in autoimmunity.
Keywords: autoimmunity, Bcl3, lymphocytes, NF‐κB, Nfkbid, Nfkbiz
This review article summarizes the currently available information on the functions of atypical IκB proteins including Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ, which have been studied mostly in mouse models. We focus on the regulation of these modulators of transcription, describe their role in lymphocyte differentiation, and their involvement in the development of autoimmunity.

1. Introduction
NF‐κB constitutes a family of transcription factors that critically controls immune homeostasis. Thus, mutations and aberrations within the NF‐κB signaling pathway are associated with various autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases [1, 2, 3]. As NF‐κB controls multiple functions, including survival, proliferation, differentiation, and activation of immune cells, its activity and effects on target gene expression have to be tightly controlled. IκB proteins comprise a key family of NF‐κB‐related co‐factors that not only regulate the overall activity of NF‐κB but also the expression of subgroups of NF‐κB target genes. This class of co‐factors can be roughly distinguished into classical IκBs such as IκBα and IκBβ, the precursor p105 and p100 that are processed to p50 and p52, respectively, and the atypical IκBs, such as Bcl‐3, IκBζ, and IκBNS. Whereas classical IκBs and the precursors p105 and p100 retain NF‐κB in the cytoplasm in the absence of NF‐κB signaling, the protein family of atypical IκBs, Bcl‐3 (encoded by Bcl3), IκBζ (encoded by Nfkbiz), and IκBNS (encoded by Nfkbid), are inducibly expressed upon activation of NF‐κB (Figure 1). Subsequently, these atypical IκBs interact with NF‐κB, but also with other transcription factors on the chromatin to promote or suppress the transcriptional induction of a subset of NF‐κB target genes (Figure 1). Initial research on the atypical IκB proteins has compared them to classical IκBs and uncovered a preference for binding to p50 or p52 homodimers over p65/p50 heterodimers [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. While a cocrystal structure for the classical IκB, IκBα, in complex with NF‐κB p50/p65 has been solved [12], the interaction of atypical IκBs remains undefined at the structural level. Various investigations on the physiologic importance, interaction partners, and downstream function of atypical IκBs have been performed, but their exact role and mechanism of action are still poorly defined.
FIGURE 1.

Overview of the regulation and function of the atypical IκB proteins, IκBζ (encoded by Nfkbiz), IκBNS (encoded by Nfkbid), and Bcl‐3 (encoded by Bcl3). In resting cells, classical IκBs, such as IκBα sequester NF‐κB in the cytoplasm, rendering it inactive. Upon stimulation, NF‐κB is translocated into the nucleus. Subsequently, together with multiple other transcription factors such as STATs or CEBP, NF‐κB transcriptionally induces the expression of atypical IκBs. Moreover, Regnase‐1 and 3 as well as Roquin‐1 and 2 regulate the mRNA stability or expression of Nfkbid and Nfkbiz, thereby modifying the overall expression of IκBζ and IκBNS. Upon protein expression of the atypical IκBs, all three members associated with different transcription factor complexes, thereby recruiting other (epi)‐genetic co‐factors, changing chromatin accessibility, and ultimately gene expression of a subset of NF‐κB target genes. Please note that miRNA‐mediated regulation has been proposed for all three atypical IκBs, however, it is not displayed in this figure, since a physiologic relevance for lymphocyte function has not been demonstrated, yet.
Given their flexible protein interactions, target gene regulation, and dynamic expression patterns, a direct comparison between studies is difficult. Thus, genetic models have been instrumental in understanding atypical IκB functions and underscore the prominent role of these molecules in lymphocytes and immune responses. Mouse knockout models of all three atypical IκBs (Bcl3, Nfkbid, and Nfkbiz) showed unperturbed development, but immune functions and cytokine production were altered already at homeostasis, during immune responses or in disease models [10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. The current challenge is to understand when and how the expression of Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ is induced, what functions these proteins have in different cell types, which genes they regulate, and how they impact the gene regulatory networks to control the differentiation of immune cells and affect the immune system or immune responses.
As a large part of our knowledge has been obtained in the mouse system, we will in this review, unless specified otherwise, refer to the mouse genes, the mRNAs encoded in the mouse, and functions of the proteins in the cells of the mouse immune system. A major focus of this review is placed on the role of atypical IκB in lymphocytes, trying to understand how these factors impact the development of immune‐related diseases and autoimmunity.
2. Molecular Features of Atypical IκB Proteins
An overview of the genomic structure and regulation of all three atypical IκB proteins is shown in Figure 2. Of note, although multiple isoforms have already been described for the atypical IκBs, isoform‐specific functions have only rarely been investigated so far.
FIGURE 2.

Gene structure, transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, and posttranslational modifications of Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ. (A) Gene structure. IκBζ is encoded by two different variants of Nfkbiz, resulting from alternative splicing, and thus generates two different proteins consisting of 728 and 629 amino acids. Of note, both variants contain unique promoter regions which can be occupied by canonical NF‐κB, STAT1‐3 or CEBP [126, 127, 128]. Besides 7 ankyrin repeats, it contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS), a potential TAD, and an OCA domain [19, 129]. Direct interaction and mapping of the interaction sites have already been identified for POU transcription factors [129], STAT3 [130], and NF‐κB p50, p52, and p65 [10, 131]. The smallest member of atypical IκBs is IκBNS, encoded by Nfkbid, which exists in three different isoforms through splicing events at the 5'‐UTR, leading to the generation of a 327 amino acid long protein. Our schematic omits a putative isoform of IκBNS (470 aa) since this isoform has not been experimentally verified. It consists of 6 ankyrin repeats which mediate the interaction with NF‐κB p50, p52, and c‐Rel. Of note, no reporter promoter studies of Nfkbid have been published so far. Bcl‐3 (encoded by Bcl3) consists of 448 amino acids, and contains two transactivation domains (TAD) and 7 ankyrin (ANK) repeats [4, 132]. Moreover, several promoter studies revealed that Bcl‐3 expression is induced by binding of either canonical or noncanonical NF‐κB signaling [133], as well as STAT1 [134] and STAT3 [135]. Direct interactions of Bcl‐3 with AP1 [76] and p50/p52 have been reported [136, 137, 138]. (B) Posttranscriptional regulation. Nfkbiz and Nfkbid, but not Bcl3, are posttranscriptionally regulated by Regnase‐1 and 3 and Roquin‐1 and 2. Regnase and Roquin proteins can bind at the 3'‐UTR, thus inducing mRNA decay and inhibiting translation of IκBζ and IκBNS at steady state [52, 59, 64]. (C) Posttranslational modifications. Apart from transcription and posttranscriptional regulation, posttranslational modifications of Bcl‐3 and IκBζ have been described, that modify their activity, binding to interaction partners, and overall function. Of note, no posttranslational modifications have been described for IκBNS so far.
IκBζ, encoded by Nfkbiz, was originally identified as a protein called MAIL, short for molecule possessing ankyrin repeats induced by lipopolysaccharide. It was also termed INAP, which stands for interleukin (IL)‐1 inducible nuclear ankyrin‐repeat protein [19, 20]. The N‐terminus of IκBζ differs from the other IκB proteins [11], providing additional interaction sites with other transcription factors such as POU and STAT proteins. It also contains a transactivation domain (TAD), although the functionality of this domain remains under debate [21, 22]. Earlier publications suggested selective IκBζ complex formation with p50 and p52 homodimers, which themselves lack a TAD, consequently leading to an IκBζ‐dependent activation of NF‐κB target genes [22, 23, 24]. Other publications showed IκBζ binding to p65:p50 heterodimers and p50 homodimers, and involvement in the inhibition of DNA‐binding of these dimers [21, 25, 26]. IκBζ is expressed in nonhematopoietic cells such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and chondrocytes [19, 27‐30], as well as in innate and adaptive immune cells [10, 31‐36].
IκΒΝS, encoded by Nfkbid, is the smallest member of the atypical IκΒ protein family [6]. It contains six ankyrin repeats which interact with NF‐κB [37]. IκΒΝS was originally identified in a study on negative selection (NS) in the thymus and has been suggested to interact with all members of the NF‐κB family in vitro [6]. Later studies determined p50 as the main interaction partner in macrophages [7] as well as p50:c‐Rel heterodimers in CD4+ T cells or Treg cells [9]. Promoter studies investigating regulators of IκΒΝS expression are so far lacking, although NF‐κB is likely to be involved. IκΒΝS has been described to be expressed in adaptive and innate immune cells and lung epithelial cells [7, 9, 13, 18, 38‐43].
Bcl‐3 (B cell leukemia 3 protein) is a proto‐oncogene that was originally identified by its translocation into the immunoglobulin alpha‐locus in some patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It contains amino‐terminal and carboxy‐terminal TADs [44, 45]. The seven ankyrin repeats of Bcl‐3 interact with NF‐κB p50 or p52 homodimers and early studies suggested that Bcl‐3 represses the binding of these homodimers to DNA [4, 8, 46, 47]. Of note, many cell types express Bcl‐3 at a steady state, and its expression can be further induced by TLR activation in myeloid cells and other NF‐κB‐inducing agents. This process may partially depend on p50 expression [48].
3. Regulation
In most of the studied cell types, such as keratinocytes or T‐cells, Nfkbiz transcription, and IκBζ protein expression are induced in response to a variety of different NF‐κB‐ and STAT‐activating stimuli (Table 1), which is followed by rapid proteasomal degradation of the IκBζ protein [49, 50, 51]. The E3 ubiquitin ligase PDLIM2 may mediate IκBζ proteasomal degradation, at least in myeloid cells [51]. Moreover, multiple threonine phosphorylation sites have been identified in IκBζ, which can switch IκBζ from a gene activator to a gene repressor by promoting the recruitment of HDAC1 to target gene promoters [21] (Figure 2C). The Nfkbiz mRNA is also posttranscriptionally regulated by the endoribonuclease activities of Regnase‐1 and Regnase‐3 which bind to a defined cis‐element composed of several stem‐loop structures in the 3'‐UTR of Nfkbiz and induce mRNA decay but also translational inhibition [52, 53, 54, 55, 56] (Figure 2B). The inhibitory effect of Regnase‐1 can also be counteracted by Arid5a, which, during IL‐17 stimulation, seems to interfere with Regnase‐1 activity, stabilizes Nfkbiz mRNA, and promotes IκBζ protein expression [57]. Regnase‐1 is a target of MALT1 proteolytic cleavage [58], and Nfkbiz/IκBζ expression is strongly triggered by MALT1 activation in T cells [59]. Moreover, treatment of macrophages and keratinocytes with itaconate suppressed LPS‐induced IκBζ expression, possibly through ATF3‐dependent repression [60]. MicroRNAs also regulate NFKBIZ mRNA stability. In detail, miR‐376b and miR‐124a can inhibit NFKBIZ expression, while miR‐376b and Nfkbiz have an impact on liver regeneration, tubular damage, and intrarenal inflammation in acute kidney injury [61, 62, 63].
TABLE 1.
Expression stimuli, target genes, and interaction partners of atypical IκBs.
| IκBζ | IκΒΝS | Bcl‐3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stimulus and receptor leading to expression | B‐cell: BCR [35] |
B‐cell: Tlr1/2 (Pam3CSK4) [108]Tlr4 (LPS) [108] Tlr6/2 (FSC‐1) [108] Tlr7 (Imiquimod) [108] Tlr9 (ODN1826) [108] BCR [100, 103] |
|
| T‐cell: Il6r (IL‐6) [36] Tgfbr (TGF‐β) [36] | T‐cell: TCR (IL‐2, CD3, and CD28) [9, 59, 70] | ||
| Target genes | B‐cell: Il10 [35], Ctla4 [35], Cd86 [35], Tnfa [35, 99] | B‐cell: Pax5 [106], Blimp1 [106, 107] | |
|
T‐cell: Il17a [36], Il17f [36], Il21 [36], Il22 [36], Il23r [36] Treg: Foxp3 [82] |
T‐cell: Bcl6 [85], Il2 [18, 83], Il10 [83], Ccl3 [83], Csf2 [18, 83], Il17f [84], Ccr6 [84] Treg: Foxp3 [9] |
||
| Interaction partner |
p50, p65 [26]—in macrophages Akirin2 [139]—in macrophages POU transcription factors [129]—HEK293T C/EBPβ, STAT3, STAT1 [127]—in HaCaT AP1, KLF4 [126]—in HaCaT PDLIM2 [51]—in macrophages RORγt and RORα [36]—in CD4+‐T‐cells (some experiments Th17 condition) Foxp3 [82]—in EL‐4/LAF |
p50 [7]—in macrophages p65, Rel, Relb [6]—in thymic extracts from N15 TCRtg mice cRel, p50 [9]—in CD4+CD25‐ Tcon |
p50 [92]—in Tregs p52 [140]—in macrophages HDAC1 [48]—in macrophages |
IκΒΝS protein expression and Nfkbid transcription are induced by several stimuli including antigen receptors, TLRs, or cytokine receptors (Table 1), but the Nfkbid mRNA is also placed under profound posttranscriptional control. The 3'‐UTR of the Nfkbid mRNA harbors several stem–loop structures that form a cis‐element [64], very similar to the one defined in Nfkbiz [52] (Figure 2B). Both cis‐elements contain one or two constitutive decay elements (CDEs), which are known to be recognized by the Roquin family of RNA‐binding proteins, namely Roquin‐1 and its redundantly functioning paralog Roquin‐2 [52, 64‐68]. Nfkbid/IκΒΝS mRNA and protein expression are regulated by Roquin‐1 via induced mRNA decay that involves deadenylation and decapping as well as inhibition of translation [64]. Very similar to IκBζ, IκΒΝS is strongly derepressed upon activation of the MALT1 protease, which is explained by Roquin‐1 and Roquin‐2 being MALT1 substrates [59, 69]. In fact, IκΒΝS induction upon TCR signaling closely follows the proteolytic cleavage of Roquin proteins and is prevented by MALT1 inhibition or mutations of the MALT1‐specific cleavage sites in Roquin‐1 [59, 70]. NFKBID is also regulated by microRNA. It has been shown that miR‐492 binds NFKBID and leads to the downregulation of NFKBID mRNA levels in the context of Zika virus replication [71].
Bcl‐3 protein levels are regulated via posttranslational modifications, especially phosphorylation and ubiquitination (Figure 2C). Under resting conditions, Bcl‐3 degradation and oncogenicity are regulated by protein kinase GSK3β‐mediated phosphorylation [72, 73]. However, the proteasomal degradation in the cytoplasm was shown to be independent of GSK3 [74]. The ability of Bcl‐3 to affect gene transcription depends on its phosphorylation by AKT, ERK2, and IKK1/2, which enable the regulation of NF‐κB p52 and p50 homodimer transcriptional activity [73]. Translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus requires K‐63‐linked polyubiquitination [73]. The deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD has been shown to control Bcl‐3 localization in keratinocytes by removing polyubiquitin chains upon UV irradiation. This prevents nuclear accumulation and consequently Bcl‐3‐mediated regulation of gene transcription [75]. Bcl‐3 can suppress transcription by recruiting transcriptional co‐repressors. This was specifically demonstrated by the recruitment of HDAC1 and the subsequent suppression of TNF production in macrophages upon LPS stimulation [48]. The recruitment of the co‐repressor CtBP by Bcl‐3 was associated with increased Bcl‐3 stability and enhancement of its suppressive capacity [74]. Bcl‐3 can also activate gene transcription by forming a ternary complex with p50 homodimers, inducing transcription through its TADs [4]. The interaction of Bcl‐3 with proteins such as histone acetyltransferases (e.g., p300 and Tip60) suggests, among others, a putative role of Bcl‐3 in chromatin remodeling [76, 77]. Lastly, Bcl‐3 expression may also be repressed by the microRNAs miR‐125b and miR‐19a [78, 79] but functional investigations for the relevance of these observations in noncancerous cells are still lacking.
4. Function in T Cells
IκBζ is highly expressed in Th17 cells compared with other T helper cell subsets. Combined IL‐6 and TGF‐β stimulation triggers its induction in Th17 cells, which depends on STAT3 [36]. While CD4+ T cells isolated from global Nfkbiz knockout mice exhibit normal Th17 differentiation, they completely lose IL‐17A expression in a RORγt and RORα‐dependent manner (Table 1). Consequently, no experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) was induced when CD4+ T cells from global Nfkbiz knockout mice were transferred into Rag2 knockout mice [36]. Furthermore, MaruYama et al. [80] explored the role of IκBζ in T cells using Lck‐Cre Nfkbiz knockout mice. These mice developed lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and leukocyte infiltration in various tissues and organs between 6‐18 months of age. In younger mice, deletion of Nfkbiz resulted in increased numbers of Treg cells and effector/memory CD4+ T cells as well as increased serum levels of IFN‐γ and IL‐2. These effects may be partly due to the use of the Lck‐Cre, as a report implied adverse and off‐target effects in the Lck‐Cre line, and wild‐type mice without Lck‐Cre were used as controls [81]. Opposingly, a Treg‐specific knockout of Nfkbiz did not show significant differences in the numbers of effector T cells, thymic‐derived Treg cells, or expression levels of key cytokines [80]. In contrast, Treg cells from Lck‐Cre Nfkbiz knockout mice exhibited reduced immunoregulatory function in a T‐cell transfer colitis model. Further studies suggested that IκBζ can bind to the Foxp3 promoter in the presence of TGF‐β in Treg cells and can inhibit Foxp3 expression by interfering with p65 transactivation [82], thereby possibly interfering with Treg differentiation or function (Table 1).
IκΒNS is expressed in both effector and regulatory T cells [9, 18, 83]. Although global Nfkbid knockout mice did not show changes in immune cell populations within the thymus or peripheral lymphoid organs, conditional inactivation reveals a proliferation defect of IκΒΝS‐deficient CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vitro, which can be rescued by exogenous IL‐2 and IL‐7 supplementation [13, 18]. IκΒΝS‐deficient T cells expressed lower levels of IL‐2 and IFN‐γ [18]. They also showed a specific impairment in the induction of RORγt in response to TGFβ and IL‐6 and were less capable of differentiating into the Th17 subset, exhibiting reduced expression of IL‐17A and Th17‐related genes as compared with wild‐type counterparts [84] (Table 1). Citrobacter rodentium infections revealed that the absence of IκΒΝS significantly reduced the infiltration of IL‐17A+ T‐cells into the gut lamina propria [83]. IκΒΝS does not directly regulate Il17a transcription, but instead interacts with the Il10 gene locus, as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) [83, 84] (Table 1). In Listeria monocytogenes (L.m.) infections IκΒΝS was required for the induction of L.m.–Ova‐specific Th1 cells and effector cytokine production. Although IκΒΝS expression was necessary during the early stages of Th1 priming, it did not affect T‐bet expression [39]. Additional roles for IκΒΝS in promoting Tfh cell differentiation were described and direct regulation of the Tfh signature genes, Bcl6 and Il21, was confirmed in ChIP experiments [85]. IκΒΝS also plays a critical role in thymic Treg development. In ChIP experiments IκΒΝS bound to the conserved noncoding region 3 (CNS3) in the Foxp3 promoter via p50 and c‐Rel, and IκΒΝS was required for the induction of Foxp3 but dispensable for CD25 expression [86] (Table 1). Nfkbid‐deficient Treg cells accumulated in the GITR+ CD25+ Foxp3– precursor stage, failing to progress into mature thymic Treg cells, which caused a 50% reduction in mature peripheral Treg cells [9]. Functionally, Nfkbid‐deficient Treg cells were unable to protect from T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis [9]. In mature Treg cells, Nfkbid is suppressed by Foxp3 and is not required for the maintenance or suppressive function of Treg cells [9, 87].
Bcl‐3 was shown early on to be highly expressed in tolerogenic T cells and to directly control the formation of NF‐κB dimers and IL‐2 production [88]. Bcl‐3 was proposed to slow down T cell activation early after stimulation by a T cell‐intrinsic mechanism [89]. Like its function in other cell types, Bcl‐3 controls survival and apoptosis following activation of T cells: overexpression of Bcl‐3 increases survival, while Bcl‐3 deficiency accelerates cell death. The anti‐apoptotic activity of Bcl‐3 is partially based on the inhibition of the proapoptotic molecule Bim, since Bim was overactivated in Bcl‐3‐deficient T cells, and forced Bcl‐3 expression kept T cells alive but failed to promote the survival of Bim‐deficient T cells [90] (Table 1). In line with these results, mixed bone marrow chimeras showed that Bcl‐3‐deficient thymocytes were outcompeted by wild‐type cells; however, this effect was completely reversed in the intestinal lamina propria, presumably due to high amounts of Th17 and Treg cells at this site, and the strong effects of Bcl‐3 in restraining these cells [91]. Importantly, CD4+ T cells overexpressing Bcl‐3 fail to induce colitis in a T cell transfer‐induced colitis experiment, presumably due to impaired proliferation of these cells in vivo, which is a prerequisite for inducing colitis in this model [92]. Bcl‐3 has unique roles in different T helper cell subsets. For example, in vitro differentiation of Th2, but not Th1 cells, is impaired in Bcl‐3‐deficient T cells [93], as Bcl‐3 together with p50 transactivates the GATA3 promoter [93] (Table 1). In Th1 cells, Bcl‐3 expression suppresses trans‐differentiation toward less pathogenic Th17‐like cells [94]. Mechanistically, Bcl‐3 prevents the binding of c‐Rel and p50 at the RORC locus and Bcl‐3‐deficient Th1 cells already show higher Rorc expression [94] (Table 1). Similarly, Bcl‐3‐deficient animals harbor elevated frequencies of (nonpathogenic) Th17 cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine, while overexpression of Bcl‐3 in T cells results in impaired Th17 differentiation in vitro and reduced frequencies of Th17 cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine [91, 95]. Pathogenicity of Th17 cells, indicated by co‐expression of IFN‐γ and GM‐CSF, may be regulated by Bcl‐3 at the metabolic level because enhanced glycolysis and lower respiration are observed in Bcl‐3‐deficient Th17 cells [96]. Bcl‐3 directly interacts with Raptor, one of the mTORC1 components, to control cell metabolism of Th17 cells [96]. Noteworthy, Bcl‐3‐deficient animals harbor elevated numbers of Treg cells in various compartments whereas T‐cell‐specific overexpression of Bcl‐3 results in impaired Treg cell differentiation and function [91, 92]. This is not only true for thymic‐derived Treg cells, but also for microbiome‐induced Treg cells co‐expressing RORγt [91, 97]. Additionally, there is also some evidence that Bcl‐3 affects the differentiation of CD8+ T cells, thereby limiting terminal effector cell differentiation and promoting memory cell formation [98].
5. Function in B cells
IκBζ expression is induced in B cells by activation of the BCR and/or by co‐stimulation with TLR9/TLR7 [35, 99]. IκBζ‐deficient mice showed impaired proliferation of B cells after TLR9 stimulation compared with wild‐type mice, but not after BCR stimulation. There were no differences in the number of mature B cells, follicular B cells, and the expression of surface markers such as IgM, FcγRIIB, and TLR9 in Nfkbiz‐deficient mice. In contrast, a slightly reduced number of transitional B cells and a slightly increased number of marginal zone B cells were present in these mice. Likewise, no difference in NF‐κB activation of IκBζ‐deficient B cells could be detected after TLR9 stimulation [35].
However, individual genes show differences in expression in IκBζ‐deficient B cells, including Il10, Ctla4, Tnf, and Cd86 expression, although some of these effects were stimulus‐dependent (Table 1) [35].
IκBNS expression is rapidly induced in B cells at the mRNA and protein level in response to LPS, anti‐CD40, and anti‐IgM stimulation [38, 100]. IκΒΝS‐deficient mice, or mice that harbor a premature stop codon in the Nfkbid gene, also known as bumble mice, completely lack B1 cells, show a delayed IgG response, and fail to differentiate toward plasma cells [38, 101‐103]. Additionally, bumble mice have severely reduced marginal zone (MZ) B cells and reduced IgM levels in the circulation. The MZ B cell compartment was restored to normal levels in aged bumble mice; however, these cells were not functional [104]. Interestingly, mice carrying a heterozygous bumble mutation also showed reduced IgM production despite having normal B cell development, which suggests a requirement for full IκΒΝS expression from two Nfkbid alleles [105]. Furthermore, IκΒΝS was shown to be required for the generation of plasma blasts and plasma cells in response to LPS stimulation. In bumble B cells, expression of Pax5 and Blimp1 which regulate plasma cell differentiation is increased (Table 1). This is accompanied by an excessive metabolic activity observed in bumble B cells that leads to impaired T‐cell‐independent antibody responses [106, 107]. Similar to T cells, IκΒΝS was required for IL‐10 production by B cells following TLR stimulation, at least during the initial phases of induction, with IL‐10 expression normalizing over time [108].
Bcl‐3‐deficient mice show a requirement for Bcl‐3 in the germinal center reaction and immunization‐induced antibody responses [15, 109]. The diminished humoral immune responses may explain why Bcl‐3‐deficient mice show impaired clearance of Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Toxoplasma infections [14, 15, 109]. In contrast, the Eμ‐Bcl3 transgenic mice, in which Bcl‐3 is overexpressed in B and T cells, display splenomegaly and an accumulation of mature B‐cells in secondary lymphoid organs [110]. Transgenic mice that overexpress or lack Bcl‐3 specifically in B cells show that Bcl‐3 is a pivotal regulator of B cell fate determination. Loss of Bcl‐3 leads to an increase in marginal zone B cells and a reduction in follicular B cells, whereas overexpression of Bcl‐3 causes the opposite phenotype [111, 112]. Furthermore, Bcl‐3 promotes the survival and proliferation of B cell receptor‐stimulated B cells while impairing responses to LPS [112]. Bcl‐3 modulates the growth capacity of B cells, where its overexpression is linked to reduced proliferation upon activation, likely due to decreased cell death rather than increased growth [111, 112]. Taken together, Bcl‐3 possesses antiapoptotic properties that are critical for safeguarding B cells from programmed cell death.
6. Atypical IκBs in Autoimmunity and Autoinflammation
Given their importance in B and T cells, it is plausible that atypical IκBs play pivotal roles in spontaneous autoimmunity or experimental models of brain or gut autoimmunity and autoinflammation.
6.1. Spontaneous Disease
Global Nfkbiz‐deficient mice show 90% lethality during embryogenesis. 4–8‐week‐old mice develop lesions resembling atopic dermatitis that affect the face and neck and are characterized by strong infiltration of leukocytes [16, 113]. This phenotype has been related to Sjögren's syndrome and is associated with enhanced apoptosis due to IκBζ deficiency in epithelial cells of the lacrimal gland as well as the formation of Sjögren's syndrome‐associated autoantibodies in the serum of Nfkbiz knockout mice [28]. Interestingly, the salivary glands are also affected, since female Nfkbiz‐deficient mice show a reduced salivary flow rate, which was associated with dysbiotic oral microbiota and focal lymphocytic sialadenitis [114].
Global Nfkbid‐deficient mice or mice deficient in both IκΒΝS and c‐Rel do not show any signs of autoimmunity or severe abnormalities in the development of the immune system, despite having a reduced Treg cell compartment [18]. The lack of autoimmunity has been attributed to the impaired activation of conventional T‐cells, which may balance the loss of Treg cells [115]. Interestingly, NOD mice express a hypermorphic Nfkbid allele which leads to a reduction in negative selection of diabetogenic CD8+ cells and may therefore contribute to autoimmune diabetes [116].
Global Bcl3 knockout mice also do not show signs of autoimmunity, whereas the combined absence of Bcl3 and Nfkb2 results in the loss of central tolerance and autoimmunity [117]. This phenotype manifests despite the presence of elevated numbers of Treg cells in the context of Bcl‐3 deficiency. Although Bcl3‐deficient mice do not suffer from spontaneous autoimmunity, they are more susceptible to streptozotocin‐induced type 1 diabetes [118]. Also, in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)–like disease, Bcl‐3 was shown to play a protective role, since Bcl3‐deficient mice carrying the lpr mutation developed a more severe SLE–like inflammatory phenotype than control lpr mice [119]. In line with this observation, forced overexpression of Bcl‐3 in T cells impaired Treg cell development and function, resulting in a spontaneous colitis phenotype [92]. Even though not related to autoimmunity, Bcl3 deficiency also resulted in resistance to skeletal muscle atrophy, a phenomenon that is phenotypically mimicked in p105/p50 (Nfkb1) knockout mice [120].
6.2. Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Resistance to EAE has been reported for Nfkbid and Nfkbiz knockout mice; in both cases, the phenotype is T‐cell‐intrinsic and can be explained by reduced Th17 differentiation [36, 84]. Surprisingly, both Bcl‐3 deficiency in T cells and conditional overexpression of Bcl‐3 in CD4+ T cells protect mice from the development of EAE [94, 95]. This protection is associated with a strong reduction of immune cells infiltrating the central nervous system of both models. Resistance to EAE can be explained by the trans‐differentiation of Th1 cells to nonpathogenic Th17 cells in Bcl‐3‐deficient mice, whereas T cells overexpressing Bcl‐3 fail to differentiate into pathogenic Th17 cells [94, 95].
6.3. Gut‐Related inflammation
Global Nfkbiz knockout mice exhibit greater weight loss after dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) treatment and develop more severe colitis as determined by histopathological analysis [121]. However, mice with epithelial‐specific deletion of Nfkbiz (Vil1‐Cre) show similar levels of DSS‐induced inflammation as control mice, which suggests that the observed phenotype is driven by immune rather than epithelial cells [122]. Consistently, it has been shown that in patients with ulcerative colitis, the inflamed gut is remodeled by pervasive clones. Many of these clones are positively selected by the acquisition of mutations, often affecting the NFKBIZ gene. Consequently, these mutations are involved in the downregulation of IL‐17 signaling, and proinflammatory signaling [122, 123, 124]. In contrast, global Bcl3‐knockout mice are less susceptible than wild‐type mice to DSS‐induced colitis. The absence of Bcl‐3 was associated in one study with enhanced epithelial cell turnover and regeneration, despite similar levels of inflammation compared with wild‐type counterparts [125], whereas in another study, protection from DSS‐induced colitis was associated with elevated frequencies of RORγt‐expressing Treg cells [97]. Mice with a T‐cell‐specific overexpression of Bcl‐3 develop more severe colitis that can be attributed to defective Treg cell development and function [92].
In a transfer‐induced colitis model, Rag1 –/– mice receiving Nfkbid knockout T cells developed a more severe form of colitis, characterized by an increase in IFN‐γ+ T cells and a complete loss of IL‐17A‐producing cells [83]. In contrast, Rag1 –/– mice that received Bcl‐3‐deficient T cells were protected from transfer‐induced colitis. Upon transfer of naïve T cells into Rag1 –/– recipients, Bcl‐3 deficiency resulted in a preferential differentiation to nonpathogenic Th17 cells and a reduced differentiation toward pathogenic Th1 cells and/or further trans‐differentiation of Th1 cells into nonpathogenic Th17 cells [94]. Additionally, Bcl‐3‐deficient T cells may preferentially differentiate toward RORγt+ Treg cells, with increased frequencies of both thymic and microbiome‐induced RORγt+ Treg cells potentially contributing to protection against colitis [91, 97].
In summary, all these observations suggest an important contribution of all three atypical IκBs, Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ, in the differentiation and functionality of T and B cells. The impact of these molecules is controlled and finetuned at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and posttranslational levels all together enabling the time‐ and context‐dependent regulation of adaptive immune cells. Thus, we propose that atypical IκBs serve to enhance flexibility for the use of NF‐κB‐dependent gene regulation and harmonize this functionality with other pathways such as control of chromatin accessibility or cell metabolism with—if disturbed—important consequences for autoimmune disorders and intestinal inflammation.
7. Conclusion and Outlook
The investigation of atypical IκBs began with gene identification, followed by characterization of the gene products, examination of their regulation, and generation of mouse models with global or conditional knockouts or overexpression. The various approaches have generated numerous indications that implicate these factors in the control of T and B cell activation, differentiation, and survival and the development of autoimmune diseases. However, despite the use of similar approaches and models, in many cases, differing experimental setups preclude direct comparisons. Consequently, fundamental questions remain unanswered. For example, is the involvement of IκBNS, and IκBζ in the same cell types and phenotypes and in the same molecular processes explained by redundant or cooperative functions? Which target genes are bound by individual atypical IκBs in a specific cell type? Which NF‐κB homo‐ or heterodimers are bound by these atypical IκBs in cells? Through which of the proposed mechanisms do they regulate the expression of specific target genes?
In future research, it will be crucial to reassess specific functions in parallel using conditional inactivation of floxed alleles with the same Cre lines and to generate double knockout models that can answer questions about redundancy. The studies of atypical IκBs in T cells have focused more on T helper cells, therefore additional studies will now be required to describe their role in cytotoxic T cells during infections to provide information for a more balanced view. We propose that biochemical and bioinformatic approaches to determine genome‐wide interactions will be essential for advancing our understanding. Specifically, developing comprehensive and comparative genome‐wide binding maps for Bcl‐3, IκBNS, and IκBζ in the same cell type, using Cut&Run or Cut&Tag technologies would be an invaluable resource to uncover the function of atypical IκBs, especially in lymphocytes and in the setting of autoimmunity and autoinflammatory diseases.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Peer Review
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/eji.202451273.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge funding support from the German Research Foundation, TRR355/1 project number 490846870 (TP‐A05 to NH and CO, TP‐A06 to VH, and TP‐A08 to DK), CRC1371 project number 395357507 (TP‐P07 to CO), SFB1292 project number 318346496 (TP‐20 to NH), FOR2599 project number OH 282/1‐2 (TP07 to CO), TRR156/3 project number 246807620 (TP‐B09 to DK) TRR338/1 project number 452881907 (TP‐C02 to VH), CRC1054/3 project number 210592381 (TP‐A03 to VH) and grants from the Foundation of Experimental Biomedicine and Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (DK) and the Wilhelm‐Sander Foundation (to VH).
Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Funding: The research received support from German Research Foundation, TRR355/1 project number 490846870 (TP‐A05 to N.H. and C.O., TP‐A06 to V.H. and T.P.‐A08 to D.K.), CRC1371 project number 395357507 (TP‐P07 to C.O.), SFB1292 project number 318346496 (TP‐20 to N.H.), FOR2599 project number OH 282/1‐2 (TP07 to C.O.), TRR156/3 project number 246807620 (TP‐B09 to D.K.) TRR338/1 project number 452881907 (TP‐C02 to V.H.), CRC1054/3 project number 210592381 (TP‐A03 to V.H.) and grants from the Foundation of Experimental Biomedicine and Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (D.K.) and the Wilhelm‐Sander Foundation (to V.H.).
Contributor Information
Caspar Ohnmacht, Email: caspar.ohnmacht@helmholtz-munich.de.
Nadine Hövelmeyer, Email: hoevelme@uni-mainz.de.
Daniela Kramer, Email: kramerda@uni-mainz.de.
Vigo Heissmeyer, Email: vigo.heissmeyer@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- 1. Guo Q., Jin Y., Chen X., et al., “NF‐κB in Biology and Targeted Therapy: New Insights and Translational Implications,” Signal Transduct Target Ther 9, no. 1 (2024): 53, 10.1038/s41392-024-01757-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Liu T., Zhang L., Joo D., and Sun S. C., “NF‐kappaB Signaling in Inflammation,” Signal Transduct Target Ther 2 (2017): 17023, 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhang Q., Lenardo M. J., and Baltimore D., “30 Years of NF‐kappaB: A Blossoming of Relevance to Human Pathobiology,” Cell 168, no. 1‐2 (2017): 37–57, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bours V., Franzoso G., Azarenko V., et al., “The Oncoprotein Bcl‐3 Directly Transactivates Through Kappa B Motifs via Association With DNA‐binding p50B Homodimers,” Cell 72, no. 5 (1993): 729–739, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90401-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Caamano J. H., Perez P., Lira S. A., and Bravo R., “Constitutive Expression of Bc1‐3 in Thymocytes Increases the DNA Binding of NF‐kappaB1 (p50) Homodimers in Vivo,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 16, no. 4 (1996): 1342–1348, 10.1128/MCB.16.4.1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fiorini E., Schmitz I., Marissen W. E., et al., “Peptide‐induced Negative Selection of Thymocytes Activates Transcription of an NF‐kappa B Inhibitor,” Molecular Cell 9, no. 3 (2002): 637–648, 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00469-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hirotani T., Lee P. Y., Kuwata H., et al., “The Nuclear IkappaB Protein IkappaBNS Selectively Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide‐induced IL‐6 Production in Macrophages of the Colonic Lamina Propria,” Journal of Immunology 174, no. 6 (2005): 3650–3657, 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nolan G. P., Fujita T., Bhatia K., et al., “The Bcl‐3 Proto‐Oncogene Encodes a Nuclear IκB‐Like Molecule That Preferentially Interacts With NF‐κB p50 and p52 in a Phosphorylation‐Dependent Manner,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 13, no. 6 (1993): 3557–3566, 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3557-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schuster M., Glauben R., Plaza‐Sirvent C., et al., “IκB(NS) Protein Mediates Regulatory T Cell Development via Induction of the Foxp3 Transcription Factor,” Immunity 37, no. 6 (2012): 998–1008, 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yamamoto M., Yamazaki S., Uematsu S., et al., “Regulation of Toll/IL‐1‐receptor‐mediated Gene Expression by the Inducible Nuclear Protein IkappaBzeta,” Nature 430, no. 6996 (2004): 218–222, 10.1038/nature02738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yamazaki S., Muta T., and Takeshige K., “A Novel IkappaB Protein, IkappaB‐zeta, Induced by Proinflammatory Stimuli, Negatively Regulates Nuclear Factor‐kappaB in the Nuclei,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, no. 29 (2001): 27657–27662, 10.1074/jbc.M103426200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Huxford T., Huang D. B., Malek S., and Ghosh G., “The Crystal Structure of the IkappaBalpha/NF‐kappaB Complex Reveals Mechanisms of NF‐kappaB Inactivation,” Cell 95, no. 6 (1998): 759–770, 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81699-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kuwata H., Matsumoto M., Atarashi K., et al., “IkappaBNS Inhibits Induction of a Subset of Toll‐Like Receptor‐dependent Genes and Limits Inflammation,” Immunity 24, no. 1 (2006): 41–51, 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Riemann M., Endres R., Liptay S., Pfeffer K., and Schmid R. M., “The IkappaB Protein Bcl‐3 Negatively Regulates Transcription of the IL‐10 Gene in Macrophages,” Journal of Immunology 175, no. 6 (2005): 3560–3568, 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schwarz E. M., Krimpenfort P., Berns A., and Verma I. M., “Immunological Defects in Mice With a Targeted Disruption in Bcl‐3,” Genes & development 11, no. 2 (1997): 187–197, 10.1101/gad.11.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shiina T., Konno A., Oonuma T., et al., “Targeted Disruption of MAIL, a Nuclear IkappaB Protein, Leads to Severe Atopic Dermatitis‐Like Disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, no. 53 (2004): 55493–55498, 10.1074/jbc.M409770200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tassi I., Claudio E., Wang H., et al., “The NF‐κB Regulator Bcl‐3 Governs Dendritic Cell Antigen Presentation Functions in Adaptive Immunity,” Journal of Immunology 193, no. 9 (2014): 4303–4311, 10.4049/jimmunol.1401505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Touma M., Antonini V., Kumar M., et al., “Functional Role for I Kappa BNS in T Cell Cytokine Regulation as Revealed by Targeted Gene Disruption,” Journal of Immunology 179, no. 3 (2007): 1681–1692, 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shiina T., Morimatsu M., Kitamura H., et al., “Genomic Organization, Chromosomal Localization, and Promoter Analysis of the Mouse Mail Gene,” Immunogenetics 53, no. 8 (2001): 649–655, 10.1007/s00251-001-0376-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gautam P., Maenner S., Cailotto F., et al., “Emerging Role of IκBζ in Inflammation: Emphasis on Psoriasis,” Clinical and translational medicine 12, no. 10 (2022): e1032, 10.1002/ctm2.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Grondona P., Bucher P., Schmitt A., et al., “Threonine Phosphorylation of IκBζ Mediates Inhibition of Selective Proinflammatory Target Genes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 140, no. 9 (2020): 1805–1814, 10.1016/j.jid.2019.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Motoyama M., Yamazaki S., Eto‐Kimura A., Takeshige K., and Muta T., “Positive and Negative Regulation of Nuclear Factor‐kappaB‐mediated Transcription by IkappaB‐zeta, an Inducible Nuclear Protein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, no. 9 (2005): 7444–7451, 10.1074/jbc.M412738200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Trinh D. V., Zhu N., Farhang G., Kim B. J., and Huxford T., “The Nuclear I kappaB Protein I kappaB Zeta Specifically Binds NF‐kappaB p50 Homodimers and Forms a Ternary Complex on kappaB DNA,” Journal of Molecular Biology 379, no. 1 (2008): 122–135, 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Matsuo S., Yamazaki S., Takeshige K., and Muta T., “Crucial Roles of Binding Sites for NF‐kappaB and C/EBPs in IkappaB‐zeta‐Mediated Transcriptional Activation,” Biochemical Journal 405, no. 3 (2007): 605–615, 10.1042/bj20061797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Feng Y., Chen Z., Xu Y., et al., “The central Inflammatory Regulator IκBζ: Induction, Regulation and Physiological Functions,” Frontiers in immunology 14 (2023): 1188253, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1188253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Daly A. E., Yeh G., Soltero S., and Smale S. T., “Selective Regulation of a Defined Subset of Inflammatory and Immunoregulatory Genes by an NF‐κB p50‐IκBζ Pathway,” Genes & development 38, no. 11‐12 (2024): 536–553, 10.1101/gad.351630.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yamazaki S., Muta T., Matsuo S., and Takeshige K., “Stimulus‐specific Induction of a Novel Nuclear Factor‐kappaB Regulator, IkappaB‐zeta, via Toll/Interleukin‐1 Receptor Is Mediated by mRNA Stabilization,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, no. 2 (2005): 1678–1687, 10.1074/jbc.M409983200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Okuma A., Hoshino K., Ohba T., et al., “Enhanced Apoptosis by Disruption of the STAT3‐IκB‐ζ Signaling Pathway in Epithelial Cells Induces Sjögren's Syndrome‐Like Autoimmune Disease,” Immunity 38, no. 3 (2013): 450–460, 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kao C. Y., Kim C., Huang F., and Wu R., “Requirements for Two Proximal NF‐kappaB Binding Sites and IkappaB‐zeta in IL‐17A‐Induced Human Beta‐Defensin 2 Expression by Conducting Airway Epithelium,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 283, no. 22 (2008): 15309–15318, 10.1074/jbc.M708289200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Arra M., Swarnkar G., Alippe Y., Mbalaviele G., and Abu‐Amer Y., “IκB‐ζ Signaling Promotes Chondrocyte Inflammatory Phenotype, Senescence, and Erosive Joint Pathology,” Bone Res 10, no. 1 (2022): 12, 10.1038/s41413-021-00183-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Seshadri S., Kannan Y., Mitra S., Parker‐Barnes J., and Wewers M. D., “MAIL Regulates Human Monocyte IL‐6 Production,” Journal of Immunology 183, no. 8 (2009): 5358–5368, 10.4049/jimmunol.0802736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cardone M., Dzutsev A. K., Li H., et al., “Interleukin‐1 and Interferon‐γ Orchestrate β‐Glucan‐Activated Human Dendritic Cell Programming via IκB‐ζ Modulation,” PLoS ONE 9, no. 12 (2014): e114516, 10.1371/journal.pone.0114516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kannan Y., Yu J., Raices R. M., et al., “IκBζ Augments IL‐12‐ and IL‐18‐Mediated IFN‐γ Production in Human NK Cells,” Blood 117, no. 10 (2011): 2855–2863, 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ohto‐Ozaki H., Hayakawa M., Kamoshita N., Maruyama T., Tominaga S. I., and Ohmori T., “Induction of IκBζ Augments Cytokine and Chemokine Production by IL‐33 in Mast Cells,” Journal of Immunology 204, no. 8 (2020): 2033–2042, 10.4049/jimmunol.1900315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hanihara F., Takahashi Y., Okuma A., Ohba T., and Muta T., “Transcriptional and Post‐Transcriptional Regulation of IκB‐ζ Upon Engagement of the BCR,” TLRs and FcγR Int Immunol 25, no. 9 (2013): 531–544, 10.1093/intimm/dxt017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Okamoto K., Iwai Y., Oh‐Hora M., et al., “IkappaBzeta Regulates T(H)17 Development by Cooperating With ROR Nuclear Receptors,” Nature 464, no. 7293 (2010): 1381–1385, 10.1038/nature08922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Manavalan B., Basith S., Choi Y. M., Lee G., and Choi S., “Structure‐Function Relationship of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear IκB Proteins: An in Silico Analysis,” PLoS ONE 5, no. 12 (2010): e15782, 10.1371/journal.pone.0015782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Touma M., Keskin D. B., Shiroki F., et al., “Impaired B Cell Development and Function in the Absence of IkappaBNS,” Journal of Immunology 187, no. 8 (2011): 3942–3952, 10.4049/jimmunol.1002109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Frentzel S., Jeron A., Pausder A., et al., “IκB(NS)‐deficiency Protects Mice From Fatal Listeria Monocytogenes Infection by Blunting Pro‐Inflammatory Signature in Ly6C(high) Monocytes and Preventing Exaggerated Innate Immune Responses,” Frontiers in immunology 13 (2022): 1028789, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1028789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Niida T., Isoda K., Kitagaki M., et al., “IκBNS Regulates Interleukin‐6 Production and Inhibits Neointimal Formation After Vascular Injury in Mice,” Cardiovascular Research 93, no. 2 (2011): 371–379, 10.1093/cvr/cvr323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yokota M., Tamachi T., Yokoyama Y., et al., “IκBNS Induces Muc5ac Expression in Epithelial Cells and Causes Airway Hyper‐responsiveness in Murine Asthma Models,” Allergy 72, no. 7 (2017): 1043–1053, 10.1111/all.13079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fujita S., Seino K., Sato K., et al., “Regulatory Dendritic Cells Act as Regulators of Acute Lethal Systemic Inflammatory Response,” Blood 107, no. 9 (2006): 3656–3664, 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yamamoto M. and Takeda K., “Role of Nuclear IkappaB Proteins in the Regulation of Host Immune Responses,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 14, no. 4 (2008): 265–269, 10.1007/s10156-008-0619-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Schuster M., Annemann M., Plaza‐Sirvent C., and Schmitz I., “Atypical IκB Proteins—Nuclear Modulators of NF‐κB Signaling,” Cell Communication and Signaling 11, no. 1 (2013): 23, 10.1186/1478-811x-11-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ohno H., Takimoto G., and McKeithan T. W., “The Candidate Proto‐Oncogene Bcl‐3 Is Related to Genes Implicated in Cell Lineage Determination and Cell Cycle Control,” Cell 60, no. 6 (1990): 991–997, 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90347-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fujita T., Nolan G. P., Liou H. C., Scott M. L., and Baltimore D., “The Candidate Proto‐Oncogene Bcl‐3 Encodes a Transcriptional Coactivator That Activates Through NF‐kappa B p50 Homodimers,” Genes & development 7, no. 7b (1993): 1354–1363, 10.1101/gad.7.7b.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wulczyn F. G., Naumann M., and Scheidereit C., “Candidate Proto‐Oncogene Bcl‐3 Encodes a Subunit‐Specific Inhibitor of Transcription Factor NF‐kappa B,” Nature 358, no. 6387 (1992): 597–599, 10.1038/358597a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wessells J., Baer M., Young H. A., et al., “BCL‐3 and NF‐kappaB p50 Attenuate Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Inflammatory Responses in Macrophages,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, no. 48 (2004): 49995–50003, 10.1074/jbc.M404246200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Sundaram K., Mitra S., Gavrilin M. A., and Wewers M. D., “House Dust Mite Allergens and the Induction of Monocyte Interleukin 1β Production That Triggers an IκBζ‐Dependent Granulocyte Macrophage Colony‐Stimulating Factor Release From Human Lung Epithelial Cells,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 53, no. 3 (2015): 400–411, 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0370OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bertelsen T., Ljungberg C., Litman T., et al., “IκBζ Is a Key Player in the Antipsoriatic Effects of Secukinumab,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 145, no. 1 (2020): 379–390, 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kimura A., Kitajima M., Nishida K., et al., “NQO1 Inhibits the TLR‐dependent Production of Selective Cytokines by Promoting IκB‐ζ Degradation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 215, no. 8 (2018): 2197–2209, 10.1084/jem.20172024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Behrens G., Winzen R., Rehage N., et al., “A Translational Silencing Function of MCPIP1/Regnase‐1 Specified by the Target Site Context,” Nucleic Acids Res. 46, no. 8 (2018): 4256–4270, 10.1093/nar/gky106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dhamija S., Winzen R., Doerrie A., et al., “Interleukin‐17 (IL‐17) and IL‐1 Activate Translation of Overlapping Sets of mRNAs, Including That of the Negative Regulator of Inflammation, MCPIP1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, no. 26 (2013): 19250–19259, 10.1074/jbc.M113.452649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Garg A. V., Amatya N., Chen K., et al., “MCPIP1 Endoribonuclease Activity Negatively Regulates Interleukin‐17‐Mediated Signaling and Inflammation,” Immunity 43, no. 3 (2015): 475–487, 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Liu B., Huang J., Ashraf A., et al., “The RNase MCPIP3 Promotes Skin Inflammation by Orchestrating Myeloid Cytokine Response,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 4105, 10.1038/s41467-021-24352-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Uehata T., Yamada S., Ori D., et al., “Regulation of Lymphoid‐Myeloid Lineage Bias Through Regnase‐1/3‐Mediated Control of Nfkbiz,” Blood 143, no. 3 (2024): 243–257, 10.1182/blood.2023020903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Amatya N., Childs E. E., Cruz J. A., et al., “IL‐17 Integrates Multiple Self‐reinforcing, Feed‐Forward Mechanisms Through the RNA Binding Protein Arid5a,” Science signaling 11, no. 551 (2018), 10.1126/scisignal.aat4617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Uehata T., Iwasaki H., Vandenbon A., et al., “Malt1‐Induced Cleavage of Regnase‐1 in CD4(+) Helper T Cells Regulates Immune Activation,” Cell 153, no. 5 (2013): 1036–1049, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Jeltsch K. M., Hu D., Brenner S., et al., “Cleavage of Roquin and Regnase‐1 by the Paracaspase MALT1 Releases Their Cooperatively Repressed Targets to Promote T(H)17 Differentiation,” Nature Immunology 15, no. 11 (2014): 1079–1089, 10.1038/ni.3008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Bambouskova M., Gorvel L., Lampropoulou V., et al., “Electrophilic Properties of Itaconate and Derivatives Regulate the IkappaBzeta‐ATF3 Inflammatory Axis,” Nature 556, no. 7702 (2018): 501–504, 10.1038/s41586-018-0052-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lindenblatt C., Schulze‐Osthoff K., and Totzke G., “IkappaBzeta Expression Is Regulated by miR‐124a,” Cell Cycle 8, no. 13 (2009): 2019–2023, 10.4161/cc.8.13.8816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Liu Z., Tang C., He L., et al., “The Negative Feedback Loop of NF‐kappaB/miR‐376b/NFKBIZ in Septic Acute Kidney Injury,” JCI Insight 5, no. 24 (2020), 10.1172/jci.insight.142272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Lu S., Jiao H., Xu J., Zheng Y., Sun Y., and Chen H., “Downregulation of IL6 Targeted MiR‐376b May Contribute to a Positive IL6 Feedback Loop during Early Liver Regeneration in Mice,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 37, no. 1 (2015): 233–242, 10.1159/000430348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Essig K., Kronbeck N., Guimaraes J. C., et al., “Roquin Targets mRNAs in a 3'‐UTR‐Specific Manner by Different Modes of Regulation,” Nature Communications 9, no. 1 (2018): 3810, 10.1038/s41467-018-06184-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Leppek K., Schott J., Reitter S., Poetz F., Hammond M. C., and Stoecklin G., “Roquin Promotes Constitutive mRNA Decay via a Conserved Class of Stem‐loop Recognition Motifs,” Cell 153, no. 4 (2013): 869–881, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Schlundt A., Heinz G. A., Janowski R., et al., “Structural Basis for RNA Recognition in Roquin‐mediated Post‐Transcriptional Gene Regulation,” Nature structural & molecular biology 21, no. 8 (2014): 671–678, 10.1038/nsmb.2855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Stoecklin G., Lu M., Rattenbacher B., and Moroni C., “A Constitutive Decay Element Promotes Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha mRNA Degradation via an AU‐rich Element‐Independent Pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 23, no. 10 (2003): 3506–3515, 10.1128/mcb.23.10.3506-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Vogel K. U., Edelmann S. L., Jeltsch K. M., et al., “Roquin Paralogs 1 and 2 Redundantly Repress the Icos and Ox40 Costimulator mRNAs and Control Follicular Helper T Cell Differentiation,” Immunity 38, no. 4 (2013): 655–668, 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Gewies A., Gorka O., Bergmann H., et al., “Uncoupling Malt1 Threshold Function From Paracaspase Activity Results in Destructive Autoimmune Inflammation,” Cell reports 9, no. 4 (2014): 1292–1305, 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Schmidt H., Raj T., O'Neill T. J., et al., “Unrestrained Cleavage of Roquin‐1 by MALT1 Induces Spontaneous T Cell Activation and the Development of Autoimmunity,” PNAS 120, no. 48 (2023): e2309205120, 10.1073/pnas.2309205120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kang L., Xie H., Ye H., et al., “Hsa_circ_0007321 Regulates Zika Virus Replication Through miR‐492/NFKBID/NF‐kappaB Signaling Pathway,” Journal of Virology 97, no. 12 (2023): e0123223, 10.1128/jvi.01232-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Viatour P., Dejardin E., Warnier M., et al., “GSK3‐Mediated BCL‐3 Phosphorylation Modulates Its Degradation and Its Oncogenicity,” Molecular Cell 16, no. 1 (2004): 35–45, 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wang V. Y., Li Y., Kim D., et al., “Bcl3 Phosphorylation by Akt, Erk2, and IKK Is Required for Its Transcriptional Activity,” Molecular Cell 67, no. 3 (2017): 484–497.e5, 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Keutgens A., Shostak K., Close P., et al., “The Repressing Function of the Oncoprotein BCL‐3 Requires CtBP, While Its Polyubiquitination and Degradation Involve the E3 Ligase TBLR1,” Molecular and Cellular Biology 30, no. 16 (2010): 4006–4021, 10.1128/mcb.01600-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Massoumi R., Chmielarska K., Hennecke K., Pfeifer A., and Fässler R., “Cyld Inhibits Tumor Cell Proliferation by Blocking Bcl‐3‐Dependent NF‐kappaB Signaling,” Cell 125, no. 4 (2006): 665–677, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Dechend R., Hirano F., Lehmann K., et al., “The Bcl‐3 Oncoprotein Acts as a Bridging Factor Between NF‐kappaB/Rel and Nuclear co‐regulators,” Oncogene 18, no. 22 (1999): 3316–3323, 10.1038/sj.onc.1202717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Watanabe N., Iwamura T., Shinoda T., and Fujita T., “Regulation of NFKB1 Proteins by the Candidate Oncoprotein BCL‐3: Generation of NF‐kappaB Homodimers From the Cytoplasmic Pool of p50‐p105 and Nuclear Translocation,” Embo Journal 16, no. 12 (1997): 3609–3620, 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Guan Y., Yao H., Zheng Z., Qiu G., and Sun K., “MiR‐125b Targets BCL3 and Suppresses Ovarian Cancer Proliferation,” International Journal of Cancer 128, no. 10 (2011): 2274–2283, 10.1002/ijc.25575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Mogilyansky E. and Rigoutsos I., “The miR‐17/92 Cluster: A Comprehensive Update on Its Genomics, Genetics, Functions and Increasingly Important and Numerous Roles in Health and Disease,” Cell Death and Differentiation 20, no. 12 (2013): 1603–1614, 10.1038/cdd.2013.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. MaruYama T., Kobayashi S., Ogasawara K., Yoshimura A., Chen W., and Muta T., “Control of IFN‐γ Production and Regulatory Function by the Inducible Nuclear Protein IκB‐ζ in T Cells,” J Leukoc Biol 98, no. 3 (2015): 385–393, 10.1189/jlb.2A0814-384R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Carow B., Gao Y., Coquet J., and Reilly M., “Rottenberg ME. lck‐Driven Cre Expression Alters T Cell Development in the Thymus and the Frequencies and Functions of Peripheral T Cell Subsets,” Journal of Immunology 197, no. 6 (2016): 2261–2268, 10.4049/jimmunol.1600827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. MaruYama T., “TGF‐β‐induced IκB‐ζ Controls Foxp3 Gene Expression,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 464, no. 2 (2015): 586–589, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Annemann M., Wang Z., Plaza‐Sirvent C., et al., “IκBNS Regulates Murine Th17 Differentiation During Gut Inflammation and Infection,” Journal of Immunology 194, no. 6 (2015): 2888–2898, 10.4049/jimmunol.1401964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kobayashi S., Hara A., Isagawa T., Manabe I., Takeda K., and MaruYama T., “The Nuclear IκB family Protein IκBNS Influences the Susceptibility to Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in a Murine Model,” PLoS ONE 9, no. 10 (2014): e110838, 10.1371/journal.pone.0110838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hosokawa J., Suzuki K., Meguro K., et al., “IκBNS Enhances Follicular Helper T‐cell Differentiation and Function Downstream of ASCl2,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 140, no. 1 (2017): 288–291, 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Schuster M., Plaza‐Sirvent C., Visekruna A., Huehn J., and Schmitz I., “Generation of Foxp3(+)CD25(‐) Regulatory T‐Cell Precursors Requires c‐Rel and IκB(NS),” Frontiers in immunology 10 (2019): 1583, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Marson A., Kretschmer K., Frampton G. M., et al., “Foxp3 occupancy and Regulation of Key Target Genes During T‐cell Stimulation,” Nature 445, no. 7130 (2007): 931–935, 10.1038/nature05478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Grundström S., Anderson P., Scheipers P., and Sundstedt A., “Bcl‐3 and NFkappaB p50‐p50 Homodimers Act as Transcriptional Repressors in Tolerant CD4+ T Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, no. 9 (2004): 8460–8468, 10.1074/jbc.M312398200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Bassetti M. F. J., White J., Kappler J. W., and Marrack P., “Transgenic Bcl‐3 Slows T Cell Proliferation,” International Immunology 21, no. 4 (2009): 339–348, 10.1093/intimm/dxp002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Bauer A., Villunger A., Labi V., et al., “The NF‐kappaB Regulator Bcl‐3 and the BH3‐only Proteins Bim and Puma Control the Death of Activated T Cells,” PNAS 103, no. 29 (2006): 10979–10984, 10.1073/pnas.0603625103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Köhler A., Geiselhöringer A. L., Kolland D., et al., “The atypical IκB family Member Bcl3 Determines Differentiation and Fate of Intestinal RORγt+Regulatory T‐cell Subsets,” Mucosal Immunology 17, no. 4 (2024): 673–691, 10.1016/j.mucimm.2024.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Reißig S., Tang Y., Nikolaev A., et al., “Elevated Levels of Bcl‐3 Inhibits Treg Development and Function Resulting in Spontaneous Colitis,” Nature Communications 8 (2017): 15069, 10.1038/ncomms15069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Corn R. A., Hunter C., Liou H. C., Siebenlist U., and Boothby M. R., “Opposing Roles for RelB and Bcl‐3 in Regulation of T‐box Expressed in T Cells, GATA‐3, and Th Effector Differentiation,” Journal of Immunology 175, no. 4 (2005): 2102–2110, 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Tang W., Wang H., Claudio E., et al., “The Oncoprotein and Transcriptional Regulator Bcl‐3 Governs Plasticity and Pathogenicity of Autoimmune T Cells,” Immunity 41, no. 4 (2014): 555–566, 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Mufazalov I. A., Kuschmann J., Andruszewski D., et al., “Balanced Bcl‐3 Expression in Murine CD4(+) T Cells Is Required for Generation of Encephalitogenic Th17 Cells,” European Journal of Immunology 47, no. 8 (2017): 1335–1341, 10.1002/eji.201746933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Liu H., Zeng L., Yang Y., et al., “Bcl‐3 Regulates the Function of Th17 Cells Through raptor Mediated Glycolysis Metabolism,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022), 10.3389/fimmu.2022.929785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Tang W., Saret S., Tian R., et al., “Bcl‐3 Suppresses Differentiation of RORγt(+) Regulatory T Cells,” Immunology and Cell Biology 99, no. 6 (2021): 586–595, 10.1111/imcb.12441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Jaiswal H., Ciucci T., Wang H., et al., “The NF‐kappaB Regulator Bcl‐3 Restricts Terminal Differentiation and Promotes Memory Cell Formation of CD8+ T Cells During Viral Infection,” Plos Pathogens 17, no. 1 (2021): e1009249, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Hijioka K., Matsuo S., Eto‐Kimura A., Takeshige K., and Muta T., “Induction of the Nuclear IkappaB Protein IkappaB‐zeta Upon Stimulation of B Cell Antigen Receptor,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 356, no. 2 (2007): 476–480, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Adori M., Khoenkhoen S., Zhang J., and Dopico X. C., “Karlsson Hedestam GB. Enhanced B Cell Receptor Signaling Partially Compensates for Impaired Toll‐Like Receptor 4 Responses in LPS‐Stimulated IκBNS‐Deficient B Cells,” Cells 12, no. 9 (2023), 10.3390/cells12091229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Arnold C. N., Pirie E., Dosenovic P., et al., “A Forward Genetic Screen Reveals Roles for Nfkbid, Zeb1, and Ruvbl2 in Humoral Immunity,” PNAS 109, no. 31 (2012): 12286–12293, 10.1073/pnas.1209134109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Pedersen G. K., Àdori M., Khoenkhoen S., Dosenovic P., Beutler B., and Karlsson Hedestam G. B., “B‐1a Transitional Cells Are Phenotypically Distinct and Are Lacking in Mice Deficient in IκBNS,” PNAS 111, no. 39 (2014): E4119–E4126, 10.1073/pnas.1415866111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Khoenkhoen S., Ádori M., Solís‐Sayago D., et al., “IκBNS Expression in B Cells Is Dispensable for IgG Responses to T Cell‐dependent Antigens,” Frontiers in immunology 13 (2022): 1000755, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1000755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Ádori M., Pedersen G. K., Ádori C., et al., “Altered Marginal Zone B Cell Selection in the Absence of IκBNS,” Journal of Immunology 200, no. 2 (2018): 775–787, 10.4049/jimmunol.1700791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Pedersen G. K., Ádori M., Stark J. M., et al., “Heterozygous Mutation in IκBNS Leads to Reduced Levels of Natural IgM Antibodies and Impaired Responses to T‐Independent Type 2 Antigens,” Frontiers in immunology 7 (2016): 65, 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Khoenkhoen S., Erikson E., Ádori M., et al., “TACI Expression and Plasma Cell Differentiation Are Impaired in the Absence of Functional IκBNS,” Immunology and Cell Biology 97, no. 5 (2019): 485–497, 10.1111/imcb.12228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Erikson E., Ádori M., Khoenkhoen S., et al., “Impaired Plasma Cell Differentiation Associates With Increased Oxidative Metabolism in IκBNS‐deficient B Cells,” Cellular Immunology 375 (2022): 104516, 10.1016/j.cellimm.2022.104516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Miura M., Hasegawa N., Noguchi M., Sugimoto K., and Touma M., “The atypical IκB Protein IκB(NS) Is Important for Toll‐Like Receptor‐induced Interleukin‐10 Production in B Cells,” Immunology 147, no. 4 (2016): 453–463, 10.1111/imm.12578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Franzoso G., Carlson L., Scharton‐Kersten T., et al., “Critical Roles for the Bcl‐3 Oncoprotein in T Cell‐Mediated Immunity, Splenic Microarchitecture, and Germinal Center Reactions,” Immunity 6, no. 4 (1997): 479–490, 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80291-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Ong S. T., Hackbarth M. L., Degenstein L. C., Baunoch D. A., Anastasi J., and McKeithan T. W., “Lymphadenopathy, Splenomegaly, and Altered Immunoglobulin Production in BCL3 Transgenic Mice,” Oncogene 16, no. 18 (1998): 2333–2343, 10.1038/sj.onc.1201771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Hövelmeyer N., Wörns M. A., Reissig S., et al., “Overexpression of Bcl‐3 Inhibits the Development of Marginal Zone B Cells,” European Journal of Immunology 44, no. 2 (2014): 545–552, 10.1002/eji.201343655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Zhang X., Paun A., Claudio E., Wang H., and Siebenlist U., “The Tumor Promoter and NF‐κB Modulator Bcl‐3 Regulates Splenic B Cell Development,” Journal of Immunology 191, no. 12 (2013): 5984–5992, 10.4049/jimmunol.1300611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Ueta M., Hamuro J., Ueda E., et al., “Stat6‐independent Tissue Inflammation Occurs Selectively on the Ocular Surface and Perioral Skin of IkappaBzeta‐/‐ mice,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 49, no. 8 (2008): 3387–3394, 10.1167/iovs.08-1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Lee J., Alam J., Choi E., Ko Y. K., Lee A., and Choi Y., “Association of a Dysbiotic Oral Microbiota With the Development of Focal Lymphocytic Sialadenitis in IκB‐ζ‐deficient Mice,” Npj Biofilms and Microbiomes 6, no. 1 (2020): 49, 10.1038/s41522-020-00158-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Schuster M., Plaza‐Sirvent C., Matthies A. M., et al., “c‐REL and IκB(NS) Govern Common and Independent Steps of Regulatory T Cell Development From Novel CD122‐Expressing Pre‐Precursors,” Journal of Immunology 199, no. 3 (2017): 920–930, 10.4049/jimmunol.1600877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Presa M., Racine J. J., Dwyer J. R., et al., “A Hypermorphic Nfkbid Allele Contributes to Impaired Thymic Deletion of Autoreactive Diabetogenic CD8(+) T Cells in NOD Mice,” Journal of Immunology 201, no. 7 (2018): 1907–1917, 10.4049/jimmunol.1800465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Zhang X., Wang H., Claudio E., Brown K., and Siebenlist U., “A Role for the IkappaB Family Member Bcl‐3 in the Control of central Immunologic Tolerance,” Immunity 27, no. 3 (2007): 438–452, 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Ruan Q., Zheng S. J., Palmer S., Carmody R. J., and Chen Y. H., “Roles of Bcl‐3 in the Pathogenesis of Murine Type 1 Diabetes,” Diabetes 59, no. 10 (2010): 2549–2557, 10.2337/db10-0480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Tang W., Wang H., Tian R., et al., “Bcl‐3 Inhibits Lupus‐Like Phenotypes in BL6/Lpr Mice,” European Journal of Immunology 51, no. 1 (2021): 197–205, 10.1002/eji.202048584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Hunter R. B. and Kandarian S. C., “Disruption of either the Nfkb1 or the Bcl3 Gene Inhibits Skeletal Muscle Atrophy,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation 114, no. 10 (2004): 1504–1511, 10.1172/JCI21696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Michaelis L., Treß M., Löw H. C., et al., “Gut Commensal‐Induced IκBζ Expression in Dendritic Cells Influences the Th17 Response,” Frontiers in immunology 11 (2020): 612336, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.612336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Kakiuchi N., Yoshida K., Uchino M., et al., “Frequent Mutations That Converge on the NFKBIZ Pathway in Ulcerative Colitis,” Nature 577, no. 7789 (2020): 260–265, 10.1038/s41586-019-1856-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Nanki K., Fujii M., Shimokawa M., et al., “Somatic Inflammatory Gene Mutations in Human Ulcerative Colitis Epithelium,” Nature 577, no. 7789 (2020): 254–259, 10.1038/s41586-019-1844-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Yamazaki S., Inohara N., Ohmuraya M., et al., “IkappaBzeta Controls IL‐17‐triggered Gene Expression Program in Intestinal Epithelial Cells That Restricts Colonization of SFB and Prevents Th17‐Associated Pathologies,” Mucosal Immunol 15, no. 6 (2022): 1321–1337, 10.1038/s41385-022-00554-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. O'Carroll C., Moloney G., Hurley G., et al., “Bcl‐3 Deficiency Protects Against Dextran‐Sodium Sulphate‐Induced Colitis in the Mouse,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology 173, no. 2 (2013): 332–342, 10.1111/cei.12119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Müller A., Hennig A., Lorscheid S., et al., “IκBζ Is a Key Transcriptional Regulator of IL‐36‐driven Psoriasis‐Related Gene Expression in Keratinocytes,” PNAS 115, no. 40 (2018): 10088–10093, 10.1073/pnas.1801377115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Muromoto R., Sato A., Komori Y., et al., “Regulation of NFKBIZ Gene Promoter Activity by STAT3, C/EBPβ, and STAT1,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 613 (2022): 61–66, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.04.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Ohgakiuchi Y., Saino Y., Muromoto R., et al., “Dimethyl Fumarate Dampens IL‐17‐ACT1‐TBK1 Axis‐Mediated Phosphorylation of Regnase‐1 and Suppresses IL‐17‐Induced IκB‐ζ Expression,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 521, no. 4 (2020): 957–963, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Alpsoy A., Wu X. S., Pal S., et al., “IκBζ Is a Dual‐Use Coactivator of NF‐κB and POU Transcription Factors,” Molecular Cell 84, no. 6 (2024): 1149–1157, 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Wu Z., Zhang X., Yang J., et al., “Nuclear Protein IkappaB‐zeta Inhibits the Activity of STAT3,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 387, no. 2 (2009): 348–352, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Totzke G., Essmann F., Pohlmann S., Lindenblatt C., Janicke R. U., and Schulze‐Osthoff K., “A Novel Member of the IkappaB Family, Human IkappaB‐zeta, Inhibits Transactivation of p65 and Its DNA Binding,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, no. 18 (2006): 12645–12654, 10.1074/jbc.M511956200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Michel F., Soler‐Lopez M., Petosa C., Cramer P., Siebenlist U., and Muller C. W., “Crystal Structure of the Ankyrin Repeat Domain of Bcl‐3: A Unique Member of the IkappaB Protein family,” Embo Journal 20, no. 22 (2001): 6180–6190, 10.1093/emboj/20.22.6180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Walker T., Adamson A., and Jackson D. A., “BCL‐3 Attenuation of TNFA Expression Involves an Incoherent Feed‐Forward Loop Regulated by Chromatin Structure,” PLoS ONE 8, no. 10 (2013): e77015, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Gaire B., Padmanabhan S., Zou Y., Uddin M. M., Reddy S. U., and Vancurova I., “IFNgamma Induces Bcl3 Expression by JAK1/STAT1/p65 Signaling, Resulting in Increased IL‐8 Expression in Ovarian Cancer Cells,” FEBS Open Bio 13, no. 8 (2023): 1495–1506, 10.1002/2211-5463.13624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Brocke‐Heidrich K., Ge B., Cvijic H., et al., “BCL3 is Induced by IL‐6 via Stat3 Binding to Intronic Enhancer HS4 and Represses Its Own Transcription,” Oncogene 25, no. 55 (2006): 7297–7304, 10.1038/sj.onc.1209711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Bundy D. L. and McKeithan T. W., “Diverse Effects of BCL3 Phosphorylation on Its Modulation of NF‐kappaB p52 Homodimer Binding to DNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, no. 52 (1997): 33132–33139, 10.1074/jbc.272.52.33132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Collins P. E., Kiely P. A., and Carmody R. J., “Inhibition of Transcription by B Cell Leukemia 3 (Bcl‐3) Protein Requires Interaction With Nuclear Factor κB (NF‐κB) p50,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 289, no. 10 (2014): 7059–7067, 10.1074/jbc.M114.551986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Franzoso G., Bours V., Azarenko V., et al., “The Oncoprotein Bcl‐3 Can Facilitate NF‐kappa B‐Mediated Transactivation by Removing Inhibiting p50 Homodimers From Select Kappa B Sites,” Embo Journal 12, no. 10 (1993): 3893–3901, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06067.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Tartey S., Matsushita K., Vandenbon A., et al., “Akirin2 is Critical for Inducing Inflammatory Genes by Bridging IκB‐ζ and the SWI/SNF Complex,” Embo Journal 33, no. 20 (2014): 2332–2348, 10.15252/embj.201488447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Wang V. Y., Huang W., Asagiri M., et al., “The Transcriptional Specificity of NF‐κB Dimers Is Coded Within the κB DNA Response Elements,” Cell reports 2, no. 4 (2012): 824–839, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
