Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323918

Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang

Yuxin Wei 1,2, Hongfei Tao 1,2, Yan Xu 3, Mahemujiang Aihemaiti 1,2, Chunlei Lu 4, Youwei Jiang 1,2, Qiao Li 1,2,*
Editor: Nguyen-Thanh Son5
PMCID: PMC12074591  PMID: 40359423

Abstract

Global warming is exacerbating the occurrence of droughts, which have a significant impact on society. Drought is one of the main factors limiting the development of the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang. Clarifying the driving mechanism and spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of drought in this irrigation area is crucial for ensuring the sustainable development of agriculture. In this paper, the temperature vegetation drought index (TVDI) is used as a drought indicator to analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang, as well as to reveal the factors influencing drought using a Geoprobe model. The results show that the mean value of the TVDI in the Xinjiang Santun River Irrigation Area during 19 years was 0. 738, categorizing it as medium drought. During this period, there was an increasing trend of drought in spring and autumn and a decreasing trend of drought in summer. The drought in the irrigation district had strong spatial heterogeneity, and overall, the drought was stronger in the northern part of the region than in the southern part of the region. Over the past 19 years, the light drought areas in the irrigation district shifted to the medium and severe drought classes at a rate of 114.9 km2·10a−1. The combined effect of elevation and temperature had the strongest explanatory power for drought occurrence in the irrigated area, with a q-value of 0.869. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for drought risk assessment and water resource planning in arid regions, as well as a reference for drought monitoring studies in similar regions.

1. Introduction

Due to the combination of various factors, including global warming and human activities, drought disasters are becoming more frequent, causing tens of billions of dollars in economic losses and seriously threatening human society [1,2]. Drought has become one of the most widespread and destructive natural disasters worldwide [3], and it is characterized by the following features: a slow onset and long duration, wide-ranging impacts, significant cumulative effects, and destructive effects on ecosystems and human society [4]. In addition, drought events are characterized by significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and their impacts accumulate over time and persist in the ecosystem for a long period of time even after the drought is over [5,6]. Therefore, quickly attaining an accurate understanding of the drought situation is of great significance in guiding the ecological restoration and agricultural production in a region [7].

Traditional drought monitoring mainly reflects regional drought conditions by means of climate data or soil moisture information for specific locations [8]. Many different drought indicators have been proposed to monitor changes in drought severity. The most commonly used indicators include the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) [9], standardized precipitation index(SPI) [10], and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) [11]. However, due to differences in global climate conditions, the results of the drought index assessment will vary from region to region [12]. The PDSI lacks the ability to characterize multi-scale drought, and its parameters are uncertain [13]. The SPI only considers the precipitation factor, and it ignores other important factors affecting drought such as evapotranspiration [14]. The SPEI considers the water balance but does not consider soil water information [14].

Remote sensing technology has gradually become a research hotspot because it provides multi-spatiotemporal scale vegetation and surface temperature information for the study of land surface processes, realizes wide-area dynamic monitoring, and greatly improves the efficiency of drought assessment [15,16]. Many scholars have conducted research on the use of remote sensing technology to monitor drought disasters. For example, Yue et al. [17] found that the Climate Forecast System Model (CFSMP) has the potential to mitigate seasonal drought in South China and can be applied to similar regions with similar resource crises. Yang et al. [18] used the SPEI to analyze the temporal and spatial patterns of meteorological drought on the North China Plain from 1970 to 2020 and explored the contributions of climate factors on annual and seasonal scales. Zhang et al. [19] analyzed the spatial and temporal characteristics of drought in Asian grassland ecosystems and the change trend from 2010 to 2018 using the temperature vegetation drought index (TVDI).

At the driver level, droughts occur as a result of the non-linear coupling of natural factors and human activities [20]. Climate warming alters precipitation patterns and increases evapotranspiration from vegetation, leading to more frequent droughts, while human activities alter the water cycle and vegetation cover, further amplifying the effects of drought [21]. Understanding these climate phenomena and the mechanisms by which human activities respond to drought is essential for monitoring and responding to future drought risks. As drought research continues to deepen, scholars around the globe have conducted extensive research on drought-driven mechanisms. For example, Wang et al. [22] revealed that the main drivers of drought in the Yellow River Basin in China are climate and elevation. Gebremichael et al. [23] found that the main drivers of drought in the Upper Awash Basin in Ethiopia are land use changes and vegetation cover changes. Zhu et al. [24] found that the increase in the water vapor pressure deficit is one of the main drivers of drought propagation in Central Asia.

Although many studies have explored the spatial and temporal changes in drought and its influencing factors, there are some shortcomings in existing studies. First, most of the drought monitoring studies focused on large-scale regional analysis, and there is a lack fine monitoring of ecologically sensitive units such as typical irrigation zones over long time scales. Second, most of the existing studies focused on drought inversion and did not reveal enough about the coupling mechanism between drought and natural and human activities. Finally, it is often difficult for traditional research methods to quantify both the spatial distribution characteristics and temporal changes of drought, thus hindering the attainment of a deeper understanding of the evolution and driving mechanisms of drought. In order to more comprehensively analyze the spatial and temporal characteristics of drought and its driving mechanisms, the combination of Geodetector and trend analysis has become an innovative approach for studying drought dynamics [25].

The Xinjiang Santun River Irrigation Area, as the core of the economic belt on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang, China, is the solid foundation of Changji’s agricultural economy and plays a vital role in ensuring the stable development of the city’s economy. Since 2005, a series of water resource management and ecological protection measures have been taken in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang. However, there are still two gaps in research on drought in this region. (1) There is a lack of quantitative analysis of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of drought in a long time series (>15 years). (2) The interactive driving mechanism of multi-dimensional factors such as the topographic gradient (elevation and slope), climate change (temperature) and human activities (gross domestic product (GDP) and land use types) on the occurrence of drought has not yet been explained. These research gaps directly restrict scientific decision-making for the optimal allocation of water resources and drought prevention and control in irrigated areas. Clearly understanding the spatiotemporal differentiation and driving mechanism of drought in this region can provide a scientific basis for optimizing the irrigation system and planting structure.

In view of this, the two research objectives of this study were (1) to reveal the drought intensity and spatial-temporal differentiation patterns in the Santun River Irrigation Area based on Landsat (thematic mapper (TM)/ enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+)/ operational land imager (OLI)_thermal infrared sensor (TIRS)) time-series datasets for 2005–2023 by integrating trend analysis and spatial transfer matrix methods through the TVDI model; and (2) to quantify the contributions of topographic factors, climatic factors, and anthropogenic factors to the formation of the spatial pattern of drought and their interaction effect. In this study, an entire chain of drought monitoring-driver analysis-strategy response was realized. The results of this study provide strong support for the optimal allocation of water resources, adjustment of the irrigation system and policy formulation, and promotion of sustainable regional development.

2. Study area

2.1 Study area

The Xinjiang Santun River Irrigation Area (86°24’–87°37’E, 43°26’–45°20’N) is located in the Xinjiang Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, in the northern foothills of the Tianshan Mountains, and at the southern edge of the Junggar Basin (Fig 1). The main water source projects in this area are the Santun River Reservoir and Nurga Reservoir, and the backbone water transmission projects are the east and west trunk canals, making this a typical oasis agricultural system in an arid region. As a large irrigation area in China, the Santun River Irrigation Area is responsible for irrigating 680 km2 of farmland. The irrigation area has an elevations of 415–1315 m, a total area of about 730 km2, and a total population of about 403,500 people. The entire area exhibits an irregular cluster shape. Subject to its geographic location and topographic conditions, the climate in the study area is complex, with an average annual temperature of 6.87°C and precipitation of 280.03 mm. The overall climate features include severe winters, hot summers, rare rainfall, strong evaporation, and a large temperature difference between day and night. The crops in the irrigated areas mainly include wheat, corn, cotton, and other crops, and drought is the dominant factor restricting local development.

Fig 1. Study area.

Fig 1

2.2 Materials and methods

Considering the influences of the weather, cloud cover, and seasonal vegetation cover in the study area [26,27], in this study, Landsat TM/ETM + /OLI_TIRS series remote sensing images (strip number: 143, line number: 29, 30, resolution: 30 m for period 114 from 2005 to 2023 with clear weather and cloud cover below 10%,) were selected for analysis. ENVI software was utilized to conduct remote sensing image geometric correction, stripping, radiometric calibration, atmospheric correction, mosaicking, cropping, and mask pre-processing operations [28]. Additional data sources are presented in Table 1. in the remote sensing image information is presented Table 2.

Table 1. Data information.

Data Resolution (m) Data availability Data sources
Landsat remote sensing data 30 2005–2023 United States Geological Survey website (http://glovis.usgs.gov/)
China National Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/)
Digital elevation model 30 2005–2023 China National Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/)
Slope 30 2005–2023 China National Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/)
Aspect 30 2005–2023 China National Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn/)
Temperature / 2005–2023 China National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/)
Precipitation / 2005–2023 China National Meteorological Information Center (http://data.cma.cn/)
Gross domestic product 1000 2005–2023 Data Center for Resource and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/)
Land use type 30 2005–2023 Data Center for Resource and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/)
Agrotype 1000 2005–2023 Data Center for Resource and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn/)
Measured soil moisture / 2017 Deployment of Smart Moisture Monitors in Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

Table 2. Remote sensing imagery schedule.

Number Date Number Date Number Date
1 8-Apr-2005 39 15-Aug-2011 77 22-July-2017
2 24-Apr-2005 40 31-Aug-2011 78 7-Aug-2017
3 14-Aug-2005 41 18-Oct-2011 79 8-Sept-2017
4 30-Aug-2005 42 3-Nov-2011 80 12-Oct-2017
5 1-Oct-2005 43 11-Apr-2012 81 10-Aug-2018
6 17-Oct-2005 44 24-Apr-2012 82 26-Aug-2018
7 13-May-2006 45 17-Aug-2012 83 9-Oct-2018
8 29-May-2006 46 2-Sep-2012 84 25-Oct-2018
9 1-Aug-2006 47 4-Oct-2012 85 9-May-2019
10 17-Aug-2006 48 20-Oct-2012 86 25-May-2019
11 20-Oct-2006 49 22-Apr-2013 87 13-Aug-2019
12 5-Nov-2006 50 8-May-2013 88 29-Aug-2019
13 22-Apr-2007 51 12-Aug-2013 89 16-Oct-2019
14 8-May-2007 52 28-Aug-2013 90 1-Nov-2019
15 20-Aug-2007 53 15-Oct-2013 91 11-May-2020
16 5-Sept-2007 54 31-Oct-2013 92 27-May-2020
17 8-Nov-2007 55 9-Apr-2014 93 15-Aug-2020
18 24-Nov-2007 56 25-Apr-2014 94 31-Aug-2020
19 31-Mar-2008 57 15-Aug-2014 95 2-Oct-2020
20 16-Apr-2008 58 31-Aug-2014 96 18-Oct-2020
21 6-Aug-2008 59 12-Oct-2014 97 14-May-2021
22 22-Aug-2008 60 28-Oct-2014 98 30-May-2021
23 9-Oct-2008 61 12-Apr-2015 99 2-Aug-2021
24 25-Oct-2008 62 28-Apr-2015 100 18-Aug-2021
25 3-Apr-2009 63 6-July-2015 101 5-Oct-2021
26 19-Apr-2009 64 22-July-2015 102 21-Oct-2021
27 22-June-2009 65 5-Oct-2015 103 1-May-2022
28 8-July-2009 66 21-Oct-2015 104 17-May-2022
29 26-Sept-2009 67 16-May-2016 105 5-Aug-2022
30 12-Oct-2009 68 30-Apr-2016 106 21-Aug-2022
31 8-May-2010 69 4-Aug-2016 107 8-Oct-2022
32 24-May-2010 70 20-Aug-2016 108 24-Oct-2022
33 9-June-2010 71 7-Oct-2016 109 25-Mar-2023
34 25-June-2010 72 23-Oct-2016 110 10-Apr-2023
35 15-Oct-2010 73 3-May-2017 111 16-Aug-2023
36 31-Oct-2010 74 19-May-2017 112 1-Sept-2023
37 9-Apr-2011 75 6-June-2017 113 3-Oct-2023
38 25-Apr-2011 76 22-June-2017 114 19-Oct-2023

Annotation: For 2005–2012, the remote sensing image sensor model is Landsat 7 ETM; for 2013–2021 and 2023, the remote sensing image sensor model is Landsat 8 OLI; and for 2022, the sensor model is Landsat 9 OLI.

2.3 Methods of data analysis

Xinjiang is the core of the Silk Road Economic Belt, but its special geographic environment has led to the frequent occurrence of drought events. Previous studies on drought monitoring in Xinjiang have mostly discussed the influences of meteorological factors on drought in large-scale regions. In this study, in addition to using Landsat series satellite data to calculate the TVDI index, the potential influences of factors such as the topography, geomorphology, land use types, gross domestic product (GDP), and human activities on drought were analyzed. The specific workflow of the research is illustrated in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Workflow of the study.

Fig 2

2.3.1 Calculation of temperature–vegetation drought index based on Ts-NDVI feature space.

Among the many drought indices developed, compared with drought indices such as the SPI and SPEI, the TVDI has a clear physical mechanism for retrieving drought through the land surface temperature (LST)–normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) feature space, which can effectively eliminate the influence of a single factor on monitoring results. The model is simple and effective, which is more suitable for agro-ecosystem monitoring [29]. According to relevant studies, the LST and NDVI exhibit an obvious negative correlation at different temporal and spatial resolutions [30]. The theoretical value range of the TVDI is (0,1). The higher the value, the drier the representative pixel that represents the region. The specific calculation formulas are as follows:

TVDI=TsTs_minTs_maxTs_min, (1)
Ts_max=amax+bmaxNDVI, (2)
Ts_min=amin+bminNDVI, (3)

where Ts_max is the maximum surface temperature, constituting the dry edge of the feature space; Ts_min is the minimum surface temperature, constituting the wet edge of the feature space; amax and bmax are the dry-side linear fit parameters; and amin and bmin are the wet-side linear fit parameters.

In this study, the drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area was divided into five levels according to relevant research results on the temperature vegetation drought index, as well as the actual soil water content in the study area and the drought levels classification methods utilized in previous studies [3133]. The details are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. TVDI drought monitoring grade classification standard in the Santun River Irrigation Area.
Range of TVDI values Degree of drought Drought expression
0–0.6 No drought Normal vegetation development
0.6–0.71 Mild drought The air near the surface is dry
0.71–0.76 Moderate drought The leaves of the plants wilted
0.76–0.85 Severe drought The soil appears to be thick and dry
0.85–1.0 Extreme drought The soil cracked and the vegetation died

2.3.2 Drought trend analysis under time series.

In this study, Theil-Sen trend analysis and the Mann-Kendall (MK) test were used to analyze the change trend of the drought. These methods do not depend on the specific distribution form of the data, have a strong tolerance for errors in the data, can handle the discontinuity problem of remote sensing data without interpolation, and can complementarily analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of drought, thereby providing a robust analysis framework for drought research [34,35]. The formula is as follows:

β=Median{(xjxi)ji}j>i, (4)

where β is the median of the data pairs’ slopes; Median () is the functions used to take the median of a data pair; xi is item i of the raster data in the time series; and xj is item j of the raster data in the time series:

S=i=1n1j=i+1nsgn(xjxi)i<jn, (5)

where sgn() is a symbolic function. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

sgn(xjxi)={1xjxi>00xjxi=01xjxi<0, (6)

where S is the statistic representing the test; and n is the sample size of the time series. When n < 10, S is used directly for trend testing; and when n > 10, S is standardized and is later converted to the test statistic Z.

The specific formula for calculating the statistic Z is as follows:

Z={S1var(S)S>00S=0S+1var(S)S<0, (7)
var(S)=n(n1)(2n+5)i=1mti(ti1)(2ti+5)18, (8)

wherevar(S) is the variance of S; n is the total length of the sample year; m is the number of recurring datasets in the sequence; and ti is the number of duplicates in the ith duplicate dataset.

If Z > 0, the trend of TVDI is increasing, and vice versa. If Z = 0, TVDI does not exhibit a significant trend. In this study, the significance level is α=0.05. When |Z | is greater than 1.96 and 2.58, the trend passes the significance test at the 95% and 99% confidence levels, respectively. The criteria for determining the significance of a specific trend are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Mann–Kendall trend test grading.
β |Z| Trend classification
β>0 2.58<|Z| Extremely significant desiccation
1.96<|Z|≤2.58 Significant desiccation
1.96≥|Z| Slight desiccation
β |Z|=0 Intact
β<0 1.96≥|Z| Mild relief
1.96<|Z|≤2.58 Significant relief
2.58<|Z| Extremely significant relief

2.3.3 Spatial transition matrix.

The space transition matrix, also known as the transition matrix or state transition matrix, is mainly used to analyze and predict the changes between different states of the system. It can analyze complex transformations into basic operations and is an important mathematical tool for describing the state transition law of a system in discrete time [36]. By constructing and applying the spatial transfer matrix, in this study, the transfer conditions and rules of the different drought grades in the study area were investigated. The specific formula is as follows:

Sij=(S11S1nSn1Snn), (9)

where Sij is the area of class i data converted to class j; and n is the total number of graded area divisions

2.3.4 Geodetector model.

The selection of the Geodetector for use in this study was based on the advantages of its method and the high adaptability of the drought driving mechanism; that is, as a non-parametric chemical tool, it does not need to presuppose the mathematical relationship between variables, effectively avoids the bias of the traditional regression model caused by function mis-setting, and is suitable for nonlinear or threshold response analysis between drought factors and indexes [37]. In this study, the TVDI was taken as the dependent variable, and nine types of factors, including natural factors and human factors, were taken as the independent variables. Through the detection module of single factor and double factor interaction, the drought driving factors of the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation District and the influence of each factor interaction on the TVDI were studied. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

q=1h=1LNhσh2σ2N2=1SSWSST, (10)

where q is the explanatory power of each influencing factor for TVDI; h is the number of the stratification of the influencing factors for each variable; Nh and N are the number of units in layer h and the total number of units in the study area, respectively; σ2 is the variance and global variance of the different graded regions; SSW is the sum of the intra-layer variances; and SST is the total variance.

The nine driving factors considered in this study were the temperature, slope, slope direction, elevation, soil type, GDP, NDVI, land use type, and fractional vegetation cover (FVC). The driving logic of each driving factor for the occurrence of drought disaster is presented in Table 5.

Table 5. The driving logic of drought by the different driving factors.
Driving factor Driver logic
Temperature Temperature directly affects the soil water deficit by regulating surface evapotranspiration, which leads to drought [38].
Slope The slope angle controls the surface runoff rate and water retention capacity and induces drought [39].
Aspect The slope aspect affects the surface evapotranspiration and induces drought through the difference in the solar radiation [40].
DEM The water-heat balance is regulated by the vertical differentiation of the temperature lapse rate (0.6°C/100 m) and precipitation [40].
Soil type The water holding capacities of different soil types are different, which directly affects the threshold of drought occurrence [40].
NDVI Reflects the vegetation greenness, biomass, and photosynthetic activity intensity [41]
FVC Quantifies the spatial density of the vegetation cover (coverage ratio) [41]
GDP The intensity of the regional economic development breaks the balance of the regional water cycle and induces drought [42].
Land use type Land use type changes alter the regional water use intensity and induce drought [43].

In this study, in the ArcGIS software, the natural breakpoint method was used to reclassify the temperature, slope, slope direction, soil type, GDP, NVI, and vegetation cover indicators, each of which was divided into 10 categories, and the land use type indicators were divided into six categories. After this, a fishing net was constructed based on the specification of 500 m × 500 m in the Santun River Irrigation Area, and it was clipped based on the vector map of the irrigation area to obtain a vector map of the irrigation area covered by the fishing net. Using the interactive detection module of Geodetector, the attribute values of the nine indicators were extracted for data analysis, and the center of each grid was taken as a sampling point. The classification scheme is presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Classification of TVDI effector interactions.
Basis of judgment Type of interaction
q(X1 ∩ X2)<min(q(X1),q(X2)) Nonlinear weakening
min(q(X1),q(X2))<q(X ∩ X2)<max(q(X1),q(X2)) Single-factor nonlinear attenuation
q(X1 ∩ X2)<max(q(X1),q(X2)) Two-factor enhancement
q(X1 ∩ X2)=q(X1)+q(X2) Separate
q(X1 ∩ X2)>q(X1)+q(X2) Nonlinear enhancement

3. Results

3.1 Evaluation of the credibility of the drought monitoring indicators for the vegetation growing season in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

According to the physical meaning of the TVDI, the TVDI value is negatively correlated with the soil moisture. When the soil water content of the 0–20 cm layer is used as the validation standard for the drought classification, the evaluation results are more accurate. A large number of related studies have verified this conclusion [44]. In this study, the soil moisture content at a depth of 10 cm was selected to evaluate the credibility of the TVDI monitoring results. Information about the spatial extent of the measured soil moisture content sampling points is shown in Fig 3. Due to the long study period, the missing soil moisture data, and the large amount of month-by-month validation data, in this study, the measured soil water content data for the irrigation area in May, June, July, August, and September 2017 corresponding to the TVDI obtained via inversion of the remote sensing image data for the same period were selected for use in conducting the correlation analysis and validation. As shown in Fig 4, the overall fitting coefficient of determination R2 of the TVDI and the measured soil water content for each period in the irrigation area was 0.47, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was –0.721, which all passed the significance test (P = 0.05). Overall, the TVDI exhibited a significant negative correlation with the soil water content, so the TVDI calculated from the Landsat series remote sensing data for drought monitoring in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang is highly credible.

Fig 3. Distribution of sampling sites in the study area.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Correlation between soil moisture content and TVDI.

Fig 4

3.2 Construction of Ts-NDVI feature space and fitting of the wet and dry edges

Fig 5 shows the results of the dry and wet edge fitting of the Ts-NDVI feature space for the Santun River Irrigation Area. The sampling interval is 10 image points for each period due to the large amount of data, and it is illustrated using the data for the following eight periods as an example. As can be seen from Fig 5, the slope of the dry edge was negative for many years, and the mean R2 value was as high as 0.9 for many years, indicating that the dry edge fitting effect was excellent. With increasing NDVI, the land surface temperature decreased, and the two had a strong negative correlation. The slope of the wet-edge fitting equation was greater than zero except in 2022, indicating that in most cases, the minimum surface temperature increased when the NDVI increased. The absolute value and R2 value of the fitted equations for the dry side exceeded those for the wet side, i.e., the sensitivity of the fitted maximum surface temperature to the changes in the NDVI was higher for the dry side than for the wet side. Therefore, the dry side had a better overall fit.

Fig 5. Spatial dry and wet side fitting of the TS-NDVI characteristics for different time periods in the Santun River Irrigation Area: (a) 2006/05; (b) 2007/04; (c) 2008/10; (d) 2009/08; (e) 2011/08; (f) 2014/04;(g) 2017/05; and (h) 2022/05.

Fig 5

3.3 Characteristics of the spatial and temporal variations in the TVDI during the vegetation growing season in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

3.3.1 Trends of the drought duration.

To analyze the characteristics of the time series changes in the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang from 2005 to 2023 on different time scales, in this study, the annual average TVDI, the TVDI for the different drought categories, and the percentage of the area during 2005–2023 were statistically analyzed using linear trend analysis (Fig 6). It can be seen that during the past 20 years, the annual average TVDI in the irrigation area varied between 0.699 and 0.774, and the average TVDI was 0.738 in many years. According to the drought classifications presented in Table 2, the drought condition in the irrigation area was medium drought all year. The peak TVDI value occurred in 2016 (0.774), and the lowest value occurred in 2011 (0.699). Thus, the drought condition in the irrigation area as a whole exhibited a fluctuating increasing trend, and the growth rate was 0.0008/a according to the linear fitting.

Fig 6. Inter-annual variations in the TVDI and proportions of the study area with different drought classes in the Santun River Irrigation Area during 2005–2023.

Fig 6

In addition, the irrigation area in which moderate drought occurred accounted for the largest multi-year proportion, with an average value of 53.01%. The area with severe drought accounted for the next highest proportion (26.52%). The area with mild drought accounted for 20.1%. The areas with no drought or extreme drought were very small, accounting for only 0.2% and 0.16% of the study area. During the last 20 years, the percentage of the area with moderate drought ranged from 19.07% to 68.32%, and it continuously increased at a rate of 0.0019/a. The area with moderate drought accounted for the largest percentage of the total area (498 km2) in 2015. The proportion of the area with severe drought ranged from 1.54% to 77.67%, and it exhibited an increasing trend with a rate of 0.0089/a. The area with severe drought was the largest (about 566 km2) in 2016. The percentage of the area with mild drought ranged from 0.92% to 69.43% during the last 20 years, and it decreased slowly at a rate of –0.0064/a. The proportion of the area with mild drought (506 km2) occurred in 2011. Based on the interannual trends of the temperature, precipitation, and TVDI in the study area (Fig 7), it can be seen that in the study area, the TVDI was positively correlated with the temperature and negatively correlated with the precipitation during the last 20 years. As the temperature increased and the precipitation decreased, droughts occurred frequently in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang, and the trend of the droughts gradually increased.

Fig 7. Trends of the temperature, precipitation, and TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang, during 2005–2023.

Fig 7

(a) Relationship between the mean annual temperature and the TVDI; (b) Relationship between the mean annual precipitation and the TVDI.

From the perspective of the vegetation growth season, the TVDI exhibited different trends with seasonal changes (Fig 8). Based on the statistical analysis, the mean value of the spring TVDI (March–May) was 0.772, the mean value of the summer TVDI (June–August) was 0.722, and the mean value of the autumn TVDI (September–November) was 0.721. Linear fitting of the TVDI for each season yielded linear trends of 0.0049 a–1 (spring), –0.0047 a–1 (summer), and 0.0023 a–1 (autumn). This indicates that from 2005 to 2023, the drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area of Xinjiang was reduced in the summer and enhanced in the spring and fall.

Fig 8. Temporal trends of the TVDI in different seasons in the Santun River Irrigation Area.

Fig 8

3.3.2 Characteristics of the spatial distribution of drought.

The spatial distribution of the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang from 2005 to 2023 is shown in Fig 9. As can be seen from Fig 9, the distribution of the TVDI in the irrigation district exhibited very strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity, with light drought and moderate drought being the most common levels of drought severity. The drought was weaker in the south and southwest than in the north and northeast. In general, the irrigated areas exhibited a trend of gradual drying during the past 20 years, and the frequency of the occurrence of moderate drought was much higher in the northwest and central areas than in the south. The average annual TVDI in the irrigated area was 0.738, indicating medium drought. The area with a low degree of drought was mainly concentrated in the southern part of the irrigation area. This area was characterized by a relatively high topography, proximity to the water source, i.e., the reservoir, abundant surface water resources, a relatively high vegetation coverage, a TVDI of basically below 0.6, and no drought. Low drought and medium drought were the main types of drought in the irrigated area, which were mainly distributed in the southern and central parts of the irrigated area. In this area, the TVDI was 0.6–0.76. The regions with higher degrees of drought were mainly concentrated in the central and northern parts of the irrigated area, and the TVDI value was higher closer to the northern region.

Fig 9. Spatial distributions of the TVDI drought classes in the vegetation growing season from 2005 to 2023 in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang.

Fig 9

The spatial distribution of the TVDI in different seasons in the Santun River Irrigation Area exhibited significant differences due to a variety of factors such as seasonal solar radiation, air temperature, rainfall, land use types, geographic location, and vegetation type. As shown in Fig 10, in general, the frequency of drought was greater in the central and northern parts of the irrigation area than in the other areas. In the past 20 years, the irrigation area was mainly dominated by severe drought in spring, and the proportion of the area with drought accounted for as high as 78.44%. The drought was alleviated in summer and fall. The area was mainly dominated by light and medium drought in summer, and the proportions of the area with light and medium drought accounted for 44.14% and 32.75% of the irrigation area, respectively. In the fall, the area was mainly dominated by medium drought, and the area with drought accounted for 80.38%. The areas with TVDI values indicating moderate drought and severe drought were significantly larger in 2009, 2012, and 2016 than in the other years, the proportion of the area with severe drought was greater than 56.31%, and the TVDI of the entire irrigation area exhibited an obvious increasing trend compared with the other years. In 2005, 2011, and 2014, the degree of drought was significantly lighter, and the proportions of the area with light drought were 45.04%, 69.43%, and 54.37%, respectively.

Fig 10. Spatial distributions of the TVDI in the different seasons in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang.

Fig 10

3.3.3 Inter-annual trends of the drought conditions in the study area.

The Sen trend analysis value β of the annual average TVDI in the study area during 2005–2023 was calculated using Equation (4), and Equations (5)–(8) were used to conduct the Mann–Kendall trend significance test. The interannual trend of the TVDI and the spatial distribution of the significance of the superposition of the analysis were obtained using the Python programming code, and based on Table 2, the drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area during the last 20 years. The change trend was divided into six types: extremely significant variable drought, significant variable drought, slight variable drought, slight mitigation, significant mitigation, and extremely significant mitigation. Based on this classification scheme, the spatial distribution of the drought change trend in the Santun River Irrigation Area from 2005 to 2023 was analyzed (Fig 11a). As can be seen from Fig 10a, during the past 20 years, the drought trend in the Santun River Irrigation Area as a whole exhibited a slight drought state, accounting for about 55.32% of the study area. The areas with drought were mostly concentrated in the southeastern part of the Ashley Kazakh Township and the central part of the Liugong Township in the irrigation district. The other areas exhibited a significant drought trend (P < 0.05), accounting for about 4.21% of the study area. The drought was mostly concentrated in the southeastern part of the irrigation district. The areas characterized by slight mitigation of the regional area (P < 0.05) accounted for about 34.45%, and these areas were scattered throughout the irrigation area.

Fig 11. Types of drought trends in the Santon River Irrigation District and interannual trends of the Sen slope during 2005–2023.

Fig 11

(a) Types of multi-year drought trends; and (b) Inter-annual rate of change of the TVDI.

As shown in Fig 11b, the distribution interval of the interannual rate of change of the TVDI in the Santon River Irrigation District from 2005 to 2023 was [–0.016, 0.013]. In addition, in 70.3% of the region, the Sen slope was greater than zero (P < 0.05). This also indicates that most of the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang was in a state of gradual drought. The drought intensification trend was serious in the southeastern part of the Ashley Kazakh Township and the central part of the Liugong Township, and the drought relief areas were mostly concentrated in the peripheral parts of the irrigation area.

3.3.4 Multi-year area transfer analysis for different drought classes in the study area.

To further analyze the conversion of the areas with different drought classes during the last 20 years in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang, a spatial transfer matrix for the areas with the five drought classes in the irrigation district from 2005 to 2023 was created. As shown in Fig 12, during 2005–2010, in the irrigation area, the area with light drought decreased by 101.66 km2, the area with medium drought decreased by 30.46 km2, and the area with severe drought increased by 128.61 km2. During 2010–2015, the area with light drought decreased by 172.06 km2, the area with medium drought increased by 162.41 km2, and the area with severe drought increased by 11.68 km2. During 2015–2020, the area with light drought increased by 41.02 km2, the area with medium drought increased by 67.89 km2, and the area with severe drought increased by 29.02 km2. During 2020–2023, the area with light drought increased by 14.25 km2, the area with medium drought increased by 13.34 km2, and the area with severe drought increased by 30.71 km2. Though the areas with extreme drought and no drought fluctuated slightly during the 20-year period, the amplitudes of these changes were very small. During 2005–2010, among the areas with various drought grades that changed to severe drought, the contribution of the change from moderate drought to severe drought was the largest, with an area of 86.03 km2 being transferred (54.93%). During 2015–2020, 68.99 km2 (72.03%) of the increase in the area with light drought was due to areas with moderate drought becoming areas with light drought. During the past 20 years, the area with light drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area gradually shifted to medium and severe drought, and the area with light drought shifted to medium and severe drought at a rate of 114.9 km2 10 a–1. The areas with medium and severe drought continued to increase, with growth rates of 40.7 km2 10 a–1 and 72.9 km2 10 a–1, respectively. It can be seen that during 2005–2023, in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang, the area with light drought gradually shifted to medium and severe drought over time. The proportion of the area with medium drought (72.03%) was the largest during 2015–2020. It can be seen that from 2005 to 2023, the area with light drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area of Xinjiang gradually shifted to medium and severe drought over time. The areas with no drought and extreme drought were more stable overall, and the changes in their magnitudes were the smallest.

Fig 12. Area transfers of different drought classes in the Santon River Irrigation District during 2005–2023.

Fig 12

(a) Irrigation district drought transfers during 2005–2010; (b) Irrigation district drought transfers during 2010–2015; (c) Irrigation district drought transfers during 2015–2020; and (d) Irrigation district drought transfers during 2020–2023.

3.4 Analysis of drivers of TVDI changes in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

3.4.1 Detection factor influences and temporal variations.

With the help of Geodetector, the influences of nine detection factors on the spatial distribution of the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area were calculated using Equation (9). As can be seen from Table 7, the p-values of the nine detection factors are all 0. The q-value of the surface temperature is the largest and passes the 95% significance test, with a q-value of 0.8399, which indicates that temperature was the dominant influence factor affecting the distribution of the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area. The explanatory power of vegetation cover in the study area was greater than 0.4, which indicates that it had a moderate influence on the distribution of the spatial variations in the aridity. The q-value of the land use type was 0.1510, indicating that it influenced the spatial variations in the TVDI in the study area. The q-values of the regional GDP, soil type, and altitude elevation were all less than 0.08, so they had less influence on the variations in the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area. Notably, the q-values of the slope and slope direction in the irrigation area were only 0.0298 and 0.003, respectively, indicating that they exerted negligible influences on the variations in the TVDI in the irrigation area.

Table 7. Single-factor detection using Geodetector.
Driving factor q-value p-value
Temperature 0.8399 0
NDVI 0.5310 0
FVC 0.4328 0
GDP 0.0792 0
Agrotype 0.0530 0
Aspect 0.0030 0
Slope 0.0298 0
DEM 0.0539 0
Land-use type 0.1510 0

3.4.2 Detection of two-way interaction analysis.

To investigate the degrees of influence of the multi-factor interactions on the changes in the drought conditions in the irrigation area, the two-factor interaction detection module of the Geodetector was used to analyze the influences of the two–two interactions among the nine influencing factors on the spatial distribution of the TVDI in the irrigation area (Fig 13). As can be seen from Fig 13, among the nine influencing factors, the effect of the interaction between any two factors on the TVDI significantly exceeded the effect when a single factor acted independently. This effect manifested as nonlinear enhancement or two-factor enhancement, suggesting that the interactions among the nine factors were not simply superimposed and they produced additional effects (Fig 14). As can be seen from Fig 14, none of the nine factors acted independently of the other factors, and the effect of each factor was affected by the other factors, which acted together on the TVDI. Out of all of the interactions between the factors, the interaction that had the greatest influence on the change in the TVDI was the interaction between elevation and temperature, with a two-factor interaction q-value of 0.869. The interaction between the land use type and temperature had the next greatest influence, with a q-value of 0.8568. The double factor interaction was the weakest for the slope and slope direction with a q-value of only 0.044. Considering the geographic location and topography of the irrigation area, it can be concluded that the slope direction did not influence the occurrence of drought to a large extent in the study area due to its flat topography.

Fig 13. Detection of drought driver interactions in the Santun River Irrigation Area.

Fig 13

Fig 14. Types of driver interactions in the Santun River Irrigation Area.

Fig 14

4. Discussion

4.1 Characteristics of temporal and spatial series changes of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

The annual mean TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang was 0.699–0.774 from 2005 to 2023, and it exhibited an overall fluctuating increasing trend. In spring and fall, the drought exhibited an increasing trend, and in summer, the drought eased. The results of the spring and summer studies in the irrigation area are consistent with those of Cheng Jun [45] and Huang Jing et al. [46] on large-scale drought in Xinjiang. The intensification of the spring drought can be attributed to the coupling of natural and human activities. The rise in temperature in spring led to an increase in the vegetation evapotranspiration rate. Coupled with the uneven spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation in the high altitude areas and the market-driven planting structure changes, this aggravated the drought degree under the combined effect of multiple factors [47]. Summer is usually characterized by high temperatures, low precipitation, and high vegetation evapotranspiration, making summer the season of the year that is the most prone to severe drought. However, since the irrigation area mainly relies on glacial meltwater for its water supply and rising temperatures exacerbate glacial meltwater, in the rise in temperature increased the surface runoff and raised the groundwater level [48]. In addition, the initial completion of the water diversion project effectively alleviated the water shortage problem in the economic belt on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains, thus slowing down the occurrence of drought. Regarding the increase in the autumn drought degree, there is some difference between the research results and the reduction in the autumn drought degree in northern Xinjiang reported by Cheng Jun et al. [45]. The reason for this may be that with decreasing temperature, the evapotranspiration of vegetation water decreases and the large-scale regional drought eases. However, in the irrigated area, the crops are in the sowing period, the water demand of the vegetation is large, and the regional precipitation is scarce and its spatial and temporal distribution is uneven. This situation is more likely to lead to insufficient soil moisture, thus aggravating the occurrence of autumn drought [49].

The spatial distribution of the drought in the irrigated area exhibited obvious spatial heterogeneity, i.e., the drought was higher in the northern region than that in the southern region. The reason for this spatial distribution may be that the Santun River Irrigation Area is located on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang, and water vapor transport is blocked by the mountains, so the main source of the water resources is glacier melt water. The southern part of the irrigation area is closer to the Tianshan Mountains, and the water resources are more abundant compared to the northern part. The northern part of the irrigation area is closer to the Gulban Desert, and the vegetation coverage is more sparse than in the southern part, with a weak soil and water conservation ability and low irrigation efficiency. In addition, the northern plain has a high level of urbanization, and groundwater over-extraction is serious, which is more likely to induce drought [50]. Moreover, the implementation effect of irrigation policies in the irrigation areas is uneven, and the distribution of the water resources is unequal, which further intensifies the spatial heterogeneity of the drought.

It was found that more than 60% of the study area exhibited a trend of continuous drought, and over the past 20 years, the areas with a mild drought grade shifted to medium and severe drought grades at a rate of 114.9 km2·10 a−1. In addition to natural factors, human activities also play an important role in promoting this phenomenon [51]. Taking the land use data for 2005 and 2020 as an example, in this study, the land use type area transfer matrix from 2005 to 2020 was obtained (Table 8). The results show that compared with 2005, the area of grassland in 2020 was 18.199 km2 smaller, while the area of the urban and rural building land was 44.698 km2 greater, reflecting the rapid transformation of land into urban and rural building land in the process of urbanization. In addition, the original forest area in the irrigated area was redistributed, and up to 80.17% of the area was converted to cultivated land area, which further reflects the cultivated land expansion trend of the land use change pattern. Urban expansion will lead to the over-exploitation of groundwater near irrigated areas in order to meet living and irrigation needs, which will further lead to the gradual loss of the water storage capacity of the underground aquifers, causing a chain reaction that increases the likelihood of drought [52]. In addition, urban expansion has increased greenhouse gas emissions and created the conditions for drought [53].

Table 8. Area transfer matrix for land use types in the Santun River Irrigation Area during 2005–2020.

Area (km2) 2020
Grassland Farmland Urban and rural residential land Water bodies Unutilized land Transferred out
2005 Grassland 48.352 44.651 18.235 2.822 0.066 114.126
Farmland 40.186 465.298 36.171 2.071 0.000 543.725
Urban and rural residential land 2.446 12.564 13.345 0.184 0.000 28.539
Woodland 1.030 5.985 0.450 0.000 0.000 7.465
Water bodies 0.535 8.709 4.228 10.435 1.536 25.443
Unutilized land 3.378 3.436 0.807 0.020 0.000 7.641
transferred in 95.927 540.642 73.237 15.532 1.602 /

4.2 Drivers of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang

The results of this study show that temperature had the greatest effect on drought (q = 0.8399) under the one-way test. It has been widely proven that temperature is one of the main factors causing drought [54]. Considering the geographic location and climatic conditions of the Santun River Irrigation area, the above results may be due to the fact that the Santun River Irrigation area is located in the interior of the Eurasian continent, where the high temperatures and small amount of precipitation lead to the occurrence of drought being mainly influenced by temperature. In addition, the water resources in the study area mainly come from melting of snow in the Tianshan Mountains, and the generation of melt water from glaciers in the Tianshan Mountains is greatly promoted when the temperature rises, while the warm and wet climate is extremely conducive to plant growth and development and alleviates regional drought [55]. Therefore, the q-values of influencing factors such as the temperature and NDVI are generally large.

Regarding the two-factor interactions, the interaction between elevation and temperature had the highest explanatory power on drought (q = 0.869). Several studies have confirmed that a combination of factors such as temperature and elevation can indeed affect vegetation dynamics, resulting in drought [5658]. The reason for this may be the dual regulation of the water cycle process by the altitude-temperature coupling. First, the change in elevation directly affects the distributions of the temperature and precipitation. Higher elevations have lower temperatures, less evaporation, and more precipitation. At lower elevations, the temperature is higher, the evaporation is large, and precipitation is scarce, making soil water loss easier [59]. In addition, elevation differences also affect the path and speed of surface runoff. During the transport of precipitation and snowmelt runoff from high altitude areas to low altitude areas, part of the water is evaporated and absorbed by vegetation, which further aggravates the degree of drought in the low altitude areas [60]. This interaction between temperature and elevation affects the spatial distribution of drought by influencing the water cycle and the evaporation and precipitation distributions in the study area.

4.3 Drought coping strategies

The drought characteristics in the Santun River irrigation area in Xinjiang are significant, and they have a substantial influence on the regional water resources and agricultural production planning. Therefore, future water resource management needs to focus on improving the water use efficiency and optimizing water resource allocation. For example, strategies should include promoting the development of information technology, establishing a sound drought early warning and forecast system, improving the monitoring efficiency, developing suitable crop cultivation patterns according to the terrain and climate differences, and considering the local water resource allocation to appropriately increase the external water transfer. Additional measures that can be taken include actively adjusting the planting structure of crops in irrigated areas, prioritizing drought-tolerant and heat-resistant crop varieties in northern arid areas, introducing low-water consumption crops according to national policies to improve crop adaptability to drought, continuing to promote water-saving irrigation technology, reducing the ineffective evaporation and leakage of water resources, improving the utilization efficiency of irrigation water, increasing the input of soil moisture monitoring instruments and the real-time monitoring of soil moisture in irrigated areas, and formulating reasonable irrigation plans according to the soil moisture content and crop water requirements.

The implementation of these comprehensive measures can effectively reduce the negative impact of drought in irrigated areas while ensuring the stability of agricultural production and the safety of peoples’ lives.

4.4 Research limitations and prospects

In this study, although the inversion of TVDI drought monitoring in irrigated areas using Landsat series remote sensing data achieved good results overall, it should be noted that cloud cover and sensor accuracy affect the inversion of the index. The TVDI is a combination of the LST and vegetation index (NDVI) and is used to assess drought conditions, which may differ in areas with different climate conditions and vegetation types. The TVDI is more suitable for areas with good vegetation coverage, while in areas with bare soil or sparse vegetation, the vegetation coverage is low and the NDVI value is low or even close to zero, and thus, it cannot accurately reflect the real water status of the surface. In addition, in bare soil areas, the surface temperature is affected by many factors (soil type, solar radiation, and wind speed), leading to an incomplete correlation between the change in the LST and the soil moisture. Thus, it is difficult to build a stable feature space, which ultimately leads to a poor monitoring effect for the TVDI. Moreover, different types of soil have different thermal inertia, which may lead to differences in the response of the surface temperature to the soil moisture. This difference may be more pronounced in areas with exposed soil, affecting the applicability of the TVDI index. In view of these limitations, the utilization of comprehensive assessment, combined with other drought indicators (such as the soil moisture index and rainfall index,), will be more accurate in future studies. When the study area is focused on an irrigation area, the spring crops are in the greening stage, there is more bare land, and the vegetation coverage is low. The inversion of the TVDI value using remote sensing data will correspondingly improve, and the accuracy of the drought assessment may decrease. However, summer and autumn are the peak seasons of vegetation growth, so the vegetation coverage is better, and the inversion of the TVDI value using remote sensing data is more accurate.

Although the temporal and spatial driving mechanism of drought in the Santun River irrigated area has been systematically analyzed, the influence of groundwater depletion on regional drought, which is one of the important reasons for drought in arid irrigated area, has not been quantified. In addition, the planting structure, crop types, irrigation methods, and government policies affect drought in irrigated areas. Therefore, in order to accurately assess the drought conditions in irrigated areas, a single index may not be comprehensive enough, and it is necessary to integrate multi-source data for comprehensive analysis, which will become an important direction of drought research in irrigated areas in the future. Although the Landsat series satellite data used in this study are suitable for regional analysis, the monitoring accuracy of the local drought heterogeneity in irrigated areas is not as high. In follow-up studies, the temporal and spatial resolutions of the data should be improved, and the drought research should be refined to capture the key short-term drought fluctuations during the crop growth period and improve the sensitivity and identification ability of the local heterogeneity in small-scale irrigation areas. In addition, since there is no clear document stipulating the drought grade classification criteria, the classification criteria for drought in different regions are different, which leads to differences in the conclusions of different studies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the TVDI was used to quantify the degree of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area, Xinjiang, and the spatiotemporal characteristics of the evolution, change trend, and grade transfer of drought in the region from 2005–2023 were investigated. In addition, the driving factors affecting drought were analyzed based on the geographic detector model. The main conclusions of this study are summarized below.

  1. Temporally, the TVDI in Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang was 0.699–0.774 and increased slowly at a rate of 0.008 a−1, and the drought exhibited an aggravating trend. Spatially, the spatial distribution of the TVDI in Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang exhibited significant heterogeneity; that is, the drought was higher in the northern region than in the southern region.

  2. From 2005 to 2023, the rate of change in the TVDI in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang was between −0.016 and 0.013, and the Sen slope was greater than zero in more than 61.87% of the region. In the past 20 years, the areas with a light drought grade in the study area shifted to moderate and severe drought grades at a rate of 114.9 km2·10 a−1.

  3. The spatial heterogeneity of the TVDI in Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang was influenced by many factors. Based on the single-factor analysis, temperature was the main factor influencing the drought, with a q-value of > 0.83. Regarding the two-factor interactions, the interaction between temperature and elevation dominated the spatial differentiation of the drought (q-vale of 0.869).

To effectively deal with the challenges of drought in the future, it is important to improve monitoring accuracy, integrate multi-source data for comprehensive analysis, and quantify the impact of groundwater depletion on drought in follow-up research. In addition, it is necessary to determine suitable planting patterns and adjust water resources management policies according to the different regional ecological environments. These measures can effectively reduce the negative effects of drought in irrigated areas, ensuring the stability of agricultural production and the safety of peoples’ lives in irrigated areas.

Supporting information

S1 File. The original data file of the manuscript graphics.

(XLSX)

pone.0323918.s001.xlsx (38.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Major Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2023A02002-1),National Natural Science Foundation of China(41762018), Open Project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy Engineering Safety and Water Disaster Prevention (ZDSYS-JS-2021-09), 2023 Research project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy Engineering Safety and Water Disaster Prevention (ZDSYS-YJS-2023-10) and The Belt and Road Special Foundation of the National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention (2020491611).

References

  • 1.Raposo V de MB, Costa VAF, Rodrigues AF. A review of recent developments on drought characterization, propagation, and influential factors. Sci Total Environ. 2023;898:165550. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kanthavel P, Saxena CK, Singh RK. Risk analysis of meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological drought events and study of drought propagation features: a case study in the upper Tapti River sub-basin, Central India. J Water Clim Chang. 2023;14(6):1912–23. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang H, Zhu Y, Qin T, Zhang X. Study on the propagation probability characteristics and prediction model of meteorological drought to hydrological drought in basin based on copula function. Front Earth Sci. 2022;10. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.961871 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Qian J, Yue H. Comparison and evaluation of different dryness indices based on vegetation indices-land surface temperature/albedo feature space. Adv Space Res. 2021;68(7):2791–803. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.05.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu M, Yao N, Hu A, Gustavo Goncalves de Goncalves L, Abrahão Mantovani F, Horton R, et al. Evaluating a new temperature-vegetation-shortwave infrared reflectance dryness index (TVSDI) in the continental United States. J Hydrol. 2022;610:127785. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127785 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alahacoon N, Edirisinghe M, Ranagalage M. Satellite-based meteorological and agricultural drought monitoring for agricultural sustainability in Sri Lanka. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3427. doi: 10.3390/su13063427 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang F, Lai H, Men R, Wang Z, Li Y, Qu Y, et al. Dynamic variations of agricultural drought and its response to meteorological drought: a drought event‐based perspective. JGR Atmos. 2024;129(12). doi: 10.1029/2024jd041044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhu H, Chen K, Hu S, Wang J, Wang Z, Li J, et al. A novel GNSS and precipitation-based integrated drought characterization framework incorporating both meteorological and hydrological indicators. Remote Sens Environ. 2024;311:114261. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114261 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou Z, Kim Y, Im E, Kwon H. Impact of anthropogenic warming on future unprecedented droughts in california: insights from multiple indices and multi‐model projections. Earth’s Futur. 2024;12(1). doi: 10.1029/2023ef003856 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guttman NB. Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calculation algorithm1. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 1999;35(2):311–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03592.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee S, Moriasi DN, Danandeh Mehr A, Mirchi A. Sensitivity of Standardized Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) to the choice of SPEI probability distribution and evapotranspiration method. J Hydrol: Reg Stud. 2024;53:101761. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101761 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schwartz C, Ellenburg WL, Mishra V, Mayer T, Griffin R, Qamer F, et al. A statistical evaluation of Earth-observation-based composite drought indices for a localized assessment of agricultural drought in Pakistan. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022;106:102646. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102646 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Z, Yang Y, Zhang C, Guo H, Hou Y. Historical and future Palmer Drought Severity Index with improved hydrological modeling. J Hydrol. 2022;610:127941. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127941 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tirivarombo S, Osupile D, Eliasson P. Drought monitoring and analysis: Standardised Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI). Phys Chem Earth Pt A/B/C. 2018;106:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2018.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ashraf M, Ullah K, Adnan S. Satellite based impact assessment of temperature and rainfall variability on drought indices in Southern Pakistan. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022;108:102726. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102726 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu Z, Sun H, Zhang T, Xu H, Wu D, Gao J. The high spatial resolution Drought Response Index (HiDRI): an integrated framework for monitoring vegetation drought with remote sensing, deep learning, and spatiotemporal fusion. Remote Sens Environ. 2024;312:114324. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114324 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yue Q, Cui N, Zhang F, Guo S, Jiang S, Yu X, et al. Adaptation to seasonal drought in irrigation districts of south China: a copula-based fuzzy-flexible stochastic multi-objective approach for precise irrigation planning. J Hydrol. 2023;625:129986. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129986 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang C, Liu C, Wang Y, Gu Y, Ma X. Assessment of the spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of meteorological drought in the North China Plain. Int J Climatol. 2023;43(16):7883–98. doi: 10.1002/joc.8297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang X, Liang Y, Li X, Lin G, Liu Y. Spatio-temporal characteristics and trend analysis of grassland ecosystem drought in Asia from 2010 to 2018. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.703447 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang P, Xia L, Sun Z, Zhang T. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes and driving forces of arable land in the Weibei dry plateau region in China. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):20618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43822-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Mourik J, Ruijsch D, van der Wiel K, Hazeleger W, Wanders N. Regional drivers and characteristics of multi-year droughts. Weather Clim Extrem. 2025;48:100748. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2025.100748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang M, Chen Y, Li J, Zhao Y. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving force analysis of drought characteristics in the Yellow River Basin. Ecol Indic. 2025;170:113007. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.113007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gebremichael HB, Raba GA, Beketie KT, Feyisa GL. Temporal and spatial characteristics of drought, future changes and possible drivers over Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia, using SPI and SPEI. Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;26(1):947–85. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02743-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu Y, Yang P, Xia J, Huang H, Chen Y, Li Z, et al. Drought propagation and its driving forces in central Asia under climate change. J Hydrol. 2024;636:131260. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131260 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang J, Dong G, Wei Y. Quantitative analysis of NDVI driving factors based on the geographical detector model in the Chengdu-Chongqing region, China. Ecol Indic. 2023;155:110978. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110978 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ning J, Yao Y, Fisher JB, Li Y, Zhang X, Jiang B, et al. Soil moisture-derived SWDI at 30 m based on multiple satellite datasets for agricultural drought monitoring. Remote Sens. 2024;16(18):3372. doi: 10.3390/rs16183372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alito KT, Kerebih MS. Spatio-temporal assessment of agricultural drought using remote sensing and ground-based data indices in the Northern Ethiopian Highland. J Hydrol: Reg Stud. 2024;52:101700. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101700 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Young NE, Anderson RS, Chignell SM, Vorster AG, Lawrence R, Evangelista PH. A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing. Ecology. 2017;98(4):920–32. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bian Z, Roujean JL, Fan T, Dong Y, Hu T, Cao B, et al. An angular normalization method for temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) in monitoring agricultural drought. Remote Sens Environ. 2023;284:113330. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113330 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krishnan S, Indu J. Assessing the potential of temperature/vegetation index space to infer soil moisture over Ganga Basin. J Hydrol. 2023;621:129611. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129611 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sandholt I, Rasmussen K, Andersen J. A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of surface moisture status. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;79(2–3):213–24. doi: 10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00274-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shi X, An B, Peng Y, Wu Z. Exploration of the utilization of a new land degradation index in Lake Ebinur Basin in China. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):17510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68639-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen A, Jiang J, Luo Y, Zhang G, Hu B, Wang X, et al. Temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) for drought monitoring in the Guangdong Province from 2000 to 2019. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16337. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abu Arra A, Alashan S, Şişman E. Advancing innovative trend analysis for drought trends: incorporating drought classification frequencies for comprehensive insights. Nat Hazards. 2025:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s11069-025-07119-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Biswas S, Singh C, Bharti V, Roy S, Singh R. Unfolding extreme rainfall events characteristics over the North-West Himalayan region based on recent GPM-IMERGV7 remotely sensed observations. J Hydrol. 2025;654:132823. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132823 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berchtold A. The predictive power of transition matrices. Symmetry. 2021;13(11):2096. doi: 10.3390/sym13112096 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu W, Zhang J, Yu J, Sun Z, Yu R, Liu W, et al. Attribution analysis of soil degradation using change vector analysis and the geographical detector from 2010 to 2020 on Hainan Island. Ecol Inform. 2024;80:102484. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102484 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang R, Li R, Kuang J, Shi Z. Influence of drought intensity on soil carbon priming and its temperature sensitivity after rewetting. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168362. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farran MM, Al-Amri NS, Ewea HA, Elfeki AM. The significance of basin slope for curve number estimation and the impact on flood prediction in arid basins. Hydrol Sci J. 2024;69(7):939–50. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2024.2348722 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang J, Zhou X, Yang S, Ao Y. Spatiotemporal variations in evapotranspiration and their driving factors in Southwest China between 2003 and 2020. Remote Sens. 2023;15(18):4418. doi: 10.3390/rs15184418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bai H, Gong Z, Li L, Ma J, Dogar MM. Vegetation coverage variability and its driving factors in the semi-arid to semi-humid transition zone of North China. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2025;191:115917. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115917 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang X, Lin Q, Wu Z, Zhang Y, Li C, Liu J, et al. Agricultural GDP exposure to drought and its machine learning-based prediction in the Jialing River Basin, China. Agric Water Manag. 2025;307:109265. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109265 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang W, Cui C, Yu W, Lu L. Response of drought index to land use types in the Loess Plateau of Shaanxi, China. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12701-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huang D, Ma T, Liu J, Zhang J. Agricultural drought monitoring using modified TVDI and dynamic drought thresholds in the upper and middle Huai River Basin, China. J Hydrol: Reg Stud. 2025;57:102069. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102069 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cheng J, Li YZ, Zou Y. Spatial and temporal dynamics of drought in Xinjiang and its response to climate change. Remote Sens Natural Resour. 2022;34(04):216–24. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang J, Zhang Y, Wang M, Wang F, Tang Z, He H. Spatial and temporal distribution of drought in Xinjiang in recent 17 years and its influencing factors. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020;40(3):1077–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dahri ZH, Ludwig F, Moors E, Ahmad B, Khan A, Kabat P. An appraisal of precipitation distribution in the high-altitude catchments of the Indus basin. Sci Total Environ. 2016;548–549:289–306. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mackay J, Barrand N, Hannah D, Krause S, Jackson C, Everest J, et al. Proglacial groundwater storage dynamics under climate change and glacier retreat. Authorea, Inc; 2020. doi: 10.22541/au.159309734.47402868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li H, Miao Q, Shi H, Li X, Zhang S, Zhang F, et al. Remote sensing monitoring of irrigated area in the non-growth season and of water consumption analysis in a large-scale irrigation district. Agric Water Manag. 2024;303:109020. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Z, Liu S. Estimation of groundwater storage and its spatial and temporal evolution patterns on the north slope of tianshan mountain from 1990 to 2020. J Geogr. 2023;78(07):1744–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yuan Y, Ye X, Liu T, Li X. Drought monitoring based on temperature vegetation dryness index and its relationship with anthropogenic pressure in a subtropical humid watershed in China. Ecol Indic. 2023;154:110584. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110584 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rouillard J, Babbitt C, Pulido‐Velazquez M, Rinaudo J‐D. Transitioning out of open access: a closer look at institutions for management of groundwater rights in France, California, and Spain. Water Resour Res. 2021;57(4). doi: 10.1029/2020wr028951 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ganguli P. Amplified risk of compound heat stress-dry spells in Urban India. Clim Dyn. 2023;60(3–4):1061–78. doi: 10.1007/s00382-022-06324-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bouabdelli S, Zeroual A, Meddi M, Assani A. Impact of temperature on agricultural drought occurrence under the effects of climate change. Theor Appl Climatol. 2022;148(1–2):191–209. doi: 10.1007/s00704-022-03935-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Almouctar MAS, Wu Y, Zhao F, Qin C. Drought analysis using normalized difference vegetation index and land surface temperature over Niamey region, the southwestern of the Niger between 2013 and 2019. J Hydrol: Reg Stud. 2024;52:101689. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101689 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang S, Wu Y, Wang H, Li M, Wang F, Zhang W. Based on geographic detector ordos drought spatio-temporal changes driving factors analysis. J Res Arid Areas. 2024;41(12):1981–91. doi: 10.13866/j.azr2024.12.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu X, Wang S, Wu Y. Remote sensing identification and the spatiotemporal variation of drought characteristics in Inner Mongolia, China. Forests. 2023;14(8):1679. doi: 10.3390/f14081679 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chanuwan Wijesinghe D, Chaminda Withanage N, Kumar Mishra P, Ranagalage M, Abdelrahman K, Fnais MS. An application of the remote sensing derived indices for drought monitoring in a dry zone district, in tropical island. Ecol Indic. 2024;167:112681. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112681 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhao Z, Shi F. Thresholds of soil moisture on the temperature response of soil respiration in semiarid high-altitude grassland in Northwestern China. Eurasian Soil Sc. 2024;57(S2):S105–13. doi: 10.1134/s1064229324600143 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hiep NH, Luong ND, Ni C-F, Hieu BT, Huong NL, Du Duong B. Factors influencing the spatial and temporal variations of surface runoff coefficient in the Red River basin of Vietnam. Environ Earth Sci. 2023;82(2). doi: 10.1007/s12665-022-10726-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nguyen-Thanh Son

13 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-49768Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in XinjiangPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Li,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 25 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nguyen-Thanh Son, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

This research was funded by Major Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2023A02002-1),National Natural Science Foundation of China(41762018), Open Project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy Engineering Safety and Water Disaster Prevention (ZDSYS-JS-2021-09), 2023 Research project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy Engineering Safety and Water Disaster Prevention (ZDSYS-YJS-2023-10) and The Belt and Road Special Foundation of the National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention (2020491611). 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

4. We note that Figures 1, 8, 9, and 10 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 8, 9, and 10 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The introduction of the manuscript emphasizes the insufficiency of current research in integrating human activities with drought issues. However, the discussion on the impacts of land use changes and human activities on drought remains superficial, lacking an in-depth exploration of the underlying driving mechanisms. Furthermore, the study fails to adequately address the core questions raised in the introduction.

2. While the paper employs the TVDI indicator, which is suitable for areas with substantial vegetation cover, its applicability in regions with sparse vegetation or bare soil is debatable. The manuscript does not sufficiently address the limitations of this indicator or its potential impact on the results. A more thorough discussion of these limitations would enhance the credibility of the findings.

3. The study primarily relies on annual temporal resolution. Although seasonal variations are mentioned, the analysis does not capture critical short-term drought fluctuations within key growth periods, which diminishes its direct applicability to agricultural production and water resource management. Additionally, the use of a 30-meter spatial resolution, though appropriate for large-scale regional analysis, may obscure local heterogeneity in small-scale irrigation areas, reducing its utility for precise monitoring and strategy development.

4. Although the manuscript employs the GeoDetector model to reveal the independent and interactive effects of various driving factors, the explanations of these interactions remain qualitative, lacking robust scientific reasoning. Specifically, the paper identifies the interaction between elevation and temperature as having the strongest explanatory power for drought distribution but fails to elucidate the underlying physical mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

5.The introduction highlights the large-scale impacts of drought and critiques the limitations of large-scale studies in integrating human activities and regional heterogeneity. However, the research itself is focused on the Santun River Irrigation Area, a small-scale region, analyzing local drought characteristics and drivers. This shift between the research objectives and study scope lacks clear logical coherence, resulting in a degree of inconsistency in the manuscript.

6.The correlation analysis between TVDI and soil moisture does not report p-values to verify the strength of the relationship. The GeoDetector model results, including single-factor (e.g., temperature, NDVI) and interaction effects, lack significance tests to confirm the robustness of the q-values. The Mann-Kendall trend analysis for seasonal and annual TVDI variations omits the significance levels (e.g., p-values) of the identified trends.

7.In the discussion of seasonal drought variations, the reasons for the intensification of spring drought and the alleviation of summer drought are not analyzed in depth. The explanation is limited to temperature changes or irrigation water use, without considering factors such as precipitation distribution or adjustments in crop planting structures. Additionally, for the spatial heterogeneity where drought is more severe in the northern region, it is merely described as being "close to the desert with sparse vegetation," without a detailed analysis of human activities (e.g., over-extraction of water resources, urban expansion) or natural factors (e.g., soil water retention capacity).

Reviewer #2: 1. What is the difference between the canopy temperature in VSWI and LST?�

2. Are there any other similar studies examining the small scales other than the study area mentioned in the paper?

3. There are a number of abbreviations in the text, and it is recommended that a table or an appendix be added listing all abbreviations and their full names.

4.

Line 130: amax and bmax should use suffix notation.

Line 131: amin and bmin should use suffix notation.

Line 281: 2020 should be 2023

5. Reference 34 and 42 are the same

Reviewer #3: This paper focuses on the analysis of growing season drought characteristics and their driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang, a topic of significant scientific and practical value. However, there are deficiencies in data analysis and result discussion that require substantial revision and supplementation.

1. Data sources are not clearly specified. There is a lack of descriptions regarding the time range and spatial resolution of the data sources in Table 2. The authors mention choosing 60 images from 2005 to 2023, but the frequency of the dataset seems low. The authors need to justify whether these calculation results can represent quarterly drought characteristics.

2. Similarly, the soil moisture data in Table 2 need to include information about its spatial extent. If these data are discrete, the interpolation methods also need to be described.

3. The paper focuses on vegetation area, but some areas without vegetation are also included in the statistics, such as urban-rural residential land, water bodies, and unused land. Excluding these areas might yield more accurate results.

4. In section 3.3.1, the paper statistically analyzes the annual average TVDI and the percentages of the area with different drought classes from 2005 to 2023. The methodology and its rationale should be explained; additionally, the paper should clarify how the calculated drought areas were validated.

5. The explanation for Fig 11 is unclear, with no introduction of the numbers before the area percentages. Additionally, Fig 11 (a) and Fig 11 (b) are both labeled "Irrigation area transfers," while Fig 11 (c) and Fig 11 (d) are labeled "Irrigation district drought transfers." The descriptions should be consistent.

6. Section 3.4 analyzes the influence of driving factors but fails to explain their rationale and calculation methods. Moreover, precipitation, discussed as an influential factor in sections 4.1 and 4.2, is not mentioned among the driving factors.

7. Some discussions in this manuscript are inadequate. The inference of drought driving factors in section 4.3 and the discussion of drought response strategies in section 4.4 should focus on the drought driving factors studied in this paper. The current arguments seem disconnected from the research content and should be revised to align with the research findings.

8. Some reference formats are inconsistent with the journal’s requirements and should be checked and revised.

In conclusion, this paper has significant deficiencies in data introduction, research method description, data analysis, and result discussion. Major revision is recommended.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323918.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


25 Dec 2024

Response to Reviewers

Thank you for your letter and thank the reviewers and editorial department for their comments on our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript with reference to the reviewer's comments for your approval. Our reply is as follows:

Reviewer #1

1.The introduction of the manuscript emphasizes the insufficiency of current research in integrating human activities with drought issues. However, the discussion on the impacts of land use changes and human activities on drought remains superficial, lacking an in-depth exploration of the underlying driving mechanisms. Furthermore, the study fails to adequately address the core questions raised in the introduction.

Answer: Based on your suggestions, we have reorganized the discussion section of the paper to focus on an in-depth discussion of the impacts of human activities and land-use change types on drought and to explore in depth the underlying driving mechanisms. Please refer to lines 4879-484,495-522.

Regarding the issue of introduction, after an in-depth discussion by the team, we have reorganized the introduction and core issues of this paper.The core of this paper is to calculate the temperature-vegetation drought index (TVDI) of the study area, and to clarify the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of drought and the influencing factors of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area of Xinjiang during the period of 2005-2023 by combining the methods of trend analysis, geo-probe and spatial transfer matrix, so as to provide a scientific basis for optimizing the allocation of water resources, adjusting the irrigation system, and guaranteeing the stability of agricultural production.Therefore, we have revised the introductory section of this paper to ensure logical consistency in the research objectives and scope of the study.Please refer to lines 72-96.

2.While the paper employs the TVDI indicator, which is suitable for areas with substantial vegetation cover, its applicability in regions with sparse vegetation or bare soil is debatable. The manuscript does not sufficiently address the limitations of this indicator or its potential impact on the results. A more thorough discussion of these limitations would enhance the credibility of the findings.

Answer: Based on your suggestions, we have reorganized the discussion section to focus on adding a discussion of the potential impact of the limitations of the TVDI metrics on the results.please refer to lines 587-604.

3.The study primarily relies on annual temporal resolution. Although seasonal variations are mentioned, the analysis does not capture critical short-term drought fluctuations within key growth periods, which diminishes its direct applicability to agricultural production and water resource management. Additionally, the use of a 30-meter spatial resolution, though appropriate for large-scale regional analysis, may obscure local heterogeneity in small-scale irrigation areas, reducing its utility for precise monitoring and strategy development.

Answer: Thank you for your valuable comments. We quite agree with you. At the same time, I also recognize the shortcomings in the research, and sincerely thank you for your correction. However, since the current research for drought characteristics and influencing factors in the Santun River Irrigation Area of Xinjiang is still in a blank state, the main purpose of this paper is to fill the research gaps in the field of drought in the region, to provide basic data and preliminary understanding for the subsequent related research, and to pave the way for the later refinement of the study in the irrigation district.Therefore, we chose the Landsat series data, which is widely applicable, has a long time series, is easy to obtain, and has more comprehensive information on spectral bands, to analyze the long time-series drought characteristics and influencing factors of the Santun River irrigation area in Xinjiang. In response to the issues you mentioned, we plan to further improve the temporal and spatial resolution of the data (Sentinel-2, ground-based observations) in future studies, and refine the analysis of droughts in the region by combining with the type of cultivation in the irrigation area and the irrigation system, etc., in order to capture critical short-term drought fluctuations during the crop growth period and to improve the sensitivity to and ability to identify localized heterogeneity in small-scale irrigation areas.Following your suggestion, we have added a discussion of this deficiency in Chapter 4.Please refer to lines 612-617.

4.Although the manuscript employs the GeoDetector model to reveal the independent and interactive effects of various driving factors, the explanations of these interactions remain qualitative, lacking robust scientific reasoning. Specifically, the paper identifies the interaction between elevation and temperature as having the strongest explanatory power for drought distribution but fails to elucidate the underlying physical mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

Answer: Following your suggestion, we have reorganized and deepened the driver discussion section of this article, adding a discussion on the underlying physical mechanisms behind this phenomenon.Please refer to lines 546-562.

5.The introduction highlights the large-scale impacts of drought and critiques the limitations of large-scale studies in integrating human activities and regional heterogeneity. However, the research itself is focused on the Santun River Irrigation Area, a small-scale region, analyzing local drought characteristics and drivers. This shift between the research objectives and study scope lacks clear logical coherence, resulting in a degree of inconsistency in the manuscript.

Answer: Thank you for your valuable comments. We have revised the introductory section of this paper to ensure logical consistency in the research objectives and scope of the study.Please refer to lines 72-96.

6.The correlation analysis between TVDI and soil moisture does not report p-values to verify the strength of the relationship. The GeoDetector model results, including single-factor (e.g., temperature, NDVI) and interaction effects, lack significance tests to confirm the robustness of the q-values. The Mann-Kendall trend analysis for seasonal and annual TVDI variations omits the significance levels (e.g., p-values) of the identified trends.

Answer: According to your suggestion, we have added p value to the correlation analysis between TVDI and soil moisture in the text,please refer to lines 214-215; In the single-factor analysis of geographic detector, p-value was added, and the original q-value map was replaced with a single-factor analysis table,please refer to lines 401,412; Reorganize the data and add the significance level in the trend analysis,please refer to lines 344-350.

7.In the discussion of seasonal drought variations, the reasons for the intensification of spring drought and the alleviation of summer drought are not analyzed in depth. The explanation is limited to temperature changes or irrigation water use, without considering factors such as precipitation distribution or adjustments in crop planting structures. Additionally, for the spatial heterogeneity where drought is more severe in the northern region, it is merely described as being "close to the desert with sparse vegetation," without a detailed analysis of human activities (e.g., over-extraction of water resources, urban expansion) or natural factors (e.g., soil water retention capacity).

Answer: According to your suggestion, we reorganized the discussion section to deepen the discussion on the causes of the seasonal drought. At the same time, the discussion of arid spatial heterogeneity phenomenon adds to human activities, natural factors and other contents. Make the content more substantial and persuasive.Please refer to lines479-484,495-522.

Reviewer #2

1.What is the difference between the canopy temperature in VSWI and LST?

Answer�Thank you for your valuable comments. The main parameter in this study is TVDI, and the one used is based on the surface temperature (LST) obtained by thermal infrared sensors carried by the Landsat series of satellites.

Calculating VSWI uses canopy temperature, which is the temperature of plants and/or vegetation at the surface and is commonly used to indicate the heat and moisture status of surface vegetation. Whereas, the calculation of TVDI uses the Land Surface Temperature (LST), which is an important parameter for heat exchange at the interface between the atmosphere and the land surface, and reflects the degree of heating and cooling of surface objects.The main difference between the two of them is:

1)The measurement object is different: the canopy temperature mainly measures the temperature of the crop canopy (such as stems and leaf surfaces), which more directly reflects the moisture and heat status of the crop itself. Surface temperature, on the other hand, measures the temperature of the entire surface, including soil, vegetation, water bodies, etc. In remote sensing applications, it is usually measured as the temperature of the entire surface, including soil, vegetation, water bodies, etc. In remote sensing applications, it usually represents the average or composite temperature over a wider area.

2)Different influencing factors: Canopy temperature is influenced by a variety of factors, including soil moisture status, crop transpiration, and environmental factors (e.g., wind speed, temperature, and solar radiation). Surface temperatures, on the other hand, are more influenced by solar radiation, type of ground cover, atmospheric conditions, and other factors

2. Are there any other similar studies examining the small scales other than the study area mentioned in the paper?

Answer�Based on a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, I observed that relevant studies conducted for small scales such as irrigated areas exist. Specific relevant studies are listed below:

1)Yue Qiong and other scholars, utilized the CFSMP model to analyze the seasonal drought in irrigation areas in South China. The results showed that the CSFMP model has the potential to mitigate seasonal drought in South China and can be applied to similar regions with comparable resource crises.(Reference�Qiong Y ,Ningbo C ,Fan Z , et al. Adaptation to seasonal drought in irrigation districts of south China: A copula-based fuzzy-flexible stochastic multi-objective approach for precise irrigation planning [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 625 (PA):)

2)Zhang Fan and other scholars, proposed a Copula-based stochastic multi-objective planning (C-SMP) model for optimizing irrigation strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of seasonal agricultural drought on the yields of different crops in the irrigation area of Dongfeng Reservoir, Meishan City, Southwest China.(Reference�Fan Z ,Ningbo C ,Shanshan G , et al. Irrigation strategy optimization in irrigation districts with seasonal agricultural drought in southwest China: A copula-based stochastic multiobjective approach [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 282)

3)Akinwale T et al. Spatio-temporal characterization of drought in northern Nigeria using the self-calibrated Palmer Drought Severity Index (sc-PDSI).(Reference�Ogunrinde T A ,Oguntunde G P ,Olasehinde A D , et al. Drought spatiotemporal characterization using self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index in the northern region of Nigeria [J]. Results in Engineering, 2020, 5 (C): 100088-100088.)

In summary, research exists to study drought characteristics at small scales or within specific regions. Our study clarifies the characteristics and influencing factors of drought in the Santun River Irrigation Area of Xinjiang through trend analysis, geoprobes and spatial transfer matrices. This is crucial for optimizing water resource allocation in the irrigation area, ensuring stable agricultural production and promoting sustainable agricultural development.

3.There are a number of abbreviations in the text, and it is recommended that a table or an appendix be added listing all abbreviations and their full names.

Answer�Thank you for your comments.Full name and abbreviation control table has been added.Please refer to line 129.

4.Line 130: amax and bmax should use suffix notation.

Answer�This has been modified; please refer to line 149.

5.Line 131: amin and bmin should use suffix notation.

Answer�This has been modified; please refer to lines 149.

6.Line 281: 2020 should be 2023

Answer�This has been modified; please refer to line 326.

7.Reference 34 and 42 are the same

Answer�Thank you for your comments.This has been modified.

Reviewer #3:

1.Data sources are not clearly specified. There is a lack of descriptions regarding the time range and spatial resolution of the data sources in Table 2. The authors mention choosing 60 images from 2005 to 2023, but the frequency of the dataset seems low. The authors need to justify whether these calculation results can represent quarterly drought characteristics.

Answer�Thank you for your comments.In response to your suggestion,we have modified Table 1 to add data time ranges.Please refer to line 127; The selection of the dataset was based on strict selection criteria after excluding effects such as cloudiness and weather, and we ensured that the selected images were evenly distributed in time and covered key periods in each season to ensure that they accurately reflect the drought conditions in each season. Meanwhile, we compared the results of remote sensing calculations with the soil water content observed on the ground, and found that there was a good correlation between the two, indicating that our remote sensing calculations could better reflect the drought conditions on the ground. Compared with similar studies, we believe that the datasets used in this study are already more accurate.

2.Similarly, the soil moisture data in Table 2 need to include information about its spatial extent. If these data are discrete, the interpolation methods also need to be described.

Answer�According to your recommendations..The measured soil moisture content data in this paper are continuous data.We have added information on the spatial extent of the sampling points for measured soil moisture content in the irrigation area, as detailed in Figure 3.Please refer to lines 218-219.

3.The paper focuses on vegetation area, but some areas without vegetation are also included in the statistics, such as urban-rural residential land, water bodies, and unused land. Excluding these areas might yield more accurate results.

Answer�Thank you for your valuable comments. When analyzing in this study, we mainly consider that non-vegetated areas are equally important for the study of the functioning of the overall ecosystem and the effects of drought, as they may indirectly affect the growth and distribution of vegetation. For example, urban and rural residential land use may indirectly affect the surrounding vegetation by changing the surface cover, affecting the hydrological cycle, and so on. Therefore, we have discussed and inferred about it in the discussion section. Please refer to lines 495-522. In the follow-up study, we will use more precise geographic information technology tools to identify and extract vegetation areas to ensure the accuracy of the study. Thank you again for your review and guidance!

4.In section 3.3.1, the paper statistically analyzes the annual average TVDI and the percentages of the area with different drought classes from 2005 to 2023. The methodology and its rationale should be explained; additionally, the paper should clarify how the calculated drought areas were validated.

Answer�Thank you for your comments.In this study, the method used to analyze the trend of annual average TVDI change is linear trend analysis.The analysis of the percentage of different drought types is mainly done by using ArcGIS software to extract the data in the raster image, followed by statistical analysis in Excel, and after integrating the data, the plotting of the percentage of stacked area is carried out with the help of Origin software.Based on your suggestion, we are adding instructions on how to use it, in our analysis.Please refer to line

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0323918.s004.docx (50.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Nguyen-Thanh Son

28 Feb 2025

PONE-D-24-49768R1Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in XinjiangPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Li,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 14 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nguyen-Thanh Son, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #6: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #7: (No Response)

Reviewer #8: (No Response)

Reviewer #9: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

Reviewer #7: Yes

Reviewer #8: Yes

Reviewer #9: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: N/A

Reviewer #6: Yes

Reviewer #7: Yes

Reviewer #8: Yes

Reviewer #9: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

Reviewer #7: Yes

Reviewer #8: Yes

Reviewer #9: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: No

Reviewer #6: Yes

Reviewer #7: Yes

Reviewer #8: Yes

Reviewer #9: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: The study titled “Analysis of Growing Season Drought Characteristics and Driving Factors for Vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang” presents a remote sensing-based assessment of drought trends. The manuscript very well articulated the drought analysis in arid areas of Xinjiang. It also addressed the research applicability and drought management strategies. However, there are certain suggestions that the author should take into account:

• In the introduction section, the manuscript mentioned the study of droughts and its approaches but lacks a clear research gap and objectives that the study aims to address.

• The introduction deals more about the methods, such as TVDI, Theil-Sen trend analysis, etc., which should be appropriate for the methods section. The introduction should focus on the “how” aspect rather than “what” and "why," conveying the novelty of the research.

• Mention briefly why Santun RIA is significant for studying drought characteristics and its driving factors.

• In the methodology section, briefly mention the rationale behind choosing the mentioned methods for easy reproducibility of the work.

• The methodology section outlines various methods but does not justify why these were chosen for drought analysis.

• The study analyzes the drought conditions over a specific period, but it could be improved by exploring the implications for future water resource management and agricultural planning.

• The paper did not analyze the groundwater depletion in detail, which has been discussed as key factors for drought intensification in Xinjiang. Include the suggestion in the future research section.

• The manuscript does not address human-induced factors such as urban expansion, irrigation, and policies.

Reviewer #5: I see articles have been revised well as per comments given in previous review. The topic undertaken is needs of the time and methods applied are relevant. The article is nicely designed and written well but I suggest authors to do a comprehensive language check as at several places English language is poor and sentences are not clear. Also, discussion needs a comprehensive revision as it is lengthy and did not provide a meaningful discussion. My specific comments are as:

Kindly avoid using personal pronouns like ‘we’, ‘you’, ‘our’, ‘I’, ‘us’, etc.

Second sentence in abstract may be revised.

Keywords must be revised. The keyword ‘remote sensing monitoring’ did not make a clear meaning while the full form of TDVI should be written in keyword. Similarly, drought and Landsat are also not reliable as keywords, instead it may be written as ‘drought monitoring’ and ‘Landsat datasets’.

Line 73. Add citation.

Table 1. Kindly add a column for each Landsat satellite data used.

Table 2 may be removed and the full form of each abbreviation used should be mentioned in manuscript at first appearance.

Quality of figure 3, 9 and 10 should be improved.

Some studies have been done to monitor drought using Landsat data and temperature and vegetation indices. Authors should check these studies and compare the findings with these studies in the manuscript. Some of the studies are: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101689, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10028-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110584, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3567-1_4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112681

Discussion seems to be a summary especially sub-section 4.2-4.5. Authors should try to build arguments based on the findings of this study and comparing it with previous studies. Kindly try to provide causes and effects of major findings and add a sub-section of policy implication at the end. In current form the discussion is lengthy but did not provide a concrete discussion.

Kindly bring whole conclusion in one or two paragraph.

Reviewer #6: I have read the draft “Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xin jiang” revised based on the comments received earlier from three reviewers.

I have found that the authors have addressed the concerns raised by the previous reviewers. The contexts and arguments placed in the paper are convincing.

Water availability to the requirements of specific crops is the prime production condition, absence of which, could nullify contributions of other inputs. There are specific thresholds of optimal water requirement for every crop, which the precipitation and/or irrigation provisioning need to ensure in case water availability deviates from optimality. Thus, there involves optimization of costs for water provisioning, and all requires precise estimates on the cost and benefits derived from land use. These aspects though are not explicit in the paper, one could relate the significance the paper posits.

The context of the study is thus presented well - a timely and accurate assessment of the drought situation (water availability assessment to the requirements of crops cultivated) is of great significance in sustaining production. The authors are well aware of the developments in the field of GIS and applications, consider a host of factors including the topography and human activities as drivers of drought.

There is high water demand in the study area, though causes of demand are indicated, could be explained further as – water availability declines because of variation of precipitation, and higher water use intensity is because of cropping pattern change driven by the market. and higher human consumption of water in new areas of consumption.

Data sources are well indicated and methodology is well explained in the paper to measure the TVDI. Geodetector model however requires detailed justification on how all the factors act as drivers. If the results show drought reduction and enhancement of drought across various seasons, the explanatory factors need detailed discussion. For instance, the main reason for the gradual increase of drought in summer is temperature and increased need of water for crops, as because it is the prime growing season of crops. Further, the study area has high population density, and the demand for crops would be market driven, and market as a factor to intensify input use to derive higher yield and even change cropping patterns for exotic crops, which may require more water. Detailed discussion on these lines along with crop data could have made the analysis comprehensive.

Drought could be linked to cropping seasons, assessing water requirements for crops cultivated, and drought could be aggravated/reduced by introduction/withdrawal of water intensive crops. Mapping of crops to the seasons could have arrived to derive better results from the exercises. There is scope to have simulation exercises on water requirement on three fronts - cropping pattern to the ecological condition of the study area; introduction of water intensive crops driven by market, and introduction of low water intensive crops driven/compensated by state subsidy; and as indicated technology can complement/aggravate the rest of the interventions to ensure optimality or aggravating the droughts too.

Reviewer #7: The research study provides a detailed, well-structured analysis of drought trends in the Xinjiang Santun River Irrigation District, integrating remote sensing and statistical models. The study effectively identifies spatial heterogeneity, emphasizing that the northern part of the irrigation area experiences more severe drought than the southern part. However, some revisions and improvements are needed in the study before publication. By addressing these suggestions, the study will meaningfully contribute to drought risk assessment, water resource management, and climate change adaptation strategies in arid agricultural regions.

1. The study categorizes drought severity but does not explain the basis and threshold values for these classifications (e.g., what threshold defines “moderate” vs. “severe” drought?)

2. There is a need to discuss the potential bias in TVDI estimates, especially in sparsely vegetated regions where NDVI approaches zero and may fail to represent soil moisture conditions.

3. The study needs to discuss the model uncertainty and how the data limitations (like- cloud cover, sensor errors) may affect the results.

4. Data on groundwater depletion needs to be incorporated to establish the claim of over-extraction.

5. The study needs to discuss how various irrigation policies and water allocation strategies implemented in the area affect drought severity.

Reviewer #8: Author need to check and use concise language to enhance readability for readers. Also needs recheck the PLOS ONE Guidelines thats why requires some minor corrections before it can be accepted for publication.

Manuscript Title: “Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang”.

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-49768R1

Dear Authors,

I enjoyed reading this work. However, I have just some minor comments which are given section-wise.

The manuscript addresses a very relevant matter on the growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation. It highlights some pertinent issues in the context of agricultural production and the economic crisis of the global south region. Therefore, The topic is interesting and could be an important contribution to the journal and the discipline of climatic paradigm and agricultural production. However, the manuscript requires some minor corrections before it can be accepted for publication.

General comments:

• Use concise language to enhance readability for readers.

• Research gap needs to be justified with the help of previous literature.

• The methods section should be written clearly and comprehensively to ensure accessibility and understanding for readers. Basically who are without a background of quantitative research.

• Methodology portions needed to be written sequentially and needed to be justified with previous literature review.

• More policy recommendations need to be discussed by underpinning the findings.

Abstract:

The abstract provides an overview of the research topic but lacks of conciseness – by following the structure sequentially like background, objectives, methods, results, and conclusions would provide a standard structure of the abstract.

Introduction:

• Overall, the introduction portion is comprehensive, but the sentences lack of proper linkages.

• Therefore, the suggestion is to critically evaluate the literature to highlight specific gaps by incorporating more recent studies to reflect advancements in the climatic paradigm, including human aspects.

Study Area:

• After replacing this “Study Area, Data, and Methods” authors should write study area only in the line of 96.

• The paragraph needs to include why Xinjiang Santun River Irrigation District is more important than others in the context of climatic chapters with a proxy of drought.

Data and Methods:

• “In line 116 the title “Data sources and Processing” should be corrected as “Material and Methods”.

• In line 130 the title “Methods” should be corrected as “Methods of Data Analysis”.

• Minimal discussion has been done on how the data collection methods ensure reliability and validity. So, the suggestion is to discuss potential biases and how they are allayed in the data collection process by citing previous literature.

Results and Discussion:

To improve the quality of work, findings should be analyzed in reference to a theoretical framework. Include a comparison discussion with similar studies to contextualize the results in the same periphery.

Conclusion:

A concise summary should be included in the conclusion, along with key points from the results and discussion, while also addressing the study's limitations to provide a comprehensive closing perspective for this study.

Reviewer #9: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: Yes:  Dr. Shahfahad

Reviewer #6: Yes:  Kalyan Das

Reviewer #7: No

Reviewer #8: No

Reviewer #9: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review Comments.docx

pone.0323918.s003.docx (16.8KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323918.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


11 Mar 2025

Thank you for your letter. We would like to thank the reviewers and editorial department for their comments on our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript based on the reviewer's comments and are submitting it again for your approval. Our replies to the reviewers’ comments are presented below. (Note: The line numbers in “Please refer to lines .” are from the Manuscript file.)

Reviewer #4

The study titled “Analysis of Growing Season Drought Characteristics and Driving Factors for Vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang” presents a remote sensing-based assessment of drought trends. The manuscript very well articulated the drought analysis in arid areas of Xinjiang. It also addressed the research applicability and drought management strategies. However, there are certain suggestions that the author should take into account:

1.In the introduction section, the manuscript mentioned the study of droughts and its approaches but lacks a clear research gap and objectives that the study aims to address.

Answer: Based on your suggestions, we have rewritten the introduction of the paper to enhance the description of the shortcomings of drought research in the present stage and to clearly present the research objectives of this study. In addition, we have appropriately added research on drought-driven mechanisms, making the introduction more closely related to the topic of this paper. Please refer to lines 76-109.

2.The introduction deals more about the methods, such as TVDI, Theil-Sen trend analysis, etc., which should be appropriate for the methods section. The introduction should focus on the “how” aspect rather than “what” and "why," conveying the novelty of the research.

Answer: After in-depth discussion by the team, we have optimized the introduction section of the paper. We have streamlined the detailed description of the specific indicators and methods, focusing instead on how drought hazards should be studied and the current research progress. Please refer to lines 34-64. In addition, we have supplemented the discussion of the driving mechanisms of drought to ensure that the introduction is closely related to the topic of the article. Please refer to lines 65-75. On this basis, we now clear point out the shortcomings of the existing research and the shortcomings of the research area so as to naturally lead to the core goal of this study. Through these adjustments, we aimed to better highlight the innovation and value of this research.Please refer to lines 76-109.

3.Mention briefly why Santun RIA is significant for studying drought characteristics and its driving factors.

Answer: I have thought deeply about the questions you have posed and respond to them in detail here. The Santun River Irrigation District in Xinjiang is important for the study of drought characteristics and its drivers. The main reasons for this are presented below.

First, the Santun River Irrigation District in Xinjiang is located in the arid zone on the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains where water resources are scarce and the ecosystems are fragile, and the impact of drought on agricultural production and the ecological environment is significant. In addition, the discussion section of this paper also points out that the land use types in this area have changed significantly in the last 20 years, and this nonlinear interaction between natural and human factors provides an ideal case for analyzing the drought-driving mechanism.

Second, as the core area of the agricultural economy in Changji City, Xinjiang, the Santun River Irrigation District in Xinjiang is mainly dominated by high water-consuming crops, such as cotton and wheat, and studying the spatial and temporal differentiation patterns of drought in this region can reveal the response threshold of oasis agricultural systems to climate change and provide a scientific basis for optimizing the irrigation system and planting structure.

Finally, most existing studies focused on large-scale regions (e.g., the North China Plain and the Tibetan Plateau in China), and there is a relative lack of detailed studies on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountains, which is a key area of ecological-economic synergy. The study of the Santun River Irrigation District can fill the regional gap in drought-driving research and provide a reference for sustainable development in similar arid zones.

In summary, the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang is of great significance for studying drought characteristics and its driving factors, and it is a very good representative area. To prevent readers from having doubts, based on your suggestions, we have pointed out the importance of the research area and the existing research gaps, as well as the research objectives of this study, in the introduction of the paper. Please refer to lines 87-91.

4.In the methodology section, briefly mention the rationale behind choosing the mentioned methods for easy reproducibility of the work.

Answer: Thank you for your review. A rationale for the selection of each method has been added to the research methods section of this paper. Please refer to lines 171-175, 189-193, 212-215, 221-225.

5.The methodology section outlines various methods but does not justify why these were chosen for drought analysis.

Answer: Based on your suggestion, the reasons for choosing each method have been added to the research methods section of this article. Please refer to lines 171-175, 189-193, 212-215, 221-225.

6.The study analyzes the drought conditions over a specific period, but it could be improved by exploring the implications for future water resource management and agricultural planning.

Answer: We have reworked the section on coping strategies in the discussion section of the paper based on your suggestions. Please refer to lines 565-582.

7.The paper did not analyze the groundwater depletion in detail, which has been discussed as key factors for drought intensification in Xinjiang. Include the suggestion in the future research section.

Answer: Thank you for your advice. The importance of groundwater depletion factors has been added to subsection 4.4 of the discussion section. Please refer to lines 604-606.

8.The manuscript does not address human-induced factors such as urban expansion, irrigation, and policies.

Answer: Based on your suggestions, we have revised the discussion section to deepen the discussion of the influences of human factors on drought. In addition, in subsection 4.1 of the discussion section, we discuss the effects of human activities (e.g., changes in land use types and urban expansion) on drought. Appropriate reference is now made to the effects of drought on irrigation systems and groundwater extraction.Please refer to lines 518-536; .

In addition, in the analysis of the driving factors in the results section, we also considered human activities (land use type change and gross domestic product) and included them in the analysis of the driving factors. However, the effect of human activities is not as great as the influence of the natural factors on the drought. Please refer to lines 447-480.

Reviewer #5

I see articles have been revised well as per comments given in previous review. The topic undertaken is needs of the time and methods applied are relevant. The article is nicely designed and written well but I suggest authors to do a comprehensive language check as at several places English language is poor and sentences are not clear. Also, discussion needs a comprehensive revision as it is lengthy and did not provide a meaningful discussion. My specific comments are as:

1.Kindly avoid using personal pronouns like ‘we’, ‘you’, ‘our’, ‘I’, ‘us’, etc.

Answer: Thank you for the suggestions, we have revised the paper as a whole with reference to the comments of the reviewers and have enhanced the logic and accuracy of the language of the article. We have also hired a professional language editing service to thoroughly check and touch up the manuscript.

2.Second sentence in abstract may be revised.

Answer: We have revised the abstract of the paper in strict accordance with the "background, purpose, methods, results, and conclusion" framework for the summary part of the writing. The description of the methods in the second sentence of the abstract has been simplified to balance the overall structure of the abstract. Please refer to lines 14-30.

3.Keywords must be revised. The keyword ‘remote sensing monitoring’ did not make a clear meaning while the full form of TDVI should be written in keyword. Similarly, drought and Landsat are also not reliable as keywords, instead it may be written as ‘drought monitoring’ and ‘Landsat datasets’.

Answer: This has been modified accordingly.Please refer to lines 31-32.

4.Line 73. Add citation.

Answer: We have reorganized and rewritten the introduction section of the article. Where relevant citations needed to be added, we have rechecked and added them. Please refer to lines 34-109.

5.Table 1. Kindly add a column for each Landsat satellite data used.

Answer: As there are too many remote sensing images involved in this paper, this information cannot be clearly expressed in Table 1. After discussion among the team, we decided to organize each data image information used into a remote sensing image information table, which is convenient for readers to read and understand. The detailed information is presented in Table 2. In addition, sensor models designed in the image are also noted in Table 2. Please refer to lines 154-157.

6.Table 2 may be removed and the full form of each abbreviation used should be mentioned in manuscript at first appearance.

Answer: According to your suggestions, we have removed this table and define each acronym the first time it is used in the article.

7.Quality of figure 3, 9 and 10 should be improved.

Answer: Based on your suggestions, we have redrawn Figures 3, 9, and 10 in the paper. We added additional boundary conditions and improved the quality of the images. Please refer to lines 268, 374, 377.

8.Some studies have been done to monitor drought using Landsat data and temperature and vegetation indices. Authors should check these studies and compare the findings with these studies in the manuscript. Some of the studies are:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101689, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10028-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110584, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3567-1_4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112681

Discussion seems to be a summary especially sub-section 4.2-4.5. Authors should try to build arguments based on the findings of this study and comparing it with previous studies. Kindly try to provide causes and effects of major findings and add a sub-section of policy implication at the end. In current form the discussion is lengthy but did not provide a concrete discussion.

Answer: Regarding the several research papers you mentioned, I have carefully read them and have referenced them and similar studies in the discussion section of this paper to support the research results and discussion. Please refer to lines 491, 496, 505, 509, 519, 525, 535, 536, 542, 549, 558, 561.

After discussion by the team, we decided to carry out block discussion according to the paper’s framework. This may make it easier for the reader to read and understand. In addition, we have made specific arguments based on the findings and similar studies in each section of the discussion. The discussion on the causes and effects of the main research findings is scattered in each section and mainly analyzes the reasons and driving mechanisms behind this phenomenon. Please refer to lines 488-582.

In addition, based on your suggestions, we provide policy recommendations and recommend drought response strategies in Section 4.3. to make it easier for readers to read and understand. Please refer to lines 564-582.

We have fine-tuned the discussion by reducing unnecessary narrative and refining the language. We hired a professional language editing service to thoroughly check and polish the manuscript.

9.Kindly bring whole conclusion in one or two paragraph.

Answer: Thank you for your suggestion. After discussion by the team, we decided to summarize the research according to three points, which may make it more convenient for readers to read and understand. In addition, according to your suggestion, we have simplified the conclusion and summarized the main conclusions it in concise language. In addition, in the last paragraph, we have also added appropriate statements on policy recommendations in accordance with other reviewers' comments to provide an overall conclusion to the article.Please refer to lines 620-643.

Reviewer #6

I have read the draft “Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xin jiang” revised based on the comments received earlier from three reviewers. I have found that the authors have addressed the concerns raised by the previous reviewers. The contexts and arguments placed in the paper are convincing. Water availability to the requirements of specific crops is the prime production condition, absence of which, could nullify contributions of other inputs. There are specific thresholds of optimal water requirement for every crop, which the precipitation and/or irrigation provisioning need to ensure in case water availability deviates from optimality. Thus, there involves optimization of costs for water provisioning, and all requires precise estimates on the cost and benefits derived from land use. These aspects though are not explicit in the paper, one could relate the significance the paper posits. The context of the study is thus presented well - a timely and accurate assessment of the drought situation (water availability assessment to the requirements of crops cultivated) is of great significance in sustaining production. The authors are well aware of the developments in the field of GIS and applications, consider a host of factors including the topography and human activities as drivers of drought. There is high water demand in the study area, though causes of demand are indicated, could be explained further as – water availability declines because of variation of precipitation, and higher water use intensity is because of cropping pattern change driven by the market. and higher human consumption of water in new areas of consumption.

Data sources are well indicated and methodology is well explained in the paper to measure the TVDI. Geodetector model however requires detailed justification on how all the factors act as drivers. If the results show drought reduction and enhancement of drought across various seasons, the explanatory factors need detailed discussion. For instance, the main reason for the gradual increase of drought in summer is temperature and increased need of water for crops, as because it is the prime growing season of crops. Further, the study area has high population density, and the demand for crops would be market driven, and market as a factor to intensify input use to derive higher yield and even change cropping patterns for exotic crops, which may require more water. Detailed discussion on these lines along with crop data could have made the analysis comprehensive.

Drought could be linked to cropping seasons, assessing water requirements for crops cultivated, and drought could be aggravated/reduced by introduction/withdrawal of water intensive crops. Mapping of crops to the seasons could have arrived to derive better results from the exercises. There is scope to have simulation exercises on water requirement on three fronts - cropping pattern to the ecological condition of the study area; introduction of water intensive crops driven by market, and introduction of low water intensive crops driven/compensated by state subsidy; and as indicated technology can complement/aggravate the rest of the interventions to ensure optimality or aggravating the droughts too.

Answer: Thank you for your suggestions.

First, regarding your comment that "The Geodetic model needs to specify how all the factors act as drivers," in Section 2.3.4 of the paper, we added tables to explain the driving logic of the different dri

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0323918.s005.docx (798.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Nguyen-Thanh Son

17 Apr 2025

Analysis of growing season drought characteristics and driving factors for vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang

PONE-D-24-49768R2

Dear Dr. Qiao Li,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nguyen-Thanh Son, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewer #4: The authors have successfully incorporated all the suggestions I provided. Therefore, I accept the paper for publication in its current form.

Reviewer #5: Authors have revised the MS as per comments. I feel manuscript has been improved significantly and may be recommended for publication now.

Reviewer #6: The authors have addressed all comments explicitly, or implicitly. To address certain questions it is understood that there are data gaps. The authors in such contexts, have led detailed discussion on the concerns raised.

Reviewer #7: The manuscript titled "Analysis of Growing Season Drought Characteristics and Driving Factors for Vegetation in the Santun River Irrigation Area in Xinjiang" presented a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the factors influencing vegetation response to drought conditions in a critical irrigation area. The authors have addressed all the queries raised during the review process and have provided adequate explanations and revisions to enhance the clarity and depth of their analysis. The methodology is robust, and the findings are well-supported by data. The manuscript now meets the standards required for publication and provides valuable information for future research and practical applications in drought management.

I recommend the paper for acceptance in its current form.

Acceptance letter

Nguyen-Thanh Son

PONE-D-24-49768R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Li,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nguyen-Thanh Son

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. The original data file of the manuscript graphics.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0323918.s001.xlsx (38.7KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0323918.s004.docx (50.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review Comments.docx

    pone.0323918.s003.docx (16.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0323918.s005.docx (798.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES