Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Sep;144(1):389–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.389

Genetic Distances and Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Trees from Microsatellite DNA

N Takezaki 1, M Nei 1
PMCID: PMC1207511  PMID: 8878702

Abstract

Recently many investigators have used microsatellite DNA loci for studying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations or species, and some authors proposed new genetic distance measures for this purpose. However, the efficiencies of these distance measures in obtaining the correct tree topology remains unclear. We therefore investigated the probability of obtaining the correct topology (P(C)) for these new distances as well as traditional distance measures by using computer simulation. We used both the infinite-allele model (IAM) and the stepwise mutation model (SMM), which seem to be appropriate for classical markers and microsatellite loci, respectively. The results show that in both the IAM and SMM CAVALLI-SFORZA and EDWARDS' chord distance (D(C)) and NEI et al.'s D(A) distance generally show higher P(C) values than other distance measures, whether the bottleneck effect exists or not. For estimating evolutionary times, however, NEI's standard distance and GOLDSTEIN et al.'s (δ μ)(2) are more appropriate than other distances. Microsatellite DNA seems to be very useful for clarifying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (989.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson P. W. Physics: the opening to complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6653–6654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowcock A. M., Ruiz-Linares A., Tomfohrde J., Minch E., Kidd J. R., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):455–457. doi: 10.1038/368455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Edwards A. W. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deka R., Jin L., Shriver M. D., Yu L. M., DeCroo S., Hundrieser J., Bunker C. H., Ferrell R. E., Chakraborty R. Population genetics of dinucleotide (dC-dA)n.(dG-dT)n polymorphisms in world populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Feb;56(2):461–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garza J. C., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jul;12(4):594–603. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein D. B., Pollock D. D. Least squares estimation of molecular distance--noise abatement in phylogenetic reconstruction. Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Jun;45(3):219–226. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):463–471. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6723–6727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jorde L. B., Bamshad M. J., Watkins W. S., Zenger R., Fraley A. E., Krakowiak P. A., Carpenter K. D., Soodyall H., Jenkins T., Rogers A. R. Origins and affinities of modern humans: a comparison of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic data. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Sep;57(3):523–538. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320570340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kwiatkowski D. J., Henske E. P., Weimer K., Ozelius L., Gusella J. F., Haines J. Construction of a GT polymorphism map of human 9q. Genomics. 1992 Feb;12(2):229–240. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li W. H., Nei M. Drift variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance in transient states. Genet Res. 1975 Jun;25(3):229–248. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nei M., Tajima F., Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. J Mol Evol. 1983;19(2):153–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02300753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ohta T., Kimura M. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res. 1973 Oct;22(2):201–204. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paetkau D., Calvert W., Stirling I., Strobeck C. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reynolds J., Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):767–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roy M. S., Geffen E., Smith D., Ostrander E. A., Wayne R. K. Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jul;11(4):553–570. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SANGHVI L. D. Comparison of genetical and morphological methods for a study of biological differences. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1953 Sep;11(3):385–404. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330110313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shriver M. D., Jin L., Boerwinkle E., Deka R., Ferrell R. E., Chakraborty R. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):914–920. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shriver M. D., Jin L., Chakraborty R., Boerwinkle E. VNTR allele frequency distributions under the stepwise mutation model: a computer simulation approach. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):983–993. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tajima F., Takezaki N. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Mar;11(2):278–286. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Takezaki N., Rzhetsky A., Nei M. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):823–833. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):737–749. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weber J. L., Wong C. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1123–1128. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.8.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhivotovsky L. A., Feldman M. W. Microsatellite variability and genetic distances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11549–11552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES