Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Oct;144(2):511–521. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.511

Multicopy Fzf1 (Sul1) Suppresses the Sulfite Sensitivity but Not the Glucose Derepression or Aberrant Cell Morphology of a Grr1 Mutant of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

D Avram 1, A T Bakalinsky 1
PMCID: PMC1207546  PMID: 8889516

Abstract

An ssu2 mutation in Sacccharomyces cerevisiae, previously shown to cause sulfite sensitivity, was found to be allelic to GRR1, a gene previously implicated in glucose repression. The suppressor rgt1, which suppresses the growth defects of grr1 strains on glucose, did not fully suppress the sensitivity on glucose or nonglucose carbon sources, indicating that it is not strictly linked to a defect in glucose metabolism. Because the Cln1 protein was previously shown to be elevated in grr1 mutants, the effect of CLN1 overexpression on sulfite sensitivity was investigated. Overexpression in GRR1 cells resulted in sulfite sensitivity, suggesting a connection between CLN1 and sulfite metabolism. Multicopy FZF1, a putative transcription factor, was found to suppress the sulfite sensitive phenotype of grr1 strains, but not the glucose derepression or aberrant cell morphology. Multicopy FZF1 was also found to suppress the sensitivity of a number of other unrelated sulfite-sensitive mutants, but not that of ssu1 or met20, implying that FZF1 may act through Ssu1p and Met20p. Disruption of FZF1 resulted in sulfite sensitivity when the construct was introduced in single copy at the FZF1 locus in a GRR1 strain, providing evidence that FZF1 is involved in sulfite metabolism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blanco C., Ritzenthaler P., Mata-Gilsinger M. Negative dominant mutations of the uidR gene in Escherichia coli: genetic proof for a cooperative regulation of uidA expression. Genetics. 1986 Feb;112(2):173–182. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chien C. T., Bartel P. L., Sternglanz R., Fields S. The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9578–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Erickson J. R., Johnston M. Suppressors reveal two classes of glucose repression genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1271–1278. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flick J. S., Johnston M. GRR1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for glucose repression and encodes a protein with leucine-rich repeats. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5101–5112. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gietz D., St Jean A., Woods R. A., Schiestl R. H. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 25;20(6):1425–1425. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim Y. J., Francisco L., Chen G. C., Marcotte E., Chan C. S. Control of cellular morphogenesis by the Ip12/Bem2 GTPase-activating protein: possible role of protein phosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(5):1381–1394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.5.1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ozcan S., Schulte F., Freidel K., Weber A., Ciriacy M. Glucose uptake and metabolism in grr1/cat80 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Sep 1;224(2):605–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sathe G. M., O'Brien S., McLaughlin M. M., Watson F., Livi G. P. Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of gene insertions in whole yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Sep 11;19(17):4775–4775. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.17.4775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vallier L. G., Coons D., Bisson L. F., Carlson M. Altered regulatory responses to glucose are associated with a glucose transport defect in grr1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1279–1285. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu X., Wightman J. D., Geller B. L., Avram D., Bakalinsky A. T. Isolation and characterization of sulfite mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1994 Jun;25(6):488–496. doi: 10.1007/BF00351667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yocum R. R., Hanley S., West R., Jr, Ptashne M. Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of the inducible divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;4(10):1985–1998. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.10.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES