Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Nov;144(3):1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1053

Synonymous Substitutions in the Xdh Gene of Drosophila: Heterogeneous Distribution along the Coding Region

J M Comeron 1, M Aguade 1
PMCID: PMC1207601  PMID: 8913749

Abstract

The Xdh (rosy) region of Drosophila subobscura has been sequenced and compared to the homologous region of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster. Estimates of the numbers of synonymous substitutions per site (Ks) confirm that Xdh has a high synonymous substitution rate. The distributions of both nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions along the coding region were found to be heterogeneous. Also, no relationship has been detected between Ks estimates and codon usage bias along the gene, in contrast with the generally observed relationship among genes. This heterogeneous distribution of synonymous substitutions along the Xdh gene, which is expression-level independent, could be explained by a differential selection pressure on synonymous sites along the coding region acting on mRNA secondary structure. The synonymous rate in the Xdh coding region is lower in the D. subobscura than in the D. pseudoobscura lineage, whereas the reverse is true for the Adh gene.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguadé M. Nucleotide sequence comparison of the rp49 gene region between Drosophila subobscura and D. melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Jul;5(4):433–441. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akashi H. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067–1076. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britten R. J. Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science. 1986 Mar 21;231(4744):1393–1398. doi: 10.1126/science.3082006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897–907. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carulli J. P., Krane D. E., Hartl D. L., Ochman H. Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):837–845. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Comeron J. M. A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1152–1159. doi: 10.1007/BF00173196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coté B., Bender W., Curtis D., Chovnick A. Molecular mapping of the rosy locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1986 Apr;112(4):769–783. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eyre-Walker A., Bulmer M. Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1407–1412. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyre-Walker A. Synonymous substitutions are clustered in enterobacterial genes. J Mol Evol. 1994 Nov;39(5):448–451. doi: 10.1007/BF00173413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillespie J. H. Lineage effects and the index of dispersion of molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Nov;6(6):636–647. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene. 1984 Jun;28(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilliker A. J., Clark S. H., Chovnick A., Gelbart W. M. Cytogenetic analysis of the chromosomal region immediately adjacent to the rosy locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1980 May;95(1):95–110. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes R. K., Doyle W. A., Chovnick A., Whittle J. R., Burke J. F., Bray R. C. Use of rosy mutant strains of Drosophila melanogaster to probe the structure and function of xanthine dehydrogenase. Biochem J. 1992 Jul 15;285(Pt 2):507–513. doi: 10.1042/bj2850507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Juan E., Papaceit M., Quintana A. Nucleotide sequence of the genomic region encompassing Adh and Adh-dup genes of D. lebanonensis (Scaptodrosophila): gene expression and evolutionary relationships. J Mol Evol. 1994 May;38(5):455–467. doi: 10.1007/BF00178845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kimura M. Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. Genet Res. 1968 Jun;11(3):247–269. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirby D. A., Muse S. V., Stephan W. Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9047–9051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee C. S., Curtis D., McCarron M., Love C., Gray M., Bender W., Chovnick A. Mutations affecting expression of the rosy locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):55–66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li W. H. Maintenance of genetic variability under the pressure of neutral and deleterious mutations in a finite population. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):647–667. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li W. H., Tanimura M., Sharp P. M. An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences. J Mol Evol. 1987;25(4):330–342. doi: 10.1007/BF02603118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li W. H. Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol. 1993 Jan;36(1):96–99. doi: 10.1007/BF02407308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin A. P., Palumbi S. R. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1;90(9):4087–4091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.4087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moriyama E. N., Gojobori T. Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):855–864. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moriyama E. N., Hartl D. L. Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):847–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morton B. R. Chloroplast DNA codon use: evidence for selection at the psb A locus based on tRNA availability. J Mol Evol. 1993 Sep;37(3):273–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00175504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Muse S. V., Gaut B. S. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):715–724. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ohta T. Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clock. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02111276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Precup J., Parker J. Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context. J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 15;262(23):11351–11355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Riley M. A. Nucleotide sequence of the Xdh region in Drosophila pseudoobscura and an analysis of the evolution of synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Jan;6(1):33–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Segarra C., Aguadé M. Nucleotide divergence of the rp49 gene region between Drosophila melanogaster and two species of the Obscura group of Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1993 Mar;36(3):243–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00160479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):28–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02099948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Staden R. Automation of the computer handling of gel reading data produced by the shotgun method of DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Aug 11;10(15):4731–4751. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.15.4731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stephan W., Kirby D. A. RNA folding in Drosophila shows a distance effect for compensatory fitness interactions. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):97–103. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tajima F. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):599–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES