Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Nov;144(3):1237–1245. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1237

Measuring and Testing Genetic Differentiation with Ordered versus Unordered Alleles

O Pons 1, R J Petit 1
PMCID: PMC1207615  PMID: 8913764

Abstract

Estimates and variances of diversity and differentiation measures in subdivided populations are proposed that can be applied to haplotypes (ordered alleles such as DNA sequences, which may contain a record of their own histories). Hence, two measures of differentiation can be compared for a single data set: one (G(ST)) that makes use only of the allelic frequencies and the other (N(ST)) for which similarities between the haplotypes are taken into account in addition. Tests are proposed to compare N(ST) and G(ST) with zero and with each other. The difference between N(ST) and G(ST) can be caused by several factors, including sampling artefacts, unequal effect of mutation rates and phylogeographic structure. The method presented is applied to a published data set where a nuclear DNA sequence had been determined from individuals of a grasshopper distributed in 24 regions of Europe. Additional insights into the genetic subdivision of these populations are obtained by progressively combining related haplotypes and reanalyzing the data each time.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cooper S. J., Ibrahim K. M., Hewitt G. M. Postglacial expansion and genome subdivision in the European grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Mol Ecol. 1995 Feb;4(1):49–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Excoffier L., Smouse P. E., Quattro J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479–491. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hudson R. R., Boos D. D., Kaplan N. L. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Jan;9(1):138–151. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lynch M., Crease T. J. The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1990 Jul;7(4):377–394. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nei M. Evolution of human races at the gene level. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;103(Pt A):167–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nei M. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann Hum Genet. 1977 Oct;41(2):225–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1977.tb01918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nei M., Li W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Takahata N., Nei M. F and g statistics in the finite island model. Genetics. 1984 Jul;107(3):501–504. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.3.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Templeton A. R., Routman E., Phillips C. A. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):767–782. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES