Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Nov;144(3):1297–1307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297

Molecular Evolution between Drosophila Melanogaster and D. Simulans: Reduced Codon Bias, Faster Rates of Amino Acid Substitution, and Larger Proteins in D. Melanogaster

H Akashi 1
PMCID: PMC1207620  PMID: 8913769

Abstract

Both natural selection and mutational biases contribute to variation in codon usage bias within Drosophila species. This study addresses the cause of codon bias differences between the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Under a model of mutation-selection-drift, variation in mutational processes between species predicts greater base composition differences in neutrally evolving regions than in highly biased genes. Variation in selection intensity, however, predicts larger base composition differences in highly biased loci. Greater differences in the G+C content of 34 coding regions than 46 intron sequences between D. melanogaster and D. simulans suggest that D. melanogaster has undergone a reduction in selection intensity for codon bias. Computer simulations suggest at least a fivefold reduction in N(e)s at silent sites in this lineage. Other classes of molecular change show lineage effects between these species. Rates of amino acid substitution are higher in the D. melanogaster lineage than in D. simulans in 14 genes for which outgroup sequences are available. Surprisingly, protein sizes are larger in D. melanogaster than in D. simulans in the 34 genes compared between the two species. A substantial fraction of silent, replacement, and insertion/deletion mutations in coding regions may be weakly selected in Drosophila.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson S. G., Kurland C. G. Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jun;54(2):198–210. doi: 10.1128/mr.54.2.198-210.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquadro C. F. Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1992 Oct;8(10):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala F. J., Chang B. S., Hartl D. L. Molecular evolution of the Rh3 gene in Drosophila. Genetica. 1993;92(1):23–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00057504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala F. J., Hartl D. L. Molecular drift of the bride of sevenless (boss) gene in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Sep;10(5):1030–1040. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ballard J. W., Kreitman M. Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):757–772. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barton N. H. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):821–841. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1019–1032. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennetzen J. L., Hall B. D. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 25;257(6):3026–3031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carulli J. P., Krane D. E., Hartl D. L., Ochman H. Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):837–845. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eanes W. F., Kirchner M., Yoon J. Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7475–7479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Easteal S., Collet C. Consistent variation in amino-acid substitution rate, despite uniformity of mutation rate: protein evolution in mammals is not neutral. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jul;11(4):643–647. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eyre-Walker A., Bulmer M. Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1407–1412. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillespie J. H. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):943–952. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gouy M., Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 25;10(22):7055–7074. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.22.7055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Jacobzone M., Mercier R. Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):r43–r74. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.213-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grosjean H., Fiers W. Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes. Gene. 1982 Jun;18(3):199–209. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartl D. L., Dykhuizen D. E., Dean A. M. Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):655–674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Higgins D. G., Sharp P. M. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. 1988 Dec 15;73(1):237–244. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90330-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hudson R. R., Bailey K., Skarecky D., Kwiatowski J., Ayala F. J. Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1329–1340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jul 15;158(4):573–597. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. KIMURA M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kliman R. M., Hey J. Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Nov;10(6):1239–1258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kreitman M., Hudson R. R. Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):565–582. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kreitman M. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1983 Aug 4;304(5925):412–417. doi: 10.1038/304412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leicht B. G., Muse S. V., Hanczyc M., Clark A. G. Constraints on intron evolution in the gene encoding the myosin alkali light chain in Drosophila. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):299–308. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li W. H., Tanimura M., Sharp P. M. An evaluation of the molecular clock hypothesis using mammalian DNA sequences. J Mol Evol. 1987;25(4):330–342. doi: 10.1007/BF02603118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin C. H., Mayeda C. A., Meyerowitz E. M. Evolution and expression of the Sgs-3 glue gene of Drosophila. J Mol Biol. 1988 May 20;201(2):273–287. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90138-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Martinez H. M. A flexible multiple sequence alignment program. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Mar 11;16(5):1683–1691. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.5.1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moran N. A. Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):2873–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mount S. M., Burks C., Hertz G., Stormo G. D., White O., Fields C. Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Aug 25;20(16):4255–4262. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.16.4255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mukai T. The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. VII Synergistic Interaction of Spontaneous Mutant Polygenes Controlling Viability. Genetics. 1969 Mar;61(3):749–761. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.3.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nachman M. W., Boyer S. N., Aquadro C. F. Nonneutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6364–6368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Needleman S. B., Wunsch C. D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970 Mar;48(3):443–453. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ohta T. Amino acid substitution at the Adh locus of Drosophila is facilitated by small population size. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4548–4551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ota T. Statistical analyses of Drosophila and human protein polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3194–3196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sawyer S. A., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6225–6228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sawyer S. A., Hartl D. L. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1161–1176. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schaeffer S. W., Miller E. L. Estimates of linkage disequilibrium and the recombination parameter determined from segregating nucleotide sites in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):541–552. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398–402. doi: 10.1007/BF02603075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Simmons G. M., Kwok W., Matulonis P., Venkatesh T. Polymorphism and divergence at the prune locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jul;11(4):666–671. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stephan W., Kirby D. A. RNA folding in Drosophila shows a distance effect for compensatory fitness interactions. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):97–103. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stephan W., Rodriguez V. S., Zhou B., Parsch J. Molecular evolution of the metallothionein gene Mtn in the melanogaster species group: results from Drosophila ananassae. Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):135–143. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wayne M. L., Contamine D., Kreitman M. Molecular population genetics of ref(2)P, a locus which confers viral resistance in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):191–199. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilbur W. J., Lipman D. J. Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(3):726–730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.3.726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES