Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Dec;144(4):1817–1833. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1817

Effects of Character Weighting and Species Sampling on Phylogeny Reconstruction: A Case Study Based on DNA Sequence Data in Cetaceans

M C Milinkovitch 1, R G LeDuc 1, J Adachi 1, F Farnir 1, M Georges 1, M Hasegawa 1
PMCID: PMC1207731  PMID: 8978067

Abstract

Different phylogenetic analyses of the same genetic data set can yield conflicting results, depending on the choic of parameter settings and included taxa. This is particularly true in studies involving data sets where levels of homoplasy are high and likely to obscure the phylogenetic signal. Filtering of this phylogenetic noise can be attempted, with varying degrees of success, by using different weighting schemes and ingroup/outgroup choices, but it can be difficult to decide objectively which approach is best. Using a cytochrome b data set from cetaceans and artiodactyls, we examined the effects of a suite of parameter settings on the outcome of phylogenetic analyses. We tested 2968 combinations among the seven parameters that most often vary among phylogenetic studies. It is our contention that this sensitivity analysis identifies portions of the multidimensional parameter space where phylogenetic signal is most reliably recovered, and simple rules are given to guide the choice of settings. Portions of this data set have been used in previous studies with conflicting results, namely the monophyly vs. paraphyly of one of the two major recognized cetacean suborders, the toothed whales. This analysis strongly supports the sister relationship between sperm whales and baleen whales.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (10.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnason U., Gullberg A. Relationship of baleen whales established by cytochrome b gene sequence comparison. Nature. 1994 Feb 24;367(6465):726–728. doi: 10.1038/367726a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao Y., Adachi J., Janke A., Päbo S., Hasegawa M. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J Mol Evol. 1994 Nov;39(5):519–527. doi: 10.1007/BF00173421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hendriks L., Van de Peer Y., Van Herck M., Neefs J. M., De Wachter R. The 18S ribosomal RNA sequence of the sea anemone Anemonia sulcata and its evolutionary position among other eukaryotes. FEBS Lett. 1990 Sep 3;269(2):445–449. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81212-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science. 1994 Apr 29;264(5159):671–677. doi: 10.1126/science.8171318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hixson J. E., Brown W. M. A comparison of the small ribosomal RNA genes from the mitochondrial DNA of the great apes and humans: sequence, structure, evolution, and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Jan;3(1):1–18. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128–144. doi: 10.1007/BF02515385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Jun;8(3):275–282. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol. 1989 Aug;29(2):170–179. doi: 10.1007/BF02100115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lecointre G., Philippe H., Vân Lê H. L., Le Guyader H. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1993 Sep;2(3):205–224. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1993.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Milinkovitch M. C., Meyer A., Powell J. R. Phylogeny of all major groups of cetaceans based on DNA sequences from three mitochondrial genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Nov;11(6):939–948. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Milinkovitch M. C., Ortí G., Meyer A. Novel phylogeny of whales revisited but not revised. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):518–520. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Milinkovitch M. C., Ortí G., Meyer A. Revised phylogeny of whales suggested by mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Nature. 1993 Jan 28;361(6410):346–348. doi: 10.1038/361346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Naylor G. J., Collins T. M., Brown W. M. Hydrophobicity and phylogeny. Nature. 1995 Feb 16;373(6515):565–566. doi: 10.1038/373565b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ou C. Y., Ciesielski C. A., Myers G., Bandea C. I., Luo C. C., Korber B. T., Mullins J. I., Schochetman G., Berkelman R. L., Economou A. N. Molecular epidemiology of HIV transmission in a dental practice. Science. 1992 May 22;256(5060):1165–1171. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perry F., Code S. Shared governance: a Canadian experience. Can J Nurs Adm. 1991 Jun;4(2):27-8, 30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith M. R., Shivji M. S., Waddell V. G., Stanhope M. J. Phylogenetic evidence from the IRBP gene for the paraphyly of toothed whales, with mixed support for Cetacea as a suborder of Artiodactyla. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Sep;13(7):918–922. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang Z., Goldman N., Friday A. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Mar;11(2):316–324. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES