Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 Dec;144(4):1923–1932. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1923

Marker-Assisted Introgression in Backcross Breeding Programs

P M Visscher 1, C S Haley 1, R Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1207739  PMID: 8978075

Abstract

The efficiency of marker-assisted introgression in backcross populations derived from inbred lines was investigated by simulation. Background genotypes were simulated assuming that a genetic model of many genes of small effects in coupling phase explains the observed breed difference and variance in backcross populations. Markers were efficient in introgression backcross programs for simultaneously introgressing an allele and selecting for the desired genomic background. Using a marker spacing of 10-20 cM gave an advantage of one to two backcross generations selection relative to random or phenotypic selection. When the position of the gene to be introgressed is uncertain, for example because its position was estimated from a trait gene mapping experiment, a chromosome segment should be introgressed that is likely to include the allele of interest. Even for relatively precisely mapped quantitative trait loci, flanking markers or marker haplotypes should cover ~10-20 cM around the estimated position of the gene, to ensure that the allele frequency does not decline in later backcross generations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson L., Haley C. S., Ellegren H., Knott S. A., Johansson M., Andersson K., Andersson-Eklund L., Edfors-Lilja I., Fredholm M., Hansson I. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science. 1994 Mar 25;263(5154):1771–1774. doi: 10.1126/science.8134840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gimelfarb A., Lande R. Simulation of marker assisted selection in hybrid populations. Genet Res. 1994 Feb;63(1):39–47. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hazel L N. The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):476–490. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hillel J., Schaap T., Haberfeld A., Jeffreys A. J., Plotzky Y., Cahaner A., Lavi U. DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):783–789. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES