Abstract
To assess the genetic basis of sperm competition under conditions in which it occurs, I estimated additive, dominance, homozygous and environmental variance components, the effects of inbreeding, and the weighted average dominance of segregating alleles for two measures of sperm precedence in a large, outbred laboratory population. Both first and second male precedence show significant decline on inbreeding. Second male precedence demonstrates significant dominance variance and homozygous genetic variance, but the additive variance is low and not significantly different from zero. For first male precedence, the variance among homozygous lines is again significant, and dominance variance is larger than the additive variance, but is not statistically significant. In contrast, male mating success and other fitness components in Drosophila generally exhibit significant additive variance and little or no dominance variance. Other recent experiments have shown significant genotypic variation for sperm precedence and have associated it with allelic variants of accessory-gland proteins. The contrast between sperm precedence and other male fitness traits in the structure of quantitative genetic variation suggests that different mechanisms may be responsible for the maintenance of variation in these traits. The pattern of genetic variation and inbreeding decline shown in this experiment suggests that one or a few genes with major effects on sperm precedence may be segregating in this population.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aguadé M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):755–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellen H. J., Kiger J. A., Jr Sexual hyperactivity and reduced longevity of dunce females of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):153–160. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bohren B. B., Hill W. G., Robertson A. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet Res. 1966 Feb;7(1):44–57. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300009460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth B., Lapid A., Canada D. The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Inferences on the nature of selection against elements. Genet Res. 1992 Oct;60(2):115–130. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Quadratic analyses of reciprocal crosses. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):187–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulthart M. B., Singh R. S. Differing amounts of genetic polymorphism in testes and male accessory glands of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Biochem Genet. 1988 Feb;26(1-2):153–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00555496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fain P. R. Characteristics of simple sibship variance tests for the detection of major loci and application to height, weight and spatial performance. Ann Hum Genet. 1978 Jul;42(1):109–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb00935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert D. G., Richmond R. C. Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. VI. ejaculate competitive abilities of males having null or active alleles. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):85–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg R, Crow J F. A Comparison of the Effect of Lethal and Detrimental Chromosomes from Drosophila Populations. Genetics. 1960 Aug;45(8):1153–1168. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.8.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes K. A. The inbreeding decline and average dominance of genes affecting male life-history characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1995 Feb;65(1):41–52. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):541–553. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukai T., Cardellino R. A., Watanabe T. K., Crow J. F. The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Dec;78(4):1195–1208. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.4.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Service P. M., Fales A. J. Evolution of delayed reproductive senescence in male fruit flies: sperm competition. Genetica. 1993;91(1-3):111–125. doi: 10.1007/BF01435992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Service P. M., Vossbrink R. E. Genetic variation in "first" male effects on egg laying and remating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1996 Jan;26(1):39–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02361157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simmons M. J., Crow J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]