Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Jan;145(1):29–38. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.29

Highly Mismatched Molecules Resembling Recombination Intermediates Efficiently Transform Mismatch Repair Proficient Escherichia Coli

J Westmoreland 1, G Porter 1, M Radman 1, M A Resnick 1
PMCID: PMC1207780  PMID: 9017387

Abstract

The ability of related DNAs to undergo recombination decreases with increased sequence divergence. Mismatch repair has been proposed to be a key factor in preventing homeologous recombination; however, the contribution of mismatch repair is not universal. Although mismatch repair has been proposed to act by preventing strand exchange and/or inactivating multiply mismatched heteroduplexes, there has been no systematic study to determine at what step(s) in recombination mismatch repair acts in vivo. Since heteroduplex is a commonly proposed intermediate in many models of recombination, we have investigated the consequences of mismatch repair on plasmids that are multiply mismatched in heteroduplex structures that are similar to those that might arise during recombination. Plasmids containing multiply mismatched regions were transformed into wild-type and Mut(-) Eschericia coli mutants. There was only a 30-40% reduction in transformation of Mut(+) as compared to mutS and mutL strains for DNAs containing an 18% mismatched heteroduplex. The products obtained from mutS hosts differed from those obtained from Mut(+) hosts in that there were many more colonies containing mixtures of two plasmids, due to survival of both strands of the heteroduplex. There were nearly 10 times more recombinants obtained from the mutS as compared to the wild-type host. Based on these results and those from other studies with E. coli and yeast, we propose that the prevention of recombination between highly diverged DNAs may be at step earlier than heteroduplex formation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abastado J. P., Cami B., Dinh T. H., Igolen J., Kourilsky P. Processing of complex heteroduplexes in Escherichia coli and Cos-1 monkey cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5792–5796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abastado J. P., Darche S., Godeau F., Cami B., Kourilsky P. Intramolecular recombination between partially homologous sequences in Escherichia coli and Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(18):6496–6500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.18.6496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailis A. M., Rothstein R. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair dependent process. Genetics. 1990 Nov;126(3):535–547. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borts R. H., Leung W. Y., Kramer W., Kramer B., Williamson M., Fogel S., Haber J. E. Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):573–584. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cami B., Chambon P., Kourilsky P. Correction of complex heteroduplexes made of mouse H-2 gene sequences in Escherichia coli K-12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(2):503–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.2.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chung C. T., Miller R. H. A rapid and convenient method for the preparation and storage of competent bacterial cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Apr 25;16(8):3580–3580. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.8.3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Datta A., Adjiri A., New L., Crouse G. F., Jinks Robertson S. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccaromyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Mar;16(3):1085–1093. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.3.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doutriaux M. P., Wagner R., Radman M. Mismatch-stimulated killing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2576–2578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang J. C., Hsu D. S., Kazantsev A., Sancar A. Substrate spectrum of human excinuclease: repair of abasic sites, methylated bases, mismatches, and bulky adducts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):12213–12217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Humbert O., Prudhomme M., Hakenbeck R., Dowson C. G., Claverys J. P. Homeologous recombination and mismatch repair during transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae: saturation of the Hex mismatch repair system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9052–9056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lahue R. S., Au K. G., Modrich P. DNA mismatch correction in a defined system. Science. 1989 Jul 14;245(4914):160–164. doi: 10.1126/science.2665076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maryon E., Carroll D. Characterization of recombination intermediates from DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes: evidence for a nonconservative mechanism of homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3278–3287. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ozenberger B. A., Roeder G. S. A unique pathway of double-strand break repair operates in tandemly repeated genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1222–1231. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petit M. A., Dimpfl J., Radman M., Echols H. Control of large chromosomal duplications in Escherichia coli by the mismatch repair system. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):327–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Porter G., Westmoreland J., Priebe S., Resnick M. A. Homologous and homeologous intermolecular gene conversion are not differentially affected by mutations in the DNA damage or the mismatch repair genes RAD1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, PMS1 and MSH2. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):755–767. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Priebe S. D., Westmoreland J., Nilsson-Tillgren T., Resnick M. A. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;14(7):4802–4814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Radman M. Mismatch repair and the fidelity of genetic recombination. Genome. 1989;31(1):68–73. doi: 10.1139/g89-014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Selva E. M., New L., Crouse G. F., Lahue R. S. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1175–1188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zahrt T. C., Mora G. C., Maloy S. Inactivation of mismatch repair overcomes the barrier to transduction between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. J Bacteriol. 1994 Mar;176(5):1527–1529. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.5.1527-1529.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Wind N., Dekker M., Berns A., Radman M., te Riele H. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES