Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Feb;145(2):261–266. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.261

The Enigma of Y Chromosome Degeneration: Tram, a Novel Retrotransposon Is Preferentially Located on the Neo-Y Chromosome of Drosophila Miranda

M Steinemann 1, S Steinemann 1
PMCID: PMC1207793  PMID: 9071582

Abstract

We have cloned a novel transposable element from the neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda. The size of the element, designated as TRAM, is 3.452 bp, including on both sides long terminal direct repeats (LTRs) of 372 bp, respectively. The element is flanked by a 5-bp target site duplication, ATATG. The putative primer binding site (PBS) for minus-strand priming is complementary to 18 nucleotides of the 3'-end of tRNA(Trp). Data base screens for DNA sequence identities were negative, apart from the sequence motif of the PBS. The deduced amino acid sequence from the large ORF does not reveal identities described for other transposons. In situ hybridizations with TRAM subclones show a biased distribution in the genome, with a massive accumulation of TRAM in the neo-Y chromosome, while the former homologue, the X2 chromosome is devoid of TRAM sites. The enriched occurrence of the TRAM element at the evolving neo-Y chromosome of D.miranda adds compelling evidence in favor of the view that Y chromosome degeneration is driven by the accumulation of transposable elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrio E., Latorre A., Moya A., Ayala F. J. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Drosophila obscura group, on the basis of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Jul;9(4):621–635. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlesworth B. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 1996 Feb 1;6(2):149–162. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00448-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth B. The evolution of sex chromosomes. Science. 1991 Mar 1;251(4997):1030–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1998119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B. The evolutionary genetics of sexual systems in flowering plants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):513–530. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobzhansky T. Drosophila Miranda, a New Species. Genetics. 1935 Jul;20(4):377–391. doi: 10.1093/genetics/20.4.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganguly R., Swanson K. D., Ray K., Krishnan R. A BamHI repeat element is predominantly associated with the degenerating neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda but absent in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1340–1344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lucchesi J. C. Gene dosage compensation and the evolution of sex chromosomes. Science. 1978 Nov 17;202(4369):711–716. doi: 10.1126/science.715437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lucchesi J. C. The evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Bioessays. 1994 Feb;16(2):81–83. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Macknight R H. The Sex-Determining Mechanism of Drosophila Miranda. Genetics. 1939 Mar;24(2):180–201. doi: 10.1093/genetics/24.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Muller H J. Genetic Variability, Twin Hybrids and Constant Hybrids, in a Case of Balanced Lethal Factors. Genetics. 1918 Sep;3(5):422–499. doi: 10.1093/genetics/3.5.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pimpinelli S., Berloco M., Fanti L., Dimitri P., Bonaccorsi S., Marchetti E., Caizzi R., Caggese C., Gatti M. Transposable elements are stable structural components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Apr 25;92(9):3804–3808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rice W. R. Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science. 1994 Jan 14;263(5144):230–232. doi: 10.1126/science.8284674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rice W. R. Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):161–167. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz D. E., Tizard R., Gilbert W. Nucleotide sequence of Rous sarcoma virus. Cell. 1983 Mar;32(3):853–869. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spradling A. C. Transposable elements and the evolution of heterochromatin. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1994;49:69–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steinemann M. Multiple sex chromosomes in Drosophila miranda: a system to study the degeneration of a chromosome. Chromosoma. 1982;86(1):59–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00330730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steinemann M., Steinemann S. A duplication including the Y allele of Lcp2 and the TRIM retrotransposon at the Lcp locus on the degenerating neo-Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda: molecular structure and mechanisms by which it may have arisen. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):497–505. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steinemann M., Steinemann S. Degenerating Y chromosome of Drosophila miranda: a trap for retrotransposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7591–7595. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Steinemann M., Steinemann S. Preferential Y chromosomal location of TRIM, a novel transposable element of Drosophila miranda, obscura group. Chromosoma. 1991 Dec;101(3):169–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00355366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Steinemann M., Steinemann S., Turner B. M. Evolution of dosage compensation. Chromosome Res. 1996 Apr;4(3):185–190. doi: 10.1007/BF02254957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strobel E., Pelling C., Arnheim N. Incomplete dosage compensation in an evolving Drosophila sex chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb;75(2):931–935. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xiong Y., Eickbush T. H. Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3353–3362. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07536.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES