Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Feb;145(2):453–465. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.453

Epistasis for Three Grain Yield Components in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)

Z Li 1, SRM Pinson 1, W D Park 1, A H Paterson 1, J W Stansel 1
PMCID: PMC1207809  PMID: 9071598

Abstract

The genetic basis for three grain yield components of rice, 1000 kernel weight (KW), grain number per panicle (GN), and grain weight per panicle (GWP), was investigated using restriction fragment length polymorphism markers and F(4) progeny testing from a cross between rice subspecies japonica (cultivar Lemont from USA) and indica (cv. Tequing from China). Following identification of 19 QTL affecting these traits, we investigated the role of epistasis in genetic control of these phenotypes. Among 63 markers distributed throughout the genome that appeared to be involved in 79 highly significant (P < 0.001) interactions, most (46 or 73%) did not appear to have ``main'' effects on the relevant traits, but influenced the trait(s) predominantly through interactions. These results indicate that epistasis is an important genetic basis for complex traits such as yield components, especially traits of low heritability such as GN and GWP. The identification of epistatic loci is an important step toward resolution of discrepancies between quantitative trait loci mapping and classical genetic dogma, contributes to better understanding of the persistence of quantitative genetic variation in populations, and impels reconsideration of optimal mapping methodology and marker-assisted breeding strategies for improvement of complex traits.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cabot E. L., Davis A. W., Johnson N. A., Wu C. I. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):175–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark A. G. Mutation-selection balance and metabolic control theory. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):909–923. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockerham C. C., Zeng Z. B. Design III with marker loci. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1437–1456. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis A. W., Noonburg E. G., Wu C. I. Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):191–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doebley J., Stec A., Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillespie J. H. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. V. The SAS--CFF model. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Aug;14(1):1–45. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horvat S., Medrano J. F. Interval mapping of high growth (hg), a major locus that increases weight gain in mice. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1737–1748. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kowalski S. P., Lan T. H., Feldmann K. A., Paterson A. H. QTL mapping of naturally-occurring variation in flowering time of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Dec 1;245(5):548–555. doi: 10.1007/BF00282217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lande R. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res. 1975 Dec;26(3):221–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):743–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lark K. G., Chase K., Adler F., Mansur L. M., Orf J. H. Interactions between quantitative trait loci in soybean in which trait variation at one locus is conditional upon a specific allele at another. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4656–4660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Long A. D., Mullaney S. L., Reid L. A., Fry J. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1273–1291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palopoli M. F., Wu C. I. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):329–341. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S., Tanksley S. D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):181–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paterson A. H., DeVerna J. W., Lanini B., Tanksley S. D. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):735–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rieseberg LH, Sinervo B, Linder CR, Ungerer MC, Arias DM. Role of Gene Interactions in Hybrid Speciation: Evidence from Ancient and Experimental Hybrids. Science. 1996 May 3;272(5262):741–745. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5262.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spassky B., Dobzhansky T., Anderson W. W. Genetics of natural populations. XXXVI. Epistatic interactions of the components of the genetic load in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1965 Sep;52(3):653–664. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.3.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Templeton A. R. The Unit of Selection in DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM. II. Genetic Revolution and the Origin of Coadapted Genomes in Parthenogenetic Strains. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1265–1282. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.4.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Templeton A. R. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. VAN DER VEEN J. H. Tests of non-allelic interaction and linkage for quantitative characters in generations derived from two diploid pure lines. Genetica. 1959;30:201–232. doi: 10.1007/BF01535675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES