Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 May;146(1):245–252. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.245

Isolation of Mutations in the Drosophila Homologues of the Human Neurofibromatosis 2 and Yeast Cdc42 Genes Using a Simple and Efficient Reverse-Genetic Method

R G Fehon 1, T Oren 1, D R LaJeunesse 1, T E Melby 1, B M McCartney 1
PMCID: PMC1207939  PMID: 9136014

Abstract

Reverse genetic analysis in Drosophila has been greatly aided by a growing collection of lethal P transposable element insertions that provide molecular tags for the identification of essential genetic loci. However, because the screens performed to date primarily have generated autosomal P-element insertions, this collection has not been as useful for performing reverse genetic analysis of X-linked genes. We have designed a reverse genetic screen that takes advantage of the hemizygosity of the X chromosome in males together with a cosmid-based transgene that serves as an autosomally linked duplication of a small region of the X chromosome. The efficacy and efficiency of this method is demonstrated by the isolation of mutations in Drosophila homologues of two well-studied genes, the human Neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor and the yeast CDC42 gene. The method we describe should be of general utility for the isolation of mutations in other X-linked genes, and should also provide an efficient method for the isolation of new alleles of existing X-linked or autosomal mutations in Drosophila.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Johnson D. I., Longnecker R. M., Sloat B. F., Pringle J. R. CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):131–142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballinger D. G., Benzer S. Targeted gene mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9402–9406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown N. H., Kafatos F. C. Functional cDNA libraries from Drosophila embryos. J Mol Biol. 1988 Sep 20;203(2):425–437. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunch T. A., Grinblat Y., Goldstein L. S. Characterization and use of the Drosophila metallothionein promoter in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1043–1061. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clifford R., Schüpbach T. The torpedo (DER) receptor tyrosine kinase is required at multiple times during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. 1992 Jul;115(3):853–872. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.3.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooley L., Kelley R., Spradling A. Insertional mutagenesis of the Drosophila genome with single P elements. Science. 1988 Mar 4;239(4844):1121–1128. doi: 10.1126/science.2830671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa M., Wilson E. T., Wieschaus E. A putative cell signal encoded by the folded gastrulation gene coordinates cell shape changes during Drosophila gastrulation. Cell. 1994 Mar 25;76(6):1075–1089. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90384-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eaton S., Auvinen P., Luo L., Jan Y. N., Simons K. CDC42 and Rac1 control different actin-dependent processes in the Drosophila wing disc epithelium. J Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;131(1):151–164. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eberl D. F., Hilliker A. J. Characterization of X-linked recessive lethal mutations affecting embryonic morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1988 Jan;118(1):109–120. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards K. A., Kiehart D. P. Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1499–1511. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fehon R. G., Dawson I. A., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. A Drosophila homologue of membrane-skeleton protein 4.1 is associated with septate junctions and is encoded by the coracle gene. Development. 1994 Mar;120(3):545–557. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.3.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferrús A., Llamazares S., de la Pompa J. L., Tanouye M. A., Pongs O. Genetic analysis of the Shaker gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Jun;125(2):383–398. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.2.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Garrity P. A., Rao Y., Salecker I., McGlade J., Pawson T., Zipursky S. L. Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance and targeting requires the dreadlocks SH2/SH3 adapter protein. Cell. 1996 May 31;85(5):639–650. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81231-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harden N., Lee J., Loh H. Y., Ong Y. M., Tan I., Leung T., Manser E., Lim L. A Drosophila homolog of the Rac- and Cdc42-activated serine/threonine kinase PAK is a potential focal adhesion and focal complex protein that colocalizes with dynamic actin structures. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):1896–1908. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harden N., Loh H. Y., Chia W., Lim L. A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development. 1995 Mar;121(3):903–914. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.3.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson D. I., Pringle J. R. Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):143–152. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaiser K., Goodwin S. F. "Site-selected" transposon mutagenesis of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(5):1686–1690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kolodkin A. L., Pickup A. T., Lin D. M., Goodman C. S., Banerjee U. Characterization of Star and its interactions with sevenless and EGF receptor during photoreceptor cell development in Drosophila. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):1731–1745. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kozlova T. u., Semeshin V. F., Tretyakova I. V., Kokoza E. B., Pirrotta V., Grafodatskaya V. E., Belyaeva E. S., Zhimulev I. F. Molecular and cytogenetical characterization of the 10A1-2 band and adjoining region in the Drosophila melanogaster polytene X chromosome. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):1063–1073. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lai Z. C., Fortini M. E., Rubin G. M. The embryonic expression patterns of zfh-1 and zfh-2, two Drosophila genes encoding novel zinc-finger homeodomain proteins. Mech Dev. 1991 Jun;34(2-3):123–134. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(91)90049-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luo L., Liao Y. J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: Drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev. 1994 Aug 1;8(15):1787–1802. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.15.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martuza R. L., Eldridge R. Neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis). N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 17;318(11):684–688. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198803173181106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayer U., Nüsslein-Volhard C. A group of genes required for pattern formation in the ventral ectoderm of the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1496–1511. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McCartney B. M., Fehon R. G. Distinct cellular and subcellular patterns of expression imply distinct functions for the Drosophila homologues of moesin and the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor, merlin. J Cell Biol. 1996 May;133(4):843–852. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.4.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miklos G. L., Rubin G. M. The role of the genome project in determining gene function: insights from model organisms. Cell. 1996 Aug 23;86(4):521–529. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80126-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Murphy A. M., Montell D. J. Cell type-specific roles for Cdc42, Rac, and RhoL in Drosophila oogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1996 May;133(3):617–630. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.3.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Price J. V., Clifford R. J., Schüpbach T. The maternal ventralizing locus torpedo is allelic to faint little ball, an embryonic lethal, and encodes the Drosophila EGF receptor homolog. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):1085–1092. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90641-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramos R. G., Grimwade B. G., Wharton K. A., Scottgale T. N., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Physical and functional definition of the Drosophila Notch locus by P element transformation. Genetics. 1989 Oct;123(2):337–348. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.2.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rebay I., Fehon R. G., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Specific truncations of Drosophila Notch define dominant activated and dominant negative forms of the receptor. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):319–329. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90423-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Riesgo-Escovar J. R., Jenni M., Fritz A., Hafen E. The Drosophila Jun-N-terminal kinase is required for cell morphogenesis but not for DJun-dependent cell fate specification in the eye. Genes Dev. 1996 Nov 1;10(21):2759–2768. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.21.2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schejter E. D., Shilo B. Z. The Drosophila EGF receptor homolog (DER) gene is allelic to faint little ball, a locus essential for embryonic development. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):1093–1104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90642-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Spradling A. C., Stern D. M., Kiss I., Roote J., Laverty T., Rubin G. M. Gene disruptions using P transposable elements: an integral component of the Drosophila genome project. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Nov 21;92(24):10824–10830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sturtevant M. A., Roark M., Bier E. The Drosophila rhomboid gene mediates the localized formation of wing veins and interacts genetically with components of the EGF-R signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 1993 Jun;7(6):961–973. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.6.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tamkun J. W., Deuring R., Scott M. P., Kissinger M., Pattatucci A. M., Kaufman T. C., Kennison J. A. brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):561–572. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90191-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tower J., Karpen G. H., Craig N., Spradling A. C. Preferential transposition of Drosophila P elements to nearby chromosomal sites. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):347–359. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilson R., Ainscough R., Anderson K., Baynes C., Berks M., Bonfield J., Burton J., Connell M., Copsey T., Cooper J. 2.2 Mb of contiguous nucleotide sequence from chromosome III of C. elegans. Nature. 1994 Mar 3;368(6466):32–38. doi: 10.1038/368032a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu T., Harrison S. D. Mosaic analysis using FLP recombinase. Methods Cell Biol. 1994;44:655–681. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60937-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu T., Rubin G. M. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 1993 Apr;117(4):1223–1237. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.4.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu T., Wang W., Zhang S., Stewart R. A., Yu W. Identifying tumor suppressors in genetic mosaics: the Drosophila lats gene encodes a putative protein kinase. Development. 1995 Apr;121(4):1053–1063. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.4.1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES