Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Jun;146(2):629–640. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.2.629

Altering Developmental Trajectories in Mice by Restricted Index Selection

W R Atchley 1, S Xu 1, D E Cowley 1
PMCID: PMC1208003  PMID: 9178012

Abstract

A restricted index selection experiment on mice was carried out for 14 generations on rate of early postnatal development (growth rate from birth to 10 days of age) vs. rate of development much later in ontogeny (growth rate from 28 to 56 days of age). Early rate of development (E) approximates hyperplasia (changes in cell number) and later rate (L) reflects hypertropy (changes in cell size). The selection criteria were as follows: E+L0 was selected to increase early body weight gain while holding late body weight gain constant; E-L0 was selected to decrease early body gain while holding late gain constant; E0L+ was selected to increase late gain holding early gain constant; and E0L- was selected to decrease late gain holding early gain constant. After 14 generations of selection, significant divergence among lines has occurred and the changes in the growth trajectories are very close to expectation. The genetic and developmental bases of complex traits are discussed as well as the concept of developmental homoplasy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atchley W. R., Plummer A. A., Riska B. Genetic analysis of size-scaling patterns in the mouse mandible. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):579–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atchley W. R., Plummer A. A., Riska B. Genetics of mandible form in the mouse. Genetics. 1985 Nov;111(3):555–577. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atchley W. R., Xu S., Vogl C. Developmental quantitative genetic models of evolutionary change. Dev Genet. 1994;15(1):92–103. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020150110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger P. J., Harvey W. R. Realized genetic parameters from index selection in mice. J Anim Sci. 1975 Jan;40(1):38–47. doi: 10.2527/jas1975.40138x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham E. P., Moen R. A., Gjedrem T. Restriction of selection indexes. Biometrics. 1970 Mar;26(1):67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisen E. J. Single-trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice. Genetics. 1978 Apr;88(4):781–811. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.4.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falconer D. S., Gauld I. K., Roberts R. C. Cell numbers and cell sizes in organs of mice selected for large and small body size. Genet Res. 1978 Jun;31(3):287–301. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300018061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goss R. J. Hypertrophy versus hyperplasia. Science. 1966 Sep 30;153(3744):1615–1620. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3744.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunsett F. C., Andriano K. N., Rutledge J. J. Estimating the precision of estimates of genetic parameters realized from multiple-trait selection experiments. Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):981–989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill W. G. Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics. 1972 Sep;28(3):747–765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirkpatrick M., Heckman N. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 1989;27(4):429–450. doi: 10.1007/BF00290638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirkpatrick M., Lofsvold D., Bulmer M. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):979–993. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kohn L. A., Leigh S. R., Jacobs S. C., Cheverud J. M. Effects of annular cranial vault modification on the cranial base and face. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993 Feb;90(2):147–168. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330900203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCarthy J. C., Doolittle D. P. Effects of selection for independent changes in two highly correlated body weight traits of mice. Genet Res. 1977 Apr;29(2):133–145. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300017201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Riska B., Atchley W. R., Rutledge J. J. A genetic analysis of targeted growth in mice. Genetics. 1984 May;107(1):79–101. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WIDDOWSON E. M., McCANCE R. A. Some effects of accelerating growth. I. General somatic development. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1960 May 17;152:188–206. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1960.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Winick M., Noble A. Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA, and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Dev Biol. 1965 Dec;12(3):451–466. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu S. Z., Muir W. M. Multistage selection for genetic gain by orthogonal transformation. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):963–974. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES