Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Jun;146(2):695–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.2.695

Recombination and Gene Flux Caused by Gene Conversion and Crossing over in Inversion Heterokaryotypes

A Navarro 1, E Betran 1, A Barbadilla 1, A Ruiz 1
PMCID: PMC1208008  PMID: 9178017

Abstract

A theoretical analysis of the effects of inversions on recombination and gene flux between arrangements caused by gene conversion and crossing over was carried out. Two different mathematical models of recombination were used: the Poisson model (without interference) and the Counting model (with interference). The main results are as follows. (1) Recombination and gene flux are highly site-dependent both inside and outside the inverted regions. (2) Crossing over overwhelms gene conversion as a cause of gene flux in large inversions, while conversion becomes relatively significant in short inversions and in regions around the breakpoints. (3) Under the Counting model the recombination rate between two markers depends strongly on the position of the markers along the inverted segment. Two equally spaced markers in the central part of the inverted segment have less recombination than if they are in a more extreme position. (4) Inversions affect recombination rates in the uninverted regions of the chromosome. Recombination increases in the distal segment and decreases in the proximal segment. These results provide an explanation for a number of observations reported in the literature. Because inversions are ubiquitous in the evolutionary history of many Drosophila species, the effects of inversions on recombination are expected to influence DNA variation patterns.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carson H L. The Effects of Inversions on Crossing over in Drosophila Robusta. Genetics. 1953 Mar;38(2):168–186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/38.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carson H L. The Selective Elimination of Inversion Dicentric Chromatids during Meiosis in the Eggs of Sciara Impatiens. Genetics. 1946 Jan;31(1):95–113. doi: 10.1093/genetics/31.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chovnick A. Gene conversion and transfer of genetic information within the inverted region of inversion heterozygotes. Genetics. 1973 Sep;75(1):123–131. doi: 10.1093/genetics/75.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyne J. A., Aulard S., Berry A. Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):791–802. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A., Meyers W., Crittenden A. P., Sniegowski P. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Federer W. T., Steel R. G., Wallace B. Mathematical models for chromosomal inversions. Genetics. 1967 Apr;55(4):783–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.4.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foss E. J., Stahl F. W. A test of a counting model for chiasma interference. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foss E., Lande R., Stahl F. W., Steinberg C. M. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GRELL R. F. A new model for secondary nondisjunction: the role of distributive pairing. Genetics. 1962 Dec;47:1737–1754. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.12.1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartl D. L., Lozovskaya E. R. Genome evolution: between the nucleosome and the chromosome. EXS. 1994;69:579–592. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7527-1_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasson E., Eanes W. F. Contrasting histories of three gene regions associated with In(3L)Payne of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1565–1575. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hilliker A. J., Chovnick A. Further observations on intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1981 Dec;38(3):281–296. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300020619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hilliker A. J., Clark S. H., Chovnick A. The effect of DNA sequence polymorphisms on intragenic recombination in the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):779–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hilliker A. J., Harauz G., Reaume A. G., Gray M., Clark S. H., Chovnick A. Meiotic gene conversion tract length distribution within the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1019–1026. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.4.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson R. R. How can the low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of the drosophila genome with low recombination rates be explained? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6815–6818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kreitman M., Wayne M. L. Organization of genetic variation at the molecular level: lessons from Drosophila. EXS. 1994;69:157–183. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7527-1_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McPeek M. S., Speed T. P. Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1031–1044. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Montgomery E. A., Huang S. M., Langley C. H., Judd B. H. Chromosome rearrangement by ectopic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster: genome structure and evolution. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1085–1098. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Navarro A., Betrán E., Zapata C., Ruiz A. Dynamics of gametic disequilibria between loci linked to chromosome inversions: the recombination-redistributing effect of inversions. Genet Res. 1996 Feb;67(1):67–76. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300033486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Novitski E, Braver G. An Analysis of Crossing over within a Heterozygous Inversion in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1954 Mar;39(2):197–209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.2.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Popadić A., Anderson W. W. Evidence for gene conversion in the amylase multigene family of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Jul;12(4):564–572. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Popadić A., Popadić D., Anderson W. W. Interchromosomal exchange of genetic information between gene arrangements on the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):938–943. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. ROBERTS P. Interchromosomal effects and the relation between crossing-over and nondisjunction. Genetics. 1962 Dec;47:1691–1709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.12.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wesley C. S., Eanes W. F. Isolation and analysis of the breakpoint sequences of chromosome inversion In(3L)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3132–3136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhao H., Speed T. P., McPeek M. S. Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1045–1056. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES