Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Jul;146(3):1061–1069. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1061

Genotype Selection to Rapidly Breed Congenic Strains

M M Weil 1, B W Brown 1, D M Serachitopol 1
PMCID: PMC1208035  PMID: 9215908

Abstract

Congenic strains can now be constructed guided by the transmission of DNA markers. This allows not only selection for transmission of a desired, donor-derived differential region but also selection against the transmission of unwanted donor origin genomic material. The additional selection capacity should allow congenic strains to be produced in fewer generations than is possible with random backcrosses. Here, we consider modifications of a standard backcross breeding scheme to produce congenic mice by the inclusion of genotype-based selective breeding strategies. Simulation is used to evaluate the consequences of each strategy on the number of chromosomes that contain unwanted, donor-derived genetic material and the average length of this unwanted donor DNA for each backcross generation. Our prototypic strategy was to choose a single mouse to sire each generation using criteria designed to select against the transmission of chromosomes, other than the one containing the replacement genomic region, that contain any donor origin sequence at all. This chromosome elimination strategy resulted in an average of 16.4 chromosomes free of donor DNA in mice of the third backcross (N(3)) generation. A strategy based solely on positive selection for the replacement region required six backcross generations to achieve the same results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dietrich W., Katz H., Lincoln S. E., Shin H. S., Friedman J., Dracopoli N. C., Lander E. S. A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):423–447. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frankel W. N., Johnson E. W., Lutz C. M. Congenic strains reveal effects of the epilepsy quantitative trait locus, El2, separate from other El loci. Mamm Genome. 1995 Dec;6(12):839–843. doi: 10.1007/BF00292432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lander E. S., Schork N. J. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2037–2048. doi: 10.1126/science.8091226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morel L., Yu Y., Blenman K. R., Caldwell R. A., Wakeland E. K. Production of congenic mouse strains carrying genomic intervals containing SLE-susceptibility genes derived from the SLE-prone NZM2410 strain. Mamm Genome. 1996 May;7(5):335–339. doi: 10.1007/s003359900098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yui M. A., Muralidharan K., Moreno-Altamirano B., Perrin G., Chestnut K., Wakeland E. K. Production of congenic mouse strains carrying NOD-derived diabetogenic genetic intervals: an approach for the genetic dissection of complex traits. Mamm Genome. 1996 May;7(5):331–334. doi: 10.1007/s003359900097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES