Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Aug;146(4):1319–1331. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1319

Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Protein Ord and Its Role in the Maintenance of Centromeric Cohesion

S E Bickel 1, D W Wyman 1, T L Orr-Weaver 1
PMCID: PMC1208078  PMID: 9258677

Abstract

The ord gene is required for proper segregation of all chromosomes in both male and female Drosophila meiosis. Here we describe the isolation of a null ord allele and examine the consequences of ablating ord function. Cytologically, meiotic sister-chromatid cohesion is severely disrupted in flies lacking ORD protein. Moreover, the frequency of missegregation in genetic tests is consistent with random segregation of chromosomes through both meiotic divisions, suggesting that sister cohesion may be completely abolished. However, only a slight decrease in viability is observed for ord null flies, indicating that ORD function is not essential for cohesion during somatic mitosis. In addition, we do not observe perturbation of germ-line mitotic divisions in flies lacking ORD activity. Our analysis of weaker ord alleles suggests that ORD is required for proper centromeric cohesion after arm cohesion is released at the metaphase I/anaphase I transition. Finally, although meiotic cohesion is abolished in the ord null fly, chromosome loss is not appreciable. Therefore, ORD activity appears to promote centromeric cohesion during meiosis II but is not essential for kinetochore function during anaphase.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bickel S. E., Orr-Weaver T. L. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays. 1996 Apr;18(4):293–300. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel S. E., Wyman D. W., Miyazaki W. Y., Moore D. P., Orr-Weaver T. L. Identification of ORD, a Drosophila protein essential for sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 1996 Mar 15;15(6):1451–1459. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COOPER K. W. MEIOTIC CONJUNCTIVE ELEMENTS NOT INVOLVING CHIASMATA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Nov;52:1248–1255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.5.1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis B. K. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;113(3):251–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00339546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foster G. G. Negative complementation at the notch locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1975 Sep;81(1):99–120. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldstein L. S. Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1980;78(1):79–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00291909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kerrebrock A. W., Miyazaki W. Y., Birnby D., Orr-Weaver T. L. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):827–841. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kleckner N. Meiosis: how could it work? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8167–8174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin H. P., Church K. Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster, III. The effect of orientation disruptor (ord) on gonial mitotic and the meiotic divisions in males. Genetics. 1982 Dec;102(4):751–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.4.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason J. M. Orientation disruptor (ord): a recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):545–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKee B. D., Karpen G. H. Drosophila ribosomal RNA genes function as an X-Y pairing site during male meiosis. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90215-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKee B. D. The license to pair: identification of meiotic pairing sites in Drosophila. Chromosoma. 1996 Sep;105(3):135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF02509494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miyazaki W. Y., Orr-Weaver T. L. Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants. Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1047–1061. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Molnar M., Bähler J., Sipiczki M., Kohli J. The rec8 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is involved in linear element formation, chromosome pairing and sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):61–73. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Portin P. Allelic negative complementation at the Abruptex locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1975 Sep;81(1):121–133. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raz E., Schejter E. D., Shilo B. Z. Interallelic complementation among DER/flb alleles: implications for the mechanism of signal transduction by receptor-tyrosine kinases. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):191–201. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell. 1994 Jan 14;76(1):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES