Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Oct;147(2):371–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.371

``break Copy'' Duplication: A Model for Chromosome Fragment Formation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

D M Morrow 1, C Connelly 1, P Hieter 1
PMCID: PMC1208164  PMID: 9335579

Abstract

Introduction of a chromosome fragmentation vector (CFV) into the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in a targeted homologous recombination event that yields an independently segregating chromosome fragment (CF) and an alteration in the strain's karyotype. Fragmentation with an acentric CFV directed in a centromere-proximal orientation generates a CF that contains all sequences proximal to the targeting segment and results in loss of the endogenous targeted chromosome to yield a 2N-1+CF karyotype. In contrast, fragmentation with a centric CFV directed in a centromere-distal orientation generates a CF that contains all sequences distal to the targeting segment and retention of the endogenous targeted chromosome to yield a 2N+CF karyotype. We have termed this phenomenon ``break copy'' duplication. Using yeast strains in which the centromere had been transposed to a new location, it was demonstrated that the centromere inhibited break copy duplication. These data suggest that CF formation is the product of an unscheduled DNA replication event initiated by the free end of the CFV and is analogous to a ``half'' double-strand break gap-repair reaction. We suggest that break copy duplication may have evolved as a mechanism for maintenance of ploidy following DNA breakage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloom K. S., Carbon J. Yeast centromere DNA is in a unique and highly ordered structure in chromosomes and small circular minichromosomes. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):305–317. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Das Gupta R., Morrow B., Marondel I., Parimoo S., Goei V. L., Gruen J., Weissman S., Skoultchi A., Kucherlapati R. An integrated approach for identifying and mapping human genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4364–4368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fitzgerald-Hayes M., Clarke L., Carbon J. Nucleotide sequence comparisons and functional analysis of yeast centromere DNAs. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):235–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90108-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. George J. W., Kreuzer K. N. Repair of double-strand breaks in bacteriophage T4 by a mechanism that involves extensive DNA replication. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1507–1520. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerring S. L., Connelly C., Hieter P. Positional mapping of genes by chromosome blotting and chromosome fragmentation. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:57–77. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94007-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenfeder S. A., Newlon C. S. Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;12(9):4056–4066. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.9.4056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCarroll R. M., Fangman W. L. Time of replication of yeast centromeres and telomeres. Cell. 1988 Aug 12;54(4):505–513. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murray A. W., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Chromosome length controls mitotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):529–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90284-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray A. W., Szostak J. W. Construction and behavior of circularly permuted and telocentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Sep;6(9):3166–3172. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.9.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newlon C. S., Lipchitz L. R., Collins I., Deshpande A., Devenish R. J., Green R. P., Klein H. L., Palzkill T. G., Ren R. B., Synn S. Analysis of a circular derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III: a physical map and identification and location of ARS elements. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):343–357. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap repair and crossing-over. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4417–4421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pluta A. F., Mackay A. M., Ainsztein A. M., Goldberg I. G., Earnshaw W. C. The centromere: hub of chromosomal activities. Science. 1995 Dec 8;270(5242):1591–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz D. C., Cantor C. R. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):67–75. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Voelkel-Meiman K., Roeder G. S. A chromosome containing HOT1 preferentially receives information during mitotic interchromosomal gene conversion. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):561–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Voelkel-Meiman K., Roeder G. S. Gene conversion tracts stimulated by HOT1-promoted transcription are long and continuous. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):851–867. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vollrath D., Davis R. W., Connelly C., Hieter P. Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6027–6031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES