Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Oct;147(2):479–492. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.479

Mutational Analysis of Ste5 in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: Application of a Differential Interaction Trap Assay for Examining Protein-Protein Interactions

C Inouye 1, N Dhillon 1, T Durfee 1, P C Zambryski 1, J Thorner 1
PMCID: PMC1208172  PMID: 9335587

Abstract

Ste5 is essential for the yeast mating pheromone response pathway and is thought to function as a scaffold that organizes the components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. A new method was developed to isolate missense mutations in Ste5 that differentially affect the ability of Ste5 to interact with either of two MAPK cascade constituents, the MEKK (Ste11) and the MEK (Ste7). Mutations that affect association with Ste7 or with Ste11 delineate discrete regions of Ste5 that are critical for each interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis, examining the binding in vitro of Ste5 to Ste11, Ste7, Ste4 (G protein β subunit), and Fus3 (MAPK), confirmed that each mutation specifically affects the interaction of Ste5 with only one protein. When expressed in a ste5Δ cell, mutant Ste5 proteins that are defective in their ability to interact with either Ste11 or Ste7 result in a markedly reduced mating proficiency. One mutation that clearly weakened (but did not eliminate) interaction of Ste5 with Ste7 permitted mating at wild-type efficiency, indicating that an efficacious signal is generated even when Ste5 associates with only a small fraction of (or only transiently with) Ste7. Ste5 mutants defective in association with Ste11 or Ste7 showed strong interallelic complementation when co-expressed, suggesting that the functional form of Ste5 in vivo is an oligomer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akada R., Kallal L., Johnson D. I., Kurjan J. Genetic relationships between the G protein beta gamma complex, Ste5p, Ste20p and Cdc42p: investigation of effector roles in the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):103–117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. B., Walberg M. W., Edwards M. C., Elledge S. J. Finding prospective partners in the library: the two-hybrid system and phage display find a match. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Dec;20(12):511–516. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai C., Elledge S. J. Gene identification using the yeast two-hybrid system. Methods Enzymol. 1996;273:331–347. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)73029-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardwell L., Cook J. G., Chang E. C., Cairns B. R., Thorner J. Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;16(7):3637–3650. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardwell L., Cook J. G., Inouye C. J., Thorner J. Signal propagation and regulation in the mating pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev Biol. 1994 Dec;166(2):363–379. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brill J. A., Elion E. A., Fink G. R. A role for autophosphorylation revealed by activated alleles of FUS3, the yeast MAP kinase homolog. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Mar;5(3):297–312. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.3.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chenevert J., Valtz N., Herskowitz I. Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1287–1296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi K. Y., Satterberg B., Lyons D. M., Elion E. A. Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1994 Aug 12;78(3):499–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90427-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cid V. J., Durán A., del Rey F., Snyder M. P., Nombela C., Sánchez M. Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1995 Sep;59(3):345–386. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.3.345-386.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole G. M., Reed S. I. Pheromone-induced phosphorylation of a G protein beta subunit in S. cerevisiae is associated with an adaptive response to mating pheromone. Cell. 1991 Feb 22;64(4):703–716. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90500-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Durfee T., Becherer K., Chen P. L., Yeh S. H., Yang Y., Kilburn A. E., Lee W. H., Elledge S. J. The retinoblastoma protein associates with the protein phosphatase type 1 catalytic subunit. Genes Dev. 1993 Apr;7(4):555–569. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.4.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elion E. A., Satterberg B., Kranz J. E. FUS3 phosphorylates multiple components of the mating signal transduction cascade: evidence for STE12 and FAR1. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 May;4(5):495–510. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.5.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elion E. A. Ste5: a meeting place for MAP kinases and their associates. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;5(8):322–327. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Evan G. I., Lewis G. K., Ramsay G., Bishop J. M. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3610–3616. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.12.3610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fields S., Herskowitz I. The yeast STE12 product is required for expression of two sets of cell-type specific genes. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):923–930. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90288-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989 Jul 20;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gartner A., Nasmyth K., Ammerer G. Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSS1. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1280–1292. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hagen D. C., McCaffrey G., Sprague G. F., Jr Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):2952–2961. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.2952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasson M. S., Blinder D., Thorner J., Jenness D. D. Mutational activation of the STE5 gene product bypasses the requirement for G protein beta and gamma subunits in the yeast pheromone response pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1054–1065. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herskowitz I. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):187–197. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90402-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hirschman J. E., De Zutter G. S., Simonds W. F., Jenness D. D. The G beta gamma complex of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Subcellular fractionation and protein-protein interactions. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 3;272(1):240–248. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones E. W. Tackling the protease problem in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:428–453. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94034-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kranz J. E., Satterberg B., Elion E. A. The MAP kinase Fus3 associates with and phosphorylates the upstream signaling component Ste5. Genes Dev. 1994 Feb 1;8(3):313–327. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.3.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leberer E., Chenevert J., Leeuw T., Harcus D., Herskowitz I., Thomas D. Y. Genetic interactions indicate a role for Mdg1p and the SH3 domain protein Bem1p in linking the G-protein mediated yeast pheromone signalling pathway to regulators of cell polarity. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Oct 16;252(5):608–621. doi: 10.1007/BF02172407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leberer E., Dignard D., Harcus D., Hougan L., Whiteway M., Thomas D. Y. Cloning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE5 as a suppressor of a Ste20 protein kinase mutant: structural and functional similarity of Ste5 to Far1. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Nov;241(3-4):241–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00284675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Leberer E., Dignard D., Harcus D., Thomas D. Y., Whiteway M. The protein kinase homologue Ste20p is required to link the yeast pheromone response G-protein beta gamma subunits to downstream signalling components. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4815–4824. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05587.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lemmon M. A., Schlessinger J. Regulation of signal transduction and signal diversity by receptor oligomerization. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Nov;19(11):459–463. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyons D. M., Mahanty S. K., Choi K. Y., Manandhar M., Elion E. A. The SH3-domain protein Bem1 coordinates mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade activation with cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;16(8):4095–4106. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma D., Cook J. G., Thorner J. Phosphorylation and localization of Kss1, a MAP kinase of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Jul;6(7):889–909. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.7.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. MacKay V. L. Cloning of yeast STE genes in 2 microns vectors. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:325–343. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Manser E., Leung T., Salihuddin H., Zhao Z. S., Lim L. A brain serine/threonine protein kinase activated by Cdc42 and Rac1. Nature. 1994 Jan 6;367(6458):40–46. doi: 10.1038/367040a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marcus S., Polverino A., Barr M., Wigler M. Complexes between STE5 and components of the pheromone-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase module. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7762–7766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mendelsohn A. R., Brent R. Applications of interaction traps/two-hybrid systems to biotechnology research. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;5(5):482–486. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(94)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Muhlrad D., Hunter R., Parker R. A rapid method for localized mutagenesis of yeast genes. Yeast. 1992 Feb;8(2):79–82. doi: 10.1002/yea.320080202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mukai Y., Harashima S., Oshima Y. Function of the ste signal transduction pathway for mating pheromones sustains MAT alpha 1 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2050–2060. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Neiman A. M., Herskowitz I. Reconstitution of a yeast protein kinase cascade in vitro: activation of the yeast MEK homologue STE7 by STE11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3398–3402. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perlman R., Yablonski D., Simchen G., Levitzki A. Cloning of the STE5 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a suppressor of the mating defect of cdc25 temperature-sensitive mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 15;90(12):5474–5478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Peter M., Herskowitz I. Direct inhibition of the yeast cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28-Cln by Far1. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1228–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.8066461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Phizicky E. M., Fields S. Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Microbiol Rev. 1995 Mar;59(1):94–123. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.1.94-123.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Printen J. A., Sprague G. F., Jr Protein-protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):609–619. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pryciak P. M., Hartwell L. H. AKR1 encodes a candidate effector of the G beta gamma complex in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway and contributes to control of both cell shape and signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):2614–2626. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.6.2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ramer S. W., Davis R. W. A dominant truncation allele identifies a gene, STE20, that encodes a putative protein kinase necessary for mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):452–456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rhodes N., Connell L., Errede B. STE11 is a protein kinase required for cell-type-specific transcription and signal transduction in yeast. Genes Dev. 1990 Nov;4(11):1862–1874. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.11.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Simon M. N., De Virgilio C., Souza B., Pringle J. R., Abo A., Reed S. I. Role for the Rho-family GTPase Cdc42 in yeast mating-pheromone signal pathway. Nature. 1995 Aug 24;376(6542):702–705. doi: 10.1038/376702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Song J., Hirschman J., Gunn K., Dohlman H. G. Regulation of membrane and subunit interactions by N-myristoylation of a G protein alpha subunit in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 23;271(34):20273–20283. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sprague G. F., Jr Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:77–93. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94008-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stevenson B. J., Rhodes N., Errede B., Sprague G. F., Jr Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1293–1304. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tyers M., Futcher B. Far1 and Fus3 link the mating pheromone signal transduction pathway to three G1-phase Cdc28 kinase complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5659–5669. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. White M. A., Nicolette C., Minden A., Polverino A., Van Aelst L., Karin M., Wigler M. H. Multiple Ras functions can contribute to mammalian cell transformation. Cell. 1995 Feb 24;80(4):533–541. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90507-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. White M. A. The yeast two-hybrid system: forward and reverse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 17;93(19):10001–10003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu C., Whiteway M., Thomas D. Y., Leberer E. Molecular characterization of Ste20p, a potential mitogen-activated protein or extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) kinase kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 7;270(27):15984–15992. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.27.15984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zabin I., Villarejo M. R. Protein complementation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1975;44:295–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.001455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES