Abstract
Objective:
The inflammatory role of female hormones has been garnering increased attention in the literature. Studies suggest a link between estrogen and inflammatory conditions of the airways and nasal mucosa. However, there remains a paucity of literature regarding the associations of hormones with rhinitis. Given the profound hormonal changes that occur during menopause, we sought to better understand the association between menopause and rhinitis.
Methods:
Data from the All of Us Research Program regarding rhinitis diagnoses, menopause status, demographic variables, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities were extracted for female participants aged 40–60. Crude odds ratios (cORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for unadjusted associations between menopause and rhinitis. Variables were then included in multivariable logistic regression models, with separate models for allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) as the outcome variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CI were calculated.
Results:
We identified 40,875 female participants aged 40–60 without any missing data. Compared with participants without rhinitis, a greater proportion of those with AR (51.6% vs. 55.6%; cOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.11–1.25) and NAR (51.6% vs. 58.9%; cOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11–1.63) had experienced menopause. However, after controlling for covariates, menopause was associated with a decreased odds of AR (aOR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82–0.96) and not associated with NAR (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.77–1.24).
Conclusion:
Menopause was independently associated with a decreased odds of AR but was not associated with NAR. Research should aim to further examine these relationships and hormonal mechanisms underlying the observed protective associations.
Keywords: all of us research program, allergic rhinitis, menopause, nonallergic rhinitis, rhinitis
INTRODUCTION
Rhinitis refers to a variety of nasal symptoms such as congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and itching, which arise from inflammation or dysfunction of the nasal mucosa.1 This condition is categorized into two main types: allergic rhinitis (AR), an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immune response to allergens, and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR), which encompasses different disorders causing rhinitis symptoms without allergen sensitization.1,2 The role of sex hormones has become increasingly studied in the pathogenesis of AR and other inflammation-related conditions like asthma. Research highlights testosterone and progesterone as primarily exerting anti-inflammatory effects, whereas estrogen’s impact is more complex, displaying both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties.3–5 Notably, within the nasal mucosa, both estrogen and progesterone are implicated in promoting inflammation by mechanisms such as eosinophil recruitment, cytokine production, and degranulation.6,7 This aligns with findings linking estrogenrelated characteristics to a higher incidence of asthma and AR,8,9 and with the observation that these conditions are more prevalent among adult women.10–13
Based on the evidence linking sex hormones with nasal mucosal reactivity and conditions like AR, our aim was to investigate whether menopause, characterized by a significant decrease in female sex hormones, correlates with the occurrence of rhinitis. Existing literature has studied the pubertal sex shift in rhinitis, in which the incidence of rhinitis increases among post-pubertal females, potentially suggesting a hormonal role in rhinitis.14,15 On the contrary, one study conducted in France concluded that menopause is associated with an increased likelihood of rhinitis16; however, this study did not make a distinction between AR and NAR and may not be generalizable to adults in the United States. To our knowledge, no studies have directly investigated the correlation between menopause and rhinitis in the United States. In addition, the association between menopause and asthma is conflicted. Some studies suggest that menopause is associated with increased rates of asthma,17,18 while others suggest no correlation.19,20 Given the well-established link between asthma and rhinitis,21,22 it is similarly unclear how menopause truly affects the rates of rhinitis. Thus, given the decrease in hormones during menopause, we hypothesize that menopause could be protective against rhinitis.
Thus, our study aims to further investigate this association using a large national dataset from the All of Us Research Program (AoURP). Understanding the association between menopause and rhinitis is crucial for optimizing therapeutic strategies for post-menopausal women with rhinitis. This study may also lend additional evidence to the growing body of literature linking female sex hormones with inflammatory conditions and diseases of the nasal mucosa. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the association between menopause and rhinitis in the United States.
METHODS
This study utilized data from AoURP’s Controlled Tier Dataset v7, available to authorized users on the Researcher Work-bench. AoURP is a national dataset of adults in the United States that integrates participant information from various sources such as surveys, electronic health records, biosamples, and physical measurements, specifically targeting populations historically underrepresented in biomedical research.23 Participants are invited to enroll in AoURP via partner healthcare provider organizations, including academic centers, Veterans Affairs medical centers, and community health centers. Given that AoURP is a deidentified public dataset, the institutional review board determined this study to be exempt from review.
For our study, we included individuals assigned female sex at birth. To focus specifically on menopause as the variable of interest, we restricted our sample to participants aged 40–60 years. We excluded individuals who were pregnant at the time of data collection, had a history of oophorectomy, or were using hormonal medications. We then extracted data on rhinitis diagnosis as the primary outcome, encompassing both AR and NAR. In AoURP, medical diagnoses are based on participant medical records using Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) and International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-9 and ICD-10). AoURP translates these codes into a unified standardized vocabulary. For our primary outcome, we extracted data on rhinitis diagnoses by including any condition from this standardized vocabulary that contained the term “rhinitis.” We classified these diagnoses as AR if they included the terms “allergic” or “allergy,” while all other diagnoses were categorized as NAR. A manual review was conducted to ensure accurate classification.
Our primary exposure was natural menopause, denoted by participant response to the survey question “Why did your periods stop?”. We also extracted covariate data, including demographic factors (age, race/ethnicity), socioeconomic status indicators (income, education, and insurance status), and relevant comorbidities (such as asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]), guided by extensive literature supporting their association with rhinitis.24,25 Participants with any missing outcome, exposure, or covariate data were excluded from the study. Of the 249,565 adult women included in AoURP data, we identified a total of 40,875 participants meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Statistical Analysis
We calculated participant characteristics stratified by rhinitis diagnosis using proportions for categorical variables and means for continuous variables. Chi-square or t-test was conducted as appropriate to compare participant characteristics between those with and without rhinitis. Crude odds ratios (cORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for unadjusted associations between menopause and rhinitis. Covariate data were subsequently incorporated into multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the independent association of menopause and rhinitis, controlling for participant characteristics. Separate models were developed for both AR and NAR, calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for the association between exposure and outcome variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) within the AoURP cloud analysis environment.
RESULTS
Participant characteristics are shown in Table I. Among our full identified cohort, the mean age was 50.4 years old, a majority had undergone menopause (52.2%), participants were primarily non-Hispanic White (54.3%), had some college education (51.7%), and were insured through private/employer plans (57.5%). After stratification by rhinitis diagnosis and type, 5,457 participants (13.4%) had rhinitis and 35,418 (86.6%) did not have rhinitis. Of those with rhinitis, 5,007 (91.8%) had AR while 450 (8.2%) had NAR. Compared with participants without rhinitis, a greater proportion of those with AR (51.6% vs. 55.6%, respectively; cOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.11–1.25) and NAR (51.6% vs. 58.9%, respectively; cOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11–1.63) had experienced natural menopause. In terms of covariates, the rhinitis cohort had a higher proportion of participants who were middle income, college educated, insured (private/employer plans or Medicare/Medicaid), and diagnosed with asthma or GERD. Participants with AR were more likely to be White or Black, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in race/ethnicity between the NAR cohort and those without rhinitis.
TABLE I.
Participant Characteristics of Cohort for Menopause Analysis after Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria.
| Full cohort (N = 40,875) | No rhinitis (N = 35,418) | Rhinitis |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All rhinitis (N = 5457) | Allergic rhinitis (N = 5007) | Nonallergic rhinitis (N = 450) | |||
| Menopause, n (%) | |||||
| No | 19,553 (47.8%) | 17,147 (48.4%) | 2,406 (44.1%) | 2,221 (44.4%) | 185 (41.1%) |
| Yes | 21,322 (52.2%) | 18,271 (51.6%) | 3,051 (55.9%) | 2,786 (55.6%) | 265 (58.9%) |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | 0.002* |
| Age, mean (SD) | 50.4 (5.9) | 50.3 (5.9) | 51.1 (5.7) | 51.1 (5.7) | 51.4 (5.8) |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* |
| Race/Ethnicity, n (%) | |||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 22,179 (54.3%) | 19,155 (54.1%) | 3,024 (55.4%) | 2,761 (55.1%) | 263 (58.4%) |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 8,931 (21.8%) | 7,688 (21.7%) | 1,243 (22.8%) | 1,149 (22.9%) | 94 (20.9%) |
| Hispanic | 7,651 (18.7%) | 6,703 (18.9%) | 948 (17.4%) | 877 (17.5%) | 71 (15.8%) |
| Other | 2,114 (5.2%) | 1,872 (5.3%) | 242 (4.4%) | 220 (4.4%) | 22 (4.9%) |
| p-value | - | - | 0.001* | 0.002* | 0.245 |
| Annual Income (USD), n (%) | |||||
| Less than 10,000 | 7,352 (18.0%) | 6,409 (18.1%) | 943 (17.3%) | 884 (17.7%) | 59 (13.1%) |
| 10,000–25,000 | 5,774 (14.1%) | 4,950 (14.0%) | 824 (15.1%) | 744 (14.9%) | 80 (17.8%) |
| 25,000–35,000 | 3,342 (8.2%) | 2,921 (8.2%) | 421 (7.7%) | 388 (7.7%) | 33 (7.3%) |
| 35,000–50,000 | 3,467 (8.5%) | 2,990 (8.4%) | 477 (8.7%) | 434 (8.7%) | 43 (9.6%) |
| 50,000–75,000 | 4,740 (11.6%) | 4,073 (11.5%) | 667 (12.2%) | 605 (12.1%) | 62 (13.8%) |
| 75,000–150,000 | 9,495 (23.2%) | 8,184 (23.1%) | 1,311 (24.0%) | 1,206 (24.1%) | 105 (23.3%) |
| More than 150,000 | 6,705 (16.4%) | 5,891 (16.6%) | 814 (14.9%) | 746 (14.9%) | 68 (15.1%) |
| p-value | - | - | 0.002* | 0.016* | 0.025* |
| Education, n (%) | |||||
| Less than high school | 3,648 (8.9%) | 3,227 (9.1%) | 421 (7.7%) | 398 (7.9%) | 23 (5.1%) |
| High school or GED | 6,920 (16.9%) | 6,030 (17.0%) | 890 (16.3%) | 827 (16.5%) | 63 (14.0%) |
| Some college | 21,113 (51.7%) | 18,141 (51.2%) | 2,972 (54.5%) | 2,713 (54.2%) | 259 (57.6%) |
| Advanced degree | 9,194 (22.5%) | 8,020 (22.6%) | 1,174 (21.5%) | 1,069 (21.4%) | 105 (23.3%) |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | 0.003* |
| Health Insurance, n (%) | |||||
| None | 3,328 (8.1%) | 3,040 (8.6%) | 288 (5.3%) | 268 (5.4%) | Hidden† |
| Medicare/Medicaid | 12,161 (29.8%) | 10,482 (29.6%) | 1,685 (30.9%) | 1,538 (30.7%) | 147 (32.7%) |
| Private/Employer | 23,483 (57.5%) | 20,239 (57.1%) | 3,231 (59.2%) | 2,959 (59.1%) | 272 (60.4%) |
| Other | 1,903 (4.7%) | 1,657 (4.7%) | 253 (4.6%) | 242 (4.8%) | Hidden† |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | 0.001* |
| Asthma, n (%) | |||||
| No | 35,569 (87.0%) | 32,355 (91.4%) | 3,214 (58.9%) | 2,891 (57.7%) | 323 (71.8%) |
| Yes | 5,306 (13.0%) | 3,063 (8.6%) | 2,243 (41.1%) | 2,116 (42.3%) | 127 (28.2%) |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* |
| GERD, n (%) | |||||
| No | 33,538 (82.1%) | 30,853 (87.1%) | 2,685 (49.2%) | 2,436 (48.7%) | 249 (55.3%) |
| Yes | 5,306 (17.9%) | 4,565 (12.9%) | 2,772 (50.8%) | 2,571 (51.3%) | 201 (44.7%) |
| p-value | - | - | < 0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
p-values calculated using chi-square or t-test as appropriate comparing each group to the cohort without rhinitis.
Percentage values represent column percentages.
GED = general educational development; SD = standard deviation; USD = US Dollars.
p < 0.05.
Values hidden in accordance with AoURP policy requiring values less than 20 to be hidden to protect participant privacy.
Table II shows the results of the multivariable logistic regression model analyzing the independent association of menopause with rhinitis. Menopause was protective against rhinitis (aOR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83–0.97). However, when assessing both AR and NAR individually, menopause was found to be protective against AR (aOR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82–0.96) but not NAR (aOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.77–1.24). Older age (aOR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01–1.03), some college education (aOR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.07–1.40), or advanced degree compared with less than high school education (aOR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.10–1.50), asthma (aOR: 4.81; 95% CI: 4.47–5.18), and GERD (aOR: 4.84; 95% CI: 4.53–5.18) were associated with an increased likelihood of any rhinitis, and were associated with both AR and NAR individually. Private/employer insurance was associated only with AR (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22–1.68).
TABLE II.
Adjusted Associations Between Menopause and Rhinitis.
| All rhinitis (N = 5457) | Allergic rhinitis (N = 5007) | Nonallergic rhinitis (N = 450) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menopause | |||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 0.89 (0.83–0.97) | 0.89 (0.82–0.96) | 0.98 (0.77–1.24) |
| Age | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 1.03 (1.01–1.05) |
| Race/Ethnicity | |||
| Non-Hispanic White | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 1.04 (0.95–1.13) | 1.05 (0.96–1.15) | 0.97 (0.74–1.25) |
| Hispanic | 0.98 (0.89–1.07) | 0.98 (0.89–1.08) | 0.88 (0.66–1.16) |
| Other | 0.99 (0.85–1.15) | 0.98 (0.84–1.15) | 1.00 (0.62–1.52) |
| Annual Income (USD) | |||
| Less than 10,000 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 10,000–25,000 | 1.08 (0.96–1.21) | 1.04 (0.93–1.18) | 1.51 (1.06–2.16) |
| 25,000–35,000 | 0.97 (0.84–1.13) | 0.96 (0.83–1.12) | 1.17 (0.73–1.83) |
| 35,000–50,000 | 1.01 (0.86–1.17) | 0.98 (0.83–1.15) | 1.39 (0.87–2.19) |
| 50,000–75,000 | 1.00 (0.86–1.16) | 0.97 (0.83–1.14) | 1.41 (0.89–2.22) |
| 75,000–150,000 | 1.01 (0.87–1.17) | 1.00 (0.86–1.17) | 1.19 (0.75–1.88) |
| More than 150,000 | 0.92 (0.78–1.09) | 0.92 (0.78–1.09) | 1.08 (0.66–1.78) |
| Education | |||
| Less than high school | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| High school or GED | 1.05 (0.91–1.21) | 1.03 (0.89–1.19) | 1.33 (0.83–2.22) |
| Some college | 1.22 (1.07–1.40) | 1.18 (1.02–1.35) | 1.90 (1.22–3.08) |
| Advanced degree | 1.28 (1.10–1.50) | 1.22 (1.04–1.44) | 2.10 (1.28–3.57) |
| Health insurance | |||
| None | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Medicare/Medicaid | 0.94 (0.81–1.08) | 0.91 (0.79–1.06) | 1.32 (0.84–2.19) |
| Private/Employer | 1.43 (1.22–1.68) | 1.43 (1.22–1.68) | 1.43 (0.88–2.43) |
| Other | 1.17 (0.96–1.43) | 1.21 (0.99–1.49) | 0.68 (0.31–1.41) |
| Asthma | |||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 4.81 (4.47–5.18) | 5.02 (4.66–5.41) | 2.45 (1.94–3.08) |
| GERD | |||
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 4.84 (4.53–5.18) | 4.87 (4.54–5.22) | 4.18 (3.39–5.15) |
p < 0.05. Values represent OR (95% CI).
GED = general educational development; USD = US Dollars.
DISCUSSION
Our study found that menopause was independently associated with a lower odds of AR, while there was no association between menopause and NAR after adjusting for covariates.
Given the decrease in hormone levels during menopause, in addition to the fact that AR is primarily inflammation-mediated, our results could lend support to a role of hormones in the pathogenesis of AR and related inflammatory conditions. On the contrary, NAR is a more heterogeneous condition mediated by predominantly non-inflammatory mechanisms. The most common form of NAR, nonallergic rhinopathy (or vasomotor rhinitis), which comprises at least two thirds of NAR,26 is thought to be mediated by an imbalance in parasympathetic and sympathetic inputs to the autonomic nervous system in response to changes in environmental conditions, weather, strong emotions, smells, or hormones.27,28 Other less common forms of NAR may be attributed to tachyphylaxis, as in the case of rhinitis medicamentosa, or progressive atrophy of the nasal mucosa, as in the case of atrophic rhinitis.1 This lack of inflammation in the pathogenesis of many of the common forms of NAR may explain why no association between menopause and NAR was found in our study.
Although some prior research has examined the relationship between rhinitis and factors such as hormone replacement therapy and long-term estrogen exposure in postmenopausal women,8,29,30 we are not aware of any studies specifically exploring the connection between menopause and rhinitis in the United States. Our findings contradict those of Lund et al., which found that menopause was associated with an increased likelihood of rhinitis symptoms among adult women in France.16 This study is the first to investigate the relationship between menopause and both AR and NAR in the United States. We additionally utilized a large and diverse national dataset, incorporating participants of various demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds.
Although more research is needed, establishing menopause as a protective factor against AR could have significant implications in clinical management. Understanding that menopause may reduce the risk of AR could lead to more personalized treatment strategies for women by allowing clinicians to explore treatments that consider a woman’s menopausal status. From a public health perspective, women could be encouraged to seek care for AR symptoms earlier in their reproductive years, fostering better management strategies. These insights could also be applied to healthcare policy aimed at improving care for women dealing with allergic conditions throughout different life stages.
Our study has certain limitations. Menopause history and the socioeconomic variables in the AoURP dataset, including income, education, and insurance status, were self-reported by participants, making them potentially subject to bias. Additionally, because NAR is a heterogeneous category that includes various pathologies, our findings may not apply to all types of NAR. Furthermore, due to the cross-sectional design of this study, causation could not be determined.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our study found that menopause is independently associated with a decreased odds of AR while having no association with NAR. Our findings contribute to the paucity of the literature investigating the effect of endogenous hormonal changes and estrogen-related characteristics on rhinitis. Future research should investigate this association longitudinally to establish causation, and additional studies could aim to establish an association between objective laboratory values of hormone levels and rhinitis. Further investigations into the role of hormones in inflammatory conditions of the nasal mucosa are also needed to deepen our understanding of these processes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge All of Us participants for their contributions, without whom this research would not have been possible. We also thank the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us Research Program for making available the participant data examined in this study.
FUNDING INFORMATION
Dr. Lee is supported by the National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number K12AR084225.
Footnotes
Level of Evidence: 3
The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributor Information
Richard G. Chiu, Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Kamal Eldeirawi, Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Anthony I. Dick, Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Sharmilee M. Nyenhuis, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Immunology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Thasarat Sutabutr Vajaranant, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Rachel Caskey, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Victoria S. Lee, Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- 1.Settipane RA, Kaliner MA. Nonallergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol&Allergy. 2013;27(3_suppl):S48–S51. 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wise SK, Damask C, Roland LT, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: allergic rhinitis—2023. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13(4):293–859. 10.1002/alr.23090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bereshchenko O, Bruscoli S, Riccardi C. Glucocorticoids, sex hormones, and immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:9. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Straub RH. The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr Rev. 2007;28(5):521–574. 10.1210/er.2007-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zwahlen M, Stute P. Impact of progesterone on the immune system in women: a systematic literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(1):37–46. 10.1007/s00404-023-06996-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hamano N, Terada N, Maesako K, Numata T, Konno A. Effect of sex hormones on eosinophilic inflammation in nasal mucosa. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1998;19(5):263–269. 10.2500/108854198778557773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Newcomb DC, Cephus JY, Boswell MG, et al. Estrogen and progesterone decrease let-7f microRNA expression and increase IL-23/IL-23 receptor signaling and IL-17A production in patients with severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):1025–1034.e11. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee K, Hong Y, Choi J, Lee SH, Kim TH. Life-long endogenous estrogen exposure is associated with prevalence of allergic rhinitis in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2019;26(8):885–891. 10.1097/GME.0000000000001319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kliś K, Wronka I. Association of Estrogen-Related Traits with allergic rhinitis. In: Pokorski M, ed. Influenza and Respiratory Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017:71–78. 10.1007/5584_2016_190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yung JA, Fuseini H, Newcomb DC. Hormones, sex, and asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120(5):488–494. 10.1016/j.anai.2018.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eriksson J, Ekerljung L, Rönmark E, et al. Update of prevalence of self-reported allergic rhinitis and chronic nasal symptoms among adults in Sweden. Clin Respir J. 2012;6(3):159–168. 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2011.00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramkumar SP, Brar T, Marks L, Marino MJ, Lal D. Biological sex as a modulator in rhinologic anatomy, physiology, and pathology: a scoping review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13(9):1783–1800. 10.1002/alr.23135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alsowaidi S, Abdulle A, Shehab A, Zuberbier T, Bernsen R. Allergic rhinitis: prevalence and possible risk factors in a gulf Arab population. Allergy. 2010;65(2):208–212. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pinart M, Keller T, Reich A, et al. Sex-related allergic rhinitis prevalence switch from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172:224–235. 10.1159/000464324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hohmann C, Keller T, Gehring U, et al. Sex-specific incidence of asthma, rhinitis and respiratory multimorbidity before and after puberty onset: individual participant meta-analysis of five birth cohorts collaborating in MeDALL. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6(1):e000460. 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lund VJ, Preziosi P, Hercberg S, et al. Yearly incidence of rhinitis, nasal bleeding, and other nasal symptoms in mature women. Rhinology. 2006;44(1):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Troisi RJ, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Trichopoulos D, Rosner B. Menopause, postmenopausal estrogen preparations, and the risk of adult-onset asthma. A prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 152(4):1183–1188. 10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Triebner K, Johannessen A, Puggini L, et al. Menopause as a predictor of new-onset asthma: a longitudinal northern European population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(1):50–57.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zemp E, Schikowski T, Dratva J, Schindler C, Probst-Hensch N. Asthma and the menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2012;73(3):212–217. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matulonga-Diakiese B, Courbon D, Fournier A, et al. Risk of asthma onset after natural and surgical menopause: results from the French E3N cohort. Maturitas. 2018;118:44–50. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Compalati E, Ridolo E, Passalacqua G, Braido F, Villa E, Canonica GW. The link between allergic rhinitis and asthma: the united airways disease. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6(3):413–423. 10.1586/eci.10.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bergeron C, Hamid Q. Relationship between asthma and rhinitis: epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic aspects. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol. 2005;1(2):81–87. 10.1186/1710-1492-1-2-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The All of Us Research Program Investigators. The “all of us” research program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):668–676. 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leynaert B, Neukirch C, Kony S, et al. Association between asthma and rhinitis according to atopic sensitization in a population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):86–93. 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schiöler L, Ruth M, Jõgi R, et al. Nocturnal GERD – a risk factor for rhinitis/rhinosinusitis: the RHINE study. Allergy. 2015;70(6):697–702. 10.1111/all.12615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Settipane RA. Epidemiology of vasomotor rhinitis. World Allergy Organ J. 2009;2(6):115–118. 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181ac91ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jaradeh SS, Smith TL, Torrico L, et al. Autonomic nervous system evaluation of patients with vasomotor rhinitis. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(11):1828–1831. 10.1097/00005537-200011000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yan CH, Hwang PH. Surgical Management of Nonallergic Rhinitis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2018;51(5):945–955. 10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu J, Ma T, Wang X, Bai W, Wang X. Associations between HT, BMI, and allergic rhinitis in perimenopausal women. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023;19(1):107. 10.1186/s13223-023-00839-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choi JH, Hwang SH, Suh JD, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy may increase non-allergic rhinitis among postmenopausal women: results from the Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey (2010–2012). Maturitas. 2017;102:46–49. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
