Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Nov;147(3):1155–1168. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1155

Is Function of the Drosophila Homeotic Gene Ultrabithorax Canalized?

G Gibson 1, S van-Helden 1
PMCID: PMC1208240  PMID: 9383059

Abstract

Genetic variation affecting the expressivity of an amorphic allele of the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax, (Ubx(1)) was characterized after 11 generations of introgression into 29 different isofemale lines. Heterozygotes display a range of haploinsufficient phenotypes, from overlap with wild-type halteres to dramatic transformations such as a 50% increase in area and the presence of over 20 bristles on the anterior margin of each haltere. In both the wild-type and mutant genetic backgrounds, there is moderate genetic variance and low environmental variance/developmental asymmetry, as expected of a trait under stabilizing selection pressure. Surprisingly, there is little evidence that mutant halteres are more variable than wild-type ones, so it is unclear that haltere development is also canalized. The correlation between wild-type and Ubx haltere size is very low, indicating that interactions among modifiers of Ubx are complex, and in some cases sex-specific. The potential quantitative genetic contributions of homeotic genes to appendage morphology are discussed, noting that population-level effects of variation in key regulatory genes may be prevalent and complex but cannot be readily extrapolated to macroevolutionary diversification.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Averof M., Akam M. Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans. Nature. 1995 Aug 3;376(6539):420–423. doi: 10.1038/376420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll S. B., Weatherbee S. D., Langeland J. A. Homeotic genes and the regulation and evolution of insect wing number. Nature. 1995 May 4;375(6526):58–61. doi: 10.1038/375058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gavrilets S., de Jong G. Pleiotropic models of polygenic variation, stabilizing selection, and epistasis. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):609–625. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kennison J. A., Tamkun J. W. Dosage-dependent modifiers of polycomb and antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8136–8140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewis E. B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978 Dec 7;276(5688):565–570. doi: 10.1038/276565a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mackay T. F., Hackett J. B., Lyman R. F., Wayne M. L., Anholt R. R. Quantitative genetic variation of odor-guided behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):727–735. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mackay T. F. The genetic basis of quantitative variation: numbers of sensory bristles of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):464–470. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morata G., Kerridge S. An analysis of the expressivity of some bithorax transformations. Basic Life Sci. 1980;16:141–154. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7968-3_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rendel J. M., Sheldon B. L., Finlay D. E. Canalisation of development of scutellar bristles in Drosophila by control of the scute locus. Genetics. 1965 Dec;52(6):1137–1151. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.6.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers B. T., Peterson M. D., Kaufman T. C. Evolution of the insect body plan as revealed by the Sex combs reduced expression pattern. Development. 1997 Jan;124(1):149–157. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.1.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHARLOO W. MUTANT EXPRESSION AND CANALIZATION. Nature. 1964 Sep 5;203:1095–1096. doi: 10.1038/2031095b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. True J. R., Weir B. S., Laurie C. C. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):819–837. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warren R. W., Nagy L., Selegue J., Gates J., Carroll S. Evolution of homeotic gene regulation and function in flies and butterflies. Nature. 1995 Feb 2;373(6513):451–451. doi: 10.1038/373451a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES