Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Nov;147(3):1259–1266. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1259

Comparable Rates of Gene Loss and Functional Divergence after Genome Duplications Early in Vertebrate Evolution

J H Nadeau 1, D Sankoff 1
PMCID: PMC1208249  PMID: 9383068

Abstract

Duplicated genes are an important source of new protein functions and novel developmental and physiological pathways. Whereas most models for fate of duplicated genes show that they tend to be rapidly lost, models for pathway evolution suggest that many duplicated genes rapidly acquire novel functions. Little empirical evidence is available, however, for the relative rates of gene loss vs. divergence to help resolve these contradictory expectations. Gene families resulting from genome duplications provide an opportunity to address this apparent contradiction. With genome duplication, the number of duplicated genes in a gene family is at most 2(n), where n is the number of duplications. The size of each gene family, e.g., 1, 2, 3, . . . , 2(n), reflects the patterns of gene loss vs. functional divergence after duplication. We focused on gene families in humans and mice that arose from genome duplications in early vertebrate evolution and we analyzed the frequency distribution of gene family size, i.e., the number of families with two, three or four members. All the models that we evaluated showed that duplicated genes are almost as likely to acquire a new and essential function as to be lost through acquisition of mutations that compromise protein function. An explanation for the unexpectedly high rate of functional divergence is that duplication allows genes to accumulate more neutral than disadvantageous mutations, thereby providing more opportunities to acquire diversified functions and pathways.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (837.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailey G. S., Poulter R. T., Stockwell P. A. Gene duplication in tetraploid fish: model for gene silencing at unlinked duplicated loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Nov;75(11):5575–5579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basten C. J., Ohta T. Simulation study of a multigene family, with special reference to the evolution of compensatory advantageous mutations. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):247–252. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark A. G. Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2950–2954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Comings D. E. Evidence for ancient tetraploidy and conservation of linkage groups in mammalian chromosomes. Nature. 1972 Aug 25;238(5365):455–457. doi: 10.1038/238455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferris S. D., Whitt G. S. Loss of duplicate gene expression after polyploidisation. Nature. 1977 Jan 20;265(5591):258–260. doi: 10.1038/265258a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fryxell K. J. The coevolution of gene family trees. Trends Genet. 1996 Sep;12(9):364–369. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(96)80020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hood L., Campbell J. H., Elgin S. C. The organization, expression, and evolution of antibody genes and other multigene families. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:305–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.09.120175.001513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M., King J. L. Fixation of a deleterious allele at one of two "duplicate" loci by mutation pressure and random drift. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jun;76(6):2858–2861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M., Ohta T. On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2848–2852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li W. H., Gojobori T. Rapid evolution of goat and sheep globin genes following gene duplication. Mol Biol Evol. 1983 Dec;1(1):94–108. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundin L. G. Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics. 1993 Apr;16(1):1–19. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohno S., Wolf U., Atkin N. B. Evolution from fish to mammals by gene duplication. Hereditas. 1968;59(1):169–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1968.tb02169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ohta T. Evolution by gene duplication and compensatory advantageous mutations. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):841–847. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Takahata N., Maruyama T. Polymorphism and loss of duplicate gene expression: a theoretical study with application of tetraploid fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4521–4525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tartof K. D. Redundant genes. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:355–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.09.120175.002035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wagner A. Evolution of gene networks by gene duplications: a mathematical model and its implications on genome organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 10;91(10):4387–4391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wagner A. Genetic redundancy caused by gene duplications and its evolution in networks of transcriptional regulators. Biol Cybern. 1996 Jun;74(6):557–567. doi: 10.1007/BF00209427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walsh J. B. How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):421–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weiner A. M., Deininger P. L., Efstratiadis A. Nonviral retroposons: genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:631–661. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES