Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1997 Dec;147(4):1595–1607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.4.1595

Mutations Synthetically Lethal with Tpm1δ Lie in Genes Involved in Morphogenesis

T Wang 1, A Bretscher 1
PMCID: PMC1208334  PMID: 9409824

Abstract

Yeast contains two genes, TPM1 and TPM2, encoding tropomyosins, either of which can provide an essential function in the yeast cytoskeleton. To elucidate more clearly the function of the major tropomyosin, encoded by TPM1, we have isolated mutations that confer synthetic lethality with the null mutant of TPM1. Here we describe a phenotypic and genetic analysis of mutations in TSL1/BEM2, TSL2, TSL3, TSL5, and TSL6 (tropomyosin synthetic lethal). All the mutants exhibit clear morphological and some actin cytoskeletal defects, but are not noticeably defective in secretion, endocytosis, or organelle segregation. The lethality conferred by tsl tpm1δ mutations could be specifically suppressed by either TPM1 or an additional copy of TPM2. This implies that the essential function compromised in the tsl tpm1δ constructs is the same essential function for which Tpm1p or Tpm2p is necessary. Synthetic interactions and unlinked noncomplementation were observed between the tsl mutants, suggesting that they participate in related functions involving morphogenesis. In support of this, tsl6-1 was identified as an allele of the nonessential gene SLT2 or MPK1 whose product is a MAP kinase regulating cell wall synthesis. These results indicate that this synthetic lethality approach provides a sensitive screen for the isolation of mutations affecting morphogenesis, many of which are likely to be in nonessential genes, like BEM2 and SLT2.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (8.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Cooper J. A., Drubin D. G. Unexpected combinations of null mutations in genes encoding the actin cytoskeleton are lethal in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 May;4(5):459–468. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.5.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams A. E., Johnson D. I., Longnecker R. M., Sloat B. F., Pringle J. R. CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):131–142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arellano M., Durán A., Pérez P. Rho 1 GTPase activates the (1-3)beta-D-glucan synthase and is involved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe morphogenesis. EMBO J. 1996 Sep 2;15(17):4584–4591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bender A., Pringle J. R. Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1295–1305. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1295-1305.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobola N., Jansen R. P., Shin T. H., Nasmyth K. Asymmetric accumulation of Ash1p in postanaphase nuclei depends on a myosin and restricts yeast mating-type switching to mother cells. Cell. 1996 Mar 8;84(5):699–709. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bretscher A., Drees B., Harsay E., Schott D., Wang T. What are the basic functions of microfilaments? Insights from studies in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;126(4):821–825. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown S. S. Myosins in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Feb;9(1):44–48. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80150-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan C. S., Botstein D. Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):677–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drees B., Brown C., Barrell B. G., Bretscher A. Tropomyosin is essential in yeast, yet the TPM1 and TPM2 products perform distinct functions. J Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;128(3):383–392. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.3.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drgonová J., Drgon T., Tanaka K., Kollár R., Chen G. C., Ford R. A., Chan C. S., Takai Y., Cabib E. Rho1p, a yeast protein at the interface between cell polarization and morphogenesis. Science. 1996 Apr 12;272(5259):277–279. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drubin D. G., Jones H. D., Wertman K. F. Actin structure and function: roles in mitochondrial organization and morphogenesis in budding yeast and identification of the phalloidin-binding site. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Dec;4(12):1277–1294. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.12.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drubin D. G., Nelson W. J. Origins of cell polarity. Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):335–344. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81278-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geli M. I., Riezman H. Role of type I myosins in receptor-mediated endocytosis in yeast. Science. 1996 Apr 26;272(5261):533–535. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5261.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodson H. V., Anderson B. L., Warrick H. M., Pon L. A., Spudich J. A. Synthetic lethality screen identifies a novel yeast myosin I gene (MYO5): myosin I proteins are required for polarization of the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 1996 Jun;133(6):1277–1291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haarer B. K., Corbett A., Kweon Y., Petzold A. S., Silver P., Brown S. S. SEC3 mutations are synthetically lethal with profilin mutations and cause defects in diploid-specific bud-site selection. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):495–510. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haarer B. K., Petzold A. S., Brown S. S. Mutational analysis of yeast profilin. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7864–7873. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7864-7873.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Herskowitz I. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):187–197. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90402-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill K. L., Catlett N. L., Weisman L. S. Actin and myosin function in directed vacuole movement during cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;135(6 Pt 1):1535–1549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holtzman D. A., Yang S., Drubin D. G. Synthetic-lethal interactions identify two novel genes, SLA1 and SLA2, that control membrane cytoskeleton assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(3):635–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.3.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jansen R. P., Dowzer C., Michaelis C., Galova M., Nasmyth K. Mother cell-specific HO expression in budding yeast depends on the unconventional myosin myo4p and other cytoplasmic proteins. Cell. 1996 Mar 8;84(5):687–697. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnston G. C., Prendergast J. A., Singer R. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MYO2 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial transport of vesicles. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(3):539–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaiser C. A., Schekman R. Distinct sets of SEC genes govern transport vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell. 1990 May 18;61(4):723–733. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90483-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karpova T. S., Lepetit M. M., Cooper J. A. Mutations that enhance the cap2 null mutant phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affect the actin cytoskeleton, morphogenesis and pattern of growth. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim Y. J., Francisco L., Chen G. C., Marcotte E., Chan C. S. Control of cellular morphogenesis by the Ip12/Bem2 GTPase-activating protein: possible role of protein phosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(5):1381–1394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.5.1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lew D. J., Reed S. I. A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(3):739–749. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lew D. J., Reed S. I. Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins. J Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;120(6):1305–1320. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.6.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu H., Bretscher A. Characterization of TPM1 disrupted yeast cells indicates an involvement of tropomyosin in directed vesicular transport. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;118(2):285–299. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.2.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsui Y., Toh-E A. Yeast RHO3 and RHO4 ras superfamily genes are necessary for bud growth, and their defect is suppressed by a high dose of bud formation genes CDC42 and BEM1. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5690–5699. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5690-5699.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazzoni C., Zarov P., Rambourg A., Mann C. The SLT2 (MPK1) MAP kinase homolog is involved in polarized cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;123(6 Pt 2):1821–1833. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Qadota H., Python C. P., Inoue S. B., Arisawa M., Anraku Y., Zheng Y., Watanabe T., Levin D. E., Ohya Y. Identification of yeast Rho1p GTPase as a regulatory subunit of 1,3-beta-glucan synthase. Science. 1996 Apr 12;272(5259):279–281. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Riezman H. Endocytosis in yeast: several of the yeast secretory mutants are defective in endocytosis. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):1001–1009. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90360-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roemer T., Vallier L. G., Snyder M. Selection of polarized growth sites in yeast. Trends Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;6(11):434–441. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(96)10039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Salminen A., Novick P. J. A ras-like protein is required for a post-Golgi event in yeast secretion. Cell. 1987 May 22;49(4):527–538. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90455-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shortle D., Haber J. E., Botstein D. Lethal disruption of the yeast actin gene by integrative DNA transformation. Science. 1982 Jul 23;217(4557):371–373. doi: 10.1126/science.7046050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sprague G. F., Jr Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:77–93. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94008-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vida T. A., Emr S. D. A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;128(5):779–792. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.5.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Welch M. D., Holtzman D. A., Drubin D. G. The yeast actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;6(1):110–119. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90124-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yamochi W., Tanaka K., Nonaka H., Maeda A., Musha T., Takai Y. Growth site localization of Rho1 small GTP-binding protein and its involvement in bud formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(5):1077–1093. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.5.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang S., Ayscough K. R., Drubin D. G. A role for the actin cytoskeleton of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bipolar bud-site selection. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 13;136(1):111–123. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zarzov P., Mazzoni C., Mann C. The SLT2(MPK1) MAP kinase is activated during periods of polarized cell growth in yeast. EMBO J. 1996 Jan 2;15(1):83–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES