Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0321848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321848

Hematological changes in the blood of experimental male and female albino rats on exposure to pesticide, dimethoate

Nida Saleem 1,*, Mushtaq Hussain Lashari 2,*, Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad 2, Shazia Tahreem 3, Mikhlid H Almutairi 3, Shakeel Ahmed 3,4
Editor: Ashish Kumar Singh5
PMCID: PMC12083873  PMID: 40327653

Abstract

Objective

Evaluating pesticides’ impacts on human health, ecological balance, and agricultural production is the main focus of research on pesticides. The present study aims to investigate the hematological parameters of both genders of albino rats after exposure to dimethoate pesticides.

Material and Methods

There was a total of eight groups of albino rats, there were two control groups, and treatment groups were further divided into six groups. A low dose of: 5ml was given to the T1 group, a medium dose of 10ml was given to the T2 group, and a high dose of 20 ml was given to the T3 group. Each group contained nine rats in them (n=9). The first two groups of albino rats were taken as the control group and placed in normal conditions. The other six groups of albino rats were administered sub-lethal doses of dimethoate pesticide by mixing this pesticide in food by oral gavage for 90 days.

Results

The study showed that the number of white blood cells, platelets count, granulocyte count and lymphocyte count in both genders of albino rats after 30-, 60- and 90-days exposure to dimethoate was significantly increased where simultaneously the number of red blood cells, hemoglobin level, mean corpuscle hemoglobin count, and mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration count was decreased considerably due to exposure of dimethoate pesticide in both genders of albino rats. No changes observed in the control group of male and female albino rats. This study concluded that dimethoate pesticide effects the blood parameter of male and female albino rats.

Conclusion

The study’s findings highlight the importance of strict regulatory policies and thorough risk assessment techniques in order to reduce the harmful impacts of pesticides on the health of people and the environment.

Introduction

The largest sector of Pakistan economy is agriculture. Most people are either directly or indirectly depending on this industry. It is the main source of foreign exchange profits, makes up half of the employed labor force, and provides roughly 24% of the GDP [1]. In Pakistan the era of pesticide can be divided into six periods. At that time Pakistan largest imports were for malaria control program, locust control program, sugarcane, aerial spray of cotton, rice and tobacco. Pesticides are shipped in large containers and many accidents were occurred during this shipment. In Pakistan almost one-third of agricultural products are produced which depends on pesticide application by [2].

Without pesticides uses, there would be loss in fruit production almost 78%, 54% loss in production of vegetable, or 32% loss in production of cereal. That is why, pesticides play a very important role in reducing diseases and worldwide increase in the yield of crops [3]. A pesticide is a chemical or a biological agent such as a virus, antimicrobial, fungal, bacterium or disinfectant that incapacitates or kill pests. The use of pesticide is very common and we use the term pesticide for plant protection product. It is used to eliminate or control wide variety of pests that can damage agricultural industry, crops and livestock and also reduce the productivity of farm [4].

Pesticide exposure, particularly to organophosphate (OP) chemicals, accounts for a significant number of cases of acute poisoning. Acetylcholinesterase (ache) enzyme inhibition is the main mechanism of action for OP insecticides [5]. Acetylcholine (ach) builds up in the nervous system after pain is inactivated, which over stimulates muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. The three main kinds of poisoning symptoms and signs include muscarinic, nicotinic, and effects on the central nervous system. Concerns over the indiscriminate and excessive use of pesticides, the resulting environmental contamination, and the harmful consequences on human health are increasing. The risks associated with applying these chemicals have recently been brought to light by an abrupt rise in their use in household and government use, as well as in rats.

One of the most important organophosphorus pesticides, i.e., dimethoate, is extensively used for indoor control of houseflies. It is effective against a variety of insects and mites. The main human populations at risk of high levels of dimethoate exposure include farmers, pesticide workers, and pesticide producers [6]. Even though dimethoate is considered to be moderately hazardous (acute oral LD50 310 mg/kg/day, and estimated value for humans 30 mg/kg), it usually blocks neuromuscular transmission in humans as well as animals [7].

An organophosphorus insecticide named as dimethoate has high water solubility. When it is in pure form, it is crystalline solid, white in color and a mercaptan odor. It is stable in aqueous solutions with a pH range of 2–7, although it becomes unstable in alkaline solutions at ambient temperature. It has a low affinity for organic substances and a weak affinity for soils. It is quite resistant to microbial deterioration, susceptible to hydrolysis in acidic environments, and non-volatile as evidenced by its low vapor pressure [8].

There are many studies done on dimethoate’s impact on cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The current work aims to examine the changes in p16, Bcl-2, and c-myc gene expression in mouse digestive tissue after perfusion with the widely used in Chinese agricultural regions organophosphorus pesticides dichlorvos and dimethoate [9]. A decrease in sperm count and infertility in humans have been linked to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by OPs insecticides in both intracellular and extracellular areas. Dimethoate (DMT), one of the OP pesticides, is used in agriculture for protecting crops like apples, pears, and other fruits against aphids and leaf miners [10].

Despite the fact that OP pesticides are known to suppress acetylcholinesterase activity in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems [11] a number of observations point to the possibility that cholinergic system disruptions are not the only cause of OP neurotoxicity, particularly in the case of chronic exposure [12].

The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of dimethoate pesticide on the hematological parameters of male and female albino rats by using the method of CBC. Blood parameters are important for diagnosing the functional properties of organisms exposed to pollutants.

Materials and methods

The present experiment was conducted at Department of Zoology, The Islamia University Bahawalpur. Healthy albino rats (n = 72) of both sexes (male (n = 36) and female (n = 36) weighing 160 g were purchased from the local market, each group consisting of nine rats. Two groups were used as the control, and the other six groups orally received different doses of dimethoate pesticide were shown in Table 1. The pesticide was obtained in a pure form from reputable pesticide market (Bayer pharmaceutical company) and different concentrations were prepared. Three concentrations were prepared according to the average body weight.

Table 1. Experimental groups.

Treatment Groups Male (4 Groups) Female (4 Groups)
1.Control group 9 albino rats
(CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4, CM5,
CM6, CM7, CM8, CM9)
9 albino rats
(CF1, CF2, CF3, CF4, CF5,
CF6, CF7, CF8, CF9)
2.Treated group 1
(5ml/80-160g)
9 albino rats
(T1M1, T1M2, T1M3, T1M4,
T1M5, T1M6, T1M7, T1M8,
T1M9)
9 albino rats
(T1F1, T1F2, T1F3, T1F4, T1F5,
T1F6, T1F7, T1F8, T1F9)
3.Treated group 2
(10ml/80-160g)
9 albino rats
(T2M1, T2M2, T2M3, T2M4,
T2M5, T2M6, T2M7, T2M8,
T2M9)
9 albino rats
(T2F1, T2F2, T2F3, T2F4, T2F5,
T2F6, T2F7, T2F8, T2F9)
4.Treated group 3
(20ml/80-160g)
9 albino rats
(T3M1, T3M2, T3M3, T3M4,
T3M5, T3M6, T3M7, T3M8, T3M9)
9 albino rats
(T3F1, T3F2, T3F3, T3F4, T3F5,
T3F6, T3F7, T3F8, T3F9)

Toxicity test and preparing dosages for exposure

There was total eight groups, four groups of females, and four groups of male albino rats. There were two control groups and treatment groups were further divided into six groups (T1F, T1M, T2F, T2M, T3F, T3M) which were exposed to different concentrations of dimethoate pesticides. Low dose: 5ml/kg was given to T1 group, medium dose: 10ml/kg was given to T2 group and high dose: 20 ml/kg was given to T3 group. Different concentrations of pesticides were prepared according to calculated LD50 (acute oral LD50 0.085 ml). T1 group was treated with low concentration of pesticide (140 of LD50), T2 group was treated with medium concentration of pesticide (120 of LD50), T3 group was treated with high concentration of pesticide (110 of LD50). Each group contained nine rats in them (n = 9).

Designing the experiment and acclimatization of albino rats

Albino rats of both sexes, approximately 20 week’s age, was purchased from local market. All rats were examined for disease condition and acclimatized to the laboratory environment about 20 days before use and maintained under controlled laboratory conditions, including 12 h dark/light cycle, standard temperature or relative humidity. Animals were kept in separate cage with height of no less than 5 inches (12.7 cm) and a floor area per mouse of 6–15 inches (38.7 to 96.7 cm) squared, depending on body weight, and given a standard diet (laboratory chow) or water ad libitum during lab trial. The animals in the treated groups were given dimethoate one time in a week for 90 days in a row, while the animals in the control group received their daily diet of common laboratory chow. Every week during the trial, all animals were weighed. No mortality was recorded at different days and blood was collected by puncturing heart to perform hematological tests.

Sample collection

A total of 24 blood samples (three rats from each male and female group) from albino rats were taken after every 30 days in 90 days of trial with 5ml auto disposable plastic syringes, with plastic needle, needle size 23 G × 1 inserted into ventral side of heart keeping in view the recommended protocols of rat euthanasia, and blood was collected [13]. Isoflurane inhalation anesthesia was used to anesthetize experimental rats for blood collection in hematology studies due to its rapid onset and quick recovery.

Three rats from eight groups were dissected and blood was collected. Syringes were washed with prepared EDTA solution to prevent clotting of blood. Syringe was inserted into the heart side to puncture heart then instantly blood was entered into syringe. Collected blood was put into the EDTA vial to prevent clotting. Maximum blood sample was taken from each albino rat.

The blood samples were analyzed for hematological parameters. The following hematological parameters were studied: Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and White Blood Cells (WBCs), hemoglobin (Hb), Packed Cell Volume (PCV), MCH, MCHC, GRA (Granulocyte), LYM (Lymphocyte) and Platelets (PLT) count. The results are shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Hematological parameters.

Fig 1

Hematological analyses were performed through manual blood counting [14] and cross-checked using the Rayto RT-7600 Vet Auto Hematology Analyzer (China).

Ethical consideration

All research work in the submitted paper has been conducted ethically and responsibly, and is in full compliance with all relevant codes of experimentation and legislation. This study is approved by the ethical committee of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur. The meeting was held on 22-04-2023 with approval number 9357-IUB. This study was reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Statistical analysis

Level of significance at exposure times and pesticide concentrations for the data collected from the control and experimental groups was undertaken using IBM SPSS statistic 20, One-way ANOVA was applied. Both the mean and the standard deviation were determined for numerical variables such as hematological parameters (hemoglobin (HGB), red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), granulocyte (GRA), lymphocyte (LYM), mean corpuscle hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet (PLT).

Results and discussion

Blood parameters

Hematological results of albino rats of both genders after 30-, 60- and 90-days exposure of dimethoate pesticide were shown in Tables. Albino rats expose to dimethoate pesticide for 90 days induces more changes than the rats exposed to 60 or 30 days.

In comparison to a control group, the Table 2. shows the effects of different dosages of dimethoate pesticide (5 ml, 10 ml, and 20 ml) on a number of hematological changes in male and female albino rats over the course of a 30-day period. The statistical significance of each parameter is shown by the p-value, and it is represented as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). The effects of dimethoate on hematological parameters are shown in Fig 2.

Table 2. Alterations in CBC parameters in albino rats of both genders after 30 days of administration of dimethoate presented in Mean ± S.E.M. and their significance level.

Parameters Gender Control group
(n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 1
5ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 2
10 ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 3
20ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
P Value
WBC (103/ µ L) F (♀) 3.06 ± 0.3 3.74 ± 0.2 4.95 ± 0.5 6.22 ± 0.6 .002
M (♂) 3.68 ± 0.4 5.36 ± 0.5 5.47 ± 0.4 5.82 ± 0.7 0.05
RBC (106/ µ L) F (♀) 8.48 ± 0.1 7.44 ± 0.1 7.25 ± 0.1 7.01 ± 0.3 .001
M (♂) 7.59 ± 0.2 8.70 ± 0.3 8.21 ± 0.1 8.17 ± 0.2 0.02
HGB (g/dL) F (♀) 14.50 ± 0.4 12.47 ± 0.2 11.13 ± 0.3 11.10 ± 0.2 .000
M (♂) 11.97 ± 0.3 12.57 ± 0.2 11.30 ± 0.5 10.57 ± 03 0.02
PLT (103/ µ L) F (♀) 121.7 ± 1.3 97.67 ± 0.8 85.00 ± 3.6 544.33 ± 1.4 0.01
M (♂) 158.3 ± 17 215 ± 41 79.67 ± 4.7 387.67 ± 15 0.1
HCT (%) F (♀) 44.83 ± 1.8 45.67 ± 0.2 39.2 ± 0.2 41.13 ± 1.7 .023
M (♂) 47.73 ± 1.8 37.00 ± 1.7 38.7 ± 1.2 37.53 ± 3.8 0.04
MCH (pg) F (♀) 17.33 ± 1.4 14.03 ± 0.4 13.20 ± 0.5 11.43 ± 0.6 0.01
M (♂) 17.20 ± 1.0 15.33 ± 0.3 14.20 ± 0.3 13.37 ± .0.6 0.01
MCHC (g/dL) F (♀) 27.20 ± 0.3 27.57 ± 0.1 26.33 ± 1.1 30.37 ± 0.9 0.03
M (♂) 26.77 ± 0.3 28.30 ± 0.1 27.20 ± 0.3 27.90 ± .0.2 0.02
LYM (103/ µ L) F (♀) 2.69 ± 0.0 2.91 ± 0.3 4.28 ± 0.5 4.41 ± 0.2 0.01
M (♂) 2.65 ± 0.1 2.69 ± 0.2 3.41 ± 0.3 4.28 ± .0.4 .003
GRA (103/ µ L) F (♀) 0.79 ± 0.1 .58 ± 0.1 .97 ± 0.2 1.59 ± 0.2 .021
M (♂) .57 ± 0.1 .24 ± 0.2 .25 ± 0.1 .28 ± 0.1 0.01

Fig 2. Alterations in hematological parameters induced by dimethoate after 30 days.

Fig 2

The figure represents the changes in hematological parameters among different experimental groups. The blue dots indicate the control group, while the green, red and yellow markers represent treated group exposed to different sublethal doses of dimethoate pesticide: Treated Group 1 (1/40 LD50), Treated Group 2 (1/20 LD50), and Treated Group 3 (1/10 LD50). Data points depict individual subjects, with the vertical axis representing hematological values. The lines connecting points indicate the trends observed in different groups.

When compared with control albino rats, there were significant decrease in hemoglobin count P ≤ 0.00 (♀) P ≤ 0.02 (♂), mean corpuscle hemoglobin P ≤ 0.001 (♀) P ≤ 0.001 (♂), and hematocrit level P ≤ 0.04 (♂) of male and female albino rats treated with dimethoate. Generally, there was also a significant increase in the white blood cells P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.05 (♂), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration P ≤ 0.03 (♀) P ≤ 0.02 (♂) Platelets count P ≤ 0.01 (♀) P ≤ 0.01 (♂) lymphocyte P ≤ 0.01 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂) granulocyte count P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.01 (♂ and hematocrit level P ≤ 0.02 (♀). Red blood cells significantly decrease in female P ≤ 0.01, while significantly increase in male group of albino rats P ≤ 0.02.

In comparison to a control group, the Table 3. shows the effects of different dosages of dimethoate pesticide (5 ml, 10 ml, and 20 ml) on a number of hematological changes in male and female albino rats over the course of a 30-day period. The statistical significance of each parameter is shown by the p-value, and it is represented as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). The effects of dimethoate on hematological parameters are shown in Fig 3.

Table 3. Alterations in CBC parameters in albino rats of both genders after 60 days of administration of dimethoate presented in Mean ± S.E.M. and their significance level.

Parameters Gender Control group
(n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 1
5ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 2
10ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 3
20ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
P Value
WBC (103/ µ L) F (♀) 3.74 ± 0.1 4.35 ± 0.1 5.49 ± 0.1 6.50 ± 0.1 .000
M (♂) 4.59 ± 0.3 3.08 ± 0.4 4.28 ± 0.3 2.95 ± 0.3 .009
RBC (106/ µ L) F (♀) 9.40 ± 0.3 7.73 ± 0.7 6.91 ± 0.4 6.26 ± 0.7 0.02
M (♂) 9.49 ± 0.3 7.07 ± 0.4 7.20 ± 1.0 4.57 ± 0.4 .003
HGB (g/dL) F (♀) 22.33 ± 0.3 17.93 ± 1.7 16.77 ± 1.4 14.67 ± 1.5 0.02
M (♂) 21.80 ± 0.7 20.53 ± 0.8 19.03 ± 1.0 13.33 ± 2.4 0.01
PLT (103/ µ L) F (♀) 155.0 ± 15 463.0 ± 11 158.33 ± 35 278.67 ± 52 0.03
M (♂) 127.33 ± 4.1 475.33 ± 41 664.0 ± 59 813.67 ± 67 .000
HCT (%) F (♀) 44.40 ± 1.3 44.97 ± 4.5 45.97 ± 4.3 35.83 ± 5.8 0.4
M (♂) 45.10 ± 3.5 42.70 ± 1.3 49.83 ± 2.3 55.63 ± 2.8 0.03
MCH (pg) F (♀) 27.00 ± 0.8 15.43 ± 0.7 19.17 ± 3.4 16.53 ± 2.0 0.02
M (♂) 21.77 ± 1.6 25.67 ± 0.8 26.40 ± 0.5 27.53 ± 0.9 0.02
MCHC (g/dL) F (♀) 25.83 ± 1.2 41.27 ± 4.3 42.83 ± 3.0 45.70 ± 0.6 .004
M (♂) 23.87 ± 0.9 50.87 ± 0.9 47.70 ± 0.3 36.23 ± 5.7 .001
LYM (103/ µ L) F (♀) 2.84 ± 0.1 2.04 ± 0.2 1.28 ± 0.2 1.36 ± 0.1 .000
M (♂) 2.61 ± 0.3 2.28 ± 0.7 1.81 ± 0.1 1.31 ± 0.1 .003
GRA (103/ µ L) F (♀) 0.98 ± 0.1 2.31 ± 0.1 2.59 ± .0.1 2.84 ± 0.2 .000
M (♂) 2.31 ± .0.2 0.85 ± 0.3 2.52 ± 0.2 2.65 ± 0.2 .001

Fig 3. Alterations in hematological parameters induced by dimethoate after 60 days.

Fig 3

The figure illustrates the changes in hematological parameters among different experimental groups after 60 days of dimethoate exposure. The blue dots represent the control group, while the green, red, and yellow markers denote treated groups exposed to varying sub-lethal doses of dimethoate: Treated Group 1 (1/40 LD50), Treated Group 2 (1/20 LD50), and Treated Group 3 (1/10 LD50). The vertical axis represents hematological parameter values, and the data points reflect individual subjects. The observed peak in the treated groups indicates significant alterations in response to pesticide exposure.

When compared with control albino rats, there were significant decrease in red blood cells count P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂), hemoglobin count P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.01 (♂), lymphocyte P ≤ 0.00 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂) and hematocrit level P ≤ 0.04 (♂) of male and female albino rats treated with dimethoate. Generally, there was also a significant increase in the white blood cells P ≤ 0.00 (♀) P ≤ 0.009 (♂), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration P ≤ 0.004 (♀) P ≤ 0.001 (♂) granulocyte count P ≤ 0.00 (♀) P ≤ 0.001 (♂), (♀) and platelets count P ≤ 0.00 (♀) P ≤ 0.009 (♂) and non-significant decrease in hematocrit level P ≤ 0.4. There is significant increase in mean corpuscle hemoglobin P ≤ 0.02 (♀) and significant decrease in mean corpuscle hemoglobin P ≤ 0.02 (♂).

In comparison to a control group, the Table 4. shows the effects of different dosages of dimethoate pesticide (5 ml, 10 ml, and 20 ml) on a number of hematological changes in male and female albino rats over the course of a 30-day period. The statistical significance of each parameter is shown by the p-value, and it is represented as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). The effects of dimethoate on hematological parameters are shown in Fig 4.

Table 4. Alterations in CBC parameters in albino rats of both genders after 90 days of administration of dimethoate presented in Mean ± S.E.M. and their significance level.

Parameters Gender Control group
(n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 1
5ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 2
10ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
Treated group 3
20ml (n = 3)
Mean ± SEM
P Value
WBC (103/ µ L) F (♀) 3.98 ± 0.5 3.99 ± 0.3 5.39 ± 0.4 6.53 ± 0.3 .002
M (♂) 3.75 ± 0.3 7.23 ± 1.4 7.85 ± 0.3 10.74 ± 0.9 .003
RBC (106/ µ L) F (♀) 6.45 ± 0.4 6.38 ± 0.1 6.85 ± 0.1 8.00 ± 0.5 0.04
M (♂) 6.81 ± 0.3 8.79 ± 0.2 7.91 ± 0.3 6.60 ± 0.3 .001
HGB (g/dL) F (♀) 13.10 ± 0.6 20.13 ± 0.9 24.00 ± 0.1 21.40 ± 0.5 .000
M (♂) 14.90 ± 0.1 12.63 ± 0.5 12.27 ± 0.4 10.67 ± 0.4 .000
PLT (103/ µ L) F (♀) 128.00 ± 7.5 463.33 ± 17 618.00 ± 36 511.25 ± 79 0.05
M (♂) 186.00 ± 52 570.33 ± 57 713.00 ± 10 781.00 ± 82 .003
HCT (%) F (♀) 34.00 ± 0.6 31.47 ± 0.6 36.05 ± 1.2 42.00 ± 2.9 0.02
M (♂) 38.90 ± 1.0 42.10 ± 0.6 44.83 ± 1.5 47.60 ± 0.4 .001
MCH (pg) F (♀) 21.62 ± 1.1 32.13 ± 1.3 35.25 ± 0.3 22.18 ± 4.2 0.04
M (♂) 21.87 ± 0.3 31.67 ± 1.3 29.30 ± 2.0 28.27 ± 1.9 0.01
MCHC (g/dL) F (♀) 33.20 ± 1.9 63.73 ± 1.6 64.05 ± 0.9 33.10 ± 9.9 0.02
M (♂) 33.20 ± 0.7 24.57 ± 0.1 42.07 ± 6.6 47.37 ± 3.9 0.01
LYM (103/ µ L) F (♀) 4.07 ± 0.6 2.04 ± 0.3 1.26 ± 0.1 1.73 ± 0.4 .004
M (♂) 4.44 ± 0.4 3.57 ± 0.1 3.84 ± 0.4 2.13 ± 0.1 .003
GRA (103/ µ L) F (♀) .93 ± 0.2 3.69 ± 0.7 3.92 ± 0.6 4.17 ± 0.9 0.03
M (♂) 2.27 ± 0.6 3.68 ± 0.2 2.53 ± 0.2 2.16 ± 0.1 0.04

Fig 4. Alterations in hematological parameters induced by dimethoate after 90 days.

Fig 4

The figure represents changes in hematological parameters among different experimental groups. The blue dots indicate the control group, while the green, red, and yellow markers represent treated groups exposed to varying sub-lethal doses of dimethoate: Treated Group 1 (1/40 LD50), Treated Group 2 (1/20 LD50), and Treated Group 3 (1/10 LD50). The vertical axis denotes hematological parameter values, while the data points and lines illustrate trends in different treatment groups over time.

When compared with control albino rats, there were significant decrease in lymphocyte P ≤ 0.004 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂) and hematocrit level P ≤ 0.04 (♂) of male and female albino rats treated with dimethoate. Generally, there was also a significant increase in the red blood cells count P ≤ 0.04 (♀) P ≤ 0.001 (♂), white blood cells P ≤ 0.002 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.01 (♂) hematocrit level P ≤ 0.02 (♀) P ≤ 0.001 (♂) mean corpuscle hemoglobin P ≤ 0.04 (♀) P ≤ 0.01 (♂) granulocyte count P ≤ 0.03 (♀) P ≤ 0.04 (♂), and platelets count P ≤ 0.05 (♀) P ≤ 0.003 (♂). There is a significant increase in hemoglobin count P ≤ 0.00 (♀) and decrease in P ≤ 0.00 (♂).

Discussion

Albino rats exposed to dimethoate for 60 and 90 days exhibit more changes in the blood composition in both genders of albino rats than those treated for 30 days. Red blood cells, hemoglobin, and hematocrit values were significantly decreased in albino rats exposed to dimethoate pesticide. The percentage of inhibition increased with the duration of exposure. White blood cell, granulocyte, and lymphocyte values were significantly increased in albino rats exposed to dimethoate pesticide.

The CBC parameters have been used in the diagnosis of inflammation and infections during disease conditions [15]. Hematological parameters are influenced by hormones [18]. In the present study, hematological parameters in the levels of hemoglobin, red blood cells, or other parameters of blood such as packet cell volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, or mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration dose-dependent decrease were observed in all treated groups. These results are in agreement with [16].

In the present study, levels of hemoglobin and red blood cell count were decreased in both genders of albino rats. As the number of doses increases, the number of red blood cell counts also decreases and the result are in agreement with the result of [17] in which the number of red blood cells also decreased. When complement activates hemolysin, an immunogenic new toxin with hemolytic properties, red blood cells are damaged, and the antibody is dissolved. This can set off a series of events that include anemia [19].

According to the present study, dimethoate induced changes in experimental albino rats in terms of hematological indices. In present studies, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cell count were significantly decreased, which indicates the presence of anemia induced by dimethoate pesticide. These results are in agreement with [20]. The hematological changes were mainly observed in the hemoglobin level and hematocrit level, which is due to malabsorption of nutrients or hyperactivity of animal [21]. Our findings are in agreement with [21], who showed the decrease in the hemoglobin level and the decrease in the red blood cells is due to the effect of pesticides on the organs that form blood, including bone marrow and liver, or inhibition may be due to biosynthesis of heme.

Pesticide residues that cause poisoning lead to anemia development due to the interference of biosynthesis of hemoglobin and shorten the erythrocyte’s life span [20,22]. Our finding is in agreement with the [22], which showed a decrease in red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels due to dimethoate pesticide, [17], who noticed hemoglobin and red blood cell reduction or increase in sedimentation rate of erythrocytes in albino rats, exposure to oral doses of three different concentrations of dimethoate pesticide. Because dimethoate may interfere with red blood cells’ ability to transport oxygen, exposure to it in albino rats may result in a drop in hemoglobin levels. Because dimethoate inhibits cholinesterase action, erythropoiesis may be disrupted, resulting in a drop in red blood cell synthesis and a simultaneous fall in hemoglobin levels. Furthermore, dimethoate-induced oxidative stress and red blood cell destruction may be involved in the albino rats’ post-exposure decrease in hemoglobin levels.

The effects of organophosphorus pesticides may be due to their ability to produce free radicals [5,23]. The results of some previous studies on methidathion show that use of antioxidants, vitamins A, C, or E, overcome methidathion toxicity [17]. This is the fact that ensure this hypothesis of the ability of the organophosphorus pesticide to produce free radicals, which will implicate like playing a role in etiology of some hematological alterations [24].

In the present study, the level of white blood cell count was increased in both genders of albino rats. As the number of doses increases, the number of white blood cell counts also increases and result are in agreement with the result of [25]. When albino rats are exposed to pesticides, their white blood cell (WBC) count may rise in reaction to inflammation or immune system activation brought on by the pesticide’s harmful effects. This increase in WBC count may be a sign that the body is trying to protect itself against the negative consequences of the pesticide, such as oxidative stress or tissue damage. Furthermore, as part of the body’s defensive response, certain pesticides may directly cause the bone marrow to create more white blood cells. Assessing the toxicity levels of the pesticide and the physiological response of albino rats to pesticide exposure can both be aided by tracking the white blood cell count (WBC). A statistically significant increase was detected in white blood cells (lymphocyte and granulocyte) in the treated group compared to the non-treated group (P < 0.05).

[26] showed an increase in white blood cell counts in acute poisoning of organophosphate pesticide. [27], stated higher white blood cell counts (monocytes and lymphocytes) in farmers. White blood cell counts or platelet counts increased significantly in the exposed group compared with the non-exposed group. The prevalence of thrombocytosis significantly increased in the exposed group compared with the non-exposed group. Previous studies assessed exposure to pesticides or many hematopoietic cancers. Meta-analysis (a review of 14 studies published in between 1984 or 2004) shows that pesticide occupational exposure increases the risk of leukemia in adults by [28].

Platelets are the coagulating agents for the incidence of wounds. Greater concentrations of platelets may lead to coagulation of blood in the vessels, whereas deficiency causes a problem in wound healing. Dimethoate exposure in albino rats cause an increase in platelet count because the pesticide causes a pro-inflammatory response or interfere with normal hematopoiesis. As the body reacts to the toxic insult, exposure to dimethoate cause the release of cytokines or other mediators that promote platelet synthesis in the bone marrow, increasing the platelet count. Monitoring platelet counts can help assess the possible negative effects of dimethoate on coagulation and hemostasis in albino rats, as well as provide insights into the hematological consequences of exposure to the drug [29].

Higher platelets are found in females with higher estradiol levels [30]. Platelet count was significantly increased in the treated group in present study, which was in agreement with the results of previous studies. Abu Mourad reported a significant increase in the mean platelet counts in farmers as compared to control group (P < 0.05). The prevalence of thrombocytosis in the exposed group of farmers was 9.09% in previous study and production of platelet increases due to inflammation or high oxidative stress. [27], also showed that long-term exposure to pesticides was accomplished by oxidative stress. Thrombocytosis prevalence was increases in the participants with more work experience in our study, which could indirectly suggest the level of exposure to pesticides. Occupational exposure started at all stages of pesticide formulation, which include manufacture or application which involve exposure to mixtures of different types of chemicals. Susceptibility of Individual to pesticides is very important in toxicity of pesticide. Our findings have similar results with [31], which reported increase in platelet counts in pesticide retailer rather than in the controls. In contrary, [32] reported that there is no difference in platelet count between farm workers exposed to pesticide or control subjects. To the best-known study, there is present only one study about pesticide exposure which effect mean platelet volume in the farm workers. In this study, [32] reported that the decrease in mean platelet volume is present in 15% sprayers of greenhouse exposed to pesticides. Our findings confirm the result of this study.

In present study the level of lymphocyte count was increased in both genders of albino rats. As the number of doses increases, the number of lymphocyte count were also increased and result are in agreement with the result of [33]. In an effort to neutralize the toxic effect, dimethoate can cause immune system disruption, which will cause lymphocytes to proliferate. The body’s attempt to lessen the harm caused by the pesticide and restore immunological homeostasis in albino rats is shown in this elevated lymphocyte count. The body uses lymphocytes as its defense against outside invaders. These may include natural killer cells, T cells, and B cells. Lymphocyte count was significantly decreased in treated group in our study, which was in the agreement with the results of previous studies control. These results were in accordance with [34]. The eventual increase in neutrophils or decrease in lymphocyte count due to inflammation, which eventually increases baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Chronic exposure to dimethoate pesticide likely to cause change in the hematological parameters in normal range in this study.

In our study, neutrophil, lymphocyte or platelet ratios were significantly higher in the more severely treated rats. Basophils and eosinophils defend the body against parasites, allergens, and other pathogens [35]. Previous studies have reported that the ratio of neutrophil-lymphocyte is a strong indicator of inflammation or prognosis in many diseases. In many experimental studies, it has been clear that the ratio of neutrophil-lymphocyte increases in pesticide-poisoning groups [36].

A result of study suggested that organophosphorus or carbamate pesticides affect the formation of megakaryocytes by cholinergic receptors, which reduce the mean corpuscular hemoglobin count. On the other hand, there is no exact effect of cholinergic substances on the formation of megakaryocytes nor the receptors that mediate these effects, which are identified [37]. The findings of mean corpuscular hemoglobin values are in agreement with those of [37]. Similarly, in another study, it was reported that in patients who have acute poisoning of pesticides, hemoperfusion causes impairment of the platelet aggregation with the incomplete activation of platelet, which associates with the decrease in the formation of thrombin or the increase of fibrinolysis [38], found that there is no difference in the hematological parameters in exposed or non-exposed groups but for white blood cell count which increased in exposed group given pesticides. The difference may be due to the difference in types of pesticides or durations of exposure [28].

Mean corpuscle hemoglobin is the mean of hemoglobin present in the blood. Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration is the indication for detecting the hemoglobin amount [35]. In the present study, we found that more treated poisoned rats had increased mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration levels, or this increase was statistically significant. Whereas some experimental studies have reported increased mean corpuscular hemoglobin levels in sub-acute or chronic poisoning of pesticides, others have reported findings of thrombocytopenia [39]. It would be reasonable to conclude that the appearance of thrombocytopenia after oxidative stress negatively affects the membrane of platelet cells or in all blood cells [40]. Many other prospective or controlled studies should confirm these results. A rise in MCH and MCHC may be a sign of hemoglobin content alterations or erythrocyte enlargement brought on by dimethoate-induced oxidative stress or cellular damage. On the other hand, a drop in MCH and MCHC may indicate hemoglobin degradation or compromised erythropoiesis, indicating the pesticide’s harmful effects on the synthesis or function of red blood cells in albino rats’ bone marrow.

Our findings are consistent with previous studies on organophosphate toxicity, notably in terms of metabolic abnormalities (Author, Year). Elevated AST and ALT levels in exposed rats indicate hepatic distress, which has an indirect impact on erythropoiesis and immunological function. Furthermore, low urea and uric acid levels may indicate poor renal clearance, affecting hematological balance [41].

Conclusions

In conclusion, different combinations of dimethoate pesticides significantly affected both genders of albino rats’ hematology. Exposure to dimethoate causes changes in hematocrit, red blood cell count, hemoglobin levels, white blood cell count, and platelet count, among other blood parameters. Different concentrations of dimethoate pesticides were made. Statistical differences were seen in the complete blood count parameters (p < 0.05). So, it is concluded that these changes could indicate physiological problems and possible health risks related to pesticide use. It has important consequences for Pakistani public health and environmental conservation initiatives that go beyond the confines of the laboratory. Pakistan, a nation that depends largely on agricultural methods, has a difficult time controlling the use of pesticides and the health dangers they cause. The study’s findings highlight that having strict rules and careful checks is very important to reduce the harmful effects of pesticides on people and the environment.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2025R191), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia.

Abbreviations

RBC

Red blood cells

WBC

White blood cells

PLT

Platelets

HGB

Hemoglobin

HCT

Hematocrit

MCH

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin

MCHC

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

LYM

Lymphocyte

GRA

Granulocyte

MPV

Mean platelet volume

NK Cells

Natural killer cells

CBC

Complete blood count

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Jatoi FZ. Agriculture in Pakistan and its impact on Economic growth. SSRN. 2021;21. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3771914 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bertomeu-Sánchez JR. Introduction. pesticides: past and present. HoST - J Hist. Sci. Technol. 2019;13(1):1–27. doi: 10.2478/host-2019-0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bernardes MF, Pazin M, Pereira LC, Dorta DJ. Impact of pesticides on environmental and human health. Toxicology studies-cells, drugs and environment. 2015. p. 195–233. doi: 10.5772/59710 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tudi M, Daniel Ruan H, Wang L, Lyu J, Sadler R, Connell D, et al. Agriculture development pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. Feb;18(3):1112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hazarika A, Sarkar SN, Hajare S, Kataria M, Malik JK. Influence of malathion pretreatment on the toxicity of anilofos in male rats: a biochemical interaction study. Toxicology. 2003. Mar 14;185(1-2):1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00574-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharma Y, Bashir S, Irshad M, Gupta SD, Dogra TD. Effects of acute dimethoate administration on antioxidant status of liver and brain of experimental rats. Toxicology. 2005. Jan 5;206(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dongren Y, Tao L, Fengsheng H. Electroneurophysiological studies in rats of acute dimethoate poisoning. Toxicol Lett. 1999;107(1–3):249–54. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00054-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Van Scoy A, Pennell A, Zhang X. Environmental fate and toxicology of dimethoate. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016;237:53–70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23573-8_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang T, Jiang N, Han B, Liu W, Liu T, Fu F, et al. Escin attenuates cerebral edema induced by acute omethoate poisoning. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011;21(5):400–5. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2010.550337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ngoula F, Watcho P, Kenfack A, Manga JN, Defang HF, Pierre K, et al. Effect of dimethoate (an organophosphate insecticide) on the reproductive system and fertility of adult male rat. Am. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2014. Jan 1;9(1):75. doi: 10.3844/ajptsp.2014.75.83 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kwong TC. Organophosphate pesticides: biochemistry and clinical toxicology. Ther Drug Monit. 2002;24(1):144–9. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200202000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rohlman DS, Anger WK, Lein PJ. Correlating neurobehavioral performance with biomarkers of organophosphorous pesticide exposure. Neurotoxicology. 2011;32(2):268–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Etten V. Recommended methods of anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia for laboratory animal species. Inst for Anim Stud. 2002; 460(718):839–7100. https://www.spandidospublications.com/var/RecommendedMethodsAnesthesiaAnalgesiaEuthanasia.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dacie JV. Practical Haematology, 9th edn. In Lewis SM, Bain BJ, Bates I (ed) London: Churchill Livingstone. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ou D, Ling N, Wang X, Zou Y, Dong J, Zhang D, et al. Safety assessment of one Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from the traditional Chinese fermented vegetables—Jiangshui. Foods. 2022. Jul 22;11(15):2177. doi: 10.3390/foods11152177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jamdade CB, Bodare RD. Histopathological and hematological effect of dimethoate on the liver and kidney of albino mice. doi: 10.36713/epra9713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elias MA, Saif MA. The protection effect of vitamins A, C, and E, against the potential toxicity of Methidathion on blood factors in male rabbits. Yem. J. Biol. Sci. 2009;5(1):133–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grau M, Cremer JM, Schmeichel S, Kunkel M, Bloch W. Comparisons of blood parameters, red blood cell deformability and circulating nitric oxide between males and females considering hormonal contraception: a longitudinal gender study. Front Physiol. 2018. Dec 19;9:1835. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maragkoudakis PA, Zoumpopoulou G, Miaris C, Kalantzopoulos G, Pot B, Tsakalidou E. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 2006. Mar 1;16(3):189–99. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.02.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Betrosian A, Balla M, Kafiri G, Kofinas G, Makri R, Kakouri A. Multiple systems organ failure from organophosphate poisoning. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol . 1995. Jan 1;33(3):257–60. doi: 10.3109/15563659509017994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khogali FA, Sheikh JB, Rahman SA, Rahim AA, Daghestani MH. Histopathological and hematological effects of dimethoate 40EC on some organs of albino mice. J. King Saud Univ. 2005;18(2):73–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patil JA, Patil AJ, Govindwar SP. Biochemical effects of various pesticides on sprayers of grape gardens. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2003. Jul;18:16–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02867362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vidyasagar J, Karunakar N, Reddy MS, Rajnarayana K, Surender T, Krishna DR. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in acute organophosphorous insecticide poisoning. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2004. Mar 1; 36(2):76–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Swartz HM, Mason RP, Hogg N, Kalyanaraman B, Sarna T, Plonka PM, et al. Free radicals and medicine. Biomedical EPR, Part A: Free Radicals, Metals, Medicine, and Physiology. 2005. p. 25–74. doi: 10.1007/0-387-26741-7_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cortes-Iza SC, Rodríguez AI, Prieto-Suarez E. Evaluacion de parametros hematológicos en trabajadores expuestos a pesticidas organofosforados, carbamatos y piretroides, Cundinamarca 2016-2017. Revista de Salud Pública. 2017. Jul 1;19(4):468–74. doi: 10.15446/rsap.v19n4.68092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang Y, Hu L, Hong G, Zhong D, Song J, Zhao G, et al. Diagnostic value of complete blood count in paraquat and organophosphorus poisoning patients. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2018. Jul;34(7):439–47. doi: 10.1177/0748233718770896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wafa T, Nadia K, Amel N, Ikbal C, Insaf T, Asma K, et al. Oxidative stress, hematological and biochemical alterations in farmers exposed to pesticides. J Environ Sci Health B 2013. Dec 2;48(12):1058–69. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2013.824285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Al-Sarar AS, Abo Bakr Y, Al-Erimah GS, Hussein HI, Bayoumi AE. Hematological and biochemical alterations in occupationally pesticides-exposed workers of Riyadh municipality.
  • 29.Kaur H, Merchant M, Haque MM, Mande SS. Crosstalk between female gonadal hormones and vaginal microbiota across various phases of women’s gynecological lifecycle. Front Microbiol 2020. Mar 31;11:551. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Daly ME. Determinants of platelet count in humans. Haematologica. 2011. Jan;96(1):10. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.035287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rojas-García AE, Medina-Díaz IM, de Lourdes Robledo-Marenco M, Barrón-Vivanco BS, Girón-Pérez MI, Velázquez-Fernández JB, et al. Hematological, biochemical effects, and self-reported symptoms in pesticide retailers. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2011. May 1;53(5):517–21. doi: 10.1097/jom.0b013e318215fbf2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parron T, Hernandez AF, Pla A, Villanueva E. Clinical and biochemical changes in greenhouse sprayers chronically exposed to pesticides. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1996. Dec;15(12):957–63. doi: 10.1177/096032719601501203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fareed M, Pathak MK, Bihari V, Kamal R, Srivastava AK, Kesavachandran CN. Adverse respiratory health and hematological alterations among agricultural workers occupationally exposed to organophosphate pesticides: a cross-sectional study in North India. PloS one. 2013. Jul 25;8(7):e69755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sujaya IN, Suwardana GN, Gotoh K, Sumardika IW, Nocianitri KA, Sriwidyani NP, et al. Potential probiotic characteristics and safety assessment of lactobacillus rhamnosus SKG34 isolated from sumbawa mare’s milk. Kor J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;50(1):51–62. doi: 10.48022/mbl.2111.11007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Darwish AA, Rashad M, AL-Aoh HA. Methyl orange adsorption comparison on nanoparticles: Isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Dyes Pigm. 2019;160:563–71. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.08.045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dalbo J, Filgueiras LA, Mendes AN. Effects of pesticides on rural workers: haematological parameters and symptomalogical reports. Cien. Saúde Colet . 2019. Jul 22;24:2569–82. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018247.19282017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Varol E, Ogut S, Gultekin F. Effect of pesticide exposure on platelet indices in farm workers. Toxicol Ind Health. 2014;30(7):630–4. doi: 10.1177/0748233712462477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Park S, Islam MI, Jeong JH, Cho NJ, Song HY, Lee EY, et al. Hemoperfusion leads to impairment in hemostasis and coagulation process in patients with acute pesticide intoxication. Sci. Rep. 2019. Sep 16;9(1):13325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49738-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dundar ZD, Ergin M, Koylu R, Ozer R, Cander B, Gunaydin YK. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with pesticide poisoning. J Emerg Med. 2014. Sep 1;47(3):286–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aitte SA, Zain MH. Study of changes in blood parameters and calculation of PCT, MPV and DPW for the platelets of laboratory females and males of albino mice during exposure to doses of pyrethriod pesticide (Alphacypermethrin). IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2019;14(2):71–8. doi: 10.9790/3008-1402017178 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saleem N, Lashari MH, Ahmad HI. Orally administered organophosphorus dimethoate mediated biochemical alterations in male and female experimental Rattus norvegicus (albino rats). Sci. Rep. 2025;5(1):4371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88023-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ashish Kumar Singh

2 Jan 2025

PONE-D-24-37808Hematological changes in the blood of experimental male and female Rattusnorvigacus (Albino Rats) on exposure to pesticide, dimethoatePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. saleem,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 16 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ashish Kumar Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. 

The American Journal Experts (AJE) (https://www.aje.com/) is one such service that has extensive experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. Please note that having the manuscript copyedited by AJE or any other editing services does not guarantee selection for peer review or acceptance for publication. 

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Please provide a complete Data Availability Statement in the submission form, ensuring you include all necessary access information or a reason for why you are unable to make your data freely accessible. If your research concerns only data provided within your submission, please write "All data are in the manuscript and/or supporting information files" as your Data Availability Statement.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. 

5. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author's,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript titled "Hematological changes in the blood of experimental male and female Rattus norvegicus (Albino Rats) on exposure to pesticide, dimethoate" (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-37808) to PLOS One

The manuscript has been reviewed by two referees, and their evaluations have been carefully considered. Below is a summary of their feedback:

Reviewer 1 has suggested Rejection

Reviewer 2 has recommended minor revisions

Based on these reviews, we are providing you the opportunity to revise your manuscript. To proceed, we request that you:

Address all comments and concerns raised by both reviewers.

Provide a detailed response letter outlining how you have addressed each comment. This will assist the reviewers and editors in evaluating your revisions.

Please note that the revised manuscript will undergo further review to ensure that the revisions adequately address the reviewers’ concerns.

To assist in preparing your revision, I am attaching the full reviewer comments for your reference. We encourage you to carefully consider these and provide clear explanations for any changes made or not made.

Thank you for your effort and commitment to the improvement of your work. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Reviewer 1

Concern over statistical analysis

authors have not made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available

Study was performed to check effect of pesticide, dimethoate exposure on albino (Albino Rats) hematological parameters.

Study design has some defects, as it is not clear how much dose was administered to rats. Dosage mentioned in mL has very little understanding. Many of the references mentioned in the discussion do mention the dose in form per kg animals.

Lot of studies are mentioned in the discussion tells the effect of dimethoate pesticide on hematological parameters. There is no novelty in the study as MT Akay et al in 1999 mentioned similar observations (PMID: 10509431) All the speculations based on data from semi auto hematology analyzer. If these observations would have been supported with certain biochemical tests it would have great support to the data.

Research group has used both male and female rats for the treatment. However, in results it has not shown comparison of responses from male and female rats. Results are analyzed in very narrow spectrum of treated Vs non-treated.

There is lot of mismatches in description, table and figure

Reviewer 2: Minor revision

Nida Saleem et al. have shown in this article that, following exposure to the dimethoate pesticide for 30, 60, and 90 days in both male and female albino rats, the number of white blood cells, platelet count, granulocyte count, and lymphocyte count significantly increased. In contrast, the number of red blood cells, hemoglobin level, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were notably decreased. No changes were observed in the control group of male and female albino rats. This study concludes that dimethoate pesticide affects blood parameters in both male and female albino rats.

The article looks interesting to me. I have a few minor comments that could be incorporated to improve it.

1. Since Figure 3.1 appears before Figure 2, please correct the figure numbering so that the figures appear in proper sequence.

2. In Figures 3.1, 2, and 3 (all bar diagrams), label the Y-axis clearly to indicate what is being measured.

3. In the graphical abstract, please include the name of the dose for clarity.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:  Study was performed to check effect of pesticide, dimethoate exposure on albino (Albino Rats) hematological parameters.

Study design has some defects, as it is not clear how much dose was administered to rats. Dosage mentioned in mL has very little understanding. Many of the references mentioned in the discussion do mention the dose in form per kg animals.

Lot of studies are mentioned in the discussion tells the effect of dimethoate pesticide on hematological parameters. There is no novelty in the study as MT Akay et al in 1999 mentioned similar observations (PMID: 10509431) All the speculations based on data from semi auto hematology analyzer. If these observations would have been supported with certain biochemical tests it would have great support to the data.

Research group has used both male and female rats for the treatment. However, in results it has not shown comparison of responses from male and female rats. Results are analyzed in very narrow spectrum of treated Vs non-treated.

There is lot of mismatches in description, table and figure

Reviewer #2:  Nida Saleem et al. have shown in this article that, following exposure to the dimethoate pesticide for 30, 60, and 90 days in both male and female albino rats, the number of white blood cells, platelet count, granulocyte count, and lymphocyte count significantly increased. In contrast, the number of red blood cells, hemoglobin level, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were notably decreased. No changes were observed in the control group of male and female albino rats. This study concludes that dimethoate pesticide affects blood parameters in both male and female albino rats.

The article looks interesting to me. I have a few minor comments that could be incorporated to improve it.

1. Since Figure 3.1 appears before Figure 2, please correct the figure numbering so that the figures appear in proper sequence.

2. In Figures 3.1, 2, and 3 (all bar diagrams), label the Y-axis clearly to indicate what is being measured.

3. In the graphical abstract, please include the name of the dose for clarity.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Ajit Kumar Singh

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewers decission.docx

pone.0321848.s001.docx (12.7KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0321848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321848.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


14 Feb 2025

Reviewer 1:

Concern over statistical analysis

Response: We appreciate the concern regarding the statistical analysis used in this study. A one-way ANOVA was selected for dose comparison because it is a robust statistical method for analyzing differences among the means of four independent groups. In our study, the doses of dimethoate represent independent groups, and one-way ANOVA allowed us to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in the measured parameters across these groups.

Key justifications for using one-way ANOVA in this study are as follows:

Study Design: The experiment involved independent groups exposed to different doses of the substance, with each group being treated as a separate, independent category.

Comparison of Means: One-way ANOVA was specifically chosen to identify significant differences between the dose groups.

This approach ensures the reliability and accuracy of the statistical analysis, allowing for valid conclusions regarding dose-dependent effects. We believe this method appropriately addresses the objectives of our study and aligns with established statistical practices in similar research.

If further clarification or additional analyses are required, such as testing assumptions or using alternative statistical methods (e.g., non-parametric tests), we are willing to provide these upon request.

Authors have not made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available

Study was performed to check effect of pesticide, dimethoate exposure on albino (Albino Rats) hematological parameters.

Response: We acknowledge the journal's concern regarding the availability of data underlying our findings. In this study, we assessed the effects of pesticide exposure (dimethoate) on the hematological parameters of albino rats. Due to ethical considerations, privacy concerns, we are unable to make the raw data fully available for public access at this time. However, we assure you that the data supporting our conclusions are included in the manuscript files.

We are committed to ensuring transparency in our research and are happy to provide the data upon reasonable request from the journal or any other interested researchers, with due consideration for confidentiality and ethical guidelines.

Should the journal require any additional clarification or specific datasets to be shared directly, we are open to discussing further solutions.

Thank you for your understanding.

Study design has some defects, as it is not clear how much dose was administered to rats. Dosage mentioned in mL has very little understanding. Many of the references mentioned in the discussion do mention the dose in form per kg animals.

Response: Thank you for pointing out the concern regarding the dosage administered to the rats in our study. We understand that specifying the dose in mL without a clear reference to body weight may lead to confusion. To clarify:

In our study, the dosages of dimethoate were administered based on the body weight of the rats. The amount of dimethoate given was carefully calculated to ensure appropriate dosing for each group. The doses were converted into concentration (mL/kg body weight) for accurate comparison with relevant studies.

For each treatment group, the doses were as follows:

Different concentrations of pesticides were prepared according to calculated LD50 (acute oral LD50 0.085 ml). T1 group was treated with low concentration of pesticide ( of LD50), T2 group was treated with medium concentration of pesticide ( of LD50), T3 group was treated with high concentration of pesticide ( of LD50).

We apologize for the lack of clarity in the initial manuscript, and we have updated the manuscript to include these doses in mL/kg body weight to ensure better understanding. We have also included this clarification in the revised Methods section for further clarity.

We hope this addresses your concern, and we appreciate your valuable feedback. If further adjustments or additional details are needed, please let us know.

Lot of studies are mentioned in the discussion tells the effect of dimethoate pesticide on hematological parameters. There is no novelty in the study as MT Akay et al in 1999 mentioned similar observations (PMID: 10509431) All the speculations based on data from semi auto hematology analyzer. If these observations would have been supported with certain biochemical tests it would have great support to the data.

Response: We appreciate the journal’s valuable feedback and understand the concern regarding the novelty of our study in relation to previous research, particularly the work by MT Akay et al. (1999). While it is true that similar observations regarding the effects of dimethoate on hematological parameters have been made in earlier studies, we believe that our study offers new insights in several important ways:

1.Extended Study Duration: Unlike many previous studies, our study was conducted over a 90-day period, allowing us to observe the long-term effects of dimethoate exposure, which is often not fully explored in other studies.

2.Sampling Frequency:

In other studies, the duration is shorter, and sampling was done only once, whereas in my study, sampling was conducted every 30 days, and tests were performed accordingly. In this way, a total of 3 tests were conducted after 30, 60, and 90 days.

3.Use of Autohematology Analyzer in the Study:

In my study, an autohematology analyzer was used after manual calculations, whereas in other studies, a semi-auto hematology analyzer was used.

4.Gender-Specific Analysis: Our study uniquely compares the effects of dimethoate on hematological parameters between male and female albino rats, providing insights into potential gender-based differences in response to pesticide exposure.

5.Contribution to Pesticide Regulation: By highlighting the long-term, sub-lethal effects of dimethoate exposure, particularly with regard to gender-based differences in hematological parameters, our study provides critical data that could inform pesticide regulation and public health guidelines.

Regarding the suggestion to include biochemical tests, we recognize that biochemical support could strengthen our findings. While the primary focus of this study was on hematological parameters, we acknowledge that adding biochemical assays (e.g., liver enzymes, oxidative stress markers) would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. We plan to expand this aspect in future studies to provide a more holistic view of dimethoate's effects.

We appreciate your constructive feedback, and we will revise the manuscript to better highlight the unique contributions of our work and outline potential areas for further exploration.

Research group has used both male and female rats for the treatment. However, in results it has not shown comparison of responses from male and female rats. Results are analyzed in very narrow spectrum of treated Vs non-treated.

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We acknowledge the concern regarding the lack of a comparison between male and female rats in the results section of the manuscript. While both male and female rats were included in the study, the initial analysis focused primarily on comparing treated versus non-treated groups across all subjects, without emphasizing the gender-specific differences.

We agree that it is important to highlight any potential differences between male and female rats, especially given the possibility of gender-based variations in response to pesticide exposure. In light of your feedback, we have re-analyzed the data to specifically compare the hematological parameters between male and female rats in both treated and control groups.

We appreciate your suggestion to broaden the scope of our analysis, and we believe these revisions will strengthen the manuscript and provide more comprehensive insights into the effects of dimethoate exposure.

There is lot of mismatches in description, table and figure

Response: We sincerely thank you for pointing out the mismatches between the description in the manuscript, the tables, and the figures. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused and appreciate your careful review of the manuscript.

Upon re-examining the manuscript, we have identified and corrected the following discrepancies. We have carefully reviewed the tables and figures to ensure that they accurately reflect the descriptions and results presented in the text. All relevant values, statistical results, and trends now match the descriptions and are consistent across the manuscript. We have revised the figure legends and table titles for clarity, ensuring they are properly aligned with the data presented. We have also made sure that each figure and table is referred to in the correct order and that the legends provide accurate and complete explanations. We have ensured that all data points presented in the figures and tables are consistent with the results discussed in the manuscript. Any errors in the presentation of data have been corrected.

The manuscript has been updated accordingly, and we believe these revisions resolve the mismatches between the text, tables, and figures. We appreciate your attention to detail and trust that these revisions will improve the clarity and accuracy of the manuscript. Thank you for your understanding, and if further clarifications are needed, please do not hesitate to inform us.

Reviewer 2:

The article looks interesting to me. I have a few minor comments that could be incorporated to improve it. 1. Since Figure 3.1 appears before Figure 2, please correct the figure numbering so that the figures appear in proper sequence.

Response: Thank you for your positive feedback and valuable comments. We appreciate your careful review of the manuscript. Regarding your comment on the figure numbering, we have made the necessary corrections to ensure that the figures appear in the proper sequence.

We have updated the numbering of the figures so that Figure 3.1 now appears after Figure 2, and the rest of the figures have been renumbered accordingly to maintain proper order.

We believe this adjustment will improve the manuscript's clarity and organization. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and please let us know if there are any other aspects that require further revision.

In Figures 3.1, 2, and 3 (all bar diagrams), label the Y-axis clearly to indicate what is being measured.

Response: Thank you for your helpful suggestion regarding the Y-axis labels in Figures 3.1, 2, and 3. We agree that clearly labeling the Y-axis is essential for improving the clarity of the figures.

In response to your comment, we have updated the Y-axis labels in Figures 2, 3, and 4 to clearly indicate the parameters being measured. The labels now explicitly describe the units of measurement and the specific variables being assessed, ensuring that the figures are more informative and easier to interpret.

We appreciate your attention to this detail and believe these revisions will improve the presentation of our data. Should you have any further suggestions, we would be happy to incorporate them.

In the graphical abstract, please include the name of the dose for clarity.

Response: Thank you for your thoughtful comment regarding the graphical abstract. We agree that including the name of the dose will enhance clarity and provide a more complete understanding of the study's methodology.

In response to your suggestion, we have updated the graphical abstract to include the name of the dose used in the study, along with the relevant concentration or dosage information. This addition ensures that the graphical abstract accurately reflects the key elements of the study and improves its overall clarity.

We appreciate your feedback and believe this update will make the graphical abstract more informative for readers. If you have any further suggestions, we would be happy to incorporate them.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0321848.s002.docx (33.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ashish Kumar Singh

12 Mar 2025

Hematological changes in the blood of experimental male and female albino rats  on exposure to pesticide, dimethoate

PONE-D-24-37808R1

Dear author

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ashish Kumar Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Authors have taken care of all the comments appropriately and modified the manuscript accordingly. The manuscript looks more sounded now.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Ajit Kumar Singh

**********

Acceptance letter

Ashish Kumar Singh

PONE-D-24-37808R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. saleem,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ashish Kumar Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers decission.docx

    pone.0321848.s001.docx (12.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0321848.s002.docx (33.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES