Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2019 Dec 2;21(24):9846–9851. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03707

Rapid Entry into Biologically Relevant α,α-Difluoroalkylphosphonates Bearing Allyl Protection – Deblocking Under Ru(II)/(IV)-Catalysis

Kaushik Panigrahi , Xiang Fei , Masato Kitamura ‡,*, David B Berkowitz †,*
PMCID: PMC12084027  NIHMSID: NIHMS2079713  PMID: 31789041

Abstract

A convenient synthetic route to α,α-difluoroalkylphosphonates is described. Structurally diverse aldehydes are condensed with LiF2CP(O)(OCH2CH=CH2)2. The resultant alcohols are captured as the pentafluorophenyl thionocarbonates and efficiently deoxygenated with HSnBu3, BEt3, O2; then smoothly deblocked with CpRu(IV)(π-allyl)quinoline-2-carboxylate (1–2 mol %) in methanol as allyl cation scavenger. These mild deprotection conditions provide access to free, α,α-difluoroalkylphosphonates in nearly quantitative yield. This methodology is used to rapidly construct new bis-α,α-difluoroalkyl phosphonate inhibitors of PTPIB (protein phosphotyrosine phosphatase-1B).

Graphical Abstract:

graphic file with name nihms-2079713-f0001.jpg


Phosphate esters are ubiquitous in Nature, as they provide binding handles and partitioning mechanisms for metabolites, as well as the backbone for nucleic acids and phospholipids.1 The kinetic stability, yet thermodynamic lability of phosphate esters allows them to serve as on/off-signals for protein regulation and signal transduction and amplification. Since the pioneering work of Blackburn2 and McKenna,3 there has been great interest in α,α-difluorinated phosphonates as isopolar mimics of biological phosphates, that are both hydrolytically stable and resistant to phosphatase enzymes. Prior studies on difluorinated phosphonates support the notion of the isopolarity,4 reduced pKa5 and yet added hydrophobicity6 of these phosphate mimics.

These postulates have gained significant experimental support, for example, as illustrated in Figure 1, A is an effective bisubstrate analogue inhibitor of purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP),7 a target for gout, and B acts as an analogue of phosphoenolpyruvate inactivating of EPSP synthase,8 a key target for herbicide development. The β,γ-CF2-bridged analogues of dATP (C) and ATP (C’), act as TS probes for DNA polymerase9 and kinase enzymes,10 respectively. The α,α-difluorinated phosphonate mimics of L-phosphoserine (D),11 L-phosphothreonine (D’)12 and L-phosphotyrosine (E) serve as useful tools for chemical biology.13 These fluorinated phosphononates behave as ‘teflon-phosphates’ being inert to biological phosphatase enzymes; when site-specifically incorporated in peptides and proteins, they allow for the study of kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways of great interest to drug development.14 When incorporated into cyclic peptides, the pTyr analogue F leads to effective, cell permeable inhibitors of T-cell PTPase.15 The difluorinated phosphonate mimic of PLP, F, has been shown to serve as a useful proble of vitamin B6-active sites.16 Fluorinated phosphonate mimics of dTMP (G)17 and UMP (G’)18 are useful building blocks for phosphonate nucleic acids,19 an area of burgeoning contemporary interest, particularly for anti-sense applications. Fluorophosphonate analogues of phospho-sugars are useful tools in chemical biology as substrate mimics,20 mechanistic probes21 or enzyme inhibitors.22 Glucose 6-phosphate mimic H serves both as an alternate substrate for G6PDH23 and as a mechansistic probe for phosphoglucomutase by NMR.24 Finally, fluorinated phosphonate analogues of phospholipids25 such as LPA (I)26 open up new avenues to investigate and modulate phospholipid signaling mechanisms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Bio-Relevant α,α-Difluorinated Phosphonates

Previously, our lab and others have reported convergent routes into the title compounds via PCF2-C bond formation. Such routes include: (i) triflate displacement chemistry with lithio difluoromethylphosphonate anion,27 (ii) condensation of such (RO)2P(O)CF2M species with the corresponding aldehydes28 and esters,12a, 29 (iii) Pd(0)-mediated addition of (RO)2P(O)CF2I to monosubstituted alkenes followed by reductive deiodination,30 (iv) conjugate addition of (RO)2P(O)CF2M reagents to (E)-nitroalkenes in the presence of Ce(III)31 and (v) a series of radical-mediated alkene addition approaches.32 Several other elegant routes are specific for generating PCF2-C(sp2) bonds33 or directed at allylic systems.34 Also, Piettre and coworkers have recently described a convergent approach into the corresponding fluorinated phosphinates.19a However, nearly all of these studies lead to diethyl ester-protected difluoroalkylphosphonates. To date, these esters are typically deprotected with TMSX reagents that combine both nucleophilic and Lewis acidic elements in the reagent itself or when generating the reagent in situ from TMSX and NaBr of KI, for example.35 That said, the TMSX reagent of choice is TMSBr as delineated in a careful comparative study by McKenna and coworkers,36 as is discussed in more detail below.

Early on, our lab reported the synthesis of biologically relevant (α,α-difluoroalkyl)phosphonates bearing allyl ester protecting groups35 by triflate displacement.27a In that study, the fluorinated phosphonate esters thereby obtained were deallylated under Pd(0)-catalysis in the presence of the organic-soluble 2-methylhexanoate anion nucleophile as allyl cation scavenger. The unblocked phosphonates were obtained with modest to excellent (56–91%) yields, depending on the case. While these results were promising, there still were a couple of limitations to the chemistry reported here. On the one hand, while triflate displacement with (RO)2P(O)CF2Li provides for convergency, this approach does have a couple of limitations; namely (i) triflates are generally not stable over long periods of time, (ii) molecules containing highly acid sensitive functionalities may not withstand triflate synthesis conditions and (iii) triflates may be incompatible with certain internal functionalities/protecting groups (see the N-para-methoxybenzyl oxazolidinone case in our early efforts to access the pCF2Serphosphonate mimic).27c Therefore, there was a need for new methodology to synthesize CF2-phosphonate analogues of biological phosphates under milder conditions, and ideally also with ester deblocking conditions that would be exceptionally gentle to streamline access to these chemical biological tools.

We set out to synthesize α,α-difluorinated phosphonates bearing allyl blocking groups via condensation of diallyl lithio(difluoromethyl)phosphonate with a series of aldehydes. Earlier Martin and coworkers had reported the aldehyde condensation route with diethyl lithio(difluoromethyl) phosphonate followed by deoxygenation.28b However, the most significant limitation of the Martin route to (α,α-difluoroalkyl)phosphonate analogues is the need to carry ethyl phosphonate ester protecting groups through the sequence. In order to best mimic a natural phosphorus(V)-based biologically active compound, these ethyl groups need to be removed, typically using TMSX reagents. While Rabinowitz and coworkers had reported the use of TMSCl37 for this purpose early on, the groups of Olah,38 Jung39 and Blackburn40 had described the use of TMSI for such purposes, TMSCl only performs well at elevated temperature and TMSI is more effective for carboxylate ester deprotection than for phosphonate ester deprotection. This latter result was concretely evidenced in an important study by Schmidhauser and McKenna,36a in which it was shown that the TMSBr36b, 41 is the TMSX agent of choice for phosphonate ester deprotection.

While there are many examples of the successful use of TMSBr for the deblocking of diethyl phosphonate protecting groups, particularly for simple phosphonate esters, but also for α,α-difluorinated congeners, we and others have encountered deprotection problems with diethyl/dimethyl/dibutyl-phosphonate moieties by TMSBr/I when they are appended to certain lactone, pyranose, or amino acid frameworks.42 To expand the repertoire of existing deblocking conditions, the corresponding dibenzyl-protected phosphonate reagents were explored, and these proved to be useful in the sugar phosphonate arena.43 However, due to a lack of stability, the (BnO)2P(O)CF2Li reagent has not been used extensively for fluorinated phosphonate synthesis. Therefore, we set out to examine a new route into α,α-difluoroalkyl phosphonates that utilizes the (H2C=CHCH2O)2P(O)CF2Li reagent and that, if successful, would offer medicinal chemists and chemical biologists a streamlined, alternative synthetic entry in this important class of phosphate mimics.

In this new approach, the diallyl (difluoromethyl)phosphonate anion is first added to a target aldehyde at low temperature. The resulting β-hydroxy-α,α-difluoroalkyl phosphonates are then converted to the corresponding arylthionocarbonate esters. While this can be done in situ, if desired, we chose to perform these operations in two steps, as it was felt that the intermediate β-hydroxy-α,α-difluoroalkyl phosphonates might be of real interest for some chemical biology applications, and so these were fully characterized. Unfortunately, in model studies with benzaldehyde, deoxygenation of the aryl thionocarbonate ester so obtained using typical Barton conditions was largely unsuccessful (Scheme 1).44 The very low yield of desired product obtained led us to make a crucial modification in the synthetic approach. In order to prevent undesired side reactions, it was discovered that one could lower the reaction temperature from 80 °C to ambient temperature by replacing the usual AIBN initiator with BEt3 /air. The modified Barton conditions45 were found to be successful. Under these conditions, the allyl phosphonate ester protecting groups are stable to the radical tin chemistry and the pentafluorophenyl thionocarbonate esters are cleanly reduced off.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Standard Deoxygenation Conditions Fail

The overall streamlined entry into these fluorinated phosphosphonates, featuring these mild deoxygenation conditions is summarized in Scheme 2. In the first step, the diallyl lithio-α,α-difluoromethylphosphonate anion cleanly adds into a range of aldehydes including those appended to protected carbohydrate, purine and vitamin B6-cofactor scaffolds. The resultant α,α-difluorinated β-hydroxyphosphonates were derivatized as pentafluorophenyl thionocarbonates. As can be seen from Table 1, the method displays broad substrate scope and provides two-step yields of the corresponding thionocarbonate derivatives that are over 63% (> 80% average per step) for all but one densely functionalized protected guanine system 4f.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Streamlined Route into α,α–Difluorinated Phosphonates

Table 1.

P-CF2-C Bond Formation/Thionocarbonate Capture

graphic file with name nihms-2079713-t0007.jpg

The BEt3/O2-initiated radical Bu3SnH-mediated deoxygenation step proceeds particularly efficiently in this sequence. As can be seen from Table 2, for the model system (4a5a) described above, one sees a dramatic improvement in yield (86%) over that obtained under traditional AIBN-initiated deoxygenation conditions at elevated temperature (20%). These findings lead us to hypothesize that at the higher deoxygenation temperature initially employed, the intermediate tributyltin radical reacts with the allyl protecting group centers in competition with Sn-S bond formation, the desired entrée into the deoxygenation reaction manifold. Indeed, the deoxygenation conditions described (ambient temperature, oxygen-triethylborane initiation) are a key cog in the methodology presented herein as they are robustly tolerated across all substrates in our library, giving an average deoxygenation yield of ~80%.

Table 2.

Deoxygenation with Retention of Allyl PGs

graphic file with name nihms-2079713-t0008.jpg

Finally, as is depicted in Table 3, we have deblocked a set of allyl-protected of α,α-difluorinated phosphonate mimics of biological phosphates using the novel Cp-Ru(II)-2-quinolinecarboxylate catalyst developed in the Kitamura group.46 To our knowledge, these are the first examples of the use of this catalyst to provide access to this class of “ teflon” phosphate mimics. The deallylation proceeds under exceptionally mild conditions, using the cationic Ru(IV)-PF6 precatalyst shown, at modest loading (1–2%). In addition, with this catalyst system, addition of an exogenous allyl cation acceptor is unnecessary, since the reaction solvent, MeOH fills this role, affording methyl allyl ether as a volatile, readily removable byproduct. By using this methodology we have demonstrated a streamlined synthesis of a variety of “teflon” phosphonates in fully deprotected form.

Table 3.

Deallylation to the Free α,α-Difluorophosphonates

graphic file with name nihms-2079713-t0009.jpg

As shown in Table 3, the deallylation reaction provides essentially quantitative conversion with all the selected substrates. This methodology provides a practical route into analogues of several biologically relevant phosphates, such as 6b, an analogue of pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) of proven utility,16 at a time when modified PLP analogues are finding expanded use in chemical biology,47 and 5e, an analogue of ribose-5-phosphate that could be used to synthesize non-hydrolysable RNA mimics as discussed.17, 19b, 19e, 19g Heterocycle 5f is a precursor to potent bisubstrate analogue inhibitors of purine nucleoside phosphorylase7a and 5j is building block for constructing conjugates of the CF2-phosphonate mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) mimic.48 This phosphatase-inert M6P-surrogate is of great interest as an unnatural ligand for the insulin-like growth factor-II receptor (IGFIIR). Polyvalent versions of such ligands may promote the dimerization of this receptor and thereby stimulate internalization of circulating IGF-II growth factor, a potential approach to cancer therapy currently under investigation.49

Finally, we have rapidly constructed a set of α,α-difluorinated mono- and bis-phosphonates (6d, 6i and 6g, 6h) to demonstrate how this chemistry can be used to assemble targeted libaries, here a set of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B inhibitor candidates. PTP1B is a high value potential therapeutic target for type II diabetes.1415, 50 In fact, for such rapidly assembled scaffolds, significant inhibition was observed in the mid-micromolar range with 6h, in particular. These results highlight the advantage of the bis-phosphonates over their monomeric congeners (Figure 2) in binding to PTP1B.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparison of Rapidly Assembled Mono- and Bivalent Fluorinated Phosphonate PTP1B Inhibitors

A docked structure of 6h, bound to the PTP1B active site (from pdb 2B07)51 is presented in Figure 3 (AutodockVina;52 best of 25 poses shown). Each difluorinated phosphonate group is seen to engage in favorable electrostatic/H-bonding interactions with R24 and K120, with each arene ring of the inhibitor available for edge-to-face π-π interactions with F182 and Y46, respectively. Thus inhibitor 6h is expected to be a useful tool for chemical biology; it is a potential lead scaffold for PTP inhibitor development to facilitate the study of signal transduction via protein (de)phosphorylation.13a

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Inhibitor 6h Docked in the PTP1B Active Site

In conclusion, a practical route for the synthesis of α,α-difluoroalkyl)phosphonates bearing allyl ester protection has been established, by exploiting the favorable low temperature condensation of the (H2C=CHCH2O)2P(O)CF2Li reagent with a set of functionalized aldehydes appended to diverse biologically relevant scaffolds. A modified Barton deoxygenation is then employed, compatible with the presence of allyl phosphonate ester functionality. Fluorinated phosphonate deprotection is achieved under exceptionally mild conditions with the Ru (II)-catalyst pioneered in the Kitamura lab. The new method has been applied to the synthesis of CF2-phosphonate mimics of PLP (vitamin B6), D-mannopyranosyl and D-ribofuranosyl phosphates and an established purine-based phosphonate scaffold for PNP inhibition. Finally, this chemistry has been deployed in a parallel, bidirectional fashion using aromatic bis-aldehyde substrates to provide rapid access to simple bis-α,α-difluoromethylene phosphonates that display mid-micromolar inhibitory potency against PTP1B. Indeed, PTP inhibitor 6h provides an attractive and readily accessible scaffold from which to potentially build out specificity and enhanced affinity across the PTP family of signal-transducing enzymes.

Supplementary Material

SI file

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported in part by NSF CHE-1500076 and CHE-1800574. These studies were initiated by a JSPS Fellowship to DBB that brought DBB and MK together and were facilitated by the IR/D program for DBB’s appointment at the NSF. The authors thank Martin Osinde and Ranjeet Dhokale (both of the University of Nebraska) for assistance with modeling, and data analysis, respectively; NIH (SIG-1–510-RR-06307), NSF (CHE-0091975 and MRI-0079750) for NMR instrumentation and NIH (RR016544) for facilities.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

Detailed experimental procedures (synthesis and enzyme kinetics assays) and characterization data (1H, 13C, 19F and 31P NMR spectra)-182 pages. This material is available free of charge via the Internet: http://pubs.acs.org.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Westheimer FH, Science 1987, 235, 1173–1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) Blackburn GM; Brown D; Martin SJ; Parratt MJ, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 1 1987, 181–186; [Google Scholar]; (b) Blackburn GM; Taylor GE; Tattershall RH; Thatcher GRJ; McLennan A, Bioactive Molecules 1987, 3, 451–464; [Google Scholar]; (c) Blackburn GM; Parratt MJ, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 1 1986, 1417–1424; [Google Scholar]
  • (3).McKenna CE; Shen P-D, J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4573–4576. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) Meanwell NA, J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Panigrahi K; Nelson DL; Berkowitz DB, Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 666–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Rodriguez JB; Gallo-Rodriguez C, ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 190–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Hoffmann W; Langenhan J; Huhmann S; Moschner J; Chang R; Accorsi M; Seo J; Rademann J; Meijer G; Koksch B; Bowers MT; von Helden G; Pagel K, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8216–8220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) Halazy S; Ehrhard A; Danzin C, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 315–317; [Google Scholar]; b Halazy S; Eggenspiller A; Ehrhard A; Danzin C, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1992, 2, 407–410. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Phillion DP; Cleary DG, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2763–2764. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).(a) Oertell K; Florian J; Haratipour P; Crans DC; Kashemirov BA; Wilson SH; McKenna CE; Goodman MF, Biochemistry 2019, 58, 1764–1773; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Haratipour P; Minard C; Nakhjiri M; Negahbani A; Kashemirov BA; McKenna CE, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2019, 194, 329–330; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Oertell K; Kashemirov BA; Negahbani A; Minard C; Haratipour P; Alnajjar KS; Sweasy JB; Batra VK; Beard WA; Wilson SH; McKenna CE; Goodman MF, Biochemistry 2018, 57, 3925–3933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Ni F; Kung A; Duan Y; Shah V; Amador CD; Guo M; Fan X; Chen L; Chen Y; McKenna CE; Zhang C, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7701–7704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).(a) Tarrant MK; Rho H-S; Xie Z; Jiang YL; Gross C; Culhane JC; Yan G; Qian J; Ichikawa Y; Matsuoka T; Zachara N; Etzkorn FA; Hart GW; Jeong JS; Blackshaw S; Zhu H; Cole PA, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 262–269; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Panigrahi K; Eggen M; Maeng J-H; Shen Q; Berkowitz DB, Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 928–936; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zheng W; Schwarzer D; LeBeau A; Weller JL; Klein DC; Cole PA, J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 10462–10467; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Higashimoto Y; Saito S. i.; Tong X-H; Hong A; Sakaguchi K; Appella E; Anderson CW, J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 23199–23203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).(a) Berkowitz DB; Eggen M; Shen Q; Shoemaker RK, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4666–4675; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Chen H-X; Kang J; Chang R; Zhang Y-L; Duan H-Z; Li Y-M; Chen Y-X, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3278–3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).(a) Lu CHS; Liu K; Tan LP; Yao SQ, Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 28–39; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Yun S-M; Moulaei T; Lim D; Bang JK; Park J-E; Shenoy SR; Liu F; Kang YH; Liao C; Soung N-K; Lee S; Yoon D-Y; Lim Y; Lee D-H; Otaka A; Appella E; McMahon JB; Nicklaus MC; Burke TR Jr.; Yaffe MB; Wlodawer A; Lee KS, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 876–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Groves MR; Yao Z-J; Roller PP; Burke TR Jr.; Barford D, Biochemistry 1998, 37, 17773–17783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Liao H; Pei D, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 9595–9598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Stirtan WG; Withers SG, Biochemistry 1996, 35, 15057–15064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Garvey EP; Lowen GT; Almond MR, Biochemistry 1998, 37, 9043–9051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Matulic-Adamic J; Haeberli P; Usman N, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2563–2569. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).(a) Zhang J; Lambert E; Xu Z-F; Brioche J; Remy P; Piettre SR, J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 5245–5260; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pfund E; Dupouy C; Rouanet S; Legay R; Lebargy C; Vasseur J-J; Lequeux T, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4803–4807; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Arangundy-Franklin S; Taylor AI; Porebski BT; Genna V; Peak-Chew S; Vaisman A; Woodgate R; Orozco M; Holliger P, Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 533–542; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Liu C; Cozens C; Jaziri F; Rozenski J; Marechal A; Dumbre S; Pezo V; Marliere P; Pinheiro VB; Groaz E; Herdewijn P, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6690–6699; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Pomeisl K; Beier P; Pohl R; Krecmerova M, ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 2102–2106; [Google Scholar]; (f) Prakash TP; Lima WF; Murray HM; Li W; Kinberger GA; Chappell AE; Gaus H; Seth PP; Bhat B; Crooke ST; Swayze EE, Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 2993–3011; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; () Shen GH; Hong JH, Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2014, 33, 1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).(a) Bartee D; Wheadon MJ; Freel Meyers CL, J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9580–9591; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cocaud C; Nicolas C; Poisson T; Pannecoucke X; Legault CY; Martin OR, J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 2753–2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Forget SM; Bhattasali D; Hart VC; Cameron TS; Syvitski RT; Jakeman DL, Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 1866–1878. [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Cocaud C; Zheng RB; Lowary TL; Poisson T; Pannecoucke X; Nicolas C; Martin OR, Carbohydr. Res. 2018, 461, 45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Berkowitz DB; Bose M; Pfannenstiel TJ; Doukov T, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4498–4508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Baxter NJ; Bowler MW; Alizadeh T; Cliff MJ; Hounslow AM; Wu B; Berkowitz DB; Williams NH; Blackburn GM; Waltho JP, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 4555–4560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).(a) Prasad VP; Wagner S; Keul P; Hermann S; Levkau B; Schaefers M; Haufe G, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 5168–5181; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nikitopoulou I; Kaffe E; Sevastou I; Sirioti I; Samiotaki M; Madan D; Prestwich GD; Aidinis V, PLoS One 2013, 8, e70941; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jiang G; Xu Y; Fujiwara Y; Tsukahara T; Tsukahara R; Gajewiak J; Tigyi G; Prestwich GD, ChemMedChem 2007, 2, 679–690; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhang H; Xu Y; Zhang Z; Liman ER; Prestwich GD, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5642–5643; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhang H; Tsukuhara R; Tigyi G; Prestwich GD, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6061–6066; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Xu Y; Lee SA; Kutateladze TG; Sbrissa D; Shisheva A; Prestwich GD, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 885–897; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Xu Y; Aoki J; Shimizu K; Umezu-Goto M; Hama K; Takanezawa Y; Yu S; Mills GB; Arai H; Qian L; Prestwich GD, J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3319–3327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Xu Y; Prestwich GD, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4021–4024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).(a) Berkowitz DB; Sloss DG, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7047–50; [Google Scholar]; (b) Shen QR; Sloss DG; Berkowitz DB, Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 1519–1530; [Google Scholar]; (c) Berkowitz DB; Shen QR; Maeng JH, Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6445–6448; [Google Scholar]; d Berkowitz DB; Eggen M; Shen Q; Sloss DG, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6174–6176. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).(a) Panigrahi K; Applegate GA; Malik G; Berkowitz DB, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3600–3609; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Martin SF; Dean DW; Wagman AS, Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1839–1842. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Lequeux TP; Percy JM, J. C. S., Chem. Commun. 1995, 2111–2112. [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Yang ZY; Burton DJ, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4676–4683. [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Lequeux TP; Percy JM, Synlett 1995, 361–362. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).(a) Yin G; Zhu M; Yang G; Wang X; Fu W, J. Fluorine Chem. 2016, 191, 63–69; [Google Scholar]; (b) Xia X-F; Zhu S-L; Li Y; Wang H, RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 51703–51709; [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhu M; Fu W; Zou G; Xu C; Wang Z, J. Fluorine Chem. 2015, 180, 1–6; [Google Scholar]; (d) De Schutter C; Pfund E; Lequeux T, Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 5920–5926; [Google Scholar]; (e) Lequeux T; Lebouc F; Lopin C; Yang H; Gouhier G; Piettre SR, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 185–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).(a) Singsardar M; Mondal S; Laru S; Hajra A, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5606–5610; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu D; Jiao M-J; Wang X-Z; Xu P-F, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4745–4749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Lebargy C; De Schutter C; Legay R; Pfund E; Lequeux T, Synlett 2018, 29, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Kamber M; Just G, Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 823–827. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).(a) McKenna CE; Schmidhauser J, J. C. S., Chem. Commun. 1979, 739; [Google Scholar]; (b) McKenna CE; Higa MT; Cheung NH; McKenna MC, Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Rabinowitz R, J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2975–2978. [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Ho T-L; Olah GA, Angew. Chem. 1976, 88, 847. [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Jung MF; Lyster MA, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 968–969. [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Blackburn GM; Ingleson D, J. C. S., Chem. Commun. 1978, 870–871. [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Hata T; Yamada K; Futatsugi T; Sekine M, Synthesis 1979, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  • (42).(a) Piettre SR; Raboisson P, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2229–2232; [Google Scholar]; (b) Gordeev MF; Patel DV; Barker PL; Gordon EM, Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7585–7588; [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang MF; Crilley MML; Golding BT; McInally T; Robinson DH; Tinker A, J. C. S., Chem. Commun. 1991, 667–668. [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Berkowitz DB; Bhuniya D; Peris G, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1869–1872. [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Barton DHR; McCombie SW, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin 1 1975, 1574–1585. [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Barton DHR; Jaszberenyi JC, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2619–2622. [Google Scholar]
  • (46).(a) Tanaka S; Kitamura M, e-EROS Encycl. Reagents Org. Synth. 2010, 1–3; [Google Scholar]; (b) Tanaka S; Saburi H; Murase T; Ishibashi Y; Kitamura M, J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 295–298; [Google Scholar]; (c) Tanaka S; Saburi H; Kitamura M, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 375–378; [Google Scholar]; (d) Tanaka S; Saburi H; Ishibashi Y; Kitamura M, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1873–1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Fux A; Pfanzelt M; Kirsch VC; Hoegl A; Sieber SA, Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 1461–1468 e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).(a) Barragan-Montero V; Awwad A; Combemale S; de Santa Barbara P; Jover B; Moles J-P; Montero J-L, ChemMedChem 2011, 6, 1771–1774; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Clavel C; Barragan-Montero V; Garric X; Moles J-P; Montero J-L, Farmaco 2005, 60, 721–725; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Khanjin NA; Montero J-L, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4017–4020; [Google Scholar]; (d) Barragan V; Menger FM; Caran KL; Vidil C; Morere A; Montero J-L, Chem. Commun. 2001, 85–86. [Google Scholar]
  • (49).(a) Fei X; Zavorka ME; Malik G; Connelly CM; MacDonald RG; Berkowitz DB, Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4267–4270; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fei X; Connelly CM; MacDonald RG; Berkowitz DB, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 3085–3089; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Berkowitz DB; Maiti G; Charette BD; Dreis CD; MacDonald RG, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4921–4924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).(a) Kobzar OL; Shevchuk MV; Lyashenko AN; Tanchuk VY; Romanenko VD; Kobelev SM; Averin AD; Beletskaya IP; Vovk AI; Kukhar VP, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 7437–7444; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang S; Zhang Z-Y, Drug Discovery Today 2007, 12, 373–381; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nichols AJ; Mashal RD; Balkan B, Drug Dev. Res. 2006, 67, 559–566; [Google Scholar]; () Shen K; Keng Y-F; Wu L; Guo X-L; Lawrence DS; Zhang Z-Y, J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 47311–47319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Moretto AF; Kirincich SJ; Xu WX; Smith MJ; Wan ZK; Wilson DP; Follows BC; Binnun E; Joseph-McCarthy D; Foreman K; Erbe DV; Zhang YL; Tam SK; Tam SY; Lee J, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 2162–2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Trott O; Olson AJ, J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI file

RESOURCES