Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Apr 17;17(4):e82431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82431

A Case of Low T1 Mapping Values in Myocardial Calcifications in a Patient With End-Stage Renal Disease

Ahmed Abdelmonem 1, Ahmed S Negm 1, Subhi Al'Aref 2, Kedar Jambhekar 1,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12085066  PMID: 40385786

Abstract

Cardiac MRI is the gold standard in diagnosing many cardiac pathologies. T1 mapping, a novel cardiac MRI sequence, provides precise assessment and characterization of myocardial tissue. Low T1 values have been reported in specific entities, including Fabry disease and iron overload.

We report a case of decreased T1 values with diffuse myocardial calcifications in a 24-year-old female with end-stage renal disease. This case provides valuable new insights into T1 mapping, particularly regarding the association between myocardial calcifications and low T1 values, a connection that has only been reported in a single prior study.

Keywords: cardiac mri, diffuse myocardial calcifications, end-stage renal disease (esrd), t1 mapping, tissue characterization

Introduction

Cardiac MRI is an invaluable tool in evaluating myocardial diseases [1]. T1 mapping is a relatively newer sequence that can help diagnose certain myocardial pathologies. This is performed by measuring the tissue spin-lattice or longitudinal relaxation time and presenting it on a parametric map. This sequence has attracted considerable attention [2,3].

Elevated T1 values have been instrumental in the diagnosis of conditions such as myocardial fibrosis, amyloidosis, and myocarditis. Conversely, low T1 values have been linked to very few conditions such as iron deposition disease, Fabry disease, and fat deposition [4-9].

We present the case of a young female with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who underwent a cardiac MRI to evaluate for myocarditis. Incidental note was made of low T1 values, which corresponded to diffuse myocardial calcifications when compared with a non-contrast chest CT. To our knowledge, myocardial calcifications have only been previously reported once as a cause of low T1 mapping values in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia. Furthermore, ESRD is generally associated with elevated myocardial T1 values due to an increased incidence of myocardial fibrosis [10]. However, in our case, the findings were contrary to this expectation.

Case presentation

A 24-year-old female with ESRD who was undergoing evaluation for renal transplantation presented with acute shortness of breath and hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary edema in ESRD. Echocardiography revealed a decreased ejection fraction from 35-40% to 20%. A cardiac MRI was performed for suspected myocarditis. Contrast was not administered due to the patient’s renal status. T1 maps were conducted to evaluate the myocardium, which revealed decreased T1 times. On reviewing earlier CTs (Figures 1, 2), it was noted that the patient had diffuse myocardial calcifications related to her ESRD (Figure 3).

Figure 1. Non-contrast axial CT of the chest showing significant cardiomegaly with diffuse hyperdense calcifications in the left ventricular myocardium. Bilateral pleural effusions (more profound on the right) are also seen.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Cardiac CT with short-axis views showing diffuse hyperdense calcifications in the left ventricular myocardium. Pleural effusion is also seen.

Figure 2

Figure 3. CT of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrating atrophic kidneys, consistent with the patient’s diagnosis of end-stage renal disease.

Figure 3

Several months later, the patient presented with acute shortness of breath and hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary edema in ESRD. Echocardiography revealed a decreased ejection fraction from 35-40% to 20%. Myocarditis was suspected; hence, a non-contrast cardiac MRI was performed (Figure 4). T1 maps were conducted to evaluate the myocardium, which incidentally revealed decreased T1 times (Figure 5). On reviewing earlier CTs, it was noted that the patient has diffuse calcifications of her myocardium related to her ESRD. The patient did not have iron overload, Fabry disease, or any other conditions that could account for the low T1 values on cardiac MRI.

Figure 4. Cardiac MRI with short-axis imaging demonstrating hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall.

Figure 4

Figure 5. T1 parametric map demonstrating diffuse low T1 values corresponding to the diffuse hyperdensity seen on the CT.

Figure 5

Discussion

Cardiac MRI offers various sequences for differentiating between cardiac abnormalities. Black blood sequences evaluate anatomy and identify mediastinal and pericardial abnormalities; bright blood sequences assess motion, valvular diseases, and flow; and contrast-enhanced sequences provide detailed insights into myocardial conditions [11].

T1 mapping has recently gained popularity. It is a cardiac MRI technique that measures the spin-lattice or longitudinal relaxation time of tissues and displays it on a parametric map. Current T1 mapping techniques refined from the original look-locker method offer greater efficiency and accuracy. The modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) technique, introduced in 2004, uses electrocardiogram (ECG) gating and optimized delays to fit a T1 recovery curve within a 17-heartbeat breath hold. The shortened modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (ShMOLLI), introduced in 2010, further enhanced clinical applicability by reducing breath-hold times, eliminating heart rate dependency, and providing flexibility in estimating a wide range of T1 values, including assessments of edematous tissues and extracellular volume [12,13].

Increased T1 values have been used to describe various pathologies such as cardiac fibrosis, amyloidosis, and myocarditis. Conversely, low T1 values have been associated with other pathologies, such as iron deposition, Fabry disease, and fat deposition. In healthy individuals, normal native T1 time at 1.5T is around 970, with a range of 885-1,073. At 3T, the MOLLI technique has a mean native T1 time at around 1,100, with a range of 964-1,290. However, the T1 times are magnet and institution-specific. At our institution with a 1.5T magnet, our average normal T1 times range from 990 to 1,080. Our patient had a low T1 of 850, which was significantly lower than normal and corresponded to diffuse myocardial calcifications [14,15].

Although rare, myocardial calcification can have severe cardiac consequences. It can lead to increased morbidity and mortality due to chamber dilatation, arrhythmia, and valvular dysfunction [16]. Myocardial calcification can result from various etiologies, with dystrophic calcifications manifesting after myocardial infarction being the most common. Less common causes include metastatic calcifications, which can occur in ESRD and are usually associated with abnormal calcium metabolism [17].

A review of the literature reveals that myocardial calcification has been mentioned only once as a contributor to low T1 values in T1 mapping in a case report by Nijjar and Okasha [18], who described acute myocardial calcifications in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia. In contrast, ESRD typically results in elevated native T1 values, indicating higher levels of myocardial fibrosis. Our case, however, stands out as an exception, demonstrating low T1 values attributable to calcifications.

Conclusions

Our case supports the notion that myocardial calcifications can be a potential cause of low T1 values, which can be readily confirmed with a non-contrast chest CT. Additionally, it highlights an exception to the typical pattern in patients with ESRD, who generally exhibit high native T1 values due to myocardial fibrosis.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Ahmed S. Negm, Ahmed Abdelmonem, Kedar Jambhekar

Drafting of the manuscript:  Ahmed S. Negm, Ahmed Abdelmonem

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Ahmed S. Negm, Ahmed Abdelmonem, Subhi Al'Aref, Kedar Jambhekar

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Subhi Al'Aref, Kedar Jambhekar

Supervision:  Kedar Jambhekar

References

  • 1.T1 Mapping in cardiomyopathy at cardiac MR: comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Sibley CT, Noureldin RA, Gai N, et al. Radiology. 2012;265:724–732. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.State of the art: clinical applications of cardiac T1 mapping. Schelbert EB, Messroghli DR. Radiology. 2016;278:658–676. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016141802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement. Moon JC, Messroghli DR, Kellman P, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:92. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall'Armellina E, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Pedersen SF, Thrysøe SA, Robich MP, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:59. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Noncontrast magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Baggiano A, Boldrini M, Martinez-Naharro A, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T1 mapping in Anderson-Fabry disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ponsiglione A, Gambardella M, Green R, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24:31. doi: 10.1186/s12968-022-00859-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iron overload cardiomyopathy: better understanding of an increasing disorder. Gujja P, Rosing DR, Tripodi DJ, Shizukuda Y. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1001–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Defining myocardial tissue abnormalities in end-stage renal failure with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using native T1 mapping. Rutherford E, Talle MA, Mangion K, et al. Kidney Int. 2016;90:845–852. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cardiovascular MR imaging: technique optimization and detection of disease in clinical practice. Gaba RC, Carlos RC, Weadock WJ, Reddy GP, Sneider MB, Cascade PN. Radiographics. 2002;22:0. doi: 10.1148/rg.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.T1 mapping: basic techniques and clinical applications. Taylor AJ, Salerno M, Dharmakumar R, Jerosch-Herold M. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.State-of-the-art review: stress T1 mapping-technical considerations, pitfalls and emerging clinical applications. Piechnik SK, Neubauer S, Ferreira VM. MAGMA. 2018;31:131–141. doi: 10.1007/s10334-017-0649-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cardiac T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review. Haaf P, Garg P, Messroghli DR, Broadbent DA, Greenwood JP, Plein S. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:89. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update. Kawel-Boehm N, Hetzel SJ, Ambale-Venkatesh B, et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020;22:87. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Myocardial calcinosis in chronic renal failure. Kempf AE, Momeni MG, Saremi F. J Radiol Case Rep. 2009;3:16–19. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v3i2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rapid onset development of myocardial calcifications in the setting of renal failure and sepsis. Li J, Chelala L, Hossain R, Jeudy J, White C. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021;3:0. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial calcification. Nijjar PS, Okasha O. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20:371. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES