Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2025 May 12;14:294. Originally published 2025 Mar 14. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.162699.2

Head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Case series of extensive resections and reconstructions with literature review

Skander Kedous 1, Ameni Amri 1,a, Alia Methnani 1, Yasmine Fertani 2, Amira Gallas 2, Rim Braham 1, Mohamed Dhaha 1, Souhail Jbali 1, Sawssen Dhembri 1
PMCID: PMC12086507  PMID: 40391055

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

As recommended by the reviewers, the latter version contains a more detailed explanation of role of radiotherapy in the decision making for these cases within the multidisciplinary team. Furthermore, the term "jugal" has been replaced with "cheek". As for the discussion, separate paragraphs have been clearly defined. Lastly, we finished the manuscript with concise conclusions.

Abstract

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare, locally aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma. Head and neck involvement accounts for only 10–15% of cases. Achieving clear margins in this region is challenging owing to anatomical constraints. Such cases often require extensive resection and complex reconstructions. This study presents a case series of extensive dermatofibrosarcoma resections in the head and neck, focusing on the surgical margins, reconstruction strategies, recurrence rates, and adjuvant therapy. We report four cases of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma involving the cheek and scalp. Surgery included wide local excision with margins of 3–5 cm, which was confirmed intraoperatively by frozen section analysis. Reconstruction involved free flaps, local flaps, and healing with secondary intention. The choice depends on the defect size and location. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to selected cases. All patients achieved negative margins. One patient developed flap necrosis that required revision surgery. No local recurrence was observed during the follow-up (1–7 years). Head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma justifies aggressive surgical resection to achieve clear margins, which is the key to reducing the risk of recurrence. Free flaps and local reconstruction techniques ensure good functional and aesthetic outcomes. Adjuvant radiotherapy is indicated in patients with close margins or deep invasion. Long-term follow-up is essential owing to its high recurrence potential.

Keywords: adjuvant radiotherapy, dermatofibrosarcoma, free flap, head and neck, reconstruction

Introduction

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare aggressive soft tissue sarcoma. It arises from the dermis and slowly invades the subcutaneous tissues. DFSP often exhibits high recurrence rates owing to its infiltrative nature. Head and neck involvement is uncommon, accounting for 10–15% of cases. 1, 2 These regions present surgical challenges owing to their functional and aesthetic obligations. The key treatment is wide local excision with margins of at least 2–3 cm. 3 Reconstructive approaches vary based on the defect size and location. Options range from local flaps to free tissue transfer. 4 In addition to presenting a case series of four patients with head and neck DFSP, we reviewed the literature to highlight the current evidence on surgical management, reconstructive strategies, recurrence risk, and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Case reports

Case 1

A 32-year-old male presented with a progressively enlarging painless nodule on his left cheek over the past year. The patient had no significant medical history. Clinical examination revealed a firm, dermo-hypodermic mass measuring approximately 5 cm, with poorly defined borders and a 1 cm satellite lesion in the zygomatic area ( Figure 1A). There were no overlying buccal mucosal abnormalities or cervical lymphadenopathies. MRI revealed a subcutaneous left cheek tumor (30 × 24 × 30 mm) extending to the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus without clear signs of invasion. A biopsy confirmed DFSP, which was supported by CD34 positivity. The patient underwent tumor excision with 1-3 cm margins, which was confirmed intraoperatively by frozen section analysis. The resection margins extended deeply to the zygomatic bone, maxilla, and masseter muscle, medially to the nasal bones and left alar cartilage, which was resected with 1 cm margins ( Figure 1B, 1D). The infraorbital nerve was resected, with a frozen section margin assessment at the level of its entrance into the infraorbital foramen, which was found to be healthy ( Figure 1C). The defect was reconstructed using a radial forearm free flap ( Figure 1E). Vascular anastomosis was performed between the radial artery and the facial artery and between the cephalic vein and the facial vein. The reconstruction of the alar subunit was performed as the second step. Histopathology confirmed negative surgical margins, with a deep margin of 5 mm and no evidence of perineural or vascular invasion. Given the close deep margin and the involvement of critical anatomical structures such as the maxilla and zygomatic bone, the case was discussed at our multidisciplinary tumor board. The team included head and neck surgeons, radiation oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists. While margins were negative, the deep proximity to bone and muscle raised concerns about microscopic residual disease. The consensus was to recommend adjuvant radiotherapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence, particularly in light of the tumor’s size and anatomic depth. The patient remained disease-free after eight months of follow-up ( Figure 1F).

Figure 1. Five centimeters dermo-hypodermic mass with poorly defined borders and a 1 cm satellite lesion in the zygomatic area (white arrow) (A). Primary definition of operating margins (B). Identification of infraorbital nerve and infraorbital canal (black asterisk) (C). Final defect after tumor removal (D) Right forearm flap harvesting (E). Flap appearance at 40 days postoperatively (F).


Figure 1.

Case 2

A 40-year-old male patient presented with a rapidly enlarging subcutaneous mass in the right cheek. Clinical examination revealed a firm right cheek mass extending towards the right zygomatic region and infraorbital tissues ( Figure 2A). There was no orbital or intraoral involvement. Biopsy confirmed DFSP. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 6 cm poorly defined soft tissue mass, highly vascularized, infiltrating the buccinator, orbicularis oris, zygomaticus muscles, and nasogenian region. Resection involved the right infraorbital and lower palpebral regions, with margins extending to the right oral mucosa ( Figure 2B). A free anterolateral thigh flap was harvested for defect coverage, with microvascular anastomosis to the facial pedicle ( Figure 2C). Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of DFSP. The resection margins were clear, with a lateral safety margin of 4 mm and deep margin of 1 mm. Postoperatively, the patient developed partial flap necrosis and vascular pedicle thrombosis. During the revision surgery, the inferior thyroid artery was used as the recipient vessel for microvascular anastomosis. Although the margins were technically negative, the deep margin was only 1 mm, raising concern for possible microscopic residual disease. The case was presented at the multidisciplinary tumor board, which included surgeons, radiation oncologists, and pathologists. Considering the tumor’s infiltrative nature, its extensive muscular involvement, and the very narrow deep margin, the consensus was to proceed with adjuvant radiotherapy to optimize local control and reduce recurrence risk. Adjuvant radiotherapy (54 Gy) was administered. The patient experienced ectropion of the right lower eyelid and retraction of the right labial commissure, secondary to flap contraction ( Figure 2D). The patient underwent corrective surgery for ectropion and Z-plasty of the oral commissure. A follow-up MRI showed no evidence of recurrence. The patient has remained disease-free for six years.

Figure 2. Six centimeters poorly defined mass of the right cheek (A). Large facial defect of soft tissue (B). Result of the reconstruction with antero-lateral thigh flap five days after second surgery (C). Retraction of the flap after radiation, photography taken at 6 months postoperatively (D).


Figure 2.

Case 3

A 68-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with a one-year history of progressive enlargement and painless swelling of the right cheek. Clinical examination revealed a firm, mobile, non-ulcerated mass, measuring 4 cm in diameter. Mucosal or bony involvement was not observed. The overlying skin exhibited mild inflammation. Imaging confirmed a subcutaneous mass opposite the right mandibular ramus, without bony invasion. No signs of distant metastasis were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a well-defined lesion with heterogeneous enhancement. Incisional biopsy revealed proliferation of spindle-shaped cells arranged in a “woven basket” pattern, confirming DFSP. Immunohistochemistry results were positive for CD34. The patient underwent tumor excision with wide margins of 2-3 cm including the underlying oral mucosa ( Figure 3A, B). Perioperative frozen sections of the margins were clear. Defect reconstruction was performed by using a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. The skin covered the mucosal defect, whereas the muscular side provided coverage of the outer surface ( Figure 3C). The postoperative course was uneventful. The outer surface of the flap epithelialized over time ( Figure 3D). Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis, showing the proliferation of spindle cells with mild atypia. The tumor margins were tumor-free. This case was discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting. Given the wide surgical margins (2–3 cm), the absence of deep structure involvement or high-risk features (such as fibrosarcomatous transformation or perineural invasion), and the low-grade histopathological appearance, the consensus was not to recommend adjuvant radiotherapy. The team agreed that surgical management alone was sufficient, and that the risk of recurrence was acceptably low. No recurrence was observed during the one-year follow-up period.

Figure 3. Intraoperative appearance of the tumor before surgical excision (A). Resulting skin and soft tissue defect including underlying mucosa (B). Appearance of pectoralis major flap with the muscular surface on the outside (C). Epithelization of the muscular surface 10 months postoperatively (D).


Figure 3.

Case 4

A 33-year-old male presented with a firm, slow-growing, and non-tender scalp mass that had evolved over several years. Clinical examination revealed a poorly defined, indurated tumor formed by a 3.5 cm main lesion surrounded by several satellite lesions extending from the right frontal to the temporal and parietal regions, reaching 2 cm above the insertion of the helix ( Figure 4A). CT and MRI revealed a lobulated subcutaneous mass measuring 6 cm × 3 cm. Bone invasion and intracranial extension were not observed. The patient underwent wide local excision with 3-4 cm margins, including the pericranium, resulting in a final defect extending from the frontal to parieto-occipital region ( Figure 4B). Multiple frozen section analyses confirmed the presence of clear margins. The surgical defect healed by secondary intention, and a thin skin graft was not necessary in this particular case ( Figure 4C, D). The pathology report confirmed the diagnosis, with clear margins, particularly the deep ones. This case was reviewed by the multidisciplinary tumor board. Given the large excision with 3–4 cm clinical margins, the absence of pericranial or bony involvement, and histologically confirmed clear margins, especially deep, the team agreed that adjuvant radiotherapy was not necessary. The expected benefit in local control was deemed minimal in comparison to the morbidity of radiation in this location. The patient was offered secondary skin expansion of the scalp to guarantee capillary coverage; however, he refused. The patient remained recurrence-free at the 7-year follow-up.

Figure 4. Main tumor surrounded by several satellite lesions, extending from the right frontal to the temporal and parietal regions (A). Scalp defect including the pericranium (B). Progression of the secondary intension healing process at 15 (C) and 60 days (D).


Figure 4.

Discussion

DFSP is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma. Although slow-growing, this malignancy is locally aggressive. It accounts for approximately 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Head and neck involvement is rare, accounting for only 10-15% of cases.

In contrast to its exceptional metastatic potential, DFSP is characterized by a high tendency for local recurrence. This risk underscores the importance of achieving adequate surgical margins. 5 The recurrence rate depends widely on the anatomical location and type of treatment for these tumors. In fact, involvement of the head and neck is associated with a recurrence rate of 30-50%. This rate is particularly alarming, as it is higher than those observed in other anatomical regions. Furthermore, this risk increases in cases with deep local extension, such as involvement of the periosteum, muscle, or bone. 6

When it comes to molecular and genetic characteristics, DFSP is characterized by the COL1A1-PDGFB fusion gene. This alteration results in the constitutive activation of the PDGFRB pathway. This phenomenon is the direct mechanism underlying uncontrolled fibroblast proliferation. 6 The identification of this particular genetic alteration is a key diagnostic marker for managing these cases. This has led to the development of targeted therapies, such as imatinib. Targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic DFSP by targeting PDGFRB. In fact, tumor regression under imatinib has been documented to be up to 70%, allowing delayed surgical excision in some cases. However, discontinuation of imatinib may lead to recurrence, which is why long-term follow-up is crucial. 2 , 7 DFSP with fibrosarcomatous transformation (DFSP-FS) is a challenging procedure. This variant is associated with higher mitotic activity, increased cellular atypia, and a major risk of distant metastasis than conventional DFSP. This variant accounts for approximately 10-15% of all DFSP cases. The reported metastatic rate is as high as 16%. 8 Distant secondary lesions commonly affect the lungs. 2, 9, 10

Regarding clinical presentation, DFSP of the head and neck, particularly in the early stages, can be misdiagnosed as a benign lesion. Typically, the tumor presents as a slow-growing, painless mass on the skin. Over several months or even years, the lesion turned into firm, reddish-brown, or violaceous nodules or plaques. Along with their slow-growing character, DFSP lesions can enter fast-growing phases, stimulating patients to consult. 4, 5 Facial and scalp involvement was associated with an infiltrative extension pattern. This feature increases the potential for invasion into deep structures, such as the periosteum, muscle, or even bone, which increases the risk of recurrence. 11 Another recurrence factor was dimension. Large tumors (>5 cm) were associated with a higher recurrence rate. The risk increases even more when the tumor involves areas in which wide surgical margins are difficult to achieve. The American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society has adopted a staging system for DSFP, which has also been adopted by the German Guidelines. Low-grade intra-compartmental lesions were classified as IA. When these low-grade tumors exhibit extra-compartmental extension into the underlying fascia or muscle, they are staged as IB. 12, 13

In establishing the diagnosis of DFSP, evaluation relies on a combination of histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and imaging studies. Histologically, DFSP exhibits a typical storiform or whorled pattern of spindle cells invading the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The tumor cells were CD34-positive and negative for desmin, SMA, and S100. These features are key to distinguishing DFSP from other spindle cell neoplasms. 3, 14

Regarding imaging, a study on MRI findings in DFSP revealed that T2 hyperintensity and marked enhancement are almost universal features in these lesions. 15

Ophthalmologic DFSP is a rare entity with a limited number of reported cases. A systematic review of the literature on the ophthalmologic aspects of DFSP highlights its rarity in the orbital and periorbital regions, with only a few reported cases. DFSP in this location often presents as a painless firm mass, sometimes causing proptosis, diplopia, or nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Most cases are treated with wide local excision or enbloc resection, aiming for clear margins while preserving ocular function. In more advanced cases with orbital invasion, orbital exenteration is performed, sometimes combined with dacryocystectomy for lacrimal sac involvement.

Mohs micrographic surgery has occasionally been utilized to minimize the risk of recurrence. 16 For cases with close or positive margins and when further surgical resection is not feasible, adjuvant radiotherapy with IMRT has been suggested. Even after negative-margin resection, periorbital DFSP has shown recurrence. This highlights the importance of a long-term follow-up. 17

Due to the thin nature of soft tissues and their proximity to the skull, scalp involvement is challenging. The recurrence rate for scalp DFSP was significantly higher than that for other anatomical locations. This rate is reported to be 50-75%. Unlike the trunk, scalp DFSP often justifies aggressive wide resection. In such cases, treatment includes periosteal and bony excision. A literature review of 74 scalp DFSP cases with skull involvement revealed that periosteal invasion was reported in nearly all cases that required wide excision. Skull invasion was documented in five cases, requiring margins of at least 20 mm into the bone to achieve local control. However, intracranial extension was an exception, with only 17 reported cases. Most intracranial involvements are due to inadequate initial resection. When tumor invasion is limited to the periosteum, literature suggests that dermal resection with periosteal removal is an effective strategy for local control. However, if skull involvement is confirmed, marginal bone resection at least 20 mm from the tumor edge is recommended to ensure negative margins. 18

Another exceedingly rare location is the oral DFSP, accounting for less than 5% of all head and neck cases. The most affected area is the buccal mucosa; however, cases have also been reported in the lip and gingiva. Owing to the limited tissue availability and functional constraints, it is challenging to achieve clear surgical margins in the oral cavity. Martinez et al. reported a case of DFSP of the buccal mucosa where initial margins were positive after an initial wide excision, requiring an additional 20 mm re-excision. A review of five intraoral DFSP cases reported that excision margins varied from 15 to 20 mm, with no documented recurrences. However, the long-term follow-up findings remain limited. Reconstruction in oral cases can be performed by using either local or free flaps. The Chinese flap is a common option because of its pliability and vascularity. 19

In other locations, lesions exceeding 10 cm in diameter have been associated with major recurrence rates, particularly when located on the scalp or face. Large DFSP lesions exhibit an aggressive behavior. These can be associated with deep tissue invasion, ulceration, and increased risk of metastasis. Therefore, to minimize the risk of recurrence, wide local excision with margins > 2 cm is recommended for large, high-risk tumors. When skull involvement is confirmed, periosteal resection and potential craniectomy are crucial. 10 For aggressive extensions, when surgery is not feasible, or in cases of residual microscopic disease, adjuvant therapy, including radiotherapy and targeted therapy (imatinib), may be considered. The gold standard treatment for DFSP, particularly in the head and neck, requires wide local excision with 2–5 cm margins to reduce the risk of recurrence. 20 Established recurrence risk factors are dominated by margins <2 cm, as they are associated with recurrence rates of up to 60%. 5 In contrast, surgical margins >3 cm reduce recurrence rates to < 10%. 20 Hence, when the pathology confirms positive or close (<1 mm) margins, re-excision is strongly recommended. When it comes to periosteal and deep margin considerations, frozen section analysis can be used intraoperatively to assess the margin clearance. However, its reliability is debatable because of DFSP’s infiltrative growth pattern of DFSP. For challenging scalp DFSP cases, slow Mohs surgery is an effective alternative to preserve healthy tissue while ensuring oncologic control. 21 The aim of Mohs micrographic surgery is to reduce the recurrence rates. This technique facilitates precise excision of DFSP by enabling comprehensive margin evaluation through enface sectioning. A study by Tom et al. demonstrated that Mohs surgery, when combined with inverted horizontal paraffin sectioning, improves tumor clearance compared to frozen-section techniques, as residual tumor was identified in 78% of cases despite initial frozen-section negativity. 22

Radiotherapy is an option reserved for cases where further surgery is not feasible or when fibrosarcomatous transformation is identified, thereby increasing the risk of recurrence. 23

Tissue expansion is frequently used in scalp reconstructions. This technique allows for single-stage reconstruction and reduces the need for free tissue transfer. For cases in which initial defect coverage is required, post-resection expansion can be performed before final aesthetic refinement. 24

As for the lower face and cervical involvement, the deltopectoral and parascapular flaps were expanded preoperatively. This option facilitates soft tissue coverage while preserving function. However, large scalp defects frequently require a multistage reconstruction approach with serial expansion techniques, followed by definitive local tissue advancement. 25 In cases where tissue conditions are suboptimal, healing by secondary intention can be considered. This allows the formation of granulation tissue before grafting or flap reconstruction. These techniques are interesting as they ensure optimal oncologic and functional outcomes, especially when reconstruction is not feasible owing to limited vascularity for flap or graft repair. 26 A review of the literature highlights the anterolateral thigh flap as a preferred reconstructive option for large DFSP defects in the head and neck. 27 Studies emphasize its relevance when local flaps are insufficient owing to extensive tissue loss or the need for aesthetic preservation. This flap not only provides ample soft tissue coverage but also maintains functional outcomes and minimizes donor-site morbidity. Compared with the radial forearm free flap or pectoralis major flap, this flap offers better contouring with fewer complications, making it particularly valuable for full-thickness defects. Additionally, literature reviews have highlighted its role in maintaining distinct facial aesthetic subunits. Given the adaptability and reliable vascular anatomy of this flap, it remains a leading choice for the reconstruction of large DFSP excision defects. 27, 28

Surface mold brachytherapy is a targeted radiotherapy technique utilized in scalp cases with recurrence risk factors, or when pathological confirmation of positive or close margins and re-excision is not possible. 23 This technique is characterized by its precision and conformity. In fact, it delivers high-dose radiation to the tumor bed while sparing the adjacent healthy tissues. This particularity reduces toxicity compared to external beam radiation therapy. In addition, long-term local control and minimal side effects. 23

Conclusions

DFSP of the head and neck poses significant surgical and reconstructive challenges. This malignancy is characterized by its locally aggressive nature and high recurrence risk. Wide excision with histologically confirmed clear margins remains the essential element of treatment. Given the anatomical constraints, reconstructive strategies, including free and local flaps, optimize functional and aesthetic recovery. Adjuvant treatment is recommended in cases of close margins or deep invasion to reduce recurrence risk. However, recurrence can occur even years after initial treatment. Hence, long-term follow-up is crucial.

Consent

Written informed consent for the publication of the case reports and of the associated images was obtained from each of the patients prior to submission.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

References

  • 1. Kanesen D, Zakaria Z, Ch’ng ES, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp: therapeutic challenges. ANZ J. Surg. mars 2019;89(3):261–264. 10.1111/ans.14040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kim CM, Park TJ, Kim BY, et al. : Recurrent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Scalp in a Distant Location 10 Years after Primary Excision. Ann. Dermatol. avr 2018;30(2):226–228. 10.5021/ad.2018.30.2.226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rahman T, Das A, Boro S, et al. : Giant dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans head and neck: a diagnostic dilemma. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. juin 2023;75(2):991–995. 10.1007/s12070-022-03274-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Metgudmath RB, Metgudmath AR, Das AT, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Face: A Rare Entity and Review of Literature. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. déc 2022;74(Suppl 3):5469–5472. 10.1007/s12070-021-02790-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mark RJ, Bailet JW, Tran LM, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck. A report of 16 cases. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. août 1993;119(8):891–896. 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880200097014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dai Z, He Y, Zhang X, et al. : Head-and-neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Survival analysis and Clinically relevant immunohistochemical indicators. Oral Dis. avr 2024;30(3):1040–1051. 10.1111/odi.14495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mani S, Kumar R, Kakkar A, et al. : Recurrent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of the Head and Neck: a Case Series. Indian J. Surg. Oncol. mars 2023;14(1):128–136. 10.1007/s13193-022-01636-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Angouridakis N, Kafas P, Jerjes W, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation of the head and neck. Head Neck Oncol. 4 févr 2011;3:5. 10.1186/1758-3284-3-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Uematsu Y, Fukai J, Tamura M, et al. : Distant metastasis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp--case report. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). oct 2003;43(10):493–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gatlin JL, Hosch R, Khan M: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp with fibrosarcomatous degeneration and pulmonary metastasis. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2011;1:55. 10.4103/2156-7514.90482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zheng E, Cherukuri S, Arpey CJ, et al. : Managing the positive periosteal margin after Mohs excision of scalp dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in children with underlying calvarial bone thinning and resorption: The value of multidisciplinary treatment. JAAD Case Rep. sept 2023;39:26–29. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA: Current concepts review. The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. sept 1980;62(6):1027–1030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ugurel S, Kortmann RD, Mohr P, et al. : Short German guidelines: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. mai 2008;6(Suppl 1):S17–S18. 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2008.06709.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Arifin MZ, Yudoyono F, Dahlan RH, et al. : A rare giant scalp dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2014;5:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Millare GG, Guha-Thakurta N, Sturgis EM, et al. : Imaging findings of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. févr 2014;35(2):373–378. 10.3174/ajnr.A3650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Eshraghi B, Jahanbani-Ardakani HR, Abtahi SM, et al. : Ophthalmologic aspects of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A systematic review in the context of a rare case of primary orbital involvement. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. oct 2019;42(8):913–924. 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sharudin SN, Tan SW, Mohamad NF, et al. : Orbitofacial dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with intranasal extension. Orbit. juin 2018;37(3):196–200. 10.1080/01676830.2017.1383474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hongo T, Nakamura T, Miyake A, et al. : Evaluation of Tumor Cell Infiltration to the Skull in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of the Scalp: Case Report and Literature Review. NMC Case Rep J. 2021;8(1):287–293. 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2020-0297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Martinez C, McDougal E, Gilstrap J, et al. : An oral presentation of dermatofibromasarcoma protuberans with literature review: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020;76:98–102. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stojadinovic A, Karpoff HM, Antonescu CR, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck. Ann. Surg. Oncol. oct 2000;7(9):696–704. 10.1007/s10434-000-0696-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Nelson TG, Gonda P, Sheppard P, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of the Scalp: A Challenging Tumor With a Proposed Modification to the Slow Mohs Technique. Dermatologic Surg. déc 2020;46(12):1742–1745. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tom WD, Hybarger CP, Rasgon BM: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck: treatment with Mohs surgery using inverted horizontal paraffin sections. Laryngoscope. août 2003;113(8):1289–1293. 10.1097/00005537-200308000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hans R, Singh S, Arvind P, et al. : A case of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp treated with surface mould brachytherapy. J. Contemp. Brachytherapy. juin 2023;15(3):224–228. 10.5114/jcb.2023.127807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Maguire R, Nikolorakos D, Lam A: Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: The role of tissue expansion in reconstructive surgery of the scalp. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2016;19:137–139. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.12.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Khachemoune A, Barkoe D, Braun M, et al. : Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the forehead and scalp with involvement of the outer calvarial plate: multistaged repair with the use of skin expanders. Dermatologic Surg. janv 2005;31(1):115–119. 10.1097/00042728-200501000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wong N, Zloty D: Secondary Intention Healing Over Exposed Bone on the Scalp, Forehead, and Temple Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2022;26(3):274–279. 10.1177/12034754221077903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Besharah BO, Ghazzawi RA, Al-Kaff HH, et al. : Reconstruction of facial dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans using an anterolateral thigh flap: a case report and literature review. J. Surg. Case Rep. sept 2020;2020(9):rjaa340. 10.1093/jscr/rjaa340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Villalaín L, Vicente JC, Astudillo A, et al. : Management of facial dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: case report, justification of aggressive surgical treatment, and reconstruction with an anterolateral thigh flap. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. août 2010;68(8):1994–1999. 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.181850.r384328

Reviewer response for version 2

Senda Turki 1

the comments have been taken into account by the authors: the discussion has been separated into paragraphs making it clearer and a conclusion has been added

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

cervico-facial surgery, rhinology, otology, balance and vertigo, sleep apnea

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.178941.r374041

Reviewer response for version 1

Senda Turki 1

This article deals with a tumor which, although rare, represents a therapeutic challenge due to its localization and the high risk of recurrence.

In fact, Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans poses a surgical problem when localized in the head and neck: resection, which must comply with oncological rules, coupled with suitable reconstruction, should enable the best possible preservation of the facial units for a suitable functional and aesthetic result.

Cases presentation:

The authors have presented 4 very interesting cases, covering different localizations. These cases are presented in a very clear manner, with excellent iconography showing the extent of resection and the reconstruction technique, as well as the final result.

Discussion:

This is a very well-conducted review, based on a rich and up-to-date bibliography. It has thus developed the main points of the management of this tumor, with particular emphasis on the importance of the risk of recurrence, particularly frequent for these localizations:

- Genetic markers which have been the basis for the development of targeted therapy

- Principles for the extent of resection depending on the localization, to minimize the risk of recurrence

- Different reconstruction modalities depending on the localization and the extent of excision, well detailed

- Importance of multidisciplinary consultation to establish the indication for adjuvant therapies, principally post-operative radiotherapy.

However, I have two comments for the authors, which in no way detract from the quality of this article:

  • it would be preferable to divide the discussion into paragraphs, to better highlight the different points of discussion

  • it would be desirable to add a few concluding lines after the discussion.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

cervico-facial surgery, rhinology, otology, balance and vertigo, sleep apnea

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.178941.r374038

Reviewer response for version 1

Moncef Sellami 1

This well-written and informative manuscript addresses a rare and clinically challenging presentation of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) in the head and neck region.

The authors present a case series of four patients, with detailed surgical descriptions, histopathological confirmation, and reconstructive strategies.

The discussion is enriched by a comprehensive literature review that covers recurrence risks, genetic markers, and the role of targeted therapy.

The emphasis on the importance of adjuvant radiotherapy in cases with close margins is appropriate. However, the decision-making process regarding when to recommend radiotherapy could be presented more clearly. Including a brief explanation of how the multidisciplinary team reached therapeutic decisions in each case would add practical value to the manuscript.

Minor grammatical and terminological revisions are recommended throughout the manuscript.

For example: The term “jugal” is anatomically correct but not commonly used in English-language medical literature; replacing it with “cheek” would improve clarity and align with standard clinical terminology.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES