Abstract
The presence of fungi in the coral microbiome is increasingly recognized, yet their potential impact on the holobiont’s health, particularly under stress conditions, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we isolated over 200 strains (predominantly Ascomycota) from the common scleractinian Red Sea coral, Stylophora pistillata. Using conidia from a rare (Stachybotrys chlorohalonata) and a common (Cladosporium halotolerans) fungal symbiont, we investigated their effects on coral fragments maintained at ambient (25°C) and elevated (33°C) sea temperatures. Inoculation with S. chlorohalonata resulted in significant tissue loss, across both water temperature treatments. Conversely, inoculation with C. halotolerans did not result in visible effects at ambient temperature, but mitigated tissue loss at elevated temperature. This protective effect was accompanied by reduced expression of stress-induced peroxiredoxin-6 and Rad51 host genes, yet not that of Hsp70. Additionally, potential algal symbiont photosynthetic efficiency was higher by over 25% in the elevated temperature treatment, concurrent with higher bacterial diversity, including a marked reduction (>3-fold) in the proliferation of Vibrionaceae in the C. halotolerans-treated coral nubbins. These findings reveal the contrasting impacts of fungal symbionts on coral health, highlighting the dual roles of the mycobiome in influencing holobiont resilience under environmental stress.
Keywords: Stylophora, coral mycobiome, marine fungi, Cladosporium, Stachybotrys, ocean warming
Fungal symbionts are increasingly recognized as common members of reef-building coral microbiomes [1]. Coral–microbe interactions are known to affect coral physiology and health [2–4]. However, the diversity, functionality, and ecological roles of fungi within the coral holobiont remain poorly understood [5]. A prime example is Aspergillus sydowii, a fungal endophyte implicated in aspergillosis in Caribbean Sea fans [6, 7], whose pathogenicity appears to correlate with rising water temperatures [8].
Given the frequent association of fungi with corals, we hypothesized that shifts in their diversity or abundance could influence coral well-being, especially in a changing environment. To test this, we sampled the culturable mycobiome of S. pistillata, a well-studied common scleractinian coral in the Gulf of Aqaba, northern Red Sea [9]. We isolated a total of 207 purified strains, representing 26 families spread across three phyla, including two new taxa (described elsewhere) from S. pistillata (Fig. 1; Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Our isolation procedure has known limitations [10] and it is likely that a significant number of additional taxa are associated with the holobiont. From this diverse collection, we selected two representatives for assessing their effects on the well-being of S. pistillata under thermal stress: (i) S. chlorohalonata, a rarely (<1%) found species in the coral, yet whose terrestrial counterparts are known for the production of metabolites who are toxic to other organisms [11] and (ii) Cladosporium halotolerans, a proven halotolerant species [12] which was one of the most common (~10%) species in our collection and also found in geographically adjacent samples of Acropora loripes [13].
Figure 1.
Relative abundance of cultured members of fungal families, grouped by phylum, isolated from Stylophora pistillata based on internal transcribed spacer sequences. The break in the x-axis between 80% and 84% was introduced to improve visualization of the less abundant taxa.
After a 48-h period of exposure to conidia of the two fungi at ambient sea temperature (25°C), the coral nubbins were washed with filtered sea water and transferred, along with uninoculated controls, to an open aquaria system maintained at either ambient or elevated (33°C) temperatures (Supplementary Fig. S1). Stachybotrys chlorohalonata induced rapid tissue loss, within 24 h post-inoculation, in the ambient temperature treatment (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. S2), consistent with its known production of toxic metabolites [11], and was consequently excluded from further experiments. In contrast, C. halotolerans was determined, by microscopy, to adhere to the coral tissue and did not confer visible detrimental effects on the coral at ambient (25°C) temperature (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. S3). Furthermore, it appeared to mitigate the detrimental effects, including tissue loss, observed at the elevated (33°C) temperature. Reduced tissue loss and a significant reduction in the expression of the coral host stress marker peroxiredoxin-6 ([14]; Fig. 2b) suggest mitigation of thermal stress. A similar, though statistically non-significant, trend was observed in the expression of another stress marker—Rad51. In contrast, the increase in Hsp70 expression in the heat-exposed coral was not significantly reduced in fungal-inoculated nubbins at the elevated temperature (Fig. 2b). This could be indicative of some host stress imposed by the fungus. Alternatively, this could be due to a differential effect on the host in which expression of Hsp70 was not hampered (as has been shown to occur in heat-resilient coral; [15]) by the presence of the apparently beneficial fungus. Coral inoculated with C. halotolerans exhibited higher photosynthetic symbiont photosystem II (PSII) activity at both ambient and elevated temperature conditions, as measured by pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer analysis (Fig. 2c). This corroborated the positive effect of the presence of C. halotolerans, demonstrating a measurable positive impact on the symbiotic dinoflagellates, known to be highly sensitive to a rise in sea temperature [16].
Figure 2.
Effect of Cladosporium halotolerans and Stachybotrys chlorohalonata on Stylophora pistillata under thermal stress: (a) Nubbins of S. pistillata were inoculated with conidia of S. chlorohalonata or C. halotolerans (top row; for details, see experimental design fig. S1). Maintaining the nubbins at 25°C or 33°C resulted in adverse effects, ranging from tissue loss in nubbins at the high temperature and in the S. chlorohalonata-inoculated coral (regardless of temperature) to reduced tissue loss in nubbins inoculated with C. halotolerans (middle row). C. halotolerans conidia adhered and germinated on the coral surface (bottom row). Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images of S. pistillata inoculated with C. halotolerans. The left panel (×60 magnification) shows an overview of the coral surface with fungal colonization, while the right panel (×2000 magnification) highlights conidia germination. SEM images were captured using a JEOL microscope (Vacc = 2.00 kV, detector = LED, WD = 10.0 mm). Scale bars: left panel = 100 μm, right panel = 10 μm. (b) Relative expression of three stress-related genes in S. pistillata as affected by temperature and inoculation with C. halotolerans. Statistical analysis was performed at each time point using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc test (* ≤ .05, ** ≤ .01 *** ≤ .001, n = 4 for peroxiredoxin-6 and RAD51, n = 3 for HSP70). Error bars represent standard deviation. (c) Mean maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) in S. pistillata coral fragments as affected by temperature and inoculation with C. halotolerans. Statistical analysis was performed at each time point using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc test (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, n = 5). Comparisons represent differences between treatments within each temperature. Error bars represent standard deviation. (d) Principal coordinate analysis of microbial community composition based on Bray–Curtis distance matrices, visualizing differences of bacterial community structure between treatments and time points. The ordination illustrates the clustering of samples according to their microbiome profiles under the different temperature/fungal inoculation regimes. Results are based on n = 3 or n = 4 biological replicates per treatment. (e) Relative abundance of microbial communities at the order level across treatments. Orders representing <1.5% of the total abundance, or those without taxonomic classification at the order level, are grouped as “other.” Excluding the 0 h control, all samples were collected after 96 h.
Exposure to heat, C. halotolerans inoculation, and their combination affected the beta diversity of the bacterial community (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Table S4). Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity showed distinct clustering between heat-stressed corals (33°C 96 h) with and without C. halotolerans, indicating fungal-driven shifts in bacterial composition under heat stress (Fig. 2d). A shift in alpha diversity revealed the occurrence of changes in bacterial richness across treatments (Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Fig. S5). The most notable differences were between the freshly harvested, 0 h, control, and nubbins incubated at 33°C, where the Shannon Index dropped from baseline levels of 5.12 to 3.09, indicating, as has been previously shown [17], that elevated temperatures negatively impact bacterial diversity. Inoculation with C. halotolerans also affected bacterial diversity at ambient temperature (Shannon index = 3.97), where it was lower than the control (4.78), yet at the elevated temperature, the presence of C. halotolerans resulted in higher (albeit not statistically significant within this restricted permitted coral sample size) bacterial diversity (Shannon index = 4.02) compared to the heat-stressed control (Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Fig. S5). Amplicon sequence variants related to the bacterial order Vibrionales [Proteobacteria (Supplementary Fig. S4)], whose increased abundance has been correlated with detrimental effects on the host [18, 19], were found to have higher relative abundance throughout the experiment, peaking in the heat-exposed control nubbins. However, this increase was markedly lower in nubbins inoculated with the fungus relative to the control, with the relative abundance of Vibrionales increasing by ~70% in heat-exposed control nubbins and only about 30% in heat-exposed inoculated nubbins (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Table S4). Our findings highlight the dual nature of the influence of fungal presence within the coral holobiont, at least under the conditions tested in this study.
High fungal diversity may be linked to bleaching susceptibility [20], yet our results indicate that even increasing the abundance of a single fungal species may have the ability to confer a crucial effect on coral well-being under conditions that might lead to bleaching. Stachybotrys chlorohalonata exacerbated stress, whereas C. halotolerans conferred protective effects, reducing thermal stress impacts on coral physiology and bacterial communities. The need for functional dissection of the coral mycobiome within the complex mutual relationships with bacteria, algae, viruses, and host physiology within the holobiont is timely. Given the emerging understanding of the negative outcomes of mycobiome dysbiosis in other animals, along with the potential employment of fungal probiotics as prophylactics or therapeutic interventions [21], our results emphasize the potential of manipulating the coral mycobiome to mitigate stress in the presence of changing environments.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Lior Granit, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel; The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel.
Rotem Levi, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel; The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel.
Nofar Lifshitz, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel; The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel.
Guilhem Banc-Prandi, Laboratory for Biological Geochemistry, School of Architecture Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Einat Zelinger, Centre for Scientific Imaging, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Britt Ronen, The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.
Judith Kraut-Cohen, Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel.
Ankur Naqib, Rush Research Bioinformatics Core Facility, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Stefan J Green, Genomics and Microbiome Core Facility, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60642, United States.
Maoz Fine, The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.
Oded Yarden, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel; The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences, Eilat 8810302, Israel.
Author contributions
Lior Granit (Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Rotem Levi (Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Nofar Lifshitz (Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Guilhem Banc-Prandi (Investigation, Writing—review & editing), Britt Ronen (Investigation), Judith Kraut-Cohen (Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing), Ankur Naqib (Formal analysis), Stefan Green (Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing), Maoz Fine (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing—review & editing), and Oded Yarden (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This research was funded by The Israel Science Foundation grant number 888/19 to O.Y.
Data availability
Raw sequence data are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA1198912. All fungal sequence accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
References
- 1. Roik A, Reverter M, Pogoreutz C. A roadmap to understanding diversity and function of coral reef-associated fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2022;46:fuac028. 10.1093/femsre/fuac028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bourne DG, Morrow KM, Webster NS. Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu Rev Microbiol 2016;70:317–40. 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Peixoto RS, Rosado PM, de Assis Leite DC. et al. Beneficial microorganisms for corals (BMC): proposed mechanisms for coral health and resilience. Front Microbiol 2017;8:341. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yarden O, Ainsworth TD, Roff G. et al. Increased prevalence of ubiquitous ascomycetes in an acropoid coral (Acropora formosa) exhibiting symptoms of brown band syndrome and skeletal eroding band. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:2755–7. 10.1128/AEM.02738-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Amend A, Burgaud G, Cunliffe M. et al. Fungi in the marine environment: open questions and unsolved problems. MBio 2019;10:e01189–18. 10.1128/mBio.01189-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ein-Gil N, Ilan M, Carmeli S. et al. Presence of Aspergillus sydowii, a pathogen of gorgonian sea-fans in the marine sponge Spongia obscura. ISME J 2009;3:752–5. 10.1038/ismej.2009.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Toledo-Hernández C, Zuluaga-Montero A, Bones-González A. et al. Fungi in healthy and diseased sea fans (Gorgonia ventalina): is Aspergillus sydowii always the pathogen? Coral Reefs 2008;27:707–14. 10.1007/s00338-008-0387-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ward J, Kiho K, Harvell CD. Temperature affects coral disease resistance and pathogen growth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2007;329:115–21. 10.3354/meps329115 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Loya Y. The Red Sea coral Stylophora pistillata is an r strategist. Nature 1976;259:478–80. 10.1038/259478a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zhang Z-F, Liu F, Liu L-R. et al. Culturing the uncultured marine fungi in the omics age: opportunities and challenges. Fung. Biol Rev 2024;48:100353. 10.1016/j.fbr.2023.100353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Semeiks J, Borek D, Otwinowski Z. et al. Comparative genome sequencing reveals chemotype-specific gene clusters in the toxigenic black mold Stachybotrys. BMC Genomics 2014;15:590. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zalar P, de Hoog GS, Schroers H-J. et al. Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments. Stud Mycol 2007;58:157–83. 10.3114/sim.2007.58.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lifshitz N, Hazanov L, Fine M. et al. Seasonal variations in the culturable mycobiome of Acropora loripes along a depth gradient. Microorganisms 2020;8:1139. 10.3390/microorganisms8081139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Maor-Landaw K, Levy O. Gene expression profiles during short-term heat stress; branching vs. massive Scleractinian corals of the Red Sea. PeerJ 2016;4:e1814. 10.7717/peerj.1814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Barshis DJ, Ladner JT, Oliver TA. et al. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:1387–92. 10.1073/pnas.1210224110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Franklin DJ, Hoegh-Guldberg P, Jones RJ. et al. Cell death and degeneration in the symbiotic dinoflagellates of the coral Stylophora pistillata during bleaching. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2004;272:117–30. 10.3354/meps272117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Maher RL, Schmeltzer ER, Meiling S. et al. Coral microbiomes demonstrate flexibility and resilience through a reduction in community diversity following a thermal stress event. Front Ecol Evol 2020;8:356. 10.3389/fevo.2020.555698 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Martin-Cuadrado AB, Rubio-Portillo E, Rosselló F. et al. The coral Oculina patagonica holobiont and its response to confinement, temperature, and Vibrio infections. Microbiome 2024;12:222. 10.1186/s40168-024-01921-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rosales SM, Huebner LK, Evans JS. et al. A meta-analysis of the stony coral tissue loss disease microbiome finds key bacteria in unaffected and lesion tissue in diseased colonies. ISME Comm 2023;3:19. 10.1038/s43705-023-00220-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen B, Wei Y, Yu K. et al. The microbiome dynamics and interaction of endosymbiotic Symbiodiniaceae and fungi are associated with thermal bleaching susceptibility of coral holobionts. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024;90:e01939–23. 10.1128/aem.01939-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang F, Aschenbrenner D, Yoo JY. et al. The gut mycobiome in health, disease, and clinical applications in association with the gut bacterial microbiome assembly. Lancet Microbe 2022;3:e969–83. 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00203-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequence data are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA1198912. All fungal sequence accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Table S1.


